Attached is an image of what I am receiving when I try to bundle my project for production. I am receiving a Unexpected token name <<Object>>, expected punc <<,>> message as shown in the image.
Terminal output of error
Not sure what the issue is but I have tried to use uglify-es and uglify-js and get the same error. I even attempted to make a simple app using es6+ code to see if uglify-js worked and it did. So some of the older threads on the internet mentioning that uglify-js won't handle es6+ code might be irrelevant now. I also read somewhere that the newest version (3.x) does support it but haven't been able to confirm that.
I would love to show some code but not sure what relevant piece of code I need to show. As per the image it also mentions the line, col, pos etc... but the code on that line does not start at the col number mentioned.
I will definitely update this post as I investigate but any tips or ideas would be great!
So the issue is now resolved after some thorough research. It looks like the line 1665 I was looking at in my non-optimised bundle app.js was not what I needed to look at (obvious since the column index was way off).
So instead I decided to output the bundle generated code that FuseBox was working on and it was in-fact different. This is the line I added in node_modules/fuse-box/quantum/plugin/BundleWriter.js inside the uglifyBundle function to output the content so I could read it clearly.
fs.writeFile('bundle.txt', bundle.generatedCode);
The output in bundle.txt that was the issue and my actual TypeScript code is shown here:
// bundle.txt line 1665
this.wholesalerSettings = [object Object]
// actual project code
constructor() {
this.wholesalerSettings = process.env.WHOLESALERSETTINGS;
this.API = this.setHostUrl();
}
So I took a look in my fuse.ts file and noticed I was not parsing the json object correctly.
public get wholesalerSettings()
{
const wholesaler = require(`./src/~/wholesalers/${this.wholesaler}/config.json`);
return JSON.stringify(wholesaler);
}
// then down in the environment plugin
EnvPlugin({
WHOLESALERSETTINGS: this.wholesalerSettings,
IMAGE_PATH: this.imagePath
}),
Once I parsed the object correctly with JSON.stringify it worked perfectly as process.env.WHOLESALERSETTINGS was now a JSON string instead of an Object.
First time I really dealt with devops stuff but was fun and at the same time highly stressful. I guess the main thing I learned is when you are dealing with tooling and third party tools (FuseBox uses uglify-js) then you need to take a closer look at the input that is being given to that tool rather than the output like I was at first.
UglifyJS says it sees Object where it's expecting a ,, so we can infer:
The code you wrote (or generated by some other tool right before uglifyJS processes it, e.g. babel? Though you probably don't use babel since your uglifyJS deals with es6 directly) is "Object" where the error occurs.
It's expecting a ,, so the error is occuring at some place like multiple variable declaration, let foo, bar, or object/array definition, [1, 2] {foo: 1, bar: 2}
Related
[enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/lON9e.png)
I'm writing code for a task in a react course and after the file is saved it simply changes what I wrote and a bunch of errors appear and o I don't know why. The first pic is what I wrote, and the second one what happened after I saved the file. Can someone tell me why this is happening?
This never happened to any other code I wrote before.
Your VS Code settings are probably set to run a linter (ESLint maybe?) when you save your file. You can check your settings in the VS Code workspace settings: https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/getstarted/settings. If you hover over the red squiggly lines it will hint at the errors in your code.
It's been awhile since I've worked in React, but I think you might need to wrap your return in a string literal (backticks: ``). You also might want to use Typescript or JSX with React.
You can also post a sample on Stackblitz https://stackblitz.com/ if you want more help.
I'm testing an application that calls one API, gets a bunch of work orders, then only the work order ID's are passed to another API to display on the page.
The format they need to be in is: {"workOrderIds":["12345","123456"]}
I'm using the JSON Extractor with the following Path Expressions:
$..workOrderNumber
then I'm using the JSR223 PostProcessor and using the following script:
props.put("workOrderNumber", "${workOrderNumber}";
The problem is, that its creating the object like so when I add the variable into the POST Request body of the second request:
{"workOrderIds":["12345, 123456"]}
essentially, I just need to make sure that each value has quotations, but not sure how to make this happen. Sorry if this seems simple, I'm fairly new to QA and have spent several hours trying to figure this out.
