So i'm buidling a rest api on laravel to be used by mobile and web apps ,
my question is how to handle same user authentication on multiple devices in the database side i'm thinking of generating a jwt token based on device_id and user_id , however i want to be able to revoke a token thus blocking a user on all devices , any ideas how to manage will be much appreciated.
Thank you in advance.
Take a look at https://laravel.com/docs/5.8/passport It shows you how to configure your API and frontend. It utilizes jwt strings under the hood. They have a bunch of migration and canned operations already set up for you so you don't have to reinvent the wheel. Once you get that implemented, inside of Providers/AppServiceProviders boot method or anywhere else essentially, you can figure out who the user is and what device they are using and if they are active. You can then return what ever error exception you want if you need to. throw new AuthenticationException("Authentication Exception");
Related
I am developing an application where users are playing a game and upon completion their results are sent to my back end through a POST request. Since I do not want this POST request to be done manually by someone who finds this endpoint (and mess with his results), I need a way to restrict it so that it can be done only through the application. However is it safe to hardcode a token that provides this access?
What is the correct way to go around this problem ?
I would not recommend to use hard-coded tokens, if the token gets compromized, you have to change the server as well as the client.
I would recommend some sort of auth mechanism as JWT with ssl with one rudimentary username/password system.
I am creating an Angular application, and I am having trouble wrapping my head around the proper way to ensure my application and its users is secure.
I've been reading around many stack discussions, but I believe I am missing some core understanding of what is happening, please correct any errors you see written below.
So far I have a Sinatra server with many (currently mostly hypothetical) resource routes. A user can create an account using an email address and password that is stored in a database after being hashed with BCrypt. When a user logs in, the record is retrieved from the database by email and the password checked for authentication. It is from this point I am not sure how to proceed.
Prior to this I have simply set a session variable and had the server check that the variable exists in order to correctly route logged in users. Now my application is (currently) a single HTML page that uses Angular and ui-router to display different content, so most of the requests are simply returning JSON content.
It is my understanding that Restful applications should generally not use sessions, or rather that the server should respond identically to identical requests and not have its own data that shapes a response. But if I do not store something in a session variable, how could the server know that the client making the request has the correct permissions? And are sessions not stored in the browser anyway, thus not part of the server?
I believe from what I have read, it is possible to create a token which is essentially a large random string, return that string to the client and also store it in a database with a timestamp. The client then provides this token when making requests and the server hits the database to verify it exists and valid. But would the client not also have to store that string in a cookie? I suppose the angular application could store the token in a variable, which would persist while using the ui-router but not if the users navigates using the address bar.
I also do not understand how Basic Auth may or may not fit into this picture. Any help would be greatly appreciated, as well as a pointer to some good resources where I may find a better understanding of these concepts in general.
You want to read up on JWT. There are JWT libraries for Ruby and Angular.
I know you aren't using Node for your backend but a very easy way to see all the pieces working together is to run the angular-fullstack Yeoman generator. It uses JWT and the code is easy to follow.
As far as I can see, whatever you are doing with your sessions can work just fine.
This can be a sample JSON response from the server in case the user is not loged in :
{
"errorCode": 1,
"error": "User not logged in",
"data": {}
}
You can set your own error codes and handle what you want to do. You will send any data only if the user is logged in. For all the pages which don't require authentication, you can set data to whatever you want.
On the angularJS side, you can handle based on error codes, you can redirect the user to the login page and so forth.
The alternate way to support the same on multiple platforms is to use token based approach. The token based approach in simple words work this way.
The user logs in for the first time with his / her credentials.
The server verifies these information and creates a token from which the server is able to decode the user id.
Whenever the client makes the requests, it passes its token with every request.
As the server can decode the user information from the token, it sends or doesn't send the data based on whether that's a right token or not.
The token depends on a secret value. It can be same for all the users or differnet for each based on how you want to implement.
This is all done and you can look at
http://jwt.io/
As #andy-gaskell mentioned, you can look at
http://angular-tips.com/blog/2014/05/json-web-tokens-introduction/
I'm very bad at explaining. Please let me know if any of this doesn't make sense.
you are missing the point of the REST concept. One of the main concepts in the REST apis is that the server should be stateless - this means that you should not store sessions or other "state" in your web server. Every HTTP request happens in complete isolation. Every request should include all data needed by the server to fulfill the request.
But if I do not store something in a session variable, how could the
server know that the client making the request has the correct
permissions?
You can store request scoped variables. This means that they should be only active during the same request. You can store the current logged in user in the request scoped variable. In that way you can get the current user in your invocation of the business method. I'm not familiar with Sinatra but here is the doc: http://www.sinatrarb.com/intro.html#Request/Instance%20Scope
But would the client not also have to store that string in a cookie?
of course you should store your access token in the client side
https://stormpath.com/blog/where-to-store-your-jwts-cookies-vs-html5-web-storage/
as #Andy Gaskell suggest take a look at JWT and fullstack application code generators and forget about the basic auth because it's really "basic".
more useful links:
If REST applications are supposed to be stateless, how do you manage sessions?
http://www.sitepoint.com/php-authorization-jwt-json-web-tokens/
I am writing an travel itinerary app engine application which will interact with the calendars of my users. In order to manage access to my user's calendar I intend to use OAuth 2.0. I looked online for various code examples and the closest to what I am trying to acheive is (http://code.google.com/p/google-api-java-client/source/browse/calendar-appengine-sample/src/main/java/com/google/api/services/samples/calendar/appengine/server/?repo=samples). I have the following questions
1) I find that the server needs access to the application's client id and client secrets. Most of the sample code I have seen so far loads this from a local file. Does AppEngine give some API which will enable me to retrieve the client id and client secret without me having to worry about storing it ?
