I am creating a deque to store stings in C, and when I call the free() function, the program crashes. I have implemented a similar structure but only storing integers, and encountered no problems, but this seems to be causing me a few. I created a struct containing a multidimensional array or characters, and i think maybe I am not using the pointers correctly? I have searched far and wide and cannot solve it The main area of concern is when i call clear() from the ain body. That in turn calls free(), and the program just stalls. :-( Any help would be extremely useful.
#include <stdio.h>
#define MAX 20 // number of characters for word
typedef struct {
char **deque;
int size;
int pFront;
int pRear;
} deque;
typedef int bool;
enum { false, true };
void initDeque(deque *d, int initialSize)
{
d->size = initialSize;
d->pFront = -1;
d->pRear = -1;
d->deque = (char **)malloc(sizeof(char*)*initialSize);
int idx;
for(int idx = 0; idx < d->size; idx++)
{
d->deque[idx] = (char *)malloc((MAX+1) * sizeof(char));
d->deque[idx] = "";
}
printf("d->size: %zu\n", d->size);
}
void clear(deque *d) {
if(d->pFront == -1)
{
printf("Queue is empty\n");
}
else
{
printf("Attempting to clear...\n");
for(int idx = 0; idx < d->size; idx++)
{
printf("Attempting to clear columns...");
free(d->deque[idx]);
}
printf("Attempting to clear rows...");
free(d->deque);
printf("Freed!!!!\n");
d->deque = NULL;
d->size = 0;
d->pFront = -1;
d->pRear = -1;
}
}
bool isEmpty(deque *d)
{
if(d->pFront == -1){
return true;
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
bool isFull(deque *d)
{
if(d->size == d->pRear+1)
{
return true;
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
void display(deque *d)
{
if(isEmpty(d)){
printf("empty\n");
}
else{
printf("Deque Values:\n");
int idx;
for(int idx = 0; idx <= d->pRear; idx++)
{
printf("Index: %zu\tValue: %s\n", idx, d->deque[idx]);
}
printf("Size: %zu\n", d->size);
}
}
void rAppend(deque *d, char item[]) // as in rear append - same enqueue for queue structure.
{
if(isFull(d))
{
printf("Is Full\n");
int idx;
deque dTemp;
initDeque(&dTemp, d->size);
printf("dTemp Initialised\n");
for(idx = 0; idx < d->size; idx++)
{
dTemp.deque[idx] = d->deque[idx];
}
printf("deque copied to dTemp:\n");
for(idx = 0; idx < d->size; idx++)
{
printf("dTemp[%zu]: %s\n", idx, dTemp.deque[idx]);
}
clear(&d);
printf("d cleared\n");
initDeque(&d, dTemp.size*2);
printf("New deque of double length initialised\n");
for(idx = 0; idx < dTemp.size; idx++)
{
d->deque[idx] = d->deque[idx];
}
printf("dTemp Copied to new deque\n");
clear(&dTemp);
printf("dTemp Cleared\n");
char **tmp = realloc( d->deque, sizeof (d->deque) * (d->size*2) );
if (tmp)
{
d->deque = tmp;
for (int i = 0; i < d->size; i++)
{
d->deque[d->size + i] = malloc( sizeof(char) * MAX );
}
}
}
printf("Appending to rear.. %s\n", item);
d->pRear++;
d->deque[d->pRear] = item;
if(d->pFront == -1)
d->pFront = 0;
}
int main(void)
{
deque d;
initDeque(&d, 5);
rAppend(&d, "when");
rAppend(&d, "will");
rAppend(&d, "wendy");
rAppend(&d, "walk");
rAppend(&d, "with");
display(&d);
clear(&d);
return 0;
}
The problem is your are calling free() on static chain "when", "will",...
You can replace insertion in the function void rAppend(deque *d, char item[]) :
d->deque[d->pRear] = item;
with:
d->deque[d->pRear] = strdup(item);
Doing like this chains are allocated in the heap and free from the heap.
After there is others problems in the code, but it run without crash.
