Does somebody have somewhere a simple Component example of Algolia Places used with react-instantsearch ?
I am desperately trying to mix the two of them, but I can't figure out what to use : ? how ?
It's written in the docs that we should have a HTMLInputElement as a required container option, so how do you deal with React where you shouldn't be able to touch the DOM ?
Cheers
Arnaud
There is no sample available yet; However you can take a look at a few non-official implementations:
https://www.npmjs.com/package/react-places-autocomplete
https://www.npmjs.com/package/algolia-places-react
https://www.npmjs.com/package/react-algolia-places
We'll be building an official one soon.
While waiting for Algolia to develop their own stuff, a simple solution exists, built here :
Go to https://www.algolia.com/users/sign_up/places to get an API Key and an API Id (it's the most difficult part actually, as getting to this URL naturally on Algolia's website is so difficult that I didn't succeed yet).
Get algolia-places-react, which is the package most customisable.
Fill in your options as per the Read Me, and you're good to go !
Related
Whenever i create a contact form in my Joomla! 3.3.6, some script appears in the the page's HTML code that contains many words Joomla in it. I'd like to change those Joomla words and replace them with another words (i.e. Foo) for some security issue. I'd like to know whether or not i'm able to do so and how.
That script is:
<script>(function(){var strings={"JLIB_FORM_FIELD_INVALID":"\u0641\u06cc\u0644\u062f \u0646\u0627\u0645\u0639\u062a\u0628\u0631: "};if(typeof Joomla=='undefined'){Joomla={};Joomla.JText=strings;}
else{Joomla.JText.load(strings);}})();</script>
I have no idea whether a plugin or an extension creates it or not.
Thank you
Regards
This script seems to be translating some text required for the form to use in its javascript, eg validation messages. It does this using a javascript version of JText, which is part of core Joomla. There is some info on how that works here. Weirdly, there seems to be little information in the official Joomla documentation about it.
The main JText function it is calling appears here: media/system/js/core.js
I'm sure it would be possible to write a plug-in to remove this script before the page is rendered and then to translate any untranslated text with your own scripts. However, I'm not sure I see any security benefit in doing this so it seems a waste of time.
Ultimately, someone sniffing a site for what it is built in is far more likely to see if core files exist by going direct to places like media/system/js/core.js, rather than to scan the code for the word "Joomla" - which would trigger a lot of false-positives (any site which just mentions Joomla) and negatives (any page which doesn't have a form on it). It also does not reveal the version of Joomla, which is the info a hacker would more likely be after.
I think you have to search for the script (i.e via Notepad++) in the whole directory. It must be a plugin for the contact form that has some inline script in it.
also do you use any special third party plugin or so? that might be the source of it.
PS: also i had some similar experience, i don't know exactly how i got rid of those words, but like you, i wanted to do that to hide the fact that i'm using joomla for security.
Its actually Joomla who add this, from the file: Joomlainstall/libraries/joomla/document/html/renderer/head.php
And load it globaly from:
Joomlainstall/libraries/cms/html/formbehavior.php
The developer ad that code by using the function, JText, for an example:
JText::_( 'COM_CONTACT_EMAIL_FORM' )
In my case it was the plugin ContactUs Form who add the javascript. If JText is not used, it is not loaded. If I disabled the plugin, the javascript was then not loaded. If you have that plugin enabled, my be try an other contact form?
For security reson it is bad programming by the developer off Joomla, for sure.
I'm trying to provide a chat like environment game for kids to detect if the person speaking to them is human or not (similar to what Eugene did).
I'm looking for an SDK or api that would provide me with replies for sentences (either with context of the entire conversation or without). An alternative would be a an entire database of sentences that I'll be able to search for myself and implement my own logic.
Another option is to integrate some kind of open source solution if possible.
Does anyone know of such a service \ solution can could point me to the correct direction?
If you want some database of discusions then try to found some Corpus of dialogs this is the first one which i found. It is the corpus of movie dialogs:
http://www.mpi-sws.org/~cristian/Cornell_Movie-Dialogs_Corpus.html
And if you want some chat-bot to use in your program than is probably easiest way to use some public available api of one. There is again something which could work for you:
http://blog.program-o.com/chatbot-api/
Good Luck
Is there any way to auto-generate Swagger documentation (or similar) for a Nancy service?
I found Nancy.Swagger, but there's no information on how to use it and the demo application doesn't seem to demonstrate generating documentation (if it does, it's not obvious).
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
In my current project I've been looking a lot into this problem. I used both nancy.swagger and nancy.swagger.attributes.
