My React structure is
- App
|--SelectStudy
|--ParticipantsTable
In SelectStudy there is a button whose click triggers a message to its sibling, ParticipantsTable, via the App parent. The first Child->Parent transfer works. But how do I implement the second Parent->Child transfer? See questions in comments.
App
class App extends Component {
myCallback(dataFromChild) {
// This callback receives changes from SelectStudy Child Component's button click
// THIS WORKS
alert('SelectStudy Component sent value to Parent (App): ' + dataFromChild.label + " -> " + dataFromChild.value);
// QUESTION: How to Update State of ParticipantsTable (SelectStudy's Sibling) next?
// ........................................................
}
render() {
return (
<div className="App">
<SelectStudy callbackFromParent={this.myCallback}></SelectStudy>
<ParticipantsTable></ParticipantsTable>
</div>
);
}
SelectStudy
class SelectStudy extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
error: null,
isLoaded: false,
items: [],
selectedStudy: null,
isButtonLoading: false
};
this.handleButtonClick = this.handleButtonClick.bind(this);
}
render() {
const { error, isLoaded, items, itemsForReactSelect, selectedStudy, isButtonLoading } = this.state;
return <Button onClick={this.handleButtonClick}>Search</Button>;
}
handleButtonClick = () => {
this.props.callbackFromParent(this.state.selectedStudy);
}
}
ParticipantsTable - this needs to receive a certain variable, e.g. study in its State
class ParticipantsTable extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
//alert('Constructor');
super(props);
// Initial Definition of this component's state
this.state = {
study: null,
items: [],
error: null
};
}
// THIS METHOD IS AVAILABLE, BUT HOW TO CALL IT FROM App's myCallback(dataFromChild)?
setStudy = (selectedStudy) => {
this.setState({study: selectedStudy});
}
render() {
return ( <div>{this.state.study}</div> );
}
}
The state should live definitively at the App level, not in the child. State needs to live one level above the lowest common denominator that needs access to it. So if both SelectStudy and ParticipantsTable need access to the same bit of state data, then it must live in their closest common ancestor (or above).
This is a core concept of React, known as "lifting state up", so much so that it has its own page in the official React documentation.
In your case, it would look something like this. Notice how state lives in only one place, at the <App /> level, and is passed to children via props.
import React from 'react';
class App extends React.Component {
// State lives here at the closest common ancestor of children that need it
state = {
error: null,
isLoaded: false,
items: [],
selectedStudy: null,
isButtonLoading: false
};
myCallback = (dataFromChild) => {
this.setState(dataFromChild);
};
render() {
return (
<div className="App">
{/* State is passed into child components here, as props */}
<SelectStudy data={this.state} callbackFromParent={this.myCallback}></SelectStudy>
<ParticipantsTable study={this.state.selectedStudy} />
</div>
);
}
}
class SelectStudy extends React.Component {
handleButtonClick = () => {
// Here we execute a callback, provided by <App />, to update state one level up
this.props.callbackFromParent({ ...this.props.selectedStudy, isButtonLoading: true });
};
render() {
const { error, isLoaded, items, itemsForReactSelect, selectedStudy, isButtonLoading } = this.props.data;
return <Button onClick={this.handleButtonClick}>Search</Button>;
}
}
// This component doesn't need to track any internal state - it only renders what is given via props
class ParticipantsTable extends React.Component {
render() {
return <div>{this.props.study}</div>;
}
}
I think what you need to understand is the difference between state and props.
state is internal to a component while props are passed down from parents to children
Here is a in-depth answer
So you want to set a state in the parent that you can pass as props to children
1 set state in the parent
this.state = {
value: null
}
myCallback(dataFromChild) {
this.setState({value: dataFromChild.value})
}
2 pass it as a prop to the children
class ParticipantsTable extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
study: props.study,
items: [],
error: null
};
}
Also, although not related to your question, if you learning React I suggest moving away from class-based components in favour of hooks and functional components as they have become more widely used and popular recently.
Related
I have two components Parent and Children. I want to see on my screen actual value of localStorage.getItem("myEl"). Parent state is storage:localStorage.getItem("myEl"). I change the "myEl" in localeStorage in Children component. Unfotunately Parent component not re-renders after "myEl" is changed but it works after I perform some action, such as changing the state again. I know that the problem is that setState is asinc but i don't know how to fix the problem.
For example,
Parent:
class Parent extends React.Component {
constructor() {
super();
this.state = {storage:localStorage.getItem("myEl")};
}
render(){
return <div>
<Child/>
<p>{this.state.storage}</p>
</div>
}
}
Child:
let i=0;
class Child extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
<button onClick={() => {
localStorage.setItem("myEl",i);
i++;
}}>click me</button>
);
}
}
react is not listening to changes in localStorage that is why parent component don't know when child component changes the value in localStorage.
To fix this you have to path your child component onClick function from parent this way:
class Parent extends React.Component {
constructor() {
super();
this.state = {storage:localStorage.getItem("myEl")};
}
handleChildClick = (count) => {
localStorage.setItem("myEl", count);
this.setState({ storage:localStorage.getItem("myEl") });
}
render(){
return <div>
<Child onClick={this.handleClick} />
<p>{this.state.storage}</p>
</div>
}
}
let i=0;
class Child extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
<button onClick={() => {
this.props.onClick(i);
i++;
}}>click me</button>
);
}
}
in case you need this value in other components consider using redux with react-redux containers to have a global storage available to you in any place of the react app.
Component should receive an state or prop in order to rerender itself, in your case it receive none of them. You should not update the localStorage and expect that your component is going to be reRendered with a new value from local storage, you could write a handler for your button in order to save the incremented value into your localstorage. Like below:
class App extends React.Component {
constructor() {
super()
this.state = { _val: 0 }
}
componentDidMount = () => {
const valFromLocalStorage = localStorage.getItem("myEl") || this.state._val
this.setState({ _val: valFromLocalStorage })
}
handleINC = e => {
const _valFromState = this.state._val
const _val = _valFromState++
localStorage.setItem("myEl", _val)
}
render() {
return(
<div>
<button onClick={this.handleINC}>increment value!</button>
</div>
)
}
}
By the way, in componentDidMount you get the value from localStorage or if it was falsy you get the default value from your state. Then in button handler function you get the value from state and increment it and set it in your localStorage in case of component use cases in future, when user closes the tab and opens our website after a while the localstorage data is not been cleared, then this component will get the value from there.
I want to change some inner property of a prop. Props claim to be immutable, but when I change the value, the parent's state value is getting changed.I read that props are immutable. But changing the value is reflecting in parent.
class ParentComp extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
let property = {someProperty:'ABCD'};
this.state={
myState: property
}
}
render() {
return(
<div>
Parent:{JSON.stringify(this.state.myState)}
<ChildComp pState={this.state.myState} />
</div>
);
}
}
class ChildComp extends React.Component {
render() {
this.props.pState.someProperty = '1234';
return(
<div>
Child:{JSON.stringify(this.props.pState)}
</div>
);
}
}
At the end, I see both the values are changed to 1234. In online fiddles, it is working as expected(ie., parent value is not changed.). But in my project, the parent is being changed.
How do I achieve this usecase, wherein I want to change some properties in props, and not reflect in the parent's state?
I read that props are immutable
That's not true - you only should treat them as they were immutable. In other words, they are just regular javascript Objects and you should not mutate them.
If you want to change the value of the props, you should dump the props in the state first then do the mutation on that state.
Mutating props is not best practice. So your ChildComp should be like:
class ChildComp extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
pState: props.pState,
}
}
componentDidMount() {
const { pState } = this.state.
pState.someProperty = '1234';
this.setState({
pState,
});
}
render() {
return(
<div>
Child:{JSON.stringify(this.state.pState)}
</div>
);
}
}
Im trying to use some Object Pattern in React Components because the usual Component->child structure require often a code rewriting.
class SuperComponentEveryOneWillLove extends React.component
{
constructor(props){
this.state = { master_state_all_will_use : 0 }
this.commonFunction = this.commonFunction.bind(this);
this.getMasterState = this.getMasterState.bind(this);
}
commonFunction() { return do_something; }
getMasterState() { return this.state.master_state_all_will_use }
}
class PoorSon extends SuperComponentEveryOneWillLove
{
constructor(props){
this.state = { for_me_only : 0 }
}
render() {
<span>
{ this.state.master_state_all_will_use } //DOESN'T WORKS
{ this.getMasterState() } //DOESN'T WORKS
{ this.state.for_me_only } //WORKS
{ this.commonFunction() } //WORKS
</span>
}
}
I need to access Parent state and local state.
React allow function super calling but not merging state. I've tried on google to look for some "super" or "parent" keyword to access parent state but it seems it doesn't exists.
At runtime, Son component has no scope of Father's state.
Is this possibile?
I'm not sure if it is what are you looking for, but it's close to it:
class Parent extends React.Component {
constructor(props){
super(props)
this.state = { isParentState: true };
// needed for getting access to parent state
this.getMasterState = this.getMasterState.bind(this)
}
getMasterState(){
return this.state;
}
}
class Enhancer extends Parent {
constructor(props){
super(props);
// get parent state via super keyword
const parentState = super.getMasterState();
this.state = {
isChildState: true,
...parentState
}
}
render() {
return <div>
Merged state: { JSON.stringify(this.state)}
</div>
}
}
Worked example.
Hope it helps
I'm sure it's possible, but you DO NOT want to do this.
Anything you are trying to do with inheritance can be done with composition.
In you case, your "parent component" will pass any information the children may need as props
class Parent extends React.component
{
constructor(props){
this.state = { parentState : 0 }
this.parentFunction= this.commonFunction.bind(this);
}
parentFunction() { console.log("parentFunction()"); }
render() {
return (
<Child
parentFunction={parentFuction}
parentState={this.parentState}
/>
)
}
}
https://reactjs.org/docs/composition-vs-inheritance.html
EDIT
In React, inheritance is almost NEVER the answer.
Now if you're looking for a a way to reuse method logic, why not abstract the method to a helper file?