The main problem seems to be that you don't appreciate the difference between copying / assigning pointers and copying / assigning the data to which they point. Secondarily, it seems you may not appreciate the utility of pointers that don't point to anything, especially null pointers. Some details follow.
You are dynamically allocating space for a bunch of strings ...
for(int idx = 0; idx < d->size; idx++)
{
d->deque[idx] = (char *)malloc((MAX+1) * sizeof(char));
... and then leaking all of that space by replacing the pointer to each with a pointer to an empty string literal:
d->deque[idx] = "";
}
As if the leak were not bad enough, you are not permitted to free a string literal or modify its content, which you nevertheless try to do to any of those pointers that remain in the dequeue whenever you clear() it. This is likely the cause of some of your errors.
If you want to set each allocated string to an empty one then modify its content instead of replacing the pointer to it. For example:
d->deque[idx][0] = '\0';
In fact, however, you probably don't need to do even that. You are already performing bookkeeping to know which arrays contain valid (string) data and which don't, and that should be sufficient to do the right thing. Supposing you maintain copies of the strings in the first place.
But that's not all. When you rAppend() elements to your deque you have a similar problem. You create a temporary deque, and then copy the string pointers from your original deque into the temporary:
dTemp.deque[idx] = d->deque[idx];
Not only does this leak the original (empty) data in the temporary deque, it aliases that deque's contents with the main deque's. When you later clear the temporary deque, therefore, you free all the string pointers in the original. Subsequently using or freeing them produces undefined behavior.
Perhaps you instead want to strcpy() all the elements of the main deque into the temp and back, but I suggest instead skipping the temp deque altogether with something along these lines:
void rAppend(deque *d, char item[]) // as in rear append - same enqueue for queue structure.
{
if(isFull(d))
{
printf("Is Full\n");
char **tmp = realloc(d.deque, d->size * 2);
if (tmp)
{
d->deque = tmp;
for (int i = 0; i < d->size; i++)
{
// Copied from the original, but see below
d->deque[d->size + i] = malloc( sizeof(char) * MAX );
}
d->size * 2;
} // else?
}
printf("Appending to rear.. %s\n", item);
d->pRear++;
// Oops, this is another leak / aliasing issue:
d->deque[d->pRear] = item;
if(d->pFront == -1)
d->pFront = 0;
}
The whole point of the temporary deque is lost on me, since the realloc() you need to do preserves the original data anyway (as long as it succeeds, anyway).
Note too, however, that this still has an aliasing issue: you have aliased a deque element with the appended string, and leaked the memory allocated for that element. Furthermore, when you clear the deque, you free that string for everyone holding a pointer to it. Or at least you attempt to do so. You're not permitted to do that to string literals.
I suggest not allocating space in your deque for the individual strings at all, and not freeing it. Continue to use assignment to store elements in your deque, understanding and embracing that these are aliases. This will be more analogous to your implementation for ints.
#include<memory>
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
struct S {
S() { cout << "make an S\n"; }
~S() { cout << "destroy an S\n"; }
S(const S&) { cout << "copy initialize an S\n"; }
S& operator=(const S&) { cout << "copy assign an S\n"; }
};
S* f()
{
return new S; // who is responsible for deleting this S?
};
unique_ptr<S> g()
{
return make_unique<S>(); // explicitly transfer responsibility for deleting this S
}
int main()
{
cout << "start main\n";
S* p = f();
cout << "after f() before g()\n";
// S* q = g(); // this error would be caught by the compiler
unique_ptr<S> q = g();
cout << "exit main\n";
// leaks *p
// implicitly deletes *q
}
Related
I'm going to add a new value 4 to the list array.
The original values in list array are 1,2,3.
But when i run the following code, i didn't get 1,2,3,4 but several random numbers.
Each time I run I get different output.
Can someone help me figure out what's going wrong here?
