I am trying to build hierarchies by nesting queries on the same table in MS SQL Server 2014.
To give an example of what I am trying to achieve:
I have a table 'employees' whith the following columns:
[ID],[First Name],[Last Name],[ReportsTo]
{1},{John},{Doe},{2}
{2},{Mary},{Miller},{NULL}
I am trying to build a statement, where I join the employees table with itself and where I build a hierarchy with the boss on top.
Expected Result:
[Employee],[Boss]
{Miller,Mary},{NULL}
{Doe, John},{Miller,Mary}
I apologize, if this is a stupid question, but I fail to create a working nested query.
Could you please help me with that?
Thank you very much in advance
Based on the intended results, it looks like what you essentially want is a list of employees. So let's start with that:
SELECT LastName, FirstName, ReportsTo FROM Employees
This gives you the list, so you now have the objects you're looking for. But you need to fill out more data. You want to follow ReportsTo and show data from the record to which that points as well. This would be done exactly as it would if the foreign key pointed to a different table. (The only difference from being the same table is that you must use table aliases in the query, since you're including the same table twice.)
So let's start by joining the table:
SELECT e.LastName, e.FirstName, e.ReportsTo
FROM Employees e
LEFT OUTER JOIN Employees b on e.ReportsTo = b.ID
The results should still be the same, but now you have more data to select from. So you can add the new columns to the SELECT clause:
SELECT
e.LastName AS EmployeeLastName,
e.FirstName AS EmployeeFirstName,
b.LastName AS BossLastName,
b.FirstName AS BossFirstName
FROM Employees e
LEFT OUTER JOIN Employees b on e.ReportsTo = b.ID
It's a join like any other, it just happens to be a join to the same table.
Related
I'm new to databases and I'm having a hard time figuring this out. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated
Deliveries Table
-- ID (PK)
-- DriverID (FK to Drivers Table)
Drivers Table
-- ID (PK)
-- LocationID (FK to Locations Table)
Locations Table
-- ID (PK)
-- RestaurantID (FK to Restaurants Table)
Restaurant Table
--ID (PK)
A Restaurant can have multiple locations (1 to many). A location can have multiple drivers (1 to many). a Driver can have multiple deliveries (1 to many). This design is supposed to break things out in 3rd normal form. So if I want to go to the deliveries table and get all of the deliveries associated with a particular restaurant, how would I query or do a join for that? Would I have to add a second foreign key to Deliveries that directly references the Restaurant table? I think after I see the query I can figure out what is going on. Thx
You can use left or right outer join to make a combined table and then you can easily query it, or else you can use a query with multiple sub-queries inside it to attain the required result without using join. Here is an example on how to use sub-query for your use-case.
SELECT ID FROM Deliveries De
WHERE De."DriverID" IN (SELECT ID FROM Drivers Dr
WHERE Dr. "LocationID" IN (SELECT ID FROM Locations L
WHERE L. "RestaurantID" IN (SELECT ID FROM Restaurant)))
I hope this solves your issue without using join statement.
You can use inner join or union depending on what you want to achieve. Example:
SELECT a."articleId" AS id, a.title, a."articleImage" AS "articleImage/url", c.category AS "category/public_id", a."createdOn", concat("firstName", ' ', "lastName") AS author
FROM articles a
INNER JOIN users u ON a."userId" = u."userId"
INNER JOIN categories c ON a."categoryId" = c."categoryId"
UNION
SELECT g."gifId" AS id, g.title, g."imageUrl" AS "articleImage/url", g.public_id AS "category/public_id", g."createdOn", concat("firstName", ' ', "lastName") AS author
FROM gifs g
INNER JOIN users u ON g."userId" = u."userId"
ORDER BY "createdOn" DESC
You can say how you want to get the results for more detailed query.
If I understand what you want to do then it maybe like this,
1st you have to join all those table to get corresponding result you want,
the join condition will be
select <your desire column name>
from Restaurant A,Locations B,Drivers C,Deliveries D
where A.ID = B.RestaurantID
and B.ID = C.LocationID
and C.ID = D.DriverID
Hope this is helpful, fell free to say anything.
The question is
"find project managers those who don't manage any projects , list name and id"
first table is "PM" and second table is "Projects"
How to write this query ? I tried the following query but it didnt work.
select a.ID,a.name
from PM a,Projects b
where a.ID=b.ID
group by a.name
having COUNT(b.ID)=0;
Can't you just do a left join here:
SELECT
a.ID, a.name
FROM PM a
LEFT JOIN Projects b
ON a.ID = b.ID
WHERE b.ID IS NULL
But your table structure is not at all clear to me. It is confusing to have the manager ID column have the same name in both tables.
Also, you were doing an implicit inner join in your current query. Not evil, but it certainly makes it harder to see how you are relating the two tables. With an explicit left join hopefully it is clear what is going on here. Those manager records in PM which have no projects would therefore match to no project records. The marker for this would be a (single) manager record all of whose project columns are null.
Stupidly simple question, but I just don't know what to google!
If I create a query like this:
Select id, data
from table1
Now I want to join with table2. I can immediately see that the id column is no longer unique and I have to change it to
table1.id
Is there any smart way (like a keyboard-shortcut) to do this, instead of manually adding table1 to every column? Either before I add the Join to secure that all columns will be unique, or after with suggestions based on the different possible tables.
No, there is no helper.
But do not you can alias the table name:
select x.Col1, y.Col2
from ALongTableName x
inner join AReallyReallyLongTableName y on x.Id = y.OtherId
which can also make queries clearer, and is very much necessary when doing self joins.
First of all, you should start using aliases:
SQL aliases are used to give a database table, or a column in a table,
a temporary name.
Basically aliases are created to make column names more readable.