I quickly discarded Nancy.swagger, because for me personally it doesn't sound right that you have to create a pure documentation class for each nancy module. The attributes solution was a bit "cleaner" - at least codebase and documentation were in one place. But very fast this became unmaintainable. Module code is unreadable because of many attributes. Nothing is generated automatically: you have to put path, all parameters, even http method as an attribute. This is a huge effort duplication. Problems came very fast, a few examples:
I changed POST to PUT in Nancy and forgot to update [Method] attribute.
I added a parameter but not the attribute for it.
I changed parameter from path to query and didn't update the attribute.
It's too easy to forget to update the attributes (let alone documentation module solution), which leads to discrepancies between your documentation and actual code base. Our UI team is in another country and they had some trouble using the APIs because docu just wasn't up-to-date.
My solution? Don't mix code and documentation. Generating docu from code (like Swashbuckle does) IS ok, but actually writing docu in code and try to dublicate the code in docu is NOT. It's not better than writing it in a Word document for your clients.
If you want Swagger docu, just do it the Swagger way.
- Spend some time with Swagger.Editor and really author your API in
YAML. It looks all-text and hard, but once you get used to it, it's
not.
- Spend some time with Swagger.Codegen and adapt it (it already does a fair job for generating Nancy server code and with a few
adjustments to moustache templates it was just what I needed).
- Automate your process: write a couple of batches to generate your modules and models from yaml and copy them to your repository.
Benefits? Quite a few:
-
Your YAML definition is now the single truth of your REST contract.
If somewhere something is defferent, it's wrong.
Nancy server code is auto-generated
Client code-bases are auto-generated (in our case it's android, ios and angular)
So whenever I change something in REST contract, all codebases are regenerated and added to projects in one batch. I just have to tell the teams something was updated. They don't have to look through some documents and search for it. They just have their code regenerated and probably see some compile errors, in case of breaking changes.
Do I still use nancy.swagger(.annotations)?
Yes, I do use it in another project, which has just one endpoint with a couple of methods. They don't change often. It's not worth the effort to set up everything, I have my swagger docu fast up and running. But if your project is big, API is changing, and you have multiple code-bases depending on your API, my advice is to invest some time into a real swagger setup.
I am quoting the author answer here from https://github.com/khellang/Nancy.Swagger/issues/59
The installation should be really simple, just pull down the NuGet package, add metadata modules to describe your routes, and hit /api-docs. That should get you the JSON. If you want to add swagger-ui as well, you have to add that manually right now.
No. Not in an automated. https://github.com/yahehe/Nancy.Swagger needs lots of manually created metadata.
There is a nice article here: http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/article/generating-api-document-in-nancy-using-swagger/
Looks like you still have to add swagger-ui separately.
i have something here that is basically from jqueryui. Yes, it is raw and the example uses JSON to handle the autocompleting process. My back end developers are using python on GAE and they usually just draw data out from the gql direct and dump it into the webpage. i need this function to create tags just like stackoverflow. What is the best practice in my situation here?
Whiff includes support for both GAE, jqueryUI, and AJAX that works really well for me. Have a look at http://whiffdoc.appspot.com -- particularly the tutorials.
which one is better for screen scraping? simple html dom or snoopy ??
i use simple html dom and find it comfortable..
does snoopy has any advantage over simple html dom?
my requirements : if i wanna scrape contents from a page(after login)..
simple html dom is easy but it takes a lotta time to print the results..
Is Snoopy that well known / mature of a package?
If it's not, then all other things being equal, I'd probably go with generic HTML DOM code - especially if the scraping is somewhat simple.
But only you know when your code is starting to get too big, unmanageable, etc., at which point it might be better to look at another tool out there like Snoopy.
(Which, admittedly, I don't have experience with; it's apparently at http://sourceforge.net/projects/snoopy/ for those not familiar with it - "Snoopy is a PHP class that simulates a web browser. It automates the task of retrieving web page content and posting forms, for example.")
The real reason I'm posting, even though I don't know Snoopy per se and thus can't definitively answer your question, is to ask if you've considered using Selenium (http://www.seleniumhq.org/) instead of Snoopy.
Selenium is a fairly well-known testing tool, and it occurred to me that one of the nice things about using that for what you're doing (if you can) is that it has built in tests.
The reason that's good is that screen scraping is kind of an inherently brittle task - if the target site changes something, blam, your scraping fails. So it's kind of a nice design to have an automated scrape/test-that-scraping-worked system.
Something to think about, anyway.
I've stumbled into BeautifulSoup, which is Python-based. I suppose there are a bunch of others too.
Looks like Snoopy is PHP-based, and hence can be run server-side only. Is this what you are really looking for? What are your requirements? Please elaborate on that.