I have a wpf usercontrol and a correspondent viewmodel (ChamberVm) made for it.
In viewmodel there is a property named 'UnitStatus'
But I got binding error:
System.Windows.Data Error: 40 : BindingExpression path error: 'UnitStatus' property not found on 'object' ''String' (HashCode=-1814504727)'. BindingExpression:Path=UnitStatus; DataItem='String' (HashCode=-1814504727); target element is 'VacGram' (Name='sysdgm'); target property is 'UnitStatus' (type 'KeyValuePair`2')
I have noted the mistake might be about DataContext setting in the header part of my control:
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:dgm="clr-namespace:VacSym;assembly=VacSymDgm"
xmlns:v="clr-namespace:VacViews"
mc:Ignorable="d"
d:DesignHeight="450" d:DesignWidth="400"
DataContext="ChamberVm">
<Grid Name="gridMain">
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="0*"></RowDefinition>
<RowDefinition Height="*"></RowDefinition>
<RowDefinition Height="15"></RowDefinition>
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<DockPanel Grid.Row="1">
<DockPanel x:Name="pnlDgm" Background="Transparent" HorizontalAlignment="Stretch" VerticalAlignment="Stretch">
<dgm:VacGram x:Name="sysdgm" UnitStatus="{Binding UnitStatus}" DiagramFile="{Binding DiagramFile}" HorizontalAlignment="Stretch" VerticalAlignment="Stretch"/>
</DockPanel>
. . .
I want to know:
1, why this is not correct (?)
DataContext="ChamberVm"
2, what the 'String' means in the error message:
...not found on 'object' ''String'
Ting
The assignment
DataContext="ChamberVm"
assigns the string "ChamberVm" to the DataContext property.
In order to assign an instance of the ChamberVm class, you would have to write the following, with an appropriate namespace prefix:
<UserControl ...>
<UserControl.DataContext>
<v:ChamberVm/>
</UserControl.DataContext>
...
</UserControl>
In general, you should avoid to explicitly assign the DataContext property at all.
You would instead put the UserControl in a DataTemplate that is applied to e.g. a ContentControl that has a ChamberVm object assigned to its Content property. The DataContext of the UserControl would then be set automatically.
Your DataContext is a string "ChamberVm", not an object.
That's why you can't find UnitStatus.
<!-- Just set string in DataContext -->
<Window DataContext="ChamberVm">
</Window>
ChamberVm is string right.
So, of course, there is no UnitStatus (object) in DataContext (string).
And DataContext property is object type.
// DependencyProperty
public object DataContext { get; set; }
// You can put anything in.
It's a mistake that everyone makes often.
Anyway, you use DataContext in two main ways.
(To your liking)
1. DataContext Direct Binding in XAML.
<Window xmlns:vm="clr-namespace:VacViews.ViewModels">
<Window.DataContext>
<vm:ChamberVm/>
</Window.DataContext>
</Window>
You must declare the namespace of your view model at the top first. xmlns:vm="your namespace"
And open DataContext to declare the view model you created. This is to create an instance and assign it to DataContext.
2. Set Create Instance in Behind.
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
// Your ViewModel set in DataContext.
DataContext = new ChamberVm();
}
}
Creating a 'view model' instance within the constructor block is the most impressive position.
Feel free to let me know if you have any further questions.
Related
I recentrly discovered "reusable controls" in WPF and I have a project where they seem to provide me with a solution to a problem I have.
Let me sketch the situation:
I need to make several UI elements. All of them share a common base, a common style/layout/template let's say, and they also share some common logic.
Next to that, all of these elements have some element-specific stuff.
You could say that I have some kind of inheritance here, but then for both XAML and CS.
The way I wanted to solve this, was by making an outer reusable element, I made a small example. The common part Is the Title label and the border. The element-specific UI can then be inserted into UserContent.
The code looks something like this (although it's simplified for the sake of brevity and conciseness, I also have an eventhandler and a routed event in my actual application):
ReusableControl.xaml
<UserControl x:Class="StackOverflowQuestion4.ReusableControl"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
x:Name="root">
<Border BorderBrush="Black"
BorderThickness="1"
Width="400"
Height="200">
<Grid>
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="Auto"/>
<RowDefinition Height="*"/>
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<Label Content="{Binding Title, ElementName=root}"
Grid.Row="0"/>
<ContentControl Content="{Binding UserContent, ElementName=root}"
Grid.Row="1"/>
</Grid>
</Border>
</UserControl>
ReusableControl.xaml.cs
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
namespace StackOverflowQuestion4
{
public partial class ReusableControl : UserControl
{
public ReusableControl()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
public string Title
{
get { return (string)GetValue(TitleProperty); }
set { SetValue(TitleProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty TitleProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("Title", typeof(string), typeof(ReusableControl), new PropertyMetadata(string.Empty));
public object UserContent
{
get { return GetValue(UserContentProperty); }
set { SetValue(UserContentProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty UserContentProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("UserContent", typeof(object), typeof(ReusableControl), new PropertyMetadata(string.Empty));
}
}
Lovely, I can now use my special control in other parts of my code, and I can insert whatever I want into the UserContent field.
