I have a hex string in the form of "404C49474854" .
I am trying to extract the text string out of it with :
void textFromHexString(char *hex,char *result)
{
for(int k=1;k<strlen(hex);k+=2)
{
char temp[3]={0};
sprintf(temp,"%c%c",hex[k-1],hex[k]);
*result=char((int)strtol(temp, NULL, 16));
result++;
*result ='\0';
print(temp); //**** edit
}
}
I call it from inside another function, with :
void somefunction()
{
// I have p here, which prints "404C49474854"
char text[TEXT_MAX_SIZE]={0};
textFromHexString(p,text);
}
It works, but it works 80% of the time. in some cases it crashes, where :
-incoming hex pointer is : "404C49474854". for sure .
-where the pointer temp get a completely other values that are not even inside hex.
Is there something basically wrong with this method ?
EDIT:
Check where the line that prints inside the loop, it will print this in a very specific situation :
4Hello, world
How temp, that consist of numbers only, gets this string ? (the "Hello world", is just a string I print at the beginning of the program, also temp size is 3)
You can use sscanf() to directly read hexadecimal numbers of a given length, like so:
while(hex[0] && hex[1]) {
int value;
sscanf(hex, "%2x", &value);
printf("%c", value);
hex += 2;
}
printf("\n");
It seems as if most errors were found by the commenters, so here is code that works under the assumption that I guessed right what you want.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <ctype.h>
// ALL CHECKS OMMITTED!
void textFromHexString(char *hex, char result[])
{
// work on copy
char *p = result;
// this has more steps than necessary for clarity
for (size_t k = 1; k < strlen(hex); k += 2) {
// normalize input
char first = tolower(hex[k - 1]);
char second = tolower(hex[k]);
// convert hexbyte to decimal number
int f1 = (isdigit(first)) ? first - '0' : (first - 'a') + 10;
int f2 = (isdigit(second)) ? second - '0' : (second - 'a') + 10;
// two byte number from LSB hex to decimal (e.g.: "ab" = 171)
int num = f1 * 16 + f2;
// needs to store min. 3 characters plus NUL
char temp[4] = { 0 };
// sprintf is a bit too much for it but simple
sprintf(temp, "%d", num);
// concatenate temp to the result-string
strcat(p, temp);
// For debugging, I guess, or further work?
printf("%s\n", temp);
}
}
#define TEXT_MAX_SIZE 64
int main()
{
// 0x404C49474854 = 70696391100500
char *p = "404C49474854";
// allocate some scratchspace on the stack
char text[TEXT_MAX_SIZE] = { 0 };
textFromHexString(p, text);
// the function textFromHexString() does it in chunks of two bytes,
// so the result is 647673717284 here
printf("Result: %s\n", text);
exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
Related
I have a problem that goes:
Create a C program that inputs large integers as strings.
Then every character is converted into the corresponding digit.
After that I have to create a function addBigNumbers() that has 3 matrices.
addBigNumbers(char *a1, char *a2, char *res)
a1 and a2 will contain the 2 large numbers that I want to add,res will contain the sum of those as a number sequence. We want the function that we created to check if the strings contains numbers only.
If it contains only numbers then res equals 1 and it prints the sum of those numbers else res is equal to 0 (max number length is 1000)
After that first function we want to create a function for subtraction.
So far I haven't gotten to subtraction since I stuck in the first one and I need your help.
This is the code that I have so far:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define N 1000
/* run this program using the console pauser or add your own getch, system("pause") or input loop */
int addHugeNumbers(char *a1, char *a2, char *res){
int y=0, u=0, h=0;
res=strcat(a1,a2);
if(strlen(a1)>strlen(a2)){
y=atoi(a1);
u=atoi(a2);
h=y+u;
}
else{
y=atoi(a1);
u=atoi(a2);
h=u+y;
}
printf("%d", h);
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
char res[N];
char a1[N/2];
char a2[N/2];
scanf("%s", &a1);
scanf("%s", &a2);
addHugeNumbers(a1, a2, res);
return 0;
}
The problem I have is that if I input ex. 23 23 it outputs 2346 which is obviously wrong but it got 46 correct, when I input 1234 123 it outputs 1234246 which is all wrong.
