I am using the Gmail api to send e-mails from my Oracle database.
After a while, the Oauth2 token expires and the token needs to be refreshed with, using the refresh token.
All of this works fine (in both Postman and Oracle).
When the mail has not been used for a while ( a few weeks) the refresh token doesn't work anymore.
Then I need to get a new authorization code etc. It seems as if the gmail-api revokes its grant after a certain time.
Is there a way to work around this ?
thanks in advance.
Servé
There are a number of things which can cause a refresh token to expire here are my top three.
Applications that are still in testing, and have not bee though the google verification process will have their refresh tokens expired within in two weeks.
If the user changes their password this will also cause a refresh token to expire when using the gmail scopes.
If you authorize the app, then authorize it again you get two refresh tokens both will work, you can have up to fifty outstanding refresh tokens once you have hit that number the first one will be expired, as you can maximum have fifty outstanding refresh tokens.
Have a look at the possible refresh token expiration reasons here: https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/oauth2#expiration
Related
I have an implementation of IdentityServer4 which connects with Azure AD for authentication (OIDC). In the callback method, using the IdentityServertools, I am generating the access_token and redirecting the user to SPA with the same. The SPA then stores the access_token into localstorage and uses it for authentication.
Normally, when my SPA app hits the token endpoint of the IdentityServer4, it gives access_token and refresh_token and then uses refresh_token to re-authenticate a returning user.
In this case of SSO with Azure AD, do I need to generate refresh_token manually? If yes, I can build on top of default implementation and that's not the problem (However, the docs suggest against of changing the IRefreshTokenService implementation or building something from scratch)
My real question is, is there a need of refresh_token here? Because refresh_tokens are stored in DB and never get's deleted and after sometime, these refresh_tokens table will swell (right now it already has 80k rows). The user is expected to click on a small tile inside SAP's Successfactor - that will open the signin/consent screen of Azure or will directly take the user to the main page where zhe will just answer a question and done. So it's hardly 2-3 mins business. So I can continue to generate access_tokens from my IdentityServer4 for every click as I don't expect the user to stay authenticated in the browser if zhe has logged out from SAP's Successfactor (or any other app linked with Azure).
Please advise, if I should generate refresh_token? Is it a good architecture?
Access token is used to prove the request is allowed to access the resource(such as api from ms or your custom api) and refresh token is used to refresh access token to make sure the access token isn't expired. Access token will expire in an hour by default and refresh token has 90 days.
At this point, we can easily find the refresh token is designed for some special scenarios because the expired time for refresh token is much longer than access token's expired time, but we can also generate a new access token in other way such as using msal or sign in again.
As you said in the question, you can generate an access token by one click and you don't expect users to stay authenticated for a long time. So I think it's unnecessary for you to use refresh token.
Hi I'm developing a React app that communicates with an Express API. I'm trying to implement JWT authentication but I don't know what should happen when the jwt expires. It not seems very user friendly if the user is logged out when the token expires.
Should I use refresh tokens? As it says in the node-jsonwebtoken package documentation (jsonwebtoken). This may not be the best approach.
Should I create a new jwt in every request to the server? If the user reads an article for a long time without doing any request, he is going to be logged out.
Maybe I'm wrong and the best practice is using a big expiration time and let the user be logged out. If this is the case what would be a reasonable time?
Thanks!
A pattern commonly used along with refresh tokens is to follow a workflow along the lines of:
Some API call / resource returns with a 401, alerting that the token has expired, this sometimes is accompanied by a reason, e.g. Expired token, invalid token
Create a reference to the API call that failed, to retry later
Attempt to refresh the token with the refresh_token
If the refresh works, go ahead and perform the queued API call again
If the refresh fails, the user will need to log in again
You can also use the above approach to queue multiple failed requests, in the event that multiple calls fails whilst a refresh is taking place.
Coupled with a decent expiry time, which really depends on your application, this has proven to be a robust solution in the past for me.
An alternative approach would be to implement a 'heartbeat' API call that updates the user's token periodically whilst they are on the site, however this may come with side effects that may not be desired.
I am having troubles in implementing OAuth in the right way.
I use a client/API architecture (Angular for front and Node.js for back) and I would like user to sign in using Google OAuth authentication only.
Here is what I think is the right way for the moment (tell me if I misunderstood something) :
Angular open a Google popup asking user's consent.
Once the user agree, Google Authorization server sends back to angular a verification code.
This verification code is forwarded to an API endpoint.
Then, the API asks Google Authorization server to exchange this code for an access_token, an id_token and a refresh_token.
Google sends those 3 tokens.
The API uses access_token to retrieve user from Google API
The API persists the user
Here is the little dillema, in my opinion, the access_token and refresh_token should be stored into the database and the id_token should be sent back to Angular client.
This way, it would allow the API to ask for resource in Google API and if the token expires it can still ask for a new token thanks to the refresh_token.
Client-side, the id_token is embedded in all requests thus allowing the API to identify the client and verify his authentication with Google certs from https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v3/certs.
Supposing this is right way to use tokens, how could I deal with id_token expiration since client does not have any refresh token ?
Thanks !
I do it slightly different (I have the same basic architecture though).
Angular decides the user needs to log in and displays a login popup.
The url in the login popup is not serviced by angular, but is instead directly run off of the backend server: /auth/google . (I use hapijs and bell, personally).
/auth/google is serviced by a bell plugin and initiates the OAUTH dance.
the end of the OAUTH dance results in my node server generating a local token (I just generate random bytes and store them in redis mapped to user ids)
because the initial login popup was created by window.open, the success page (generated on the api side rather than in angular) can use window.opener.postMessage to communicate the token back to the angular runtime.