We cannot provide a comprehensive answer without seeing the source JSON, maybe it worth trying explicitly casting the filtering result to an Integer like:
vars.put('workOrderIds', new groovy.json.JsonBuilder(new groovy.json.JsonSlurper().parse(prev.getResponseData()).findResults { entry -> entry.workOrderNumber as int }).toPrettyString())
More information:
Apache Groovy - Parsing and producing JSON
Apache Groovy - Why and How You Should Use It
I am using create-react-app and its typescript template, but when trying to retrieve the type of the property 'pending' in 'GenericAsyncThunk' like in redux-toolkit docs like this:
type PendingAction = ReturnType<GenericAsyncThunk["pending"]>;
I get an error: Parsing error: Unexpected token, expected "]"
Edit: looks like the errors only shows up on my machine and works in CodeSandbox. The error appears when the project is ran with the command npm start. Here is the full output:
Any suggestions on how to tackle this?
Probably the actual parse error is a bit earlier in the file and the line it reports on is not the line with the error, but rather the line at which it has to give up, since it can't make any further sense of the file.
Try removing elements before this structure, or move this structure further up the page to see if you can prove the theory.
My spacevim config file: init.toml
[[layers]]
name = "lang#javascript"
auto_fix = true
enable_flow_syntax = true
To get Vim to support a certain syntax, it has to be given the relevant .syntax file. This can be done manually, or by installing a plugin that loads it for you.
I've never used SpaceVim (I used SpaceMacs once, a couple eons ago), but looking through its documentation, the [[custom_plugins]] section looks promising. I've mocked up an example to get you started:
[[custom_plugins]]
name = "MaxMEllon/vim-jsx-pretty"
merged = false
However, this method will only yield limited results. This will only get Vim to recognize the syntax and highlight accordingly; if you want full linting capability, it looks like this GitHub user created a script to modify the bootstrap#after section of SpaceVim to use ESLint, which supports JSX. Note that you have to have ESLint installed for that to work.
For anything this "extreme", it looks like modifying the bootstrap.vim file is the only real way to go. In case you ever want to do further customization outside of SpaceVim defaults, I highly recommend getting Vim/neovim and installing the plugins yourself.
I'm creating a route using the Java DSL in Camel.
I'd like to perform a text substitution without creating a new processor or bean.
I have this:
.setHeader(MY_THING,
constant(my_template.replace("{id1}", simple("${header.subs_val}").getText())))
If I don't add 'constant' I get type mismatch errors. If I don't put getText() on the simple() part, I get text mismatch answers. When I run my route, it replaces {id} with the literal ${header.subs_val} instead of fetching my value from the header. Yet if I take the quotes off, I get compile errors; Java doesn't know the ${...} syntax of course.
Deployment takes a few minutes, so experiments are expensive.
So, how can I just do a simple substitution. Nothing I am finding on the web actually seems to work.
EDIT - what is the template? Specifically, a string (it's a URL)
http://this/that/{id1}/another/thing
I've inherited some code, so I am unable to simply to(...) the URL and apply the special .tof() (??) formatting.
Interesting case!
If you place my_template in a header you could use a nested simple expression(Camel 2.9 onwards) like in the example below. I am also setting a value to subs_val for the example, but I suppose your header has already a value in the route.
.setHeader("my_template", constant("http://this/that/{id1}/another/thing"))
.setHeader("subs_val",constant("22"))
.setHeader("MY_THING",simple("${in.header.my_template.replaceAll(\"\\{id1.?\",${in.header.subs_val.toString()})}"))
After this step header MY_THING has the value http://this/that/22/another/thing.
1)In this example I could skip to_String() but I do not know what's the type of your header "subs_val" .
2) I tried first with replaceAll(\"\{id1\"}\") but it didn't work with } Probably this is a bug...Will look at it again. That's why in my regex I used .?
3) When you debug your application inside a processor, where the exchange is available you can use SimpleBuilder to evaluate a simple expression easily in your IDE, without having to restart your app
SimpleBuilder.simple("${in.header.url.replaceAll(\"\\{id1.?\",${in.header.subs_val.toString()})}").evaluate(exchange, String.class);
Hope it helped :)