Thanks a lot.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(void){
int *list = malloc(3 * sizeof(int));
//如果直接写int list[3] 就没有办法修改大小了
if (list == NULL)
{
free(list);
return 1;
}
list[0] = 1;
list[1] = 2;
list[2] = 3;
//resize the old array to be of size 4
//用realloc指定下old array,无需再做copy的工作
int *tmp = realloc(list, 4 * sizeof(int));
if (list == NULL)
{
free(list);
//a safety check, free the original list
return 1;
}
tmp[3] = 4;
//free old array
free(list); //这里就可以free之前的list了
//remember new array
list = tmp;
//所以不需要在free(tmp), free(list)相当于free(tmp)
//print new array
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++)
{
printf("%i\n", list[i]);
}
//free new array
free(list);
return 0; //最后记得加上这个
}
the output is like this:
1609039888
25764
2043
4
try this code
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(void){
int *list = malloc(3 * sizeof(int));
//如果直接写int list[3] 就没有办法修改大小了
if (list == NULL)
{
free(list);
return 1;
}
list[0] = 1;
list[1] = 2;
list[2] = 3;
//resize the old array to be of size 4
//用realloc指定下old array,无需再做copy的工作
int *tmp = realloc(list, 4 * sizeof(int));
if (list == NULL)
{
free(list);
//a safety check, free the original list
return 1;
}
tmp[3] = 4;
//free old array
//free(list); //这里就可以free之前的list了 // this free the last memory location which empty the array.
//remember new array
list = tmp;
//所以不需要在free(tmp), free(list)相当于free(tmp)
//print new array
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++)
{
printf("%i\n", list[i]);
}
//free new array
free(list);
return 0; //最后记得加上这个
}
There's a fundamental misunderstanding on how dynamic memory management actually works...
At first, if an allocation fails (malloc returning a null pointer), then there's nothing to free anyway, so you simply don't need to (even though it's legal – then effectively a no-op...).
int* list = malloc(...);
if(!list) // shorter for list == NULL
{
return -1;
}
Then realloc replaces the old array for you already! You can imagine it to work like this:
void* realloc(void* oldData, size_t desired)
{
// retain currently allocated memory size from pointer
// that's OS/compiler specific knowledge, usually stored somewhere
// in front of the memory the pointer points to, but not (legally)
// accessible by you...
size_t old = ...;
if(desired <= old)
{
return oldData;
}
void* newData = malloc(desired);
if(newData)
{
memcpy(newData, oldData, oldSize);
free(oldData); // !!!
}
return newData;
}
Note how the old data remains intact if re-allocation fails, but gets deleted on success!
Correct usage of realloc thus looks as follows:
int* tmp = realloc(list, desiredSize);
if(!tmp)
{
// appropriate error handling
// usually you cannot meaningfully go on anyway, so let's just exit
// but HERE list still points to valid memory, so clean up first:
free(list);
return -1;
}
// we can safely use the temporary as the list now; note that the old
// memory already HAS been deleted!
list = tmp;
// and now we simply use it:
list[3] = 4;
free(list); // when done
I got assigment from the professor to create a list using pointers. I'm having a problem with free() in all of my functions when I try to free memory. I keep getting a message:
"HEAP CORRUPTION DETECTED: after Normal block (#83) at 0x00D58CE0.
CRT detected that the application wrote to memory after end of heap buffer."
