Run clang-tidy on project with headers - c

I have a project that I recently split up into headers + sources, and now clang-tidy wont "actually" check my test files that include these headers. Below is an example of the situation:
File Structure:
src/
main.c
a.h
a.c
test/
test.c
Code:
// src/main.c
#include "src/a.h"
int main(void) {
a();
return 0;
}
// src/a.h
void a(void);
// src/a.c
#include <stdlib.h>
#include "src/a.h"
void a(void) {
malloc(1); // obvious memory leak
}
// test/test.c
#include "src/a.h"
int main(void) {
// do test stuff
a();
return 0;
}
Compile src: cc src/*.c -I. -o main
Compile test: cc src/a.c test/test.c -I. -o test
Running does nothing, but the code does compile.
Then, I run the code through clang-tidy:
clang-tidy src/* -- -I.
This works:
1 warning generated.
1 warning generated.
1 warning generated.
/src/a.c:8:1: warning: Potential memory leak [clang-analyzer-unix.Malloc]
}
^
/src/a.c:7:2: note: Memory is allocated
malloc(1);
^
/src/a.c:8:1: note: Potential memory leak
}
^
But if I do:
clang-tidy test/test.c -- -I.
Nothing is outputed (ive tried to add the header-filter flag as well).
I pressume that the headers are being included, and the test code has no knowledge of the source. So, how can I make sure my tests are actually being checked if this is the case? These headers and sources are in my project, so it would only make sense that clang-tidy would be able to pick up on this?
Edit:
I can do the following, and it seems to only partially fix the problem:
// test/test.c
#include "src/a.h"
#include "src/a.c" //added this line
int main(void) {
// do test stuff
a();
return 0;
}
Now, clang-tidy picks up on the actual .c file, and thus finds the issue. But, now I cant compile my code. There is supposed to be a __clang_analyzer__ define that gets set when the code is being analyzed, but it seems to just ignore it:
#ifdef __clang_analyzer__
#include "src/a.c" // doesnt include file, thus the malloc() call is never detected
#endif

clang-tidy is only a static analyser tool, said differently a linter. It does not try to build or run an executable: it just analyses the C source files it has been given after processing the include parts.
Static analysis and testing are different parts of a quality assurance process:
the former only reads source files searching for common errors and runs nothing
the latter runs (parts of) a code base with known inputs and controls that outputs have expected values
That means that clang-tidy is expected to be run on your main sources, not only on the test ones.
To be clear, it can make sense to pass test sources to the linter, because they could contain problems that clang-tidy would detect. But only running clang-tidy on the test folder will not detect problem in main folder, whatever the coverage.

Related

Linking files / header files in C

I have 2 c files (& their header files). I have included the function "put" in the corresponding header, but I still have the following errors, when I input "gcc -o main main.c" in the terminal.
main.c:(.text+0x389): undefined reference to `put' collect2: error: ld
returned 1 exit status
may I know the reason? How should I modify my code?
I tried to change the linking order in makefile but failed. Any advice is appreciated, thanks!
CMakeLists.txt
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.19)
project(Demo)
set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 14)
include_directories(.)
add_executable(Demo
main.c main.h KeyValueStore.c KeyValueStore.h )
main.c
#include "main.h"
...
int main() {
...
if (strcmp("PUT", tokens[0]) == 0) {
put(tokens[1], tokens[2]);
...
}
main.h
...
#include "KeyValueStore.h"
...
KeyValueStore.c
#include "KeyValueStore.h"
#define BUFSIZE 1024
typedef struct KeyValueStore {
char key[BUFSIZE];
char value[BUFSIZE];
} KV_Store;
KV_Store kvStore[BUFSIZE];
...
int put(char* key, char* value){
...
}
KeyValueStore.h
...
typedef struct KeyValueStore;
int put(char* key, char* value);
...
Check to see if you have any .o files in that folder and delete them if you do. It's possible the compiler failed at some point while compiling which left *.o files that aren't linked properly
EDIT: I misread the question because for some reason it came up as a c++17 question for me. I'm not sure if what I said still applies to C though I do know it works with C++. Sorry about that to everyone that read my answer before I edited it
Not 100% sure if this is why you are having the error, though you need to put all .c files in the compiler.
So you currently are trying to "gcc -o main main.c" where instead you want to do something more like "gcc -o main main.c keyValueStore.c".
If you do not give the compiler every .c file, it won't have all the definitions and you will get an error similar to what you have.
I also don't really think you need main.h, assuming there isn't any more code in there, it really isn't worth having a whole extra file and instead just putting the #include in main.c.

how to use generated code from matlab

I want to use the C-coder in Matlab. This translates an m-code to C-code.
I use a simple function that adds 5 numbers.
When the code is generated there are a lot of C- and H-files.
of course you could just pick the code you need and import it in your code, but that's not the point of this exercise, as this will no longer be possible when the matlab-code will get more difficult.
Matlab delivers a main.c file and a .mk file.
/* Include Files */
#include "rt_nonfinite.h"
#include "som.h"
#include "main.h"
#include "som_terminate.h"
#include "som_initialize.h"
//Declare all the functions
int main(int argc, const char * const argv[]){
(void)argc;
(void)argv;
float x1=10;
float x2=20;
float x3=30;
float x4=40;
float x5=50;
float result;
/* Initialize the application.
You do not need to do this more than one time. */
som_initialize();
main_som();
result=som(x1,x2,x3,x4,x5);
printf("%f", result);
som_terminate();
return 0;
}
When I run this on a raspberry-pi with
gcc -o test1 main.c
It gives me undefined references to all the functions...
Any ideas what went wrong?
You have to build it with the generated makefile (the mk file) so it links with the correct Matlab libraries - that's where those functions are defined:
$ make -f test.mk
You also need to compile the other C files along with your main.c. If main.c is in the same directory as the generated code, you should be able to just do:
gcc -o test1 *.c
If the generated code is in another directory, then you can do something like:
gcc -o test1 /path/to/code/*.c -I/path/to/code main.c

"Undefined reference to" no idea why?

