HANA SQL Script INSERT INTO with INNER JOIN can't insert values - inner-join

I'm quite new to SQL and hope you can help me with my problem.
I have a table called Order_Status_Form_3 with the columns Order_ID (KEY), Customer_ID, Customer_Unique_ID, Status(KEY) and Date.
The table is filled, except for the Customer_Unique_ID Column.
To fill this Column I need to reference the Customer table where the Customer_ID is linked to the Customer_Unique_ID, so the right IDs cover the right places. When the Customer_ID in Order_Status_Form_3 equals the Customer_ID in the Customer table the given Customer_Unique_ID shall be inserted into the Customer_Unique_ID column in Order_Status_Form_3.
I tried to combine an INSERT INTO with a SELECT and INNER JOIN, but received an error message that says:
"cannot insert NULL or update to NULL: Order_ID".
I guess it's not clear for the program where to insert the values found and it tries to insert into all columns. I searched for similar problems but could not find any satisfying answers for my specific problem.
Here's the code I used:
Insert Into "HXE_109"."Order_Status_Form_3" ("Customer_Unique_ID")
Select customer."customer_unique_id"
From "HXE_109"."Customer" As customer
Inner Join "HXE_109"."Order_Status_Form_3" As OrderStatus3
On OrderStatus3."Customer_ID" = customer."customer_id"
I tried to specify the place to insert the values found by attaching a WHERE at the end, but received the same error.
Where OrderStatus3."Customer_ID" = customer."customer_id"
Does anyone know how to solve this issue and can tell me where my mistake is?
Thanks in advance for reading this long question and leaving an answer.
Edit
I tried using update but it seems like I cannot get it right.
Update "HXE_109"."Order_Status_Form_3"
Set "Customer_Unique_ID" = (Select customer."customer_unique_id"
From "HXE_109"."Customer" As customer
Inner Join "HXE_109"."Order_Status_Form_3" As OrderStatus3
On OrderStatus3."Customer_ID" = customer."customer_id")
Now I get the following error:
single row query returns more than one row
Do I need to use a Where condition here?
Sorry for my stupidity. :(

As I could follow the comments, what you want to do is running an UPDATE statement
Please check following DML command
Update "HXE_109"."Order_Status_Form_3"
Set
"Customer_Unique_ID" = customer."customer_unique_id"
From "HXE_109"."Order_Status_Form_3" As OrderStatus3
Inner Join "HXE_109"."Customer" As customer
On OrderStatus3."Customer_ID" = customer."customer_id"
If I try to explain the error messages:
"cannot insert NULL or update to NULL: Order_ID".
That is related with a field defined as NOT NULL. So in your target table ORDER_ID is defined as "not null", so in INSERT you have to provide a value for it or define it as an identity field in your HANA table definition
The second error: single row query returns more than one row
This is related with the case where SQL Engine expects a value not a set of values.
So the SELECT statement that you assign the results to Customer_Unique_ID field returns more than 1 value. In this case SQL engine raises an exception

Related

SQL Server Trigger to alter different table

I’m trying to create a trigger to change the value of a column in table B if it finds the information in a column in table A.
An example of my database is below:
[TableA],
itemID
[TableB],
itemID
itemInStock
Once a user creates an entry in Table A declaring an itemID, the trigger needs to change the TableB.itemInStock column to ‘Yes’
I’m still learning SQL so excuse me if I’ve missed something, let me know if you need any more info.
I understand there are better ways of doing this but I've been told I need to do this using a trigger.
I've attempted a few different things, but as it stands nothing is working, below is the current solution I have however this updates all itemInStock rows to 'Yes', where as I only want the ones to update where the TableB.itemID matches the itemID entered in TableA.
ALTER TRIGGER [itemAvailability] ON [dbo].[TableA] FOR
INSERT
AS
BEGIN
UPDATE [dbo].[TableB] set itemInStock = 'Yes' WHERE
TableB.itemID = itemID
END
Two problems -
you're not looking at the Inserted pseudo table which contains the
newly inserted rows
you're assuming the trigger is called once per row - this is not the
case, the trigger is called once per statement and the Inserted
pseudo table will contain multiple rows - and you need to deal with
that
So, your code should look like this -
ALTER TRIGGER [itemAvailability] ON [dbo].[TableA]
FOR INSERT
AS
UPDATE TB
SET itemInStock = 'Yes'
FROM [dbo].[TableB] TB JOIN inserted I
on TB.itemID = I.itemID

