I got Azure AD B2C up and running in my ASP.NET Core web app. But I wonder what's the best way to actually approve new users when they sign up? Is there anything built-in?
Now, anyone can click on Sign-Up link and there you go, you provide your data and click a button. And you're in my tenant Azure AD B2C directory! Now, I'd like to have some control over this.
Did I mention every user costs $1/month when you want to customize Azure AD UI??? (as far as I understand it, correct me if I'm wrong). So if someone goes and sign up 1000 users I'll have to pay for it $1000??
At this time there is not built-in support for user sign up approval workflows.
You can achieve this by:
Having a custom attribute to determine whether a user has been "approved" or not. You would let users sign up by themselves and you would create an experience or flow that queries the Azure AD Graph for users that haven't been "approved" and then either approve them or delete them.
Building an invitation flow. When you invite a user, you'd create the user through the Azure AD Graph. You would then direct your users to the Password Reset policy as their "account verification" flow.
As for your pricing question, if you customize the UI via the newer unified sign-up/sign-in policies, you'll only pay the regular Azure AD B2C pricing model: between $0.0011 and $0.00063 per user depending on how many you have.
Customizing the UI in the older sign-up policy is not really available. As a workaround, you can use Azure AD Premium's company branding feature which is the one that costs $1 per user. If this is the route you are pursuing, I'd recommend voting for this ask: Fully Customizable Sign-In Page.
Related
I have an app (ASP.Net Classic) that is using Azure AD authentication. Now, we want to allow user outside of the organization to sign in. I read few document B2C and B2B, but I am unable to see which one to good for me.
I am looking that members in the organization should sign in and doesn't have to create new account. One of the option B2B suggested that to add user to in AD as a guest user but this is the manual process, it would be good if it can be automated. Also that doesn't describe how user would send the request to for login info.
It depends on your use case.
Imagine a large company. They have Azure AD for their employees. Now they want some suppliers to have access to their billing system. Those suppliers are guest users. That's B2B.
For guest users, an admin can send an invitation email that contains a redemption link.
B2C is for the customers of the company. They use the company's e-commerce system. They do not need access to the billing system.
B2C is self-service i.e. these users self-register and can change their profile or reset their password.
I'm adding an external identity provider, Azure multi-tenant, as a login option. I have local accounts right now and they know nothing about Azure AD users.
I want to create an Azure Enterprise App that other tenants can use to set up SSO using OpenID Connect. Also I want the app to support User Provisioning by setting up a SCIM API.
I can't really find any documents on how to handle linking Azure AD users with the existing accounts in my IDP. I've seen examples where users can login using their local account, authenticate with Azure, and then their local account is updated to have the Azure AD User ID. This approach still seems pretty manual. Another thought was to have a step in the login journey, where if no local account has the Azure AD User ID then find a local account with the same email. I don't like this approach either since the emails might not always match. Is there an approach where an admin can automatically link all accounts with a sync or upload?
SYSTEMS
First it's worth clarifying roles:
Role
Details
Authorization Server (AS)
Your UIs and APIs receive tokens from this. It is where accounts and linked accounts are stored. It is where you use SCIM to update account records. It is where you apply account linking logic.
Identity Provider (IDP)
There can be multiple of these. When your apps call the AS it manages connections to them, and exchanges IDP tokens for AS tokens that are returned to apps. It is not usual to use SCIM against an IDP.
You are using IdentityServer as the AS so your UIs and APIs will continue to use IdentityServer tokens and remain simple. Meanwhile Azure AD will become an alternative IDP. So on the data side of things your architecture is in a good place.
AUTHENTICATION ACTIONS
I would aim to solve your problems via custom authentication actions, and to design this in a vendor agnostic way. Not all providers support these concepts, but IdentityServer has some pretty good extensibility features, so hopefully it has what you need.
A bit of code, configuration and technical investigations in IdentityServer feel like the correct direction, with no complexity added to your applications. I will describe techniques in terms of Curity (where I work), but the same principles can apply to any system.
USERNAME AUTHENTICATOR
A great way to deal with user specific differences is to make the initial screen prompt only for an email. See this example for how that looks. Later, when authentication has completed, you could set a cookie so that this screen is not shown on subsequent logins.
Then, before asking for credentials, apply some scripted logic, eg to look up existing account attributes, and decide how the user should authenticate. You might decide to route unknown users to Azure AD or do something based on business partner email suffixes.
DATA UPDATES
Something simple that might work in advance of adding Azure AD support is to assign all users a Tenant ID, and perhaps existing users get a Tenant ID of 1. Only those users are allowed to sign in with Identity Server - all others have to use Azure AD.
SCRIPTED LOGIC AND ACCOUNT LINKING
For a worked example of how this looks, see this Account Linking with Facebook tutorial. In this example the objective is to update the main account with a new linked account. This account linking doc may give you some additional ideas for your scenario. It should be possible to run custom logic before triggering authentication or once your have the Azure IDP attributes.
INVOLVE THE USER IF NEEDED
It may also be useful to present a custom screen to ask the user if they have an existing account when they first login via Azure AD. If not then an Azure AD login can create the primary account in IdentityServer data in addition to a linked account.
USERS AND PARTNERS
How users onboard is interesting, and discussed in this detailed article. I always start by getting a feel for the type of assets involved:
Type
Description
Personal Assets
You allow any user to sign up and they only have access to their own assets
Corporate Assets
Users are provisioned by an administrator, eg a banker is granted access to financial data according to business rules
In your case it feels like users are from the second category, so to enable a user to fully sign up you need data from the partner, either fed in manually or by getting them to call your API, before you can assign the user the correct tenant ID. This might eventually result in TenantID=23, but there is nothing to stop you initially allowing users to onboard and placing them in a default TenantID=0 bucket.
Ultimately this all comes down to data, claims and API authorization. Eg APIs could return certain data to TenantID=0 users but only return privileged data to users whose tenant ID has been asserted by an administrator. Not sure if these thoughts of mine match your scenario but hopefully they provide a useful hint or two.
SUMMARY
Reliable account linking is tricky, but it should be solvable via the building blocks of the Authorization Server, using the above techniques. The end result should be deterministic user data, with no duplicate users.
Is there a way to prevent users from logging into their own AAD tenants? For example, allow login to contoso.onmicrosoft.com but not fabrikam.onmicrosoft.com.
My customer has a highly-controlled Azure environment where they are running some servers and PaaS/SaaS applications. Users connect to those servers are use a variety of Azure services and some SaaS (primary concern is PowerBI). They’re concerned that a user could login with a non-company account (wahid#hotmail.com) and then upload sensitive data their own PowerBI workspace.
You cannot prevent a user who has already been in the tenant to login to that AAD tenant, except deleting the user from that tenant.
If one account was created/invited to one tenant, the user just can login to that tenant.
For the scenario you described, I suggest you could revoke the Product license for those users. If you don't assign product license to the user, the user cannot use that App or cannot see that app in My Apps panel. For other SaaS/PaaS app(Web App), you may use user assignment to allow specific users to access the App.
For others: Daniel answered this for me. Short answer, this isn't easy, you would need to inspect the response body for the tenant ID (or name) and then block it. This would also lead to a poor user experience but that's all we can do today.
Yes, you have a few options.
Option 1: Single tenant apps
If you have the ability to create apps in the tenant you want to accept users from, you can mark your app as available to only this tenant (the field is called availableToOtherTenants). This will notify the token service to only authorize access from users in the tenant the app was created in.
Option 2: Multi-tenant app w/ token validation
The other option is to mark your app as multi-tenant (same field as above, just set to true) and implement logic in your app to validate the user's tenant from which the token was issued.
In this scenario, you will need to have some kind of web service that can safely validate access tokens (.NET code sample on this). To check the tenant the user's account belongs to, you'll need to validate the iss field. It'll look something like this,
"iss": "https://sts.windows.net/7fe81447-da57-4385-becb-6de57f21477e/"
in which the GUID represents the tenant ID. This allows your web API to have an allow or deny list based off tenant IDs.
More help
Here's an excellent blog post on token validation.
Azure AD Developer Docs
.NET Web API Code Sample
I'm building a service where each user has a calendar, I want to sync users 365 calendar events into their calendar, the tricky part seems to be, that this should be done repeatable by background job on the server, to keep them in sync.
I feel like I've read a bible of documentation from Microsoft, but still gotten nowhere. I eventually stumbled upon this article https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/active-directory-v2-protocols-oauth-client-creds which allows a server to query the graph api, on behalf of users. This is exactly what I want.
Having created a Azure account, and Active Directory service, I found that only users within the tenant can use this, which makes it rather useless, requiring to add users manually from azure panel.
AADSTS50020: User account 'm#****.com' from identity provider 'live.com' does not exist in tenant 'Default Directory' and cannot access the application 'c0193dea-5145-430a-9c90-325f1229a1fc' in that tenant. The account needs to be added as an external user in the tenant first. Sign out and sign in again with a different Azure Active Directory user account.
So I'm back at square one, how can I achieve what I described?
I'm not looking for a code implementation, merely a description of how to navigate the monstrosity of Microsoft.