2) If I have to store the client secret in a secure fashion what are my options ?
3) What is the best way to store a user's access token and refresh token ?
It almost never changes, so hardcode it. It's only really loaded from a file in the sample programs so that you can get the samples running without touching the code.
See 1.
You can use the Google provided Credential class which uses a dedicated kind. Or, given that they are simply strings, you can store them as part of the User kind which your app almost certainly has to track your registered users.
As a tip, separate writing your oauth code from writing your calendar code. I would start by writing an app that only authorises, stores the refresh token, and refreshes the access token. You can test your access token using curl. Once you have that all working, then add your Calendar functionality as phase 2.
I'm trying to figure out CakePHP cookies and meet my slightly unusual authentication requirements.
I have a CakePHP-based data collection system that is now being integrated with a reporting system built with COTS software. The reporting system needs to be access controlled and unless I want to duplicate all user accounts in both systems I need the reporting system to be able to find out if the user is authenticated in my CakePHP system.
The reporting system permits me to load a Java class and execute a function when the client's report request first arrives. So my idea was to
Inspect the incoming report request and extract the cookie used by my CakePHP site for authentication / session identification
Send a request from the Java function to a 'reportauth' action within the CakePHP site with this cookie attached
The reportauth action within CakePHP then checks if the user is logged in to the CakePHP site and returns an encrypted response to the Java function identifying the user's role
I can get the cookie, send it in a request, and separately I can share encrypted information between PHP and Java.
However, when I use a 'fresh' cookie (the cookie that my browser repeatedly sends with requests to the CakePHP site after a new login) in my Java request the response says the user is not logged-in. If I then reload the site in my browser I have been logged-out. I suspect that there may be some extra information in the cookie about user-agent (?) that causes the Java-sourced request to be thrown out and that session destroyed for safety, but I don't know the system well enough. I think I might be seeing CakePHP protecting against session hijacking (which, ordinarily, would make me happy).
Can anyone tell me if there is a way around this issue? Preferably one that doesn't involve custom auth components in CakePHP as the data collection site is already live and my reporting deadline is not far away.
Any help much appreciated.
One workaround:
Get CakePHP to store a random token in a separate cookie, and as a field in the user table.
Then get the Java application to grab the token, and send it to the cakephp application to get the user's details.
Alternatively, have it authenticate with the CakePHP app itself, and pass in the session id to have cake use the right session. Note, setting with that function needs to be done before session_start() is called.
I am working on a WP7 application. This WP7 application will interact with some web services that I have created. I do not want other applications interacting with these web services. The reason why is because I do not want them stealing my data. With that in mind, here is what I'm currently doing:
Connecting to web services via HTTPS
Making my users initially login to the application
Passing the users username / password with each web service interaction
At this time, I don't see what is stopping a malicious developer from creating a username / password combo and using that account in their application to interact with my web services. How do I really lock this thing down?
Thanks!
As a start towards a more secure system you should stop storing the password and sending it over the wire with each request (even if you're using SSL).
If you must pass it with each request, store a salted hash of the password and use that instead.
I'm using a multi layered approach to this problem. I recommend thinking creatively and using a variety of methods to validate that requests are coming from devices you expect requests to come from.
Alternatively, if there is any merit in your scenario, open up your api to 3rd party developers and make this work toward your objectives.
If you do decide to store a key in your app, don't store RAW text but instead declare a byte array of the UTF8 values, this won't be as easy to read.
You can then handshake with your service using a salted hash of the key the first time the app is run, the service hands out another key for the device to actually use day-to-day.
The phone should have an almost accurate time, so you can recalculate the key each day or hour. You can also revoke the key at the server end for just that device.
This API will be useful in ensuring you can blacklist a device permanently.
DeviceExtendedProperties.GetValue(“DeviceUniqueId”).ToByte();
I've not looked into symmetric encryption by you might even be able to use the above unique ID as a private key.
I think the key to success is that first hand-shake, and ensuring that is not snooped. If it's a really important system, then don't use any of these ideas since rolling your own encryption is always flimsy to anyone with serious intent - use well-known methods and read up.
Luke
You could introduce an "Authorized Application ID" feature where the application sends its name or identifier within each HTTP request body. Then on the server side you can verify the application's identity (e.g. store the authorized app ID's in a table). The application ID would be encrypted within the HTTP(S) body.
This would also give you the option of pushing out new application ID's in updated versions of the WP7 application if you wanted to get rid of an older application ID. You'd also be able support new applications on difference devices or platforms in the future.
You may want to look at this
http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Jafa/Windows-Phone-7-Trade-Me-Developer-Starter-Kit