How can I get the result from SQL generated Identity? [duplicate]

I'm trying to get a the key-value back after an INSERT-statement.
Example:
I've got a table with the attributes name and id. id is a generated value.
INSERT INTO table (name) VALUES('bob');
Now I want to get the id back in the same step. How is this done?
We're using Microsoft SQL Server 2008.
No need for a separate SELECT...
INSERT INTO table (name)
OUTPUT Inserted.ID
VALUES('bob');
This works for non-IDENTITY columns (such as GUIDs) too
Use SCOPE_IDENTITY() to get the new ID value
INSERT INTO table (name) VALUES('bob');
SELECT SCOPE_IDENTITY()
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190315.aspx
INSERT INTO files (title) VALUES ('whatever');
SELECT * FROM files WHERE id = SCOPE_IDENTITY();
Is the safest bet since there is a known issue with OUTPUT Clause conflict on tables with triggers. Makes this quite unreliable as even if your table doesn't currently have any triggers - someone adding one down the line will break your application. Time Bomb sort of behaviour.
See msdn article for deeper explanation:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlprogrammability/archive/2008/07/11/update-with-output-clause-triggers-and-sqlmoreresults.aspx
Entity Framework performs something similar to gbn's answer:
DECLARE #generated_keys table([Id] uniqueidentifier)
INSERT INTO Customers(FirstName)
OUTPUT inserted.CustomerID INTO #generated_keys
VALUES('bob');
SELECT t.[CustomerID]
FROM #generated_keys AS g
JOIN dbo.Customers AS t
ON g.Id = t.CustomerID
WHERE ##ROWCOUNT > 0
The output results are stored in a temporary table variable, and then selected back to the client. Have to be aware of the gotcha:
inserts can generate more than one row, so the variable can hold more than one row, so you can be returned more than one ID
I have no idea why EF would inner join the ephemeral table back to the real table (under what circumstances would the two not match).
But that's what EF does.
SQL Server 2008 or newer only. If it's 2005 then you're out of luck.
There are many ways to exit after insert
When you insert data into a table, you can use the OUTPUT clause to
return a copy of the data that’s been inserted into the table. The
OUTPUT clause takes two basic forms: OUTPUT and OUTPUT INTO. Use the
OUTPUT form if you want to return the data to the calling application.
Use the OUTPUT INTO form if you want to return the data to a table or
a table variable.
DECLARE #MyTableVar TABLE (id INT,NAME NVARCHAR(50));
INSERT INTO tableName
(
NAME,....
)OUTPUT INSERTED.id,INSERTED.Name INTO #MyTableVar
VALUES
(
'test',...
)
IDENT_CURRENT: It returns the last identity created for a particular table or view in any session.
SELECT IDENT_CURRENT('tableName') AS [IDENT_CURRENT]
SCOPE_IDENTITY: It returns the last identity from a same session and the same scope. A scope is a stored procedure/trigger etc.
SELECT SCOPE_IDENTITY() AS [SCOPE_IDENTITY];
##IDENTITY: It returns the last identity from the same session.
SELECT ##IDENTITY AS [##IDENTITY];
##IDENTITY Is a system function that returns the last-inserted identity value.
There are multiple ways to get the last inserted ID after insert command.
##IDENTITY : It returns the last Identity value generated on a Connection in current session, regardless of Table and the scope of statement that produced the value
SCOPE_IDENTITY(): It returns the last identity value generated by the insert statement in the current scope in the current connection regardless of the table.
IDENT_CURRENT(‘TABLENAME’) : It returns the last identity value generated on the specified table regardless of Any connection, session or scope. IDENT_CURRENT is not limited by scope and session; it is limited to a specified table.
Now it seems more difficult to decide which one will be exact match for my requirement.
I mostly prefer SCOPE_IDENTITY().
If you use select SCOPE_IDENTITY() along with TableName in insert statement, you will get the exact result as per your expectation.
Source : CodoBee
The best and most sure solution is using SCOPE_IDENTITY().
Just you have to get the scope identity after every insert and save it in a variable because you can call two insert in the same scope.
ident_current and ##identity may be they work but they are not safe scope. You can have issues in a big application
declare #duplicataId int
select #duplicataId = (SELECT SCOPE_IDENTITY())
More detail is here Microsoft docs
You can use scope_identity() to select the ID of the row you just inserted into a variable then just select whatever columns you want from that table where the id = the identity you got from scope_identity()
See here for the MSDN info http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190315.aspx
Recommend to use SCOPE_IDENTITY() to get the new ID value, But NOT use "OUTPUT Inserted.ID"
If the insert statement throw exception, I except it throw it directly. But "OUTPUT Inserted.ID" will return 0, which maybe not as expected.
This is how I use OUTPUT INSERTED, when inserting to a table that uses ID as identity column in SQL Server:
'myConn is the ADO connection, RS a recordset and ID an integer
Set RS=myConn.Execute("INSERT INTO M2_VOTELIST(PRODUCER_ID,TITLE,TIMEU) OUTPUT INSERTED.ID VALUES ('Gator','Test',GETDATE())")
ID=RS(0)
You can append a select statement to your insert statement.
Integer myInt =
Insert into table1 (FName) values('Fred'); Select Scope_Identity();
This will return a value of the identity when executed scaler.
* Parameter order in the connection string is sometimes important. * The Provider parameter's location can break the recordset cursor after adding a row. We saw this behavior with the SQLOLEDB provider.
After a row is added, the row fields are not available, UNLESS the Provider is specified as the first parameter in the connection string. When the provider is anywhere in the connection string except as the first parameter, the newly inserted row fields are not available. When we moved the the Provider to the first parameter, the row fields magically appeared.
After doing an insert into a table with an identity column, you can reference ##IDENTITY to get the value:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa933167%28v=sql.80%29.aspx