Thank you
Update: Accordingly to Marc link. I tried to flick the multi tenant option, and change the endpoint to use common instead of tenant id. Sadly i'm still getting the same error.
You cannot sign-in to AAD with a non-AAD account using the v1 Endpoint. If you want to use a consumer Microsoft Account (#outlook.com, #hotmail.com, #live.com) then you need to use the Converged Auth model provided by the v2 Endpoint.
I have a walkthrough for the v2 Endpoint that you might find helpful: Microsoft v2 Endpoint Primer. It is similar to the v1 Endpoint but you'll need to register via https://apps.dev.microsoft.com rather than the Azure Portal. Also, v2 apps use Scopes instead of Resources and are multi-tenant out of the box.
This is a broad a question for Stack Overflow. That said, you're incorrect about Azure AD. It is absolutely not limited to a single-tenant. You do however need to register it as a multi-tenant application:
How to sign in any Azure Active Directory (AD) user using the multi-tenant application pattern
I created a "Web app / API" app in our organization's "xxx.onmicrosoft.com" Azure Active Directory. The app's "Multi-tenanted" property has been set to "Yes".
We configured OpenID Connect (we use https://github.com/mitreid-connect/) to use the following URLs:
https://login.microsoftonline.com/common/oauth2/authorize
https://login.microsoftonline.com/common/oauth2/token
Please note that we used "common" in the URLs and we didn't use "xxx.onmicrosoft.com" because we want people from outside "xxx.onmicrosoft.com" to be able to authenticate and access our app.
With those settings, the people from xxx.onmicrosoft.com can properly authenticate and access the app.
However, when I use my personal live.com account (with username xxx#gmail.com) to access the app, I get AADSTS50020 error. I am able to properly authenticate with my xxx#gmail.com account, but I do not get redirected to the Reply URL. I'm stuck on Microsoft's Web page with the following error msg:
AADSTS50020: User account 'xxx#gmail.com' from identity provider
'live.com' does not exist in tenant 'xxx.onmicrosoft.com' and cannot
access the application '391e7103-ZZZZ-zz87-xxxx-7xxxxxd5xxxx' in that
tenant. The account needs to be added as an external user in the
tenant first. Sign out and sign in again with a different Azure Active
Directory user account.
What configuration do I need to change if I want people from any identity provider to be able to access my app ?
Like it has been stated here, I expected that people from anywhere could access my app without requiring more configuration on my side.
I'm asking this question because I'm in the process of getting certified for AppSource and this currently blocks me from being able to do so.
AppSource only requires work accounts to sign-in. You are using an #gmail account - which is a personal account - and because you are using the Azure Active Directory v1 endpoint in addition to common (https://login.microsoftonline.com/common), it can't accept personal accounts to sign-in directly - only work accounts.
You have three options:
If sign-in personal accounts is not a requirement for your application, then you can continue using the v1 endpoint and use a work account to sign-in/test your application. This will make you ready for AppSource certification.
If you need/ want to allow personal accounts in your application in addition to work accounts, then you can consider using the v2 endpoint (https://login.microsoftonline.com/common/v2.0) for Azure Active Directory. The v2 endpoint allow both personal accounts and work accounts to sign-in with no effort.A note is the v2 endpoint has some limitations: if you can live with these limitations (for example, your application only needs to sign-in users and eventually make queries against Graph API), then in general it should be fine to use, but if you need extra features like protecting your own Web API with scopes, then this feature is not released at this point (as November 2017). Please read this document for an updated list of limitations of the v2 endpoint.
A third (but less recommended option for AppSource) is to keep using the v1 endpoint and make your application to be single tenant - which is to change the endpoint from https://login.microsoftonline.com/common to https://login.microsoftonline.com/{yourtenantid}, and then use B2B invitations API to invite every external users (including work and personal accounts) to be part of your Azure AD tenant/organization. More information about B2B here as well.
The option '3' above have some consequences for management as well for AppSource: by using this option, you are required to have one Azure Active Directory tenant (if you don't have a tenant already, you can get one using these instructions), and the users being invited will be guests accounts of this tenant - this mean that you need to invite every external user to your application/ tenant. A multi-tenant application allows any user from any organization to sign-in to your application with less management on your side. In general for SaaS applications, multi-tenant configuration is recommended.
For AppSource, also the option '3' leads to a less-immersive user experience (Partner led trial), where the end user won't be able to access your application's demo right away - mainly because that they have to wait for the invitation's email and accept it (user has to accept being guest of your tenant) so that they can access your application.
For more information about AppSource requirements and trial options - please see this article.