If that still doesn't work, perhaps a Higher Order Component (HOC) will do the trick.
Here's an example of a simple HOC:
const withCommonFunction = (WrappedComponent) => {
return class extends React.Component {
commonFunction() {
console.log("I'm a common function that is needed in many components!");
}
render() {
return (
<WrappedComponent commonFunction={this.props.commonFunction} />
);
}
}
}
Then you wrap whichever component you want to have the same logic with the HOC.
const Child = withCommenFunction(Child);
This is typically used to help reuse logic that would otherwise be implemented the same in different components
My parent component is like this:
export default class MobileCompo extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
data: null,
datasets: {}
};
this.get_data = this.get_data.bind(this);
}
componentWillMount() {
this.get_data();
}
async get_data() {
const ret = post_api_and_return_data();
const content={};
ret.result.gsm.forEach((val, index) => {
content[val.city].push()
});
this.setState({data: ret.result.gsm, datasets: content});
}
render() {
console.log(this.state)
// I can see the value of `datasets` object
return (
<div>
<TableElement dict={d} content={this.state.data} />
<BubbleGraph maindata={this.state.datasets} labels="something"/>
</div>
)
}
}
child component:
export default class BubbleGraph extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
finalData: {datasets: []}
};
console.log(this.props);
// here I can't get this.props.maindata,it's always null,but I can get labels.It's confusing me!
}
componentWillMount() {
sortDict(this.props.maindata).forEach((val, index) => {
let tmpModel = {
label: '',
data: null
};
this.state.finalData.datasets.push(tmpModel)
});
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<h2>{this.props.labels}</h2>
<Bubble data={this.state.finalData}/>
</div>
);
}
}
I tried many times,but still don't work,I thought the reason is about await/async,but TableElement works well,also BubbleGraph can get labels.
I also tried to give a constant to datasets but the child component still can't get it.And I used this:
this.setState({ datasets: a});
BubbleGraph works.So I can't set two states at async method?
It is weird,am I missing something?
Any help would be great appreciate!
Add componentWillReceiveProps inside child componenet, and check do you get data.
componentWillReceiveProps(newProps)
{
console.log(newProps.maindata)
}
If yes, the reason is constructor methos is called only one time. On next setState on parent component,componentWillReceiveProps () method of child component receives new props. This method is not called on initial render.
Few Changes in Child component:
*As per DOC, Never mutate state variable directly by this.state.a='' or this.state.a.push(), always use setState to update the state values.
*use componentwillrecieveprops it will get called on whenever any change happen to props values, so you can avoid the asyn also, whenever you do the changes in state of parent component all the child component will get the updates values.
Use this child component:
export default class BubbleGraph extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
finalData: {datasets: []}
};
}
componentWillReceiveProps(newData) {
let data = sortDict(newData.maindata).map((val, index) => {
return {
label: '',
data: null
};
});
let finalData = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(this.state.finalData));
finalData.datasets = finalData.datasets.concat(data);
this.setState({finalData});
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<h2>{this.props.labels}</h2>
<Bubble data={this.state.finalData}/>
</div>
);
}
}
Please see the example here http://jsfiddle.net/8xzxkteu/1/
I'm trying to only render part of the data which is changed. In this example, state of component Main, data, is indexed by id and I am using react immutability helper to set only the changed one. But, if you click on the output, it renders all the children, as indicated by the counter. I though using immutability helper react can detect only part of the data changed hence only render it. I probably could use shouldComponentUpdate and compare object values for each child, but is there a better way doing this with immutability helper.
class Child extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.onClick = this.onClick.bind(this)
this.state = {
count: 0
};
}
componentWillReceiveProps(nextProps) {
var count = this.state.count + 1;
this.setState({ count: count });
}
onClick() {
this.props.onClick(this.props.name);
}
render() {
return <p onClick={this.onClick}>{this.props.name}: {this.props.value} {this.state.count}</p>;
}
}
class Main extends React.Component{
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.handleChange = this.handleChange.bind(this)
this.state = {
data: {
"a" : "a",
"b" : "b",
}
};
}
handleChange(id) {
this.setState({
data: React.addons.update(this.state.data, { [id]: { $set: 'x' } })
});
}
render() {
const keys = Object.keys(this.state.data);
const children = keys.map(k => {
return <Child name={k} value={this.state.data[k]} onClick={this.handleChange}/>
})
return <div>
{children}
</div>;
}
}
React.render(<Main />, document.getElementById('container'));
When you change state of component react call shouldComponentUpdate of this component and if it is return true react call render of this component.
After that react call componentWillReceiveProps, then shouldComponentUpdate, then render (if shouldComponentUpdate return true) of all child component.
By default, if there no shouldComponentUpdate method, it is considered that it has returned true. It does not matter whether you use immutable data or not - react does not know about it.
If you have immutable data you want avoid rerender, you should use shouldComponentUpdate. You can use pure-render-decorator, for example – it's check component state and props.
But if you change your state in componentWillReceiveProps you still get rerender because componentWillReceiveProps is called before shouldComponentUpdate.