Inserting data into one column fails saying values in another column can't be null

I can't understand this misunderstanding by SQL Server.
As you can see, I'm trying to insert into column Ordamount, but SQL Server shows me in its error message that it can't insert null into column UserID?
Declare #variable1 int =( select sum(Orr.quantity *OI.Iteprice)
from Orderrouter Orr
inner join OrdItem OI on Orr.OrdItems =OI.ItemId
where OrdId = 1)
insert into Ord (Ordamount)
values (#variable1);
Error:
Msg 515, Level 16, State 2, Line 6 Cannot insert the value
NULL into column 'UserID', table 'Example.dbo.Ord'; column does
not allow nulls. INSERT fails.
The statement has been terminated.
For columns in the Ord table that does not allow null by default, you have to provide value for, you cannot skip them. You have to provide value for UserID if it's not Nullable unless it's an identity column
I think the problem is that you only specify the amount when inserting which isn't the primary key in the table, might be an idea to show how the table looks as well. An auto increment on the id column migh solve the problem
Please use a more descriptive title.
Beside this, it seems that the Ord.UserID field is not initialized. Maybe it is not an autoincrement.
Try with this, specifying the UserId value:
INSERT into Ord values(<UserId value here>, #Varaible1)

Will this UPDATE accomplish what I intend it to?

This is probably a very simple question for you SQL folks out there.
I have a temp table (TMP_VALIDATION_DATA) in which I've stored the old and new values of some fields I wish to update in a production table (PROVIDER_SERVICE), plus the uuids of the PROVIDER_SERVICE records that need to be updated.
What I want to accomplish is this, in pseudo-code:
For every prov_svc_uuid uuid in TMP_VALIDATION_DATA table
Set PROVIDER_SERVICE_RATE.END_DATE = NewPvSvcEndDate
Where [uuid in temp table] = [uuid in PROVIDER_SERVICE table]
end for
Is this Update statement going to accomplish what I need?
update PROVIDER_SERVICE
set END_DATE = (
select NewPvSvcEndDate
from TMP_VALIDATION_DATA T
where T.PROVIDER_SERVICE_UUID = PROVIDER_SERVICE.PROVIDER_SERVICE_UUID
)
If my UPDATE is incorrect, will you please provide the correction? Thanks.
Your query will update all records and you might get an error if you have more than one record in your subquery. I would also change your syntax to a JOIN similar to below.
update P
set END_DATE = T.NewPvSvcEndDate
FROM PROVIDER_SERVICE P
JOIN TMP_VALIDATION_DATA T
ON P.PROVIDER_SERVICE_UUID = T.PROVIDER_SERVICE_UUID
If you don't want to UPDATE all records, then add a WHERE clause.
My suggestion is if you don't know how many records would be included in the UPDATE, write your query as a SELECT first, then change it to an UPDATE. So for this one:
SELECT P.END_DATE, T.NewPvSvcEndDate
FROM PROVIDER_SERVICE P
JOIN TMP_VALIDATION_DATA T
ON P.PROVIDER_SERVICE_UUID = T.PROVIDER_SERVICE_UUID
This will either update all records, or error out (not sure what happens when you try to update a column with multiple values like that).

T-SQL: what COLUMNS have changed after an update?

OK. I'm doing an update on a single row in a table.
All fields will be overwritten with new data except for the primary key.
However, not all values will change b/c of the update.
For example, if my table is as follows:
TABLE (id int ident, foo varchar(50), bar varchar(50))
The initial value is:
id foo bar
-----------------
1 hi there
I then execute UPDATE tbl SET foo = 'hi', bar = 'something else' WHERE id = 1
What I want to know is what column has had its value changed and what was its original value and what is its new value.
In the above example, I would want to see that the column "bar" was changed from "there" to "something else".
Possible without doing a column by column comparison? Is there some elegant SQL statement like EXCEPT that will be more fine-grained than just the row?
Thanks.
There is no special statement you can run that will tell you exactly which columns changed, but nevertheless the query is not difficult to write:
DECLARE #Updates TABLE
(
OldFoo varchar(50),
NewFoo varchar(50),
OldBar varchar(50),
NewBar varchar(50)
)
UPDATE FooBars
SET <some_columns> = <some_values>
OUTPUT deleted.foo, inserted.foo, deleted.bar, inserted.bar INTO #Updates
WHERE <some_conditions>
SELECT *
FROM #Updates
WHERE OldFoo != NewFoo
OR OldBar != NewBar
If you're trying to actually do something as a result of these changes, then best to write a trigger:
CREATE TRIGGER tr_FooBars_Update
ON FooBars
FOR UPDATE AS
BEGIN
IF UPDATE(foo) OR UPDATE(bar)
INSERT FooBarChanges (OldFoo, NewFoo, OldBar, NewBar)
SELECT d.foo, i.foo, d.bar, i.bar
FROM inserted i
INNER JOIN deleted d
ON i.id = d.id
WHERE d.foo <> i.foo
OR d.bar <> i.bar
END
(Of course you'd probably want to do more than this in a trigger, but there's an example of a very simplistic action)
You can use COLUMNS_UPDATED instead of UPDATE but I find it to be pain, and it still won't tell you which columns actually changed, just which columns were included in the UPDATE statement. So for example you can write UPDATE MyTable SET Col1 = Col1 and it will still tell you that Col1 was updated even though not one single value actually changed. When writing a trigger you need to actually test the individual before-and-after values in order to ensure you're getting real changes (if that's what you want).
P.S. You can also UNPIVOT as Rob says, but you'll still need to explicitly specify the columns in the UNPIVOT clause, it's not magic.
Try unpivotting both inserted and deleted, and then you could join, looking for where the value has changed.
You could detect this in a Trigger, or utilise CDC in SQL Server 2008.
If you create a trigger FOR AFTER UPDATE then the inserted table will contain the rows with the new values, and the deleted table will contain the corresponding rows with the old values.
Alternative option to track data changes is to write data to another (possible temporary) table and then analyse difference with using XML. Changed data is being write to audit table together with column names. Only one thing is you need to know table fields to prepare temporary table.
You can find this solution here:
part 1
part 2
If you are using SQL Server 2008, you should probably take a look at at the new Change Data Capture feature. This will do what you want.
OUTPUT deleted.bar AS [OLD VALUE], inserted.bar AS [NEW VALUE]
#Calvin I was just basing on the UPDATE example. I am not saying this is the full solution. I was giving a hint that you could do this somewhere in your code ;-)
Since I already got a -1 from the above answer, let me pitch this in:
If you don't really know which Column was updated, I'd say create a trigger and use COLUMNS_UPDATED() function in the body of that trigger (See this)
I have created in my blog a Bitmask Reference for use with this COLUMNS_UPDATED(). It will make your life easier if you decide to follow this path (Trigger + Columns_Updated())
If you're not familiar with Trigger, here's my example of basic Trigger http://dbalink.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/how-to-sql-server-trigger-101/

Resources