IdentityServer 4 Table Values - identityserver4

I just started working on a project using Identity Server 4. I have Googled and found a good deal of information. What I can't find is a list of values for certain columns. For example, I found that RefreshTokenExpiration can be either Absolute or Sliding. But the column type is int. That seems to be the case for other Tables/Columns as well. Do you know where I can find the list of values for these and other columns?

Related

Generate Unique Random number in SSIS

I'm loading data from Flat file to SQL Server database. Along with the normal column, i want to add one more column with unique random number. I have around 500000 rows as of now. I have created a Derived column and added the expression
ABS(CHECKSUM(NEWID()))
to that. But it is throwing error NEWID was not recognised. I understand this is not supported in SSIS. Please help me here. Is there any other function that i can use for this? I searched some of the stackoverflow question but it didn't helped.

Can I Fix the a lookup field in Access database based upon a calculation or another field?

I am trying to create a database with field descriptions for a very large excel file that I have at work. I have created 3 tables- List of sheets, list of variables(including a lookup field pointing at the List of sheets table, so that I can select the sheet to which the variable belongs), and a third table which specify some validation rule.
In this third table, I want to see two lookup fields, one specifying the sheet in which the rule applies(say, 'Select Sheet'), and another specifying the variable(say, 'Select Variable'). I can point to the two different tables, but I want to do something a bit more nuanced than that. When I give a particular sheet name to 'Select Sheet', I want the lookup field for the variable('Select Variable') to show me only those variables which exists in that sheet.
I know that there probably will be solutions using forms, but this database is going to be very detailed and there are things to do afterwards, so I do not want to get into queries and forms before all data has been recorded in tables in a neat manner.
I have a good grasp of VBA in the context of excel and I am given to understand that I can extend the applications of Access using VBA. I am ready to do that, but I want to see before that whether this is some functionality of access that I am missing. Had anyone done anything similar before, and if so, did it take VBA to do it?

Linked SQL Server's table shows all fields as #Deleted, but when converted to local, all information is there

My company has a really old Access 2003 .ADP front-end connected to an on-premise SQL Server. I was trying to update the front-end to MS Access 2016, which is what we're transitioning to, but when linking the tables I get all the fields in this specific table as #Deleted. I've looked around and tried to change some of the settings, but I'm really not that into SQL Server to know what I'm doing, hence asking for help.
When converting the table to local, all the info is correctly displayed, so it begs the question. Also, skipping to the last record will reveal the info on that record, or sorting/filtering reveals some of the records, but most of the table stays "#Deleted"...
Since I know you're going to ask: Yes, I need to edit the records.. Although the snapshot method would work for people trying to view the info, some of us need to edit it.
I'm hoping someone can shed some light on this,
Thanks in advance, Rafael.
There are 3 common reasons for this:
You have bit fields in SQL server, but they are null. They should be assigned a default of 0.
The table in question does NOT have a PK (primary key).
Last but not least you need (want) to add a timestamp column. Keep in mind that this is really what we call a “row version” column (so it not a date/time column, but a timestamp column). Adding this column will help access determine if a record been changed, and this is especially the case for any table/form in Access that allows editing of “real” number data types (single, double). If access does not find a timestamp column, then it reverts to a column by column comparison to determine table changes, and due to how computers handle “real” numbers (with rounding), then such comparisons often fail.
So, check for the above 3 issues. You likely should re-run the linked table manager have making any changes.

How to use relations in Kibi, when creating a visualisation?

BACKGROUND
After moving our MSSQL DB to an ELK stack version 5.2, we realised we needed a relatiopnal visauliser. By then downgrading to 2.4.1 we were able to link Kibi.
TRIED
I have created the relations between the tables as shown below;
However, when trying to build a simple line graph to compare the tables tblaccounts and aspnetusers , it simply uses the values in tblaccountusers. None of the Kibi documentation seems to help, from what I have seen.
THE PROBLEM
The problem with this is I need the actual values to be used from both tables, through the child table of tblaccountusers, as to display account names rather than the ID number such as 1,2... etc.
If anyone has any guidance or links to help with this, please comment below.

Does a Full-Text Index work well for columns with embedded code values

Using SQL Server 2012, I've got a table that currently has several hundred-thousand rows, and will grow.
In this table, I've got a nvarchar(30) field that contains Medical Record Number (MRN) values. These values can be just about any alphanumeric value, but are not words.
For Example,
DR-345687
34568523
*45612345;T
My application allows the end user to enter a value, say '456' in the search field. The application would need to return all three of the example records.
Currently, I'm using Entity Framework 5.0, and asking for a field.Contains('456') type of search.
This always takes 3-5 seconds to return since it appears to do a table search.
My question is: Would creating a Full Text Index on this column help performance? I haven't tried it yet because the only copy of the database that I have with lots of data in it is currently in QA trials.
Looking at the documentation for the Full Text Indexes it appears that it is optimized around separate words in the field value, so I am hesitant to take the performance hit to create the index without knowing how it is likely to affect my query performance.
EF won't use the T-SQL keywords needed to access the SQL Server full text index (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms142571.aspx#queries) so your solution won't fly without more work.
I think you would have to create a SProc to get the data using the FTI and then have EF call this. I have a similar issue and would be interested to know your results.
Andy

Resources