This will narrow down your problem and make your code maintenance easier. If that's not enough, I guess you could start using auto-completion tools, such as these:
SQL Complete
SQL Prompt
ApexSQL Complete
These have your desired functionality, however, they do not always work as expected (at least for me).
Oh! You can use alias table name. Like this:
SELECT A.ID, A.data
FROM TableA A
INNER JOIN TableB B
ON A.ID = B.ID
You just only use A. or B. if two table have same this column selected. If they different, you don't need: Like this:
SELECT A.ID, data -- if Table B not have column data
FROM TableA A
INNER JOIN TableB B
ON A.ID = B.ID
Or:
Select A.*, B.ID
FROM TableA A
INNER JOIN TableB B
ON A.ID = B.ID
I have a couple of tables that have data in them that I am looking to get information from. Here is the rundown....In table 1 I have bunch of columns that I am pulling data from, one of the columns is a user ID (which is a number)that was the last userID to modify a record. In table 2 I want to pull in the name of that user based on the ID that is pulled from the other table (this table has both the userID and the username).
so my final query would have the columns in table 1 as well as the username from table 2 to show that was the user to last edit the record. I assume this has to be done in a nested select statement but for the life of me I cannot come up with the correct syntax.
Can anyone help me out?
Thanks
Jeff
Yes, you need a very basic join that link both tables together.
Select t1.UserID,
t2.UserName
FROM table1 t1 INNER JOIN
table2 t2 ON t1.userid=t2.userid
select t1.*, t2.{username} from table1 as t1
join table2 as t2 on t1.{userId}=t2.{userid};
change {username} with the actual column name of user
similarly {userId} with appropriate column name in tables.
Hope it helps you.
this is standard inner join query, to learn more consider reading: http://www.w3schools.com/sql/
I have this ugly source data with two columns, let's call them EmpID and SomeCode. Generally EmpID maps to the EmployeeListing table. But sometimes, people are entering the Employee IDs in the SomeCode field.
The person previously running this report in Excel 'solved' this problem by performing multiple vlookups with if statements, as well as running some manual checks to ensure results were accurate. As I'm moving these files to Access I am not sure how best to handle this scenario.
Ideally, I'm hoping to tell my queries to do a Left Join on SomeCode if EmpID is null, otherwise Left Join on EmpID
Unfortunately, there's no way for me to force validation or anything of the sort in the source data.
Here's the full SQL query I'm working on:
SELECT DDATransMaster.Fulfillment,
DDATransMaster.ConfirmationNumber,
DDATransMaster.PromotionCode,
DDATransMaster.DirectSellerNumber,
NZ([DDATransMaster]![DirectSellerNumber],[DDATransMaster]![PromotionCode]) AS EmpJoin,
EmployeeLookup.ID AS EmpLookup,
FROM FROM DDATransMaster
LEFT JOIN EmployeeLookup ON NZ([DDATransMaster]![DirectSellerNumber],[DDATransMaster]![PromotionCode]) = EmployeeLookup.[Employee #])
You can create a query like this:
SELECT
IIf(EmpID Is Null, SomeCode, EmpID) AS join_field,
field2,
etc
FROM YourTable
Or if the query will always be used within an Access session, Nz is more concise.
SELECT
Nz(EmpID, SomeCode) AS join_field,
field2,
etc
FROM YourTable
When you join that query to your other table, the Access query designer can represent the join between join_field and some matching field in the other table. If you were to attempt the IIf or Nz as part of the join's ON clause, the query designer can't display the join correctly in Design View --- it could still work, but may not be as convenient if you're new to Access SQL.
See whether this SQL gives you what you want.
SELECT
dda.Fulfillment,
dda.ConfirmationNumber,
dda.PromotionCode,
dda.DirectSellerNumber,
NZ(dda.DirectSellerNumber,dda.PromotionCode) AS EmpJoin,
el.ID AS EmpLookup
FROM
DDATransMaster AS dda
LEFT JOIN EmployeeLookup AS el
ON NZ(dda.DirectSellerNumber,dda.PromotionCode) = el.[Employee #])
But I would use the Nz part in a subquery.
SELECT
sub.Fulfillment,
sub.ConfirmationNumber,
sub.PromotionCode,
sub.DirectSellerNumber,
sub.EmpJoin,
el.ID AS EmpLookup
FROM
(
SELECT
Fulfillment,
ConfirmationNumber,
PromotionCode,
DirectSellerNumber,
NZ(DirectSellerNumber,PromotionCode) AS EmpJoin
FROM DDATransMaster
) AS sub
LEFT JOIN EmployeeLookup AS el
ON sub.EmpJoin = el.[Employee #])
What about:
LEFT JOIN EmployeeListing ON NZ(EmpID, SomeCode)
as your join, nz() uses the second parameter if the first is null, I'm not 100% sure this sort of join works in access. Worth 20 seconds to try though.
Hope it works.
You Could use a Union:
SELECT DDATransMaster.Fulfillment,
DDATransMaster.ConfirmationNumber,
DDATransMaster.PromotionCode,
DDATransMaster.DirectSellerNumber,
EmployeeLookup.ID AS EmpLookup
FROM DDATransMaster
LEFT JOIN EmployeeLookup ON
DDATransMaster.DirectSellerNumber = EmployeeLookup.[Employee #]
where DDATransMaster.DirectSellerNumber IS NOT NULL
Union
SELECT DDATransMaster.Fulfillment,
DDATransMaster.ConfirmationNumber,
DDATransMaster.PromotionCode,
DDATransMaster.DirectSellerNumber,
EmployeeLookup.ID AS EmpLookup
FROM DDATransMaster
LEFT JOIN EmployeeLookup ON
DDATransMaster.PromotionCode = EmployeeLookup.[Employee #]
where DDATransMaster.DirectSellerNumber IS NULL;