Im working on a project for stm32f4 to my school. Im using CooCox IDE.
I wanted to add new files "przerwania.c" and "przerwania.h" to write some functions there - not in "main.c". But I have no idea why CooCox is showing me errors.
Earlier I wanted to move some of functions from main.c to pwm.c and them work! But I would like to make a new files couse i have more functions.
Errors in CooCox look like this:
[mkdir] Created dir: D:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2\testowy2\Debug\obj
[cc] 12 total files to be compiled.
[cc] arm-none-eabi-gcc -mcpu=cortex-m4 -mthumb -Wall -ffunction-sections -g -O0 -c -DSTM32F407VG -DSTM32F4XX -DUSE_STDPERIPH_DRIVER -D__ASSEMBLY__ -ID:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2 -ID:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2\cmsis_boot -ID:\CooCox\CoIDE -ID:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2\cmsis_lib\include -ID:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2\cmsis -ID:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2\cmsis_lib -ID:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace D:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2\cmsis_lib\source\stm32f4xx_syscfg.c D:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2\pwm.c D:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2\dupa.c D:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2\cmsis_boot\startup\startup_stm32f4xx.c D:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2\main.c D:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2\cmsis_lib\source\stm32f4xx_rcc.c D:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2\cmsis_lib\source\stm32f4xx_adc.c D:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2\cmsis_lib\source\stm32f4xx_gpio.c D:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2\cmsis_boot\system_stm32f4xx.c D:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2\cmsis_lib\source\stm32f4xx_exti.c D:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2\cmsis_lib\source\misc.c D:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2\cmsis_lib\source\stm32f4xx_tim.c
[cc] Starting link
[cc] arm-none-eabi-gcc -mcpu=cortex-m4 -mthumb -g -nostartfiles -Wl,-Map=testowy2.map -O0 -Wl,--gc-sections -LD:\CooCox\CoIDE\configuration\ProgramData\testowy2 -Wl,-TD:\CooCox\CoIDE\configuration\ProgramData\testowy2/arm-gcc-link.ld -g -o testowy2.elf ..\obj\stm32f4xx_syscfg.o ..\obj\pwm.o ..\obj\dupa.o ..\obj\startup_stm32f4xx.o ..\obj\main.o ..\obj\stm32f4xx_rcc.o ..\obj\stm32f4xx_adc.o ..\obj\stm32f4xx_gpio.o ..\obj\system_stm32f4xx.o ..\obj\stm32f4xx_exti.o ..\obj\misc.o ..\obj\stm32f4xx_tim.o
[cc] ..\obj\main.o: In function `main':
[cc] D:\CooCox\CoIDE\workspace\testowy2/main.c:336: undefined reference to `Nowafunkcja'
[cc] collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status
main.c is quite long becouse i have some definitions of few long functions there, so I paste here only a part
#include "stm32f4xx.h"
#include "misc.h"
#include "stm32f4xx_syscfg.h"
#include "stm32f4xx_adc.h"
#include "stm32f4xx_exti.h"
#include "przerwania.h"//here is the problem
#include "pwm.h"
int main(void)
{
SystemInit();
//IniDiody();
//TimConfig();
//NVIC_Config();
//IniDiodyPWM();
LEDInit();
EXTILine0_Config();
PWM2();//wiwo
GPIO();//wiwo
Nowafunkcja();//PROBLEM
RCC_Konfiguracja_Adc12();
GPIO_Configuration_Adc1();
ADC1_Configuration();
GPIO_Configuration_Adc1();
GPIO_Configuration_Adc2();
ADC2_Configuration();
IniDiody(GPIO_Pin_14);
IniTimerPrzerwanie1();
while(1)
{
ADC_SoftwareStartConv(ADC1);
ADC_SoftwareStartConv(ADC2);
while(ADC_GetFlagStatus(ADC1, ADC_FLAG_EOC) == RESET);
wynikADC1 = (float)ADC_GetConversionValue(ADC1);
while(ADC_GetFlagStatus(ADC2, ADC_FLAG_EOC) == RESET);
wynikADC2 = (float)ADC_GetConversionValue(ADC2);
wartosc = (int)(wynikADC2 * 15);
//doPWM=(((float)ADCResult) / 41);
//wartosc = (int) doPWM;
//TIM2->CCR3 = (int) doPWM;
TIM3->CCR2 = 65535;
TIM3->CCR1 = wartosc;//(int)(wynikADC2 * 15);
wartoscPrescalera=(int)SystemCoreClock;
}
}
and files:
przerwania.h
#ifndef __przerwaniah
#define __przerwaniah
void Nowafunkcja(void);
#endif
przerwania.c