MainWindow.xaml
<Window x:Class="StackOverflowQuestion4.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:local="clr-namespace:StackOverflowQuestion4"
mc:Ignorable="d"
Title="MainWindow"
SizeToContent="WidthAndHeight">
<Grid Width="800"
Height="600">
<local:ReusableControl Title="Test">
<local:ReusableControl.UserContent>
<Rectangle Width="300"
Height="100"
Fill="Blue"/>
</local:ReusableControl.UserContent>
</local:ReusableControl>
</Grid>
</Window>
This works great, but the problem arises when I start to name things. Simply adding a name to an element inside of my ReusableControl causes a compilation error.
<Rectangle Width="300"
Height="100"
Fill="Blue"
Name="LolWhatAmIDoing"/>
I get the following error:
MC3093 - Cannot set Name attribute value 'LolWhatAmIDoing' on element 'Rectangle'. 'Rectangle' is under the scope of element 'ReusableControl', which already had a name registered when it was defined in another scope.
This seems like such a small issue, but I cannot find an easy solution to this problem.
I found this thread on the forum, but it does not really provide a solution.
Since I'm pretty new to all of this, I also don't really get what the issue is, so apologies if I'm slow minded.
Should I move to CustomControls?
What you show is a simple property assignment: you set the value of type Rectangle to the property ReusableControl.UserContent. It's important to understand that the Rectangle is not part of the visual tree at this point. It's a simple property value that is only accessible via the property and not via the visual tree.
This all happens in the scope of MainWindow.
But the Rectangle is not a member of this scope. The ReusableControl is adding it to its own visual subtree or scope by binding the value of ReusableControl.UserContent to a ContentControl. This is were the Rectangle exists i.e. is rendered in the visual tree.
It effectively doesn't exist in the scope of MainWindow. It effectively only exists inside the ReusableControl in the "shape" of a ContentControl. This means that the scope of ReusableControl is the only name scope where you can register a name for child elements. It's also the only scope where you can directly reference it (if it had been defined and registered in this scope).
If you understand this, then you understand that the Rectangle is currently trying to register a name in the wrong scope, a scope in which it doesn't exist.
As a consequence, you cannot directly refer to it in the scope of MainWindow. You would have to dig into the ContentTemplate of the UserControl (which is a ContentControl) in order to get the nested ContentControl that actually hosts the Rectangle.
I'm trying to understand dependency property and learn how to use it. I'm going through articles and in this article https://www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/6d590d/wpf-dependency-property/ there's this example:
MainWindow.xaml:
<Window x:Class="WpfApplication1.DependencyPropertyDemo" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation" xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml" xmlns:local="clr-namespace:WpfApplication1" Title="DependencyPropertyDemo" Height="350" Width="525">
<Window.Resources>
<ResourceDictionary>
<local:CarDependencyClass x:Key="carDependencyClass"></local:CarDependencyClass>
</ResourceDictionary>
</Window.Resources>
<Grid>
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition />
<RowDefinition />
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<Label Content="Enter Car:" Grid.Row="0" VerticalAlignment="Center" />
<TextBox Text="{Binding Path=MyCar, Source={StaticResource carDependencyClass }}" Name="MyTextCar" Height="25" Width="150" />
<Button Name="MyButton" Content="Click Me!" Height="25" Click="MyButton_Click" Width="150" Grid.Row="1" />
</Grid>
</Window>
MainWindow.xaml.cs:
using System.Windows;
namespace WpfApplication1 {
/// <summary>
/// Interaction logic for DependencyPropertyDemo.xaml
/// </summary>
public partial class DependencyPropertyDemo : Window {
public DependencyPropertyDemo() {
InitializeComponent();
}
private void MyButton_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) {
CarDependencyClass dpSample = TryFindResource("carDependencyClass") as CarDependencyClass;
MessageBox.Show(dpSample.MyCar);
}
}
public class CarDependencyClass : DependencyObject {
//Register Dependency Property
public static readonly DependencyProperty CarDependencyProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("MyProperty", typeof(string), typeof(CarDependencyClass));
public string MyCar {
get {
return (string)GetValue(CarDependencyProperty);
}
set {
SetValue(CarDependencyProperty, value);
}
}
}
}
It works. I noticed that they registered dependency property with the name "MyProperty" and that it isn't used anywhere in the program. Only normal CLR property MyCar is used in xaml.
But then there's another article https://www.c-sharpcorner.com/article/simplest-wpf-dependency-property-for-beginners-on-background-color/. And they provide other example:
MainWindow.xaml:
<Window x:Class="DependencyPropertyTutorial.MainWindow" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation" xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml" xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008" xmlns:views="clr-namespace:DependencyPropertyTutorial" xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006" xmlns:local="clr-namespace:DependencyPropertyTutorial" mc:Ignorable="d" Title="MainWindow" Height="350" Width="525">
<Window.Resources>
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="BG" Color="Green" />
</Window.Resources>
<Grid>
<views:CustomButtonControl SetBackground="{DynamicResource BG}"></views:CustomButtonControl>
</Grid>
</Window>
CustomButtonControl.xaml:
<UserControl x:Class="DependencyPropertyTutorial.CustomButtonControl"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:local="clr-namespace:DependencyPropertyTutorial"
mc:Ignorable="d"
d:DesignHeight="450" d:DesignWidth="800">
<Grid>
<Button x:Name="btnCustom" Content="Button" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Margin="10,10,0,0" VerticalAlignment="Top" Width="75" Height="52" Click="btnCustom_Click" />
</Grid>
</UserControl>
CustomButtonControl.xaml.cs:
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
using System.Windows.Media;
namespace DependencyPropertyTutorial {
/// <summary>
/// Interaction logic for CustomButtonControl.xaml
/// </summary>
public partial class CustomButtonControl : UserControl {
public CustomButtonControl() {
InitializeComponent();
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty btnDependencyProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("SetBackground", typeof(SolidColorBrush), typeof(CustomButtonControl), new PropertyMetadata(new SolidColorBrush(Colors.HotPink), new PropertyChangedCallback(OnSetColorChanged)));
public SolidColorBrush SetBackground {
set {
SetValue(btnDependencyProperty, value);
}
get {
return (SolidColorBrush)GetValue(btnDependencyProperty);
}
}
private void btnCustom_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) {
this.SetBackground = new SolidColorBrush(Colors.IndianRed);
}
private static void OnSetColorChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e) {
CustomButtonControl mycontrol = d as CustomButtonControl;
mycontrol.callmyInstanceMethod(e);
}
private void callmyInstanceMethod(DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e) {
btnCustom.Background = (SolidColorBrush)e.NewValue;
}
}
}
And here they register dependency property with the name "SetBackground" which is exactly the same as the name of CLR property - SetBackground. And if I change dependency property(the one I registered with Register method) "SetBackground" to something else, like "SetBackgroundDependencyProperty", then I get a XAML exception when trying to run the application. But "SetBackground" dependency property isn't even referenced in xaml anywhere. Only CLR property SetBackground is referenced in XAML at the line
<views:CustomButtonControl SetBackground="{DynamicResource BG}"></views:CustomButtonControl>
I also get an error in Visual Studio with this example:
But when I try to build and run the application, it works.
So my questions are: why in the first example they didn't have to name registered dependency property the same as CLR property, but in the second example, I have to name registered dependency property the same as CLR property. Is there a way to name registered dependency property differently to the CLR property in the second example? Why and how xaml even uses dependency properties, considering xaml references only CLR properties anyway? I checked it and in both projects only CLR properties are referenced from XAML, according to VS IntelliSense. Why do I have to register dependency property with the same name as CLR property - "SetBackground" when in xaml only CLR property is referenced and it returns SolidColorBrush from the dependency property, anyway:
return (SolidColorBrush)GetValue(btnDependencyProperty);
Here's the solution with both examples:
https://github.com/KulaGGin/DependencyProperty
First example is a bit dirty, I wouldn't code it such way. There is a good convention to avoid a confusion - to name the DP as the CLR property + 'Property'(but it's not mandatory!) and register it as name of CLR property(if you want to use it as DP in XAML).
First to your questions:
First example does work, because of everywhere, where the property MyCar being used, it is used as CLR property. If you will try to bind to the MyCar, it will fail, because of there is no such a dependency property. To implement the functionality in this example would be enough just to declare a CLR property:
public string MyCar { get; set; }
instead of all this confusion with dependency property.
In second example CLR property as well as dependency property SetBackground are defined (the name btnDependencyProperty for the field is not convenient, but OK). Missunderstanding on your side, is what being used in XAML.
If you use in XAML Binding or DynamicResource the dependency property as well as CLR property are necessary! Therefore they need to have the same name. If there aren't, then you will get an error.
If you set the property to the StaticResource or directly to the value or even do not use it in XAML, then you will be able to run the application.
DependencyProperty implementation is slightly weird.
The XAML compiler depends on the CLR property wrapper in order to compile, but at runtime bindings ignore it completely and just call GetValue/SetValue on the DP. Therefore the names should match.
There was a typo in the first example. The registered dependency property name needs to be the same as the CLR-backing property.
Declaring a DependencyProperty is a two-stage process:
Register the property so that the WPF DependencyProperty system can track it and notify when properties change, etc.
Setup a CLR property that gives developers an API to get and set values.
I hope this helps.
I'm building a custom UserControl in WPF, which has a ViewModel associated. I also want do dynamically make controls in the code behind. But now I'm having problems binding the generated controls with the ViewModel properties. My code is:
<UserControl x:Class="SVT.Teste.UserControl1"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
mc:Ignorable="d"
d:DesignHeight="300" d:DesignWidth="300"
DataContext="UserControl1ViewModel">
<Grid Name="GridContainer">
</Grid>
</UserControl>
and code behind:
public UserControl1()
{
InitializeComponent();
System.Windows.Controls.Button newBtn = new Button();
newBtn.SetBinding(Button.ContentProperty, new Binding("Test"));
GridContainer.Children.Add(newBtn);
}
public class UserControl1ViewModel
{
private string test = "ola";
public string Test
{
get { return test; }
}
}
When I run this I get:
"System.Windows.Data Error: 40 : BindingExpression path error: 'Test'
property not found on 'object' ''String' (HashCode=-946585093)'.
BindingExpression:Path=Test; DataItem='String' (HashCode=-946585093);
target element is 'Button' (Name=''); target property is 'Content'
(type 'Object')"
Can you help me?
You are setting DataContext property of UserControl1 to a string instead of your view model instance.
You need to do something like this:
<UserControl xmlns:local="clr-namespace:NAMESPACE_WHERE_VIEWMODEL_IS_DEFINED">
<UserControl.DataContext>
<local:UserControl1ViewModel />
</UserControl.DataContext>
<!-- unrelated code omitted -->
</UserControl>
You are setting you DataContext to the type, not an instance that has the properties.
In your method that creates the user control do :
public UserControl1()
{
InitializeComponent();
System.Windows.Controls.Button newBtn = new Button();
newBtn.SetBinding(Button.ContentProperty, new Binding("Test"));
GridContainer.Children.Add(newBtn);
**DataContext = new UserControl1ViewModel();**
}
You still have more work to do. The way you have it no notifications or update will happen. Implement the INotifyPropertyChanged interface (on UserControlViewModel). And remove setting DataContext in the XAML to the type.
try with this binding
Binding MyBinding = new Binding();
MyBinding.Path = new PropertyPath("Test");
newBtn.DataContext = new UserControl1ViewModel(); //or MyBinding.Source = new //UserControl1ViewModel();
newBtn.SetBinding(Button.ContentProperty, MyBinding);
max is right, but i have another question. why do you want create your usercontrol dynamic when you have a viemwodel you wanna bind to? makes no sense to me. let me explain:
if you have a viewmodel - you know in mind how this viewmodel should be rendered and what the bindings are. so you could create a usercontrol/view for this viewmodel
MyUserControl1View.xaml
<UserControl>
<Grid>
<Button Content="{Binding Test}"/>
<!-- more controls and binding if the viewmodel expose more-->
</Grid>
</UserControl>
so what you have now is a representation of your viewmodel. they are not connnected but your viewmodel should look like this and the binding are set. till now no datacontext is set at all.
all you have to do now is to go the viewmodel first approach and the use of datatemplates.
let us assume the following in your mainwindow
<Window>
<Window.Resources>
<DataTemplate Datatype="{x:Type local:Usercontrol1viewmodel}">
<view:MyUserControl1View/>
</DataTemplate>
</Window.Resources>
now wpf knows how to render Usercontrol1viewmodel.
one step more in your mainwindow viewmodel you handle your Usercontrol1viewmodel.
public Usercontrol1viewmodel MyWhatEver {get;set;}
if you bind this property to a contentpresenter, you will see the wpf magic;)
<ContentPresenter Content="{Binding MyWhatEver}"/>
now you see the MyUserControl1View in the contentpresenter, no dynamic view code needed. just go with your viewmodels.
ps: feel free to edit my bad english.
Just starting out using WPF / MVVM and have a question regarding using a viewmodel as the datacontext for a wpf window.
I'm using a view first approach and my view looks like this;
<Window x:Class="TestContext.TestForm"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="TestForm" Height="300" Width="300"
DataContext="{StaticResource testViewModel}">
<Grid>
<TextBox Text="{Binding Path=Address}" Height="23" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Margin="34,44,0,0" Name="textBox1" VerticalAlignment="Top" Width="120" />
</Grid>
</Window>
and I create my viewmodel in code like this ;
public class ViewModelFactory
{
public TestViewModel CreateTestViewModel()
{
return new TestViewModel();
}
}
I'm using the following approach in the app.xaml to create an instance of the viewmodel whenever I instantiate the view ;
<ObjectDataProvider x:Key="testViewModel" ObjectInstance="{StaticResource viewModelFactory}" MethodName="CreateTestViewModel">
This all works fine.
The problem is that I only ever see the viewmodel being created once. So new instances of the view use the same instance of the viewmodel.
I'd like to start out with a new instance of the viewmodel.
If I create the view model manually in the forms constructer ;
public TestForm()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.DataContext = new TestViewModel();
}
then it works as expected.
I'm trying to get my head around what's happening here...
Thanks....
Honestly using ObjectDataProvider isnt a good idea to get view models as that instance is single per App.
But if you insist to recreate the viewmodels you will have to refresh the testViewModel.
The way you do that is testViewModel.Refresh();
In Code
Create your view
Create Single Property on View (called VM)
Create your viewmodel
Assign the new viewmodel to VM
Set DataContext to ViewModel
Setup your bindings in XAML to point to the correct properties on your view model
As a rule
I never use ObjectDataProviders or instantiate anything in XAML (too buggy)
Always use the MVVM pattern
Be careful of static resources - they are only set once per app instance where dynamic resources can be updated
Yes, Agree with #AngelWPF You should use set DataContext as
View.DataContext = ViewModel;
You could instantiate you view model in the resources section of your view. Once you create new view - you'll get new view model.
Moreover, you'll get static bindings which are a bit performant and convenient to use because you'll get intellsense.
<Window x:Class="WpfApplication1.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml" xmlns:WpfApplication1="clr-namespace:WpfApplication1"
Title="MainWindow" Height="350" Width="525">
<Window.Resources>
<WpfApplication1:MyViewModel x:Key="ViewModel"/>
</Window.Resources>
<Grid DataContext="{StaticResource ViewModel}">
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding Data}"/>
</Grid>
</Window>
I have a simple application with just a window and a user control. The user control has a list box. The user control is positioned on the Window and I want to bind the user control's listbox to an element on the window's data context.
The examples I've been able to find have CLR properties on the user control which are accessed in code not via XAML.
<Window x:Class="WpfApplication2b.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml" xmlns:WpfApplication2b="clr-namespace:WpfApplication2b" Title="MainWindow" Height="410" Width="520">
<Grid>
<WpfApplication2b:MyUserControl></WpfApplication2b:MyUserControl>
</Grid>
And here is the user control itself.
<UserControl x:Class="WpfApplication2b.MyUserControl"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
mc:Ignorable="d"
d:DesignHeight="300" d:DesignWidth="300">
<Grid Background="#FFD8AA13">
<ListBox Height="276" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Margin="12,12,0,0" Name="listBox1" VerticalAlignment="Top" Width="276" />
</Grid>
As you can see it's just a listbox on a different coloured background. I have no idea where to go next :)
I'm guessing that I need to add a code behind property for the list box as a dependency property?
Edit: I've added a dependencyProperty, but I don't think I've quite got the point.
public partial class MyUserControl : UserControl
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty ListBoxProperty;
static MyUserControl()
{
FrameworkPropertyMetadata md = new FrameworkPropertyMetadata();
MyUserControl.ListBoxProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("MyListBox", typeof (ListBox),
typeof (MyUserControl), md);
}
public ListBox MyListBox
{
get
{
return (ListBox) GetValue(ListBoxProperty);
}
set
{
SetValue(ListBoxProperty, value);
}
}
public MyUserControl()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
}
Your UserControl will inherit the DataContext from the Window so you can bind properties on the ListBox as though it were declared in the Window. To make the control more flexible you can declare Dependency Properties for the data items from the DataContext that you want to use (i.e. an ItemsSource collection) and pass them into the control, rather than passing the ListBox out.
I think this question/answer is almost what you're looking for. Essentially you're going to need to make a dependency property (using the AddOwner registration method) and set up the DataBinding on the ListBox's ItemsSource to hook to the Dependency Property. The example in the answer does the same thing for a ComboBox, and should be almost the same for a ListBox.
Exposing inner Control properties for binding in WPF