I have no idea how to fix it. I've tried different things but nothing worked so far. I'm not sure where to search for it either anymore. I know that my program is not properly secured yet, but it doesn't affect the problem. I'm trying to eliminate it first before going further with it. Also, do you have any advice on detecting memory leaks from the program in visual studio? Here are my functions, full source code is below in the link:
Full Source Code
struct ListElement
{
int value;
struct element *next;
};
typedef struct ListElement List;
typedef List *ListEl;
void ViewListBackwards(ListEl *list_el)
{
ListEl current_element = *list_el;
int size = 0;
int i = 0;
int *reversed_array;
while (current_element->next != NULL)
{
size++;
current_element = current_element->next;
}
current_element = *list_el;
reversed_array = (int*)malloc(size * sizeof(*reversed_array));
for (i = size; i >= 0; i--)
{
reversed_array[i] = current_element->value;
current_element = current_element->next;
}
for (i = 0; i <= size; i++)
{
printf(" %d. %d\n", i + 1, reversed_array[i]);
}
free(reversed_array);
}
void RemoveFromListFront(ListEl *list_el)
{
if (ListEmpty(list_el) == 0)
{
ListEl current_element = *list_el;
*list_el = current_element->next;
free(current_element);
}
else
{
printf("List is empty!\n");
}
}
void RemoveFromListBack(ListEl *list_el)
{
if (ListEmpty(list_el) == 0)
{
ListEl current_element = *list_el;
ListEl last_element = *list_el;
while (current_element->next != NULL)
{
last_element = current_element;
current_element = current_element->next;
}
last_element->next = NULL;
free(current_element);
}
}
In the following code:
reversed_array = (int*)malloc(size * sizeof(*reversed_array));
for (i = size; i >= 0; i--)
{
reversed_array[i] = current_element->value;
current_element = current_element->next;
}
for (i = 0; i <= size; i++)
{
printf(" %d. %d\n", i + 1, reversed_array[i]);
}
you are allocating (what amounts to) an int reversed_array[size] array, but then proceed to write to reversed_array[size], which is sizeof(int) past the end of the allocated memory segment.
You instead want to change your for loops to:
for (i = size - 1; i >= 0; i--)
so that the indices you write to start at reversed_array[size - 1].
EDIT:
As an aside, please, as other people have suggested in the comments, don't cast malloc(). This is unneeded in C, as void * can be assigned to any object pointer type variables, and in addition can hide bugs in your code, such as forgetting to include stdlib.h.
And FWIW, you don't need the parentheses around sizeof(*reversed_array), as parentheses are only needed when applying the sizeof operator to types.
This is mostly just a style suggestion; it is preferred by many (myself included) that you omit the extraneous parentheses and write that expression as sizeof *reversed_array, as that makes it clear that sizeof is a unary operator and not a function.
In my below code I am trying to create a dynamically expandable array of memory.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define BLOCKSIZE 5
int hash_table_length = 0;
int *currentblock = NULL;
int size_left;
int *hash_table = NULL;
int *start = NULL;
int *create_hash_table() {
int *tmp;
if (currentblock == NULL || size_left == 0) {
if (currentblock == NULL) {
currentblock = (int *) malloc( BLOCKSIZE * sizeof(int));
start = currentblock;
size_left = BLOCKSIZE;
} else {
currentblock = (int *) malloc( BLOCKSIZE * sizeof(int));
size_left = BLOCKSIZE;
}
}
tmp = currentblock++;
size_left -= 1;
return tmp;
}
void build() {
int hash;
int i = 0;
for (i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
hash = i + 3;
if (hash_table_length == 0) {
hash_table = create_hash_table();
hash_table_length++;
} else {
hash_table = create_hash_table();
hash_table_length++;
}
hash_table = &hash;
printf("hash value is %d\n", *hash_table);
}
}
int main() {
build();
// How do I reach the start of the hash table again?
// the below start does not give me the first value
printf("Hash table first value is %d\n", *start);
return 0;
}
My problem here is I wish to traverse through the values stored in the hash_table. I am unable to reach to the first element/address of the hash_table. I wish to print out all the values stored in my hash table. How can this be done?
In your code the hash values never get stored inside the hash table(inside currentblock). Inside the create_hash_table() function you allocate memory for a new block but never store values inside this block. Thus if you try dereferencing any of these int* locations you might get a garbage value(which may be a 0).
This is what is precisely happening inside your main() function when you dereference the start pointer. It is infact pointing to the start of the hash table and as that location is uninitialized it gives an output of 0.
To actually store values inside the hash table change the following inside build():
hash_table = &hash;
to:
*hash_table = hash; // Store value of 'hash' inside the memory location pointed to by hash table(which happens to be 'current_block' inside build())
Now if you try running the code, it will output 3.
Coming to the second part of question as to how you'll traverse the entire hash table: It cannot be done using this code. This is because there is no linkage between your malloc'd blocks of integers. The malloc() call can assign any block of free memory from the heap. Thus in the current form you have disconnected blocks of locations which cannot be traversed.
Instead of malloc you can use realloc to increase the size of your current block. realloc allocates memory for the larger block and copies your previous data to this new block. This will essentially allow you to traverse the entire hash table using start.
Here is how you might do that:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define BLOCKSIZE 5
int hash_table_length = 0;
int *currentblock = NULL;
int size_left;
int *hash_table = NULL;
int *start = NULL;
int *create_hash_table() {
int *tmp;
if (currentblock == NULL || size_left == 0) {
if (currentblock == NULL) {
currentblock = (int *) malloc(BLOCKSIZE * sizeof(int));
start = currentblock;
size_left = BLOCKSIZE;
} else {
/* Call realloc() to allocate new memory block of size (hash_table_length+BLOCKSIZE) and copy previous data*/
currentblock = ((int *) realloc(start,(hash_table_length + BLOCKSIZE) * sizeof(int))) + hash_table_length;
size_left = BLOCKSIZE;
}
}
tmp = currentblock++;
size_left -= 1;
return tmp;
}
void build() {
int hash;
int i = 0;
for (i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
hash = i + 3;
if (hash_table_length == 0) {
hash_table = create_hash_table();
hash_table_length++;
} else {
hash_table = create_hash_table();
hash_table_length++;
}
/* Store value of hash inside the hash_table */
*hash_table = hash;
printf("hash value is %d\n", *hash_table);
}
}
int main() {
int i;
build();
printf("Hash table first value is %d\n", *start);
/* Traverse the hash table */
for(i = 0; i < hash_table_length; ++i)
printf("hash_table[%d] = %d\n",i,*start++);
return 0;
}
I have string array initialized like that:
char ** strArray;
if ( (strArray = malloc(sizeof(*strArray) + 3)) == NULL ) {
fprintf(stderr, "ls1: couldn't allocate memory");
//exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
strArray[0] = NULL;
strArray[0] = "111";
strArray[1] = "222";
strArray[2] = "1";
strArray[3] = "2";
I want to convert this string array to int array, like that:
int * toIntArray(char ** strArray) {
int size = getCharArraySize(strArray);
int intArray[size];
int i;
for ( i = 0; i < size ; ++i)
{
intArray[i] = atoi(strArray[i]);
printf( "r[%d] = %d\n", i, intArray[i]);
}
intArray[size] = '\0';
return intArray;
}
int getCharArraySize(char ** strArray) {
int s = 0;
while ( strArray[s]) {
printf("Char array: %s.\n", strArray[s]);
s++;
}
return s;
}
And then I want to sort this int array.
I must have string array initilized like above (char ** strArray) and then convert this to int array and then sort it. Can anybody help my with that? I would ask about printed sorted integer in main function.
A few minor things to take note of in the question code:
char ** strArray;
if ( (strArray = malloc(sizeof(*strArray) + 3)) == NULL ) {
fprintf(stderr, "ls1: couldn't allocate memory");
//exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
If successful, the intention of the above code allocates memory to strArray sufficient for three char *'s. Specifically, strArray[0], strArray1 and strArray[2].
NOTE: As pointed out in Matt McNabb's comment below, it actually incorrectly allocates memory sufficient for one char *, and three extra bytes.
strArray[0] = NULL;
The above line sets sets the first pointer in the **strArray to point at NULL.
strArray[0] = "111";
The above code is odd. After just setting strArray[0] to point at NULL, the above line changes it to point to "111". Kind of makes setting it to NULL (in the first place) seem unnecessary.
strArray[1] = "222";
strArray[2] = "1";
The above two lines initialize the other two pointers in the strArray correctly.
strArray[3] = "2";
The above line attempts to initialize strArray[3], when that element of the array really doesn't exist. So, it is changing something to point to "2", but probably not with the expected result.