#include "przerwania.h"
void Nowafunkcja(void)
{
//nothing here - just for test
}
Do you have any idea what is the problem? I'm thinking about this since yesterday and its wird :/
I'll appreciate your help!
Take a look at the line under [cc] 12 total files to be compiled.
When you added pwm.c, you also informed the compiler to include this file. You'll see it listed there. przerwania.c is not.
If you add przerwania the same way you added pwm, your IDE will take care of making sure it is included in the build.
I'm not sure what your current file/folder structure looks like:
http://www.coocox.org/CoIDE/Project_management_config.html can help you determine how to pull those new files into the build.
FWIW:
The (anthropomorphized) compiler step says: Is this valid code? So it looks though your main.c, sees that you included przerwania.h, and comes to the conclusion that you correctly used the Nowafunkcja function (just matched the signature). Even though at this point, it has NOT looked into przerwania.c to find out what it does. The compiler goes on to do this for all of your files and keeps track of what functions are defined in each file. Note that it never found the definition Nowafunkcja, because the compiler never compiled przerwania.c. It did however find the declaration in the .h (because main.c told it exactly where to find the .h)
The linker then gets this stuff from the compiler, including what functions have been defined in all your .c files. That's the first point where something tries to answer the question "Now what code do I actually need to run when he asked me to Nowafunkcja()?". So that's the first point in the build when the tools realized, I never found code for Nowafunkcja in any of the .c files I was looking in.
So, I think that roughly answers "Why", but we need to know more about your project organization to give you a "fix" to make it work.

multiple definition of main

I’m trying to create ./configure + make set for building C codes in following structure by using autotools. drive.c uses function in mylib.c
[mylib]
+mylib.c
+mylib.h
[src]
+drive.c
More details are here.
[mylib.c]
#include <stdio.h>
#include "mylib.h"
int main(){
mylib();
return 0;
}
void
mylib(void)
{
printf ("Hello world! I AM mylib \n");
}
[mylib.h]
void mylib(void);
[drive.c]
#include <mylib.h>
int
main (int argc, char **argv)
{
mylib();
return 0;
}
Actually I’ve given main() both mylib.c and drive.c.
If I make them on CentOS process is noremally finished however If I make them on MINGW an error message multiple definition ofmain'` is shown
How can I make them on MINGW even if they have multiply have main()?
And those followings are config files for autotools.
[confiugre.ac]
AC_PREREQ([2.69])
AC_INIT([libmylib], [1], [admin#localhost])
AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([mylib/mylib.c])
AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h])
AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4])
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign])
LT_INIT
AC_PROG_CC
AC_CONFIG_FILES([mylib/Makefile
src/Makefile
Makefile])
AC_OUTPUT
[Makefile.am]
SUBDIRS = mylib src
ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I m4
[Makefile.am#src]
bin_PROGRAMS = drive
drive_SOURCES = drive.c
LDADD = ../mylib/libmylib.la
AM_CPPFLAGS = -I../mylib
[Makefile.am#mylib]
lib_LTLIBRARIES = libmylib.la
libmylib_la_SOURCES = mylib.c
include_HEADERS = mylib.h
You are confusing things, the idea of having multiple main() is fundamentally wrong. Libraries never ever contain a main() function.
(With the exception of Windows DLLs that contain a DllMain, but that means something different.)
If you want to provide a test case for your library, you make the test case as a separate project which includes the library. The test code should not be inside the library itself, neither should main().
Also, I very much doubt you are able to build a program with several function definitions that have the same name, be it main() or something else. If you believe you have managed this, I would either suspect that you haven't linked the files correctly, or that the linker is crap.