Where it gets weird is if i input something like 1234r 123 or anything else that has a character in it, it outputs the exact sum.
The problem is res=strcat(a1,a2), which does something very different than that what you think: it appends a2 to a1, and it does not "create" a new string. See, for example strcat-definition at cppreference.com:
char *strcat( char *dest, const char *src )
Appends a copy of the null-terminated byte string pointed to by src
to the end of the null-terminated byte string pointed to by dest. The
character src[0] replaces the null terminator at the end of dest. The
resulting byte string is null-terminated.
So you are manipulating your input before calculating something, and that's what you will observe then when using a debugger.
Further, scanf("%s", &a1) looks suspicious; it should be scanf("%s", a1);. Your compiler should have warned you.
You'd probably rethink addBigNumbers, probably adding the digits in a loop rather than converting them to (somehow always) limited integral data types in between. This task is actually nothing for beginners in C; take the following fragment to study:
#define N 1000
int addHugeNumbers(char *a1, char *a2, char *res){
char resultBuffer[N];
int i1 = (int)strlen(a1);
int i2 = (int)strlen(a2);
int carryOver = 0;
int ri = 0;
while (i1 > 0 || i2 > 0) { // until both inputs have been read to their beginning
i1--;
i2--;
// read single digits and consider that a string might have already
// been read to its beginning
int d1 = i1 >= 0 ? a1[i1] - '0' : 0;
int d2 = i2 >= 0 ? a2[i2] - '0' : 0;
// check for invalid input
if (d1 < 0 || d1 > 9 || d2 < 0 || d2 > 9) {
return 0;
}
// calculate result digit, taking previous carryOver into account
int digitSum = d1 + d2 + carryOver;
carryOver = digitSum / 10;
digitSum %= 10;
resultBuffer[ri++] = digitSum + '0';
}
// write the last carryOver, if any
if (carryOver > 0) {
resultBuffer[ri++] = carryOver + '0';
}
// copy resultBuffer into res in reverse order:
while(ri--) {
*res++ = resultBuffer[ri];
}
// terminate res-string
*res = '\0';
return 1;
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
char res[N];
char a1[N/2] = "123412341234";
char a2[N/2] = "1231";
if (addHugeNumbers(a1, a2, res)) {
printf("result: %s\n", res);
} else {
printf("invalid number.\n");
}
return 0;
}
I would like to convert a string to an int and calling the function from main. Where the first character is a letter declaring the base of the number and the rest of the characters in the string are the number. I am able to get the function to work separately, but when using the main function to call it will not print out the correct values.
Example of user input using binary:
b1000
b1010
result should be:
b
b
1000
1010
Here is the code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <math.h>
int str_to_int(inputbase) {
char num1[50];
num1[50] = inputbase;
char numcpy1[sizeof(num1) - 1];
int i, len1;
int result1 = 0;
//printf("String: ");
//gets(num1);
//Access first character for base
printf("%c \n", num1[0]);
//Remove first character for number1 and number 2
if (strlen(num1) > 0) {
strcpy(numcpy1, &(num1[1]));
} else {
strcpy(numcpy1, num1);
}
len1 = strlen(numcpy1);
//Turn remaining string characters into an int
for (i = 0; i < len1; i++) {
result1 = result1 * 10 + ( numcpy1[i] - '0' );
}
printf("%d \n", result1);
return result1;
}
int main() {
char *number1[50], *number2[50];
int one, two;
printf("\nAsk numbers: \n");
gets(number1);
gets(number2);
one = str_to_int(number1);
two = str_to_int(number2);
printf("\nVerifying...\n");
printf("%d\n", one);
printf("%d\n", two);
return 0;
}
I suppose your code cannot be compiled because some errors.
The first one is in the line
int str_to_int(inputbase)
where inputbase are defined without type.
If this changed to
int str_to_int(char * inputbase)
the next point for improvement is in line
num1[50] = inputbase;
assignement like that has set of errors:
num1[50] means access to 51th item, but there is only 50 items indexed from 0 to 49
statement num1[0] = inputbase; (as well as with any other correct index) is wrong because of difference in types: num1[0] is char, but inputbase is pointer
num1 = inputbase; will be also wrong (for copying string = cannot be used in C, so consider making loop or using standard library function strncpy)
And since this is only the beginning of problems, I suggest starting from decimal input using some standard function for conversion char* string to int (e.g. atoi, or sscanf), then after you check the program and find it correct if it is required you can avoid using standard conversion and write your own str_to_int
The prototype for your function str_to_int() should specify the type of intputbase. You are passing a string and there is no reason for str_to_int to modify this string, so the type should be const char *inputbase.
Furthermore, you do not need a local copy for the string, just access the first character to determine the base and parse the remaining digits accordingly:
#include <stdlib.h>
int str_to_int(const char *inputbase) {
const char *p = inputbase;
int base = 10; // default to decimal
if (*p == 'b') { // binary
p++;
base = 2;
} else
if (*p == 'o') { // octal
p++;
base = 8;
} else
if (*p == 'h') { // hexadecimal
p++;
base = 16;
}
return strtol(p, NULL, base);
}
I have for example a string (mathematical equation in postfix notation) that looks like this: The numbers are 5.33,5.32,6.33,3.22
5.335.32*6.333.22++
I'm looking to make it into prefix notation but simply reversing the string won't work due to the fact it has to retain the value of the number.
I've thought of doing a normal character by character swap in a for loop, and when encountering a digit make that into a substring and place it on afterwards but I haven't gotten it to work properly and now I'm stuck.
My end-goal is to make a binary expression tree out of that, so if there's an easier way than doing this also please let me know.
A stack-based approach:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
char *postfix_to_prefix(const char *string) {
char operator, *stack[1024];
int s = 0, number, fraction;
const char *tokens = string;
while (1) {
if (sscanf(tokens, "%1d.%2d", &number, &fraction) == 2) {
stack[s] = malloc(sizeof("1.00"));
(void) sprintf(stack[s++], "%4.2f", number + (fraction / 100.0));
tokens += strlen("1.00");
} else if (sscanf(tokens, "%c", &operator) == 1) {
char *operand1 = stack[--s];
char *operand2 = stack[--s];
stack[s] = malloc(strlen(operand1) + strlen(operand1) + sizeof(operator) + sizeof('\0'));
(void) sprintf(stack[s++], "%c%s%s", operator, operand1, operand2);
free(operand1);
free(operand2);
tokens += sizeof(operator);
} else {
break;
}
}
return stack[--s];
}
int main() {
const char *string = "5.335.32*6.333.22++";
printf("%s\n", string);
char *inverted = postfix_to_prefix(string);
printf("%s\n", inverted);
free(inverted);
return 0;
}
OUTPUT
> ./a.out
5.335.32*6.333.22++
++3.226.33*5.325.33
>
This is a bare bones implementation with no real error checking nor other finishing touches. You'll want to check that non-communitive operations like subtraction and division come out with the operands in the correct order and reverse them if not.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <ctype.h>
int main(void) {
char exp[] = "5.335.32*6.333.22++";
size_t len = strlen(exp);
char temp[len];
char *p = temp;
for(int i = len-1; i >= 0; ){
if(isdigit(exp[i])){
memcpy(p, &exp[i-4+1], 4);//all number have a length of 4
p += 4;
i -= 4;
} else {
*p++ = exp[i--];//length of op is 1
}
}
memcpy(exp, temp, len);//Write back
puts(exp);//++3.226.33*5.325.33
return 0;
}
I want to convert a section of a char array to a double. For example I have:
char in_string[] = "4014.84954";
Say I want to convert the first 40 to a double with value 40.0. My code so far:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(int arg) {
char in_string[] = "4014.84954";
int i = 0;
for(i = 0; i <= sizeof(in_string); i++) {
printf("%c\n", in_string[i]);
printf("%f\n", atof(&in_string[i]));
}
}
In each loop atof it converts the char array from the starting pointer I supply all the way to the end of the array. The output is:
4
4014.849540
0
14.849540
1
14.849540
4
4.849540
.
0.849540
8
84954.000000 etc...
How can I convert just a portion of a char array to a double? This must by modular because my real input_string is much more complicated, but I will ensure that the char is a number 0-9.
The following should work assuming:
I will ensure that the char is a number 0-9.
double toDouble(const char* s, int start, int stop) {
unsigned long long int m = 1;
double ret = 0;
for (int i = stop; i >= start; i--) {
ret += (s[i] - '0') * m;
m *= 10;
}
return ret;
}
For example for the string 23487 the function will do this calculations:
ret = 0
ret += 7 * 1
ret += 8 * 10
ret += 4 * 100
ret += 3 * 1000
ret += 2 * 10000
ret = 23487
You can copy the desired amount of the string you want to another char array, null terminate it, and then convert it to a double. EG, if you want 2 digits, copy the 2 digits you want into a char array of length 3, ensuring the 3rd character is the null terminator.
Or if you don't want to make another char array, you can back up the (n+1)th char of the char array, replace it with a null terminator (ie 0x00), call atof, and then replace the null terminator with the backed up value. This will make atof stop parsing where you placed your null terminator.
Just use sscanf. Use the format "ld" and check for return value is one.
What about that, insert NULL at the right position and then revert it back to the original letter? This means you will manipulate the char array but you will revert it back to the original at the end.
You can create a function that will make the work in a temporary string (on the stack) and return the resulting double:
double atofn (char *src, int n) {
char tmp[50]; // big enough to fit any double
strncpy (tmp, src, n);
tmp[n] = 0;
return atof(tmp);
}
How much simpler could it get than sscanf?
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void) {
double foo;
assert(sscanf("4014.84954", "%02lf", &foo) == 1);
printf("Processed the first two bytes of input and got: %lf\n", foo);
assert(sscanf("4014.84954" + 2, "%05lf", &foo) == 1);
printf("Processed the next five bytes of input and got: %lf\n", foo);
assert(sscanf("4014.84954" + 7, "%lf", &foo) == 1);
printf("Processed the rest of the input and got: %lf\n", foo);
return 0;
}
I am looking for a (relatively) simple way to parse a random string and extract all of the integers from it and put them into an Array - this differs from some of the other questions which are similar because my strings have no standard format.
Example:
pt112parah salin10n m5:isstupid::42$%&%^*%7first3
I would need to eventually get an array with these contents:
112 10 5 42 7 3
And I would like a method more efficient then going character by character through a string.
Thanks for your help
A quick solution. I'm assuming that there are no numbers that exceed the range of long, and that there are no minus signs to worry about. If those are problems, then you need to do a lot more work analyzing the results of strtol() and you need to detect '-' followed by a digit.
The code does loop over all characters; I don't think you can avoid that. But it does use strtol() to process each sequence of digits (once the first digit is found), and resumes where strtol() left off (and strtol() is kind enough to tell us exactly where it stopped its conversion).
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <ctype.h>
int main(void)
{
const char data[] = "pt112parah salin10n m5:isstupid::42$%&%^*%7first3";
long results[100];
int nresult = 0;
const char *s = data;
char c;
while ((c = *s++) != '\0')
{
if (isdigit(c))
{
char *end;
results[nresult++] = strtol(s-1, &end, 10);
s = end;
}
}
for (int i = 0; i < nresult; i++)
printf("%d: