i have a view object that contains the following attributes
studentId
courseId
enrollDate
notes
and I have added 2 attributes, which are
studentName
courseName
and I want to select their values from another table(student,course) based on an SQL query.
i have tried to make a default value :SQL
and wrote the following query
select Course.courseName from Course where StudentCourse.CourseId = Course.id
but it didn't work.
You can get their values from an SQL query. This may help. Or this. Or this.
Related
I have a table that I need to add the same values to a whole bunch of items
(in a nut shell if the item doesn't have a UNIT of "CTN" I want to add the same values i have listed to them all)
I thought the following would work but it doesn't :(
Any idea what i am doing wrong ?
INSERT INTO ICUNIT
(UNIT,AUDTDATE,AUDTTIME,AUDTUSER,AUDTORG,CONVERSION)
VALUES ('CTN','20220509','22513927','ADMIN','AU','1')
WHERE ITEMNO In '0','etc','etc','etc'
If I understand correctly you might want to use INSERT INTO ... SELECT from original table with your condition.
INSERT INTO ICUNIT (UNIT,AUDTDATE,AUDTTIME,AUDTUSER,AUDTORG,CONVERSION)
SELECT 'CTN','20220509','22513927','ADMIN','AU','1'
FROM ICUNIT
WHERE ITEMNO In ('0','etc','etc','etc')
The query you needs starts by selecting the filtered items. So it seems something like below is your starting point
select <?> from dbo.ICUNIT as icu where icu.UNIT <> 'CTN' order by ...;
Notice the use of schema name, terminators, and table aliases - all best practices. I will guess that a given "item" can have multiple rows in this table so long as ICUNIT is unique within ITEMNO. Correct? If so, the above query won't work. So let's try slightly more complicated filtering.
select distinct icu.ITEMNO
from dbo.ICUNIT as icu
where not exists (select * from dbo.ICUNIT as ctns
where ctns.ITEMNO = icu.ITEMNO -- correlating the subquery
and ctns.UNIT = 'CTN')
order by ...;
There are other ways to do that above but that is one common way. That query will produce a resultset of all ITEMNO values in your table that do not already have a row where UNIT is "CTN". If you need to filter that for specific ITEMNO values you simply adjust the WHERE clause. If that works correctly, you can use that with your insert statement to then insert the desired rows.
insert into dbo.ICUNIT (...)
select distinct icu.ITEMNO, 'CTN', '20220509', '22513927', 'ADMIN', 'AU', '1'
from ...
;
I'm using Microsoft Query to pull data from MS SQL Server to Excel. Many of my tables have the same column names, for example:
[task].[active]
[user].[active]
[task].[name]
[user].[name]
When I pivot in Excel, only the column names are shown. A pivot filter might have multiple fields called "active" which is very confusing.
I'd like to alias every column with the table name it's from, so that in the filter it would say "task_active" and "user_active". My Excel SELECT statement would be:
SELECT active AS task_active, name AS task_name FROM task...
Is there a quick way to prepend the table name to an alias using a formatting tool? I have Apex SQL Refactor, and Notepad++ but I haven't found a way to do this without having to manually type all of the column names again.
If you populate resultset to datatable then datatable to excel then it will automatically change duplicate column name to col1,col2 etc.
This is not your requirement.you want it to be specific.
Method 1 . Create temp table with desire column name
Insert the result in #temp table
Return #temp table result set
Method 2 : Use dynamic query.
Wht your real query look like ?
I need to run a query in a MS Access Database providing some parameters from a form. Imagine the next example:
I have a form which contains:
CheckBox1 and Text1
CheckBox2 and Text2
Button (to run query)
Now imagine a query with two fields: ID, NAME.
I want to filter ID by Text1 only when CheckBox1 is enabled. If not, I want the query not to filter ID in any way (as if the 'query' input was empty).
In the same way, I want to filter NAME by Text2 only when CheckBox2 is enabled. If not, I want the query not to filter NAME in any way (just like ID before).
I've tried so many things for a couple of days and have sniffed tons of internet pages and still don't come up with a solution.
You can use a SQL query such as the following:
select * from YourTable t
where
([Forms]![YourForm]![CheckBox1] = False or t.ID = [Forms]![YourForm]![Text1]) and
([Forms]![YourForm]![CheckBox2] = False or t.NAME = [Forms]![YourForm]![Text2])
(Change YourTable to the name of your table and YourForm to the name of your form; t is merely an alias so that you only have to change the table name in one place in the code).
I'm trying to create a check constraint on a table so that ParentID is never a descendant of current record
For instance, I have a table Categories, with the following fields ID, Name, ParentID
I have the following CTE
WITH Children AS (SELECT ID AS AncestorID, ID, ParentID AS NextAncestorID FROM Categories UNION ALL SELECT Categories.ID, Children.ID, Categories.ParentID FROM Categories JOIN Children ON Categories.ID = Children.NextAncestorID) SELECT ID FROM Children where AncestorID =99
The results here are correct, but when I try to add it as a constraint to the table like this:
ALTER TABLE dbo.Categories ADD CONSTRAINT CK_Categories CHECK (ParentID NOT IN(WITH Children AS (SELECT ID AS AncestorID, ID, ParentID AS NextAncestorID FROM Categories UNION ALL SELECT Categories.ID, Children.ID, Categories.ParentID FROM Categories JOIN Children ON Categories.ID = Children.NextAncestorID) SELECT ID FROM Children where AncestorID =ID))
I get the following error:
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'with'. If this statement is a
common table expression, an xmlnamespaces clause or a change tracking
context clause, the previous statement must be terminated with a
semicolon.
Adding a semicolon before the WITH, didn't help.
What would be the correct way to do this?
Thanks!
Per the SQL Server documentation on column constraints:
CHECK
Is a constraint that enforces domain integrity by limiting the possible values that can be entered into a column or columns.
logical_expression
Is a logical expression used in a CHECK constraint and returns TRUE or FALSE. logical_expression used with CHECK constraints cannot reference another table but can reference other columns in the same table for the same row. The expression cannot reference an alias data type.
(The above was quoted from the SQL Server 2017 version of the documentation, but the general principle applies to all previous versions as well, and you didn't state what version you are working with.)
The important part here is the "cannot reference another table, but can reference other columns in the same table for the same row" (emphasis added). A CTE would count as another table.
As such, you can't have a complex query like a CTE used for a CHECK constraint.
Like Saman suggested, if you want to check against existing data in other rows, and it must be in the DB layer, you could do it as a trigger.
However, triggers have their own drawbacks (e.g. issues with discoverability, behavior that is unexpected by those who are unaware of the trigger's presence).
As Sami suggested in their comment, another option is a UDF, but that's not w/o its own issues, potentially with both performance and stability according to the answers on this question about this approach in SQL Server 2008. It's probably still applicable to later versions as well.
If possible, I would say it's usually best to move that logic into the application layer. I see from your comment that you already have "client-side" validation. If there is an app server between that client and the database server (such as in a web app), I would suggest putting that additional validation there (in the app server) instead of in the database.
I have a model named Product , it's attributes name, quantity
I tried to use ActiveRecord to group by name in postgresql database and it was not working
This is errors:
Product Load (53.6ms) SELECT "".* FROM "products" GROUP BY name
PG::GroupingError: ERROR: column "products.id" must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function
LINE 1: SELECT "products".* FROM "products" GROUP BY name
^
=> #<Product::ActiveRecord_Relation:0x4d26424>
Thank you for any answer!
I would like to lead you to http://guides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_querying.html#group
Here is a example
For example, if you want to find a collection of the dates orders were created on:
Product.select('name').group("name")
Product.select('name, sku').group("name, sku")
Note you need a select