Linking against older symbol version in a .so file

Using gcc and ld on x86_64 linux I need to link against a newer version of a library (glibc 2.14) but the executable needs to run on a system with an older version (2.5). Since the only incompatible symbol is memcpy (needing memcpy#GLIBC_2.2.5 but the library providing memcpy#GLIBC_2.14), I would like to tell the linker that instead of taking the default version for memcpy, it should take an old version I specify.
I found a quite arkward way to do it: simply specify a copy of the old .so file at the linker command line. This works fine, but I don't like the idea of having multiple .so files (I could only make it work by specifying all old libraries I link to that also have references to memcpy) checked into the svn and needed by my build system.
So I am searching for a way to tell the linker to take the old versioned symbol.
Alternatives that don't work (well) for me are:
Using asm .symver (as seen on Web Archive of Trevor Pounds' Blog) since this would require me to make sure the symver is before all the code that is using memcpy, which would be very hard (complex codebase with 3rd party code)
Maintaining a build environment with the old libraries; simply because I want to develop on my desktop system and it would be a pita to sync stuff around in our network.
When thinking about all the jobs a linker does, it doesn't seem like a hard thing to imlpement, after all it has some code to figure out the default version of a symbol too.
Any other ideas that are on the same complexity level as a simple linker command line (like creating a simple linker script etc.) are welcome too, as long as they are not weird hacks like editing the resulting binary...
edit:
To conserve this for the future readers, additionally to the below ideas I found the option --wrap to the linker, which might be useful sometimes too.
I found the following working solution. First create file memcpy.c:
#include <string.h>
/* some systems do not have newest memcpy##GLIBC_2.14 - stay with old good one */
asm (".symver memcpy, memcpy#GLIBC_2.2.5");
void *__wrap_memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n)
{
return memcpy(dest, src, n);
}
No additional CFLAGS needed to compile this file. Then link your program with -Wl,--wrap=memcpy.
Just link memcpy statically - pull memcpy.o out of libc.a ar x /path/to/libc.a memcpy.o (whatever version - memcpy is pretty much a standalone function) and include it in your final link. Note that static linking may complicate licensing issues if your project is distributed to the public and not open-source.
Alternatively, you could simply implement memcpy yourself, though the hand-tuned assembly version in glibc is likely to be more efficient
Note that memcpy#GLIBC_2.2.5 is mapped to memmove (old versions of memcpy consistently copied in a predictable direction, which led to it sometimes being misused when memmove should have been used), and this is the only reason for the version bump - you could simply replace memcpy with memmove in your code for this specific case.
Or you could go to static linking, or you could ensure that all systems on your network have the same or better version than your build machine.
I had a similar issue. A third party library we use needs the old memcpy#GLIBC_2.2.5. My solution is an extended approach #anight posted.
I also warp the memcpy command, but i had to use a slightly different approach, since the solution #anight posted did not work for me.
memcpy_wrap.c:
#include <stddef.h>
#include <string.h>
asm (".symver wrap_memcpy, memcpy#GLIBC_2.2.5");
void *wrap_memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n) {
return memcpy(dest, src, n);
}
memcpy_wrap.map:
GLIBC_2.2.5 {
memcpy;
};
Build the wrapper:
gcc -c memcpy_wrap.c -o memcpy_wrap.o
Now finally when linking the program add
-Wl,--version-script memcpy_wrap.map
memcpy_wrap.o
so that you will end up with something like:
g++ <some flags> -Wl,--version-script memcpy_wrap.map <some .o files> memcpy_wrap.o <some libs>
I had a similar problem. Trying to install some oracle components on RHEL 7.1, I got this:
$ gcc -o /some/oracle/bin/foo .... -L/some/oracle/lib ...
/some/oracle/lib/libfoo.so: undefined reference to `memcpy#GLIBC_2.14'
It seems that (my) RHEL's glibc only defines memcpy#GLIBC_2.2.5:
$ readelf -Ws /usr/lib/x86_64-redhat-linux6E/lib64/libc_real.so | fgrep memcpy#
367: 000000000001bfe0 16 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 8 memcpy##GLIBC_2.2.5
1166: 0000000000019250 16 FUNC WEAK DEFAULT 8 wmemcpy##GLIBC_2.2.5
So, I managed to get around this, by first creating a memcpy.c file without wrapping, as follows:
#include <string.h>
asm (".symver old_memcpy, memcpy#GLIBC_2.2.5"); // hook old_memcpy as memcpy#2.2.5
void *old_memcpy(void *, const void *, size_t );
void *memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n) // then export memcpy
{
return old_memcpy(dest, src, n);
}
and a memcpy.map file that exports our memcpy as memcpy#GLIBC_2.14:
GLIBC_2.14 {
memcpy;
};
I then compiled my own memcpy.c into a shared lib like this:
$ gcc -shared -fPIC -c memcpy.c
$ gcc -shared -fPIC -Wl,--version-script memcpy.map -o libmemcpy-2.14.so memcpy.o -lc
, moved libmemcpy-2.14.so into /some/oracle/lib (pointed to by -L arguments in my linking), and linked again by
$ gcc -o /some/oracle/bin/foo .... -L/some/oracle/lib ... /some/oracle/lib/libmemcpy-2.14.so -lfoo ...
(which compiled without errors) and verified it by:
$ ldd /some/oracle/bin/foo
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff9f3fe000)
/some/oracle/lib/libmemcpy-2.14.so (0x00007f963a63e000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f963a428000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f963a20c000)
librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x00007f963a003000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f9639c42000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f963aa5b000)
This worked for me. I hope it does it for you, too.
I'm clearly a little late responding to this but I recently upgraded (more reasons to never upgrade) my Linux OS to XUbuntu 14.04 which came with the new libc. I compile a shared library on my machine which is used by clients who, for whatever legitimate reasons, have not upgraded their environment from 10.04. The shared library I compiled no longer loaded in their environment because gcc put a dependency on memcpy glibc v. 2.14 (or higher). Let's leave aside the insanity of this. The workaround across my whole project was three fold:
