For unit testing purposes, I want to be able to run a bare-metal binary with qemu and capture it's output.
Sample file:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdint.h>
static void qemu_exit() {
register uint32_t r0 __asm__("r0");
r0 = 0x18;
register uint32_t r1 __asm__("r1");
r1 = 0x20026;
__asm__ volatile("bkpt #0xAB");
}
int main(void) {
puts("This is some example text that I want to capture");
qemu_exit();
return 0;
}
Running with:
qemu-system-gnuarmeclipse --nographic --no-reboot \
--board STM32F4-Discovery --mcu STM32F429ZI \
--semihosting-config enable=on,target=native \
--image <binary>
Displayed to the console is:
QEMU 2.8.0-13 monitor - type 'help' for more information
(qemu) This is some example text that I want to capture
This 'example text' is generated within QEMU and so redirecting stdout to a file does not capture it (only: QEMU 2.8.0-13 monitor - type 'help' for more information
(qemu)). Looking at the available qemu logging options -d help does not offer anything as far as I can see.
EDIT
A hacky solution is to use script to capture terminal session:
script --quiet --command <qemu-shell-script-wrapper>
That's not an upstream QEMU, and 2.8 is also quite old, but hopefully the same things that work with upstream QEMU will work there.
Firstly, assuming you're not actually using the monitor, you can get rid of that part of the output by dropping '--nographic' and instead using '-display none'. (--nographic does a lot of things all at once, including both "no graphical display" and also "default serial output to the terminal, add a QEMU monitor and multiplex the monitor and the serial", among other things. It's convenient if that's what you want but sometimes it's less confusing to specify everything separately.)
Secondly, you say you're using semihosting output but is the guest's stdlib definitely using semihosting for its puts() string output and not serial port (UART) output? The output will come out on the terminal either way but how you tell QEMU to redirect it somewhere else will differ. (I suspect it may be using UART output, because if it were using semihosting output then the redirection of stdout that you tried should have worked.)
If the output from the guest is via the serial port then you can control where it goes using the '-serial' option (most simply, "-serial stdio" to send to stdout, but you can also do more complicated things like sending to files, pipes or TCP sockets.). If it's via semihosting then you can control where it goes using the 'chardev=id' suboption of -semihosting-config.
Related
I keep getting the SysRq HELP printout, basically seems i can send over serial the sysrq but it won't accept the next key within 5 seconds ie the command key (b) to reboot.
I need to send the command programmatically over serial console connection to reboot system.
I can reboot the system via echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger and cat /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq is 1 (ie full sysrq is enabled)
But I notice that kernel (2.6.32) image I'm booting with only has CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y and there's no mention of CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ_SERIAL. I'd like to know if that setting is required for 2.6.32 or if it was "assumed enabled" and its only required in new kernels.
According to this, I don't need that in my kernel since it was only added to apparently optionally disable sysrq over serial to prevent unwanted triggers.
Anyway I don't really care if PERL is used or PYTHON or C code with tcsendbreak or any programmatic method to send alt-sysrq-b over /dev/ttyUSB0 to reboot linux over serial. So far all i can do is send break sequence and see output of:
SysRq : HELP : loglevel(0-9) reBoot Crash terminate-all-tasks(E) memory-full-oom
l-active-cpus(L) show-memory-usage(M) nice-all-RT-tasks(N) powerOff show-registe
-blocked-tasks(W)
But the command key sent afterward never does anything. So I'm not sure what's wrong. FYI, the system I'm trying to send sysrq over serial to is an embedded linux system that boots via uboot with uimage and dtb file.
Instead of using a break signal I would prefer a technique where the code actually sends the Alt-SysRq-b keyboard keys over the serial console connection.
I've followed the Creating a Generic Kernel Extension with Xcode tutorial.
MyKext.c:
#include <sys/systm.h>
#include <mach/mach_types.h>
kern_return_t MyKext_start (kmod_info_t * ki, void * d)
{
printf("MyKext has started.\n");
return KERN_SUCCESS;
}
kern_return_t MyKext_stop (kmod_info_t * ki, void * d)
{
printf("MyKext has stopped.\n");
return KERN_SUCCESS;
}
I've also disabled the csrutil, which allow me to load my own kext.
# csrutil disable
When I load my own kext into kernel
$ sudo kextload -v /tmp/MyKext.kext
The result of printf() not write into /var/log/system.log.