Perhaps the intent would be better served by changing the above code to:
char **strArray;
size_t strArrayElements=4;
if(NULL == (strArray = malloc((strArrayElements+1) * sizeof(*strArray))))
{
fprintf(stderr, "ls1: couldn't allocate memory");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
strArray[strArrayElements] = NULL;
strArray[0] = "111";
strArray[1] = "222";
strArray[2] = "1";
strArray[3] = "2";
As can be observed, the above code allocates 5 elements (strArrayElements+1) to the **strArray. The last element strArray[4] is initialized to NULL; a marker to indicate End-Of-List. Then the other 4 elements [0..3] are initialized.
Now shifting focus to:
int * toIntArray(char ** strArray) {
int size = getCharArraySize(strArray);
int intArray[size];
int i;
for ( i = 0; i < size ; ++i)
{
intArray[i] = atoi(strArray[i]);
printf( "r[%d] = %d\n", i, intArray[i]);
}
intArray[size] = '\0';
return intArray;
}
The above code is successful at converting the strings to their integer forms, and storing them in intArray. However, the code is flawed when it attempts to return intArray to the caller. The intArray variable was declared as a local stack object. The return statement causes all such stack variables to become invalid; and allows the stack memory such variables were using to be used for other things.
Perhaps the the following code better represents what was intended. It allocates memory from the heap for intArray. This allocated memory can outlive the return statement:
int *toIntArray(char **strArray)
{
int size = getCharArraySize(strArray);
int *intArray = malloc(size * sizeof(*intArray));
int i;
for ( i = 0; i < size ; ++i)
{
intArray[i] = atoi(strArray[i]);
printf( "r[%d] = %d\n", i, intArray[i]);
}
intArray[size] = '\0';
return(intArray);
}
Spoiler code may be found here.
I'm trying to implement a stack structure in C, for storing char arrays into.
I have the following code:
typedef struct {
size_t size;
char **data;
} loods1;
loods1 *init(void) {
loods1 *loods = malloc(sizeof(loods1));
loods->data = malloc(sizeof(char *) * STACK_MAX);
for (int i = 0; i < STACK_MAX; i++) {
*(loods->data + i) = malloc(LABEL_LENGTH_MAX * sizeof(char));
}
loods->size = 0;
if (loods == NULL) {
perror("malloc failed\n");
return NULL;
}
return loods;
}
int empty(loods1 *loods) {
return (loods->size == 0);
}
void push(loods1 *loods, char *name) {
if (loods->size == STACK_MAX) {
perror("Stack is full\n");
exit(0);
}
else {
*((loods->data) + loods->size++) = name;
}
}
char *pop(loods1 *loods) {
if (loods->size == 0) {
printf("size == 0\n");
return NULL;
}
else {
printf("%s \n", *(loods->data + 1));
return *(loods->data + (--loods->size));
}
}
int delete(loods1 *loods) {
for (int i = 0; i < STACK_MAX; i++) {
free(*(loods->data + i));
}
free(loods->data);
free(loods);
}
There are 2 problems: first off, every time I add a new element to the stack, it overwrites all existing elements (if '3' and '11' are added and I want to add '15', the new stack will look like '15', '15', '15'). And when I want to pop the stack, the popped value is empty. Not null, but an empty string or something?
I have no idea what I'm doing wrong, but there seems to be a mistake somewhere, obviously.
Sammy
In push function, if you are passing char*, it will divert your pointer to where the char * is, and when you do p++, it will go from the char* you passed.
Try change push definition to:
void push(loods1 *loods, const char *name) {
if (loods->size == STACK_MAX) {
perror("Stack is full\n");
exit(0);
}
else {
strcpy((loods->data)[loods->size++], name);
}
}
From here you might as well need some other changes to your calling program.
Also when you free it, free the single loods does not free all memory you allocated.
I flicked through the code and it seems to be ok, I think the problem is in your client.
Your only store pointers in the stack, you're probably pushing the same pointer on the stack but rewrite the string it points to.
Note that if you really only want to store pointers your 3rd malloc is wasting space and also creates a memory leak.