added to my gcc cflags: -include glibc_version_nightmare.h
created the glibc_version_nightmare.h
created a perl script to verify the symbols in the .so
glibc_version_nightmare.h:
#if defined(__GNUC__) && defined(__LP64__) /* only under 64 bit gcc */
#include <features.h> /* for glibc version */
#if defined(__GLIBC__) && (__GLIBC__ == 2) && (__GLIBC_MINOR__ >= 14)
/* force mempcy to be from earlier compatible system */
__asm__(".symver memcpy,memcpy#GLIBC_2.2.5");
#endif
#undef _FEATURES_H /* so gets reloaded if necessary */
#endif
perl script fragment:
...
open SYMS, "nm $flags $libname |";
my $status = 0;
sub complain {
my ($symbol, $verstr) = #_;
print STDERR "ERROR: $libname $symbol requires $verstr\n";
$status = 1;
}
while (<SYMS>) {
next unless /\#\#GLIBC/;
chomp;
my ($symbol, $verstr) = (m/^\s+.\s(.*)\#\#GLIBC_(.*)/);
die "unable to parse version from $libname in $_\n"
unless $verstr;
my #ver = split(/\./, $verstr);
complain $symbol, $verstr
if ($ver[0] > 2 || $ver[1] > 10);
}
close SYMS;
exit $status;
Minimal runnable self contained example
GitHub upstream.
main.c
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include "a.h"
#if defined(V1)
__asm__(".symver a,a#LIBA_1");
#elif defined(V2)
__asm__(".symver a,a#LIBA_2");
#endif
int main(void) {
#if defined(V1)
assert(a() == 1);
#else
assert(a() == 2);
#endif
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
a.c
#include "a.h"
__asm__(".symver a1,a#LIBA_1");
int a1(void) {
return 1;
}
/* ## means "default version". */
__asm__(".symver a2,a##LIBA_2");
int a2(void) {
return 2;
}
a.h
#ifndef A_H
#define A_H
int a(void);
#endif
a.map
LIBA_1{
global:
a;
local:
*;
};
LIBA_2{
global:
a;
local:
*;
};
Makefile
CC := gcc -pedantic-errors -std=c89 -Wall -Wextra
.PHONY: all clean run
all: main.out main1.out main2.out
run: all
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./main.out
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./main1.out
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./main2.out
main.out: main.c libcirosantilli_a.so
$(CC) -L'.' main.c -o '$#' -lcirosantilli_a
main1.out: main.c libcirosantilli_a.so
$(CC) -DV1 -L'.' main.c -o '$#' -lcirosantilli_a
main2.out: main.c libcirosantilli_a.so
$(CC) -DV2 -L'.' main.c -o '$#' -lcirosantilli_a
a.o: a.c
$(CC) -fPIC -c '$<' -o '$#'
libcirosantilli_a.so: a.o
$(CC) -Wl,--version-script,a.map -L'.' -shared a.o -o '$#'
libcirosantilli_a.o: a.c
$(CC) -fPIC -c '$<' -o '$#'
clean:
rm -rf *.o *.a *.so *.out
Tested on Ubuntu 16.04.
This workaround seem not compatible with -flto compile option.
My solution is calling memmove. memove does exactly the same jobs than memcpy.
The only difference is when src and dest zone overlap, memmove is safe and memcpy is unpredictable. So we can safely always call memmove instead memcpy
#include <string.h>
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C" {
#endif
void *__wrap_memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n)
{
return memmove(dest, src, n);
}
#ifdef __cplusplus
}
#endif
For nim-lang, I elaborated on a solution I found using the C compiler --include= flag as follows:
Create a file symver.h with:
__asm__(".symver fcntl,fcntl#GLIBC_2.4");
Build your program with nim c ---passC:--include=symver.h
As for me I'm cross compiling too. I compile with nim c --cpu:arm --os:linux --passC:--include=symver.h ... and I can get symbol versions using arm-linux-gnueabihf-objdump -T ../arm-libc.so.6 | grep fcntl
I had to remove ~/.cache/nim at some point. And it seems to work.
I think you can get away with making a simple C file containing the symver statement and perhaps a dummy function calling memcpy. Then you just have to ensure that the resulting object file is the first file given to linker.
I suggest you either link memcpy() statically; or find the source of memcpy( ) and compile it as your own library.
It may caused by old ld (gnu link) version.
For following simple problem:
#include <string.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc,char **argv)
{
char buf[5];
memset(buf,0,sizeof(buf));
printf("ok\n");
return 0;
}
When I use ld 2.19.1, memset is relocated to: memset##GLIBC_2.0, and cause crash.
After upgraded to 2.25, it is: memset#plt, and crash solved.
We had a similar issue, but instead of one older GLIBC symbol, we have to provide in our .so libs a mix of newer ones with necessary functionality and older ones our libs may be referencing but are not available. This situation occurs because we are shipping to customers high performance codec libs with vectorized math functions and we cannot impose requirements on what version of OS distro, gcc, or glibc they use. As long as their machine has appropriate SSE and AVX extensions, the libs should work. Here is what we did:
Include glibc 2.35 libmvec.so.1 and libm.so.6 files in a separate subfolder. These contain the necessary vectorized math functions. In a "hello codec" application example, we reference these in the link target depending on what distro, gcc, and glibc versions are found by the Makefile. More or less, for anything with glibc v2.35 or higher the high performance libs are referenced, otherwise slower libs are referenced.
To deal with missing symbols -- the subject of this thread -- we used a modification of Ortwin Anermeier's solution, in turn based on anight's solution, but without using the -Wl,--wrap=xxx option.
The .map file looks like:
GLIBC_2.35 {
hypot;
:
: (more function symbols as needed)
};
GLIBC_2.32 {
exp10;
:
: (more function symbols as needed)
};
:
: (more version nodes as needed)
and in a "stublib" .so we have:
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <math.h>
asm(".symver hypot_235, hypot#GLIBC_2.35");
asm(".symver exp10_232, exp10f#GLIBC_2.32");
/* ... more as needed */
double hypot_235(double x, double y) { return hypot(x, y); }
double exp10_232(double x) { return exp10(x); }
/* ... more as needed */
-lstublib.so is then included in the app build as the last link item, even after -lm.
This answer and this one also offer clues, but they not handling the general case of a .so flexible enough to be used on a wide variety of systems.

Resources