I've also set boot-args
$ sudo nvram boot-args="original_contents debug=0x4"
Can anyone help me out?
Apparently, since Sierra (10.12) at least, they reorganized the way the logs are written (iOS support?), so you cannot see it in system.log anymore. Still, in your Console application, you have in the sidebar a Devices section, where you can select your device (usually your Mac system) and see real-time log limited to "kernel" in the search box. So I can see these when using kext load/kextunload:
default 11:58:27.608228 +0200 kernel MyKext has started.
default 11:58:34.446824 +0200 kernel MyKext has stopped.
default 11:58:44.803350 +0200 kernel MyKext has started.
There is no need for the csrutil and nvram changes.
Important For some freaky reason, I needed to restart the Console to reflect my messages changes, otherwise it has showing the ones (start & stop) from the previous build. Very strange indeed!
Later To recover old logs, try sudo log collect --last 1d and open the result with Console(more here).
Sorry to necro-post, but I found it useful to use log(1) with one of its many commands (as suggested by #pmdj in the comments above) rather than use Console. From the manual:
log -- Access system wide log messages created by os_log, os_trace and other log-
ging systems.
For example, one can run:
log stream
to see real-time output of the system, including printf() from the MacOS kernel extension.
I want to print the response to AT command. I'm sending AT command but I'm not getting any response in the Arduino serial port. It's giving -1 instead of OK.
#include "SoftwareSerial.h"
String ssid = "connectify-krish";
String password = "12345678";
String myword= "";
SoftwareSerial esp(10, 11);
void setup() {
Serial.begin(9600);
esp.begin(9600);
esp.write("AT");
Serial.println(esp.read());
}
void loop() {}
As already pointed out in the comments you are not terminating the AT command line, so the modem will never respond to this.
Make sure you read V.250 and learn the difference between an AT command and an AT command line. ATI is an AT command, and "ATI I I\r" is a command line invoking this command three times in a row. Notice by the way in this example that you will get just one single Final result code for all three of them, i.e. the Final result code is a response to a complete command line and not to individual command invocations.
Then after fixing the sending of the command you must implement proper handling of the response. This includes reading and parsing what the modem sends back as a response to the sent command line. See this answer for the code structure and implementation hints.
As you've been told, terminate your AT commands with a carriage return character \r. Also you current code will read only a byte of the response, and thats if the response has even arrived since you included no delay at all. To communicate with the ESP interactively with the Serial monitor, I'd recommend using this:
#include <SoftwareSerial.h>
SoftwareSerial esp(10, 11);
void setup(){
Serial.begin(9600);
esp.begin(9600);
}
void loop()
{
while (Serial.available()) // forward data from monitor to esp
esp.write(Serial.read());
while (esp.available()) // forward data from esp to monitor
Serial.write(esp.read());
}
This basically makes your Arduino a conduit for communication between your PC and the ESP. You can send commands to the ESP with the Serial monitor and get their results immediately. Its great for testing commands. Just remember to set the serial monitor to BOTH NL & CR; this will serve you well for commands as well as any HTTP requests you send, as it appends \r\n to everything you send.
If you do want to write a sketch to talk to the ESP, you must provide some delay after sending a command to wait for the module to process the command and respond. The delay varies depending on the command, at least 500ms. The usual procedure is to define a timeout period for each command, depending on how long its expected to take, after which you 'give up' if there's no response yet. There are lots of libraries on GitHub that involve talking to some device using AT commands; study them to learn their techniques.
I am developing a WiFi tool in Ubuntu Linux 12.04 environment and I need to switch the WiFi interface between different channels.
Currently I found the solution in Wireshark source code ws80211_utils.c in function called ws80211_set_freq but I do not know how to implement it into my source code and which libs to include and how to compile so I could test it.
The problem is that there are too many arguments and flags you have to use. Also, this is the first time I develop a netlink wifi tool.
If there are any good manuals available where to start and how to use netlink calls for WiFi please provide me with the link.
Thanks a lot i advance!
In current Linux versions, nl80211 is the right way to "talk" to the wireless subsystem. Be aware that you cannot arbitrarily set a channel with every driver and every operating mode (master, client, monitor etc.) Some drivers allow a channel change only when the corresponding interface is "down". In modes such as client ("managed"), the channel cannot be set at all because it is defined by the access point.
Also note that not all wireless device drivers use mac80211/cfg80211. For those drivers not using it, you either have to use the old wireless extensions API or (even worse) a driver-specific proprietary API.
Sadly, there seems to be no up-to-date and complete documentation of the nl80211 interface. Please correct me if I am wrong!
Your approach of looking into the source code of other programs seems to be a reasonable way. You could also use the source code of the iw command line utility. iw has an option to set the channel:
$ iw --help
Usage: iw [options] command
Options:
--debug enable netlink debugging
--version show version (3.2)
Commands:
…
dev <devname> set channel <channel> [HT20|HT40+|HT40-]
…
In iw's phy.c, line 91ff. you can find the code called when iw wlan0 set channel is executed. However, this code is definitely not easy to read. It looks like the
NL80211_CMD_SET_WIPHYcommand in conjunction with the NL80211_ATTR_WIPHY_FREQ attribute is the way to go.
In this SO answer you can find a skeleton program for using nl80211. Also, the code of Aircrack-ng (src/osdep/linux.c, function linux_set_channel_nl80211) could act as a blueprint.
The accepted answer is currently correct, but there's no example code posted yet which solves the OP's question (even if nearly 4 years late), so I thought I would add this here for any future search engine users. It's adapted from this SO question and the specific Aircrack-ng file (/src/aircrack-osdep/linux.c, line 1050) that were both previously mentioned.
#include <net/if.h>
#include <netlink/netlink.h>
#include <netlink/genl/genl.h>
#include <netlink/genl/ctrl.h>
#include <linux/nl80211.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
/* The device's name and the frequency we wish to set it to. */
char *device = "wlan1";
int frequencyMhz = 2442;
/* Create the socket and connect to it. */
struct nl_sock *sckt = nl_socket_alloc();
genl_connect(sckt);
/* Allocate a new message. */
struct nl_msg *mesg = nlmsg_alloc();
/* Check /usr/include/linux/nl80211.h for a list of commands and attributes. */
enum nl80211_commands command = NL80211_CMD_SET_WIPHY;
/* Create the message so it will send a command to the nl80211 interface. */
genlmsg_put(mesg, 0, 0, genl_ctrl_resolve(sckt, "nl80211"), 0, 0, command, 0);
/* Add specific attributes to change the frequency of the device. */
NLA_PUT_U32(mesg, NL80211_ATTR_IFINDEX, if_nametoindex(device));
NLA_PUT_U32(mesg, NL80211_ATTR_WIPHY_FREQ, frequencyMhz);
/* Finally send it and receive the amount of bytes sent. */
int ret = nl_send_auto_complete(sckt, mesg);
printf("%d Bytes Sent\n", ret);
nlmsg_free(mesg);
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
nla_put_failure:
nlmsg_free(mesg);
printf("PUT Failure\n");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
Compile this with gcc main.c $(pkg-config --cflags --libs libnl-3.0 libnl-genl-3.0).
Once executed, check the frequency/channel of your device with e.g. iw wlan1 info or iwconfig. There's no serious error checking here, so all you will notice is if the message was sent or not. Hopefully this helps anyone like me making the transition from Wireless Extensions to cfg80211 and nl80211.
I apparently inadvertently changed some setting so all SCPI commands sent to my device that include a question mark throw a -110 (Command Header Error) as documented here:
-110 Command Header Error - Indicates there is a syntax error in the command. In this case two colons between SENSE and VOLT.Example " :SENSE::VOLT:RANGE 10"
All other commands (when used properly, of course) work fine.
Because of the error, my guess is that there's something wrong with how my computer is sending non-letters?
Note: I'm sending commands using #echo "READ?" > /dev/ttyS0. I still receive a reply using cat /dev/ttyS0 but I get a beep and error. (Same error occurs in my C code)
Just figured out the solution!
It appears that somehow (perhaps the blue screen I had yesterday on the Windows where I was running my linux VM from) the settings for ttyS0 were reset so that there was software flow control for sending data but not receiving. Thus, my transmissions didn't work with either no flow control or xon_xoff.
To fix this, I set no flow control on my external serial device and ran stty -F /dev/ttyS0 -ixon on the linux box.
Alternatively, I could have set flow control on the serial device to xon_xoff and ran stty -F /dev/ttyS0 ixoff on the linux box.