This way, all my sensitive google credentials (the user's oauth token, refresh token if needed, and my application's api ID and secret) are only on the server, except for during the OAUTH dance relay when they're in a URL string during the client redirects. This is reasonably secure.
Then for all the actual user interactions with the api, I use the token I generated in step four to authenticate. This could be a JWT if you wanted, but I don't do it that way; I just use redis to map from 'longrandostring' -> userId. That lets me (for example) force everyone to re-login if I wipe the redis database that has all the tokens stored, or I can write a lua script to delete all the entries that map to a certain userid.
If you need a refresh token, you can set access_type=offline in the initial request to oauth2/auth, and you'll get a refresh token as part of the response, unless you've previously gotten a refresh token. You can then persist it on the server side and get new access tokens as needed. If you set approval_prompt=force as well, you'll force a new consent screen and be guaranteed a refresh token (but after some small number of refresh tokens granted to a user, older ones expire on the same application so it's best to only request them if really needed).
I'm using JWT for authentication in my Angular.js application, with Express.js on the server side.
Basically, when user logs in, a new token is created (using https://github.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken) and send back to the client. If token is valid also on the client side (angular.js part, using https://github.com/auth0/angular-jwt), a new user is created and the token gets stored in a cookie.
So, each request to certain path on the server is protected by a token validation. However, my token has an expiration time. Now let's say for the sake of argument that expiration time is 30 seconds; user can actively use my application for 30 seconds and after that, he gets logged out. That's not exactly user friendly.
So what I did was that with each request to the server, I create a NEW token and send it back in the head of response. When I receive the response in my Angular.js client-side, I read the token and overwrite the token in the cookie. That way, as long as client is active (or rather, makes requests to the server side), the token gets refreshed.
Now I'd like to know the following:
Is such an approach correct? The downside is, that token gets created at each request and send back in each head of response. Cookies get overwritten quite often (performance issues?)
What would be the correct approach?
Is it OK that the token expires if there are no requests to the server? Client might still be using the application, however, if he's only writing on client side something (or reading), the token does not get refreshed.
Thanks for your time and responses!
Yes, that is a valid approach. It is the same approach many take,
including the popular Angular module ng-token-auth. You might
consider saving the tokens to local storage, with a fall back to
cookie storage if the browser doesn't support it (see
http://caniuse.com/#feat=namevalue-storage for coverage).
I would do what you describe.
One solution is to use $interval to basically ping the API. All you need to do is send in a token a get a new one back (i.e., in headers like you are now). Keep track of how many "pings" you've sent. You can reset the number of "pings" upon certain actions like on ui-router's $stateChangeSuccess (i.e., navigating to a new view) or anything you like, including submitting a form or other non-ping requests. When the number of "pings" reaches your threshold, warn the user that their session is expiring, and after a delay, erase the stored token and log them out. Check your ping responses for authentication errors from the API, indicating that the user might need to be logged out and/or redirected.
Perhaps you just gave 30 seconds as an example token lifespan. I would recommend getting closer to the browsing session timeout that you want. As points of reference, consider that the Ruby gem devise_token_auth defaults to 2 weeks and that .NET defaults to 10 hours. Your needs may vary.
The problem is also addressed by using refresh tokens. Your access token has a short life and is verified by signature. The refresh token has a longer life and is used to get new access tokens.
When the refresh token is used to get a new access token, that is a good time to do extra checks: has the refresh token been revoked? Is this user account still valid?
Both tokens can be stored in secure cookies and supplied on every request. Doing this allows your server to transparently use the refresh token when needed and set new access tokens in cookie responses.
This is the approach we've taken for Express-Stormpath and is documented in our Authentication section of the documentation. If you'd like to offload your authentication layer, I'd suggest Stormpath. (Disclaimer: I work there, and wrote that module).
I am building a glass app using the PHP sample app as reference.
To my understanding, the glass app is a web app which is user facing. When the user visit the web app, they will authorize the web app (using oauth2) to access their resources, and once authorization succeeded the web app will get an access token, which is then saved in a sqlite database (there's this store_credentials() function which stores the access token).
So if I have 100 users who visit the web app and register, the database will hold 100 access tokens for these users. Let's say I have some backend code which pull from a RSS feed every hour, and whenever I find there's a new story I will push it to all registered users. Let's say I have a cron job which does this, when when this job is triggered, I will find all the access tokens in the database and use them to make mirror API calls to insert cards. But what if some of the access token is expired when I am trying to make the mirror API call? It seems I will need to ask user to re-authorized, but at this point I am not interacting with the user. If I have a refresh token, I may be able to call oauth again to get a new access token.
Thanks.
You pretty much answered your own question - when you request permission using OAuth, you should also request "offline" access. The first time you do this for each user it will give you a refresh token along with your access token, and you should store both. If you did not request offline access initially, you will need to revoke the tokens that have been granted and re-grant them with offline access.
If the sample app you're referring to is the one at https://github.com/googleglass/mirror-quickstart-php, all this should be done for you already with the libraries included. The credentials returned from $client->getAccessToken() in oauth2callback.php should include both the access and refresh tokens, and these are saved in that same file by calling store_credentials(). The client libraries should check if the access token has expired and, if so, it gets a new one with the refresh token before making the call.
You may want to take a look at the contents of the credentials object at these various points and make sure there is a refresh token. If not, try revoking all the tokens and starting again, since it sounds like the first time you authorized the client you did so without requesting offline access.
If you are doing this yourself, best practice is to either refresh the access token if it has expired or is about to expire (since there may be some delay) before use, or (even better) attempt to make the call with an access token and, if it fails with an authentication error, get a new access token via the refresh token and try again.