Googled a lot, but can't find good directions or code for my problem...
The issue:
In Salesforce Apex i want to count the same values in 1 record inside an object.
Example record
ID | Columname1 | Columname2 | Columname3 | Columnname4
01 | ValueWrong | ValueisGood | ValueWrong | ValueNormal
If the record has more then 1 'ValueWrong' values, then it must be marked as incomplete. That's why i need to count (same) values inside a record, to make that formula.
Hope you can help me with this issue.
For this solution, I am assuming the column names are not actually name ending on consecutive numbers and they are named arbitrarily.
Since you're using Apex, one option you have is using an auxiliary variable that counts the amount of occurences of ValueWrong.
Use a trigger on insert and update (before or after depending on your use case) that determines the amount of occurences of ValueWrong there.
Number count = record.Columnname1 == 'ValueWrong' ? 1 : 0;;
count += record.Columnname2 == 'ValueWrong' ? 1 : 0;
count += record.Columnname3 == 'ValueWrong' ? 1 : 0;
count += record.Columnname4 == 'ValueWrong' ? 1 : 0;
if (count > 1) {
// Mark as incomplete
}
Alternatively, if you want to check all fields and their names are unknown. Use something like this as seen in another answer:
SObjectType type = Schema.getGlobalDescribe().get('YourObject');
Map<String, Schema.SObjectField> fieldsMap = type.getDescribe().fields.getMap();
Which you can use to iterate all fields dynamically.
Related
I want to use the sumifs formula, but the sum interval range has text in it.
Example:
|Criteria|Sum Interval|
|--------|------------|
| A | 1 - Good |
| A | 2 - Regular|
| C | 3 - Bad |
So, I want to check the criteria field and, when met, sum the first character of the Sum Interval. I tried something like this:
= sumifs( arrayformula(left(suminterval, 1)) , criteria, 'A')
In this case, the formula should return 3 (1 + 2)
arrayformula(left(suminterval, 1)) = interval with only first character
This work when used alone, but when I use it as an argument, a receive a message saying that the argument must be a range.
Ps: The hole solution has to be in an only formula.
try:
=INDEX(QUERY({A2:A, REGEXEXTRACT(B2:B, "\d+")*1}, "select sum(Col2) where Col1 = 'A'"), 2)
I have 3 arrays of size 803500*1 with the following details:
Rid: It can contain any number
RidID: It contains elements from 1 to 184 in random order. Each element appears multiple times.
r: It contains elements 0,1,2,...12. All elements (except zero) appear nearly 3400 to 3700 times at random indices in this array.
Following may be useful for generating sample data:
Rid = rand(803500,1);
RidID = randi(184,803500,1);
r = randi(13,803500,1)-1; %This may not be a good sample for r as per previously mentioned details?
What I want to do?
I want to calculate the sum of those entries of Rid which correspond to each positive unique entry of r and each unique entry of RidID.
This may be clearer with the code which I wrote for this problem:
RNum = numel(unique(RidID));
RSum = ones(RNum,12); %Preallocating for better speed
for i=1:12
RperM = r ==i;
for j = 1:RNum
RSum(j,i) = sum(Rid(RperM & (RidID==j)));
end
end
Issue:
My code works but it takes 5 seconds on average on my computer and I have to do this calculation nearly a thousand times. If this time be reduced from 5 seconds to atleast half of it, I'll be very happy. But how do I optimize this? I don't mind if it is made better with vectorization or any better written loop.
I am using MATLAB R2017b.
You can use accumarray :
u = unique(RidID);
A = accumarray([RidID r+1], Rid);
RSum = A(u, 2:13);
This is slower than accumarray as suggested by rahnema, but using findgroups and splitapply may save memory.
In your example, there may be thousands of zero-valued elements in the resulting matrix, where a combination of RidID and r does not occur. In this case a stacked result would be more memory efficient, like so:
RidID | r | Rid_sum
-------------------------
1 | 1 | 100
2 | 1 | 200
4 | 2 | 85
...
This can be achieved with the following code:
[ID, rn, RidIDn] = findgroups(r,RidID); % Get unique combo ID for 'r' and 'RidID'
RSum = splitapply( #sum, Rid, ID ); % Sum for each ID
output = table( RidIDn, rn, RSum ); % Nicely formatted table output
% Get rid of elements where r == 0
output( output.rn == 0, : ) = [];
You could convert this to the same output as the accumarray method, but it's already a slower method...
% Convert to 'unstacked' 2D matrix (optional)
RSum = full( sparse( 1:numel(Ridn), 1:numel(rn), RSum ) );
Locate moves the cursor to the first row matching a specified set of search criteria.
Let's say that q is TQuery component, which is connected to the database with two columns TAG and TAGTEXT. With next code I am getting letter a. And I would like to use Locate() function to get letter d.
If q.Locate('TAG','1',[loPartialKey]) Then
begin
tag60 := q.FieldByName('TAGTEXT');
end
For example if I got table like this:
TAG | TAGTEXT
+---+--------+
| 1 | a |
+---+--------+
| 2 | b |
+---+--------+
| 3 | c |
+---+--------+
| 1 | d |
+---+--------+
| 4 | e |
+---+--------+
| 1 | f |
+---+--------+
is it possible to locate the second time number one occurred in table?
EDIT
My job is to find the occurrence of TAG with value 1 (which occurrence I need depends on the parameter I get), I need to iterate through table and get the values from all the TAGTEXT fields till I find that value in TAG field is again number 1. Number 1 in this case represents the start of new segment, and all between the two number 1s belongs to one segment. It doesn't have to be same number of rows in each segment. Also I am not allowed to do any changes on table.
What I thought I could do is to create a counter variable that is going to be increased by one every time it comes to TAG with value 1 in it. When the counter equals to the parameter that represents the occurrence I know that I am in the right segment and I am going to iterate through that segment and get the values I need.
But this might be slow solution, and I wanted to know if there was any faster.
You need to be a bit wary of using Locate for a purpose like this, because some
TDataSet descendants' implementation of Locate (or the underlying db-access layer) construct a temporary index on the dataset. which can be discarded immediately afterwards, so repeatedly calling Locate to iterate the rows of a given segment may be a lot more inefficient than one might expect it to be.
Also, TClientDataSet constructs, uses and then discards an expression parser for each invocation of Locate (in its internal call to LocateRecord), which is a lot of overhead for repeated calls, especial when they are entirely avoidable.
In any case, the best way to do this is to ensure that your table records which segment a given row belongs to, adding a column like the SegmentID below if your table does not already have one:
TAG | TAGTEXT|SegmentID
+---+--------+---------+
| 1 | a | 1
| 2 | b | 1
| 3 | c | 1
| 1 | d | 2
+---+--------+---------+ // btw, what happened to the 2 missing rows after this one?
| 4 | e | 2
| 1 | f | 3
+---+--------+---------+
Then, you could use code like this to iterate the rows of a segment:
procedure IterateSegment(Query : TSomeTypeOfQueryComponent; SegmentID : Integer);
var
Sql; String;
begin
Sql := Format('select * from mytable where SegmentID = %d order by Tag', [SegmentID]);
if Query.Active then
Query.Close;
Query.Sql.Text := Sql;
Query.Open;
Query.DisableControls;
try
while not Query.Eof do begin
// process row here
Query.Next;
end;
finally
Query.EnableControls;
end;
end;
Once you have the SegmentID column in the table, if you don't want to open a new query to iterate a block, you can set up a local index (by SegmentID then Tag), assuming your dataset type supports it, set a filter on the dataset to restrict it to a given SegmentID and then iterate over it
You have much options to do this.
If your component don´t provide a locateNext you can make your on function locateNext, comparing the value and make next until find.
You can also bring the sql with order by then use locate for de the first value and test if the next value match the comparision.
If you use a clientDataset you can filter into the component filter propertie, or set IndexFieldNames to order values instead the "order by" of sql in the prior suggestion.
You can filter it on the SQL Where clausule too.
I have this table that i will populate with random figures:
|--week--||-2016-||-2017-|
| 1 || 26734||6314916|
| 2 || 64565||9876768|
| 3 || 32243||9976757|
what I want to do is create a fourth column that is basically a variance of these numbers.
I created the script below which I know works as I had created it from for another table, there's no difference between these tables apart from the figures in them.
select CAST(ROUND(sum (([2017]) /(([2016]))-1)*100, 0) as NUMERIC(36,0)) as [variance%]
from table2
I get the below
|--week--||-2016-||-2017-| variance%
| 1 || 26734||6314916|0
| 2 || 64565||9876768|0
| 3 || 32243||9976757|0
why am i getting zeros when the other table i had delivers the actual results for variances?
All you need to do is mould your INT into float value. Something like this :
select
CAST(ROUND(sum (([2017]*1.0) /(([2016]))-1)*100, 0) as NUMERIC(36,0)) as [variance%]
read this stack exchange answer to know more about this.
I have a dataset as such:
Case #|DateA |Drug.1|Drug.2|Drug.3|DateB.1 |DateB.2 |DateB.3 |IV.1|IV.2|IV.3
------|------|------|------|------|--------|---------|--------|----|----|----
1 |DateA1| X | Y | X |DateB1.1|DateB1.2 |DateB1.3| 1 | 0 | 1
2 |DateA2| X | Y | X |DateB2.1|DateB2.2 |DateB2.3| 1 | 0 | 1
3 |DateA3| Y | Z | X |DateB3.1|DateB3.2 |DateB3.3| 0 | 0 | 1
4 |DateA4| Z | Z | Z |DateB4.1|DateB4.2 |DateB4.3| 0 | 0 | 0
For each case, there are linked variables i.e. Drug.1 is linked with DateB.1 and IV.1 (Indicator Variable.1); Drug.2 is linked with DateB.2 and IV.2, etc.
The variable IV.1 only = 1 if Drug.1 is the case that I want to analyze (in this example, I want to analyze each receipt of Drug "X"), and so on for the other IV variables. Otherwise, IV = 0 if the drug for that scenario is not "X".
I want to calculate the difference between DateA and DateB for each instance where Drug "X" is received.
e.g. In the example above I want to calculate a new variable:
DateDiffA1_B1.1 = DateA1 - DateB1.1
DateDiffA1_B2.1 = DateA1 - DateB2.1
DateDiffA1_B1.3 = DateA1 - DateB1.3
DateDiffA1_B2.3 = DateA1 - DateB2.3
DateDiffA1_B3.3 = DateA1 - DateB3.3
I'm not sure if this new variable would need to be linked to each instance of Drug "X" as for the other variables, or if it could be a single variable that COUNTS all the instances for each case.
The end goal is to COUNT how many times each case had a date difference of <= 2 weeks when they received Drug "X". If they did not receive Drug "X", I do not want to COUNT the date difference.
I will eventually want to compare those who did receive Drug "X" with a date difference <= 2 weeks to those who did not, so having another indicator variable to help separate out these specific patients would be beneficial.
I am unsure about the best way to go about this; I suspect it will require a combination of IF and REPEAT functions using the IV variable, but I am relatively new with SPSS and syntax and am not sure how this should be coded to avoid errors.
Thanks for your help!
EDIT: It seems like I may need to use IV as a vector variable to loop through the linked variables in each case. I've tried the syntax below to no avail:
DATASET ACTIVATE DataSet1.
vector IV = IV.1 to IV.3.
loop #i = .1 to .3.
do repeat DateB = DateB.1 to DateB.3
/ DrugDateDiff = DateDiff.1 to DateDiff.3.
if IV(#i) = 1
/ DrugDateDiff = datediff(DateA, DateB, "days").
end repeat.
end loop.
execute.
Actually there is no need to add the vector and the loop, all you need can be done within one DO REPEAT:
compute N2W=0.
do repeat DateB = DateB.1 to DateB.3 /IV=IV.1 to IV.3 .
if IV=1 and datediff(DateA, DateB, "days")<=14 N2W = N2W + 1.
end repeat.
execute.
This syntax will first put a zero in the count variable N2W. Then it will loop through all the dates, and only if the matching IV is 1, the syntax will compare them to dateA, and add 1 to the count if the difference is <=2 weeks.
if you prefer to keep the count variable as missing when none of the IV are 1, instead of compute N2W=0. start the syntax with:
If any(1, IV.1 to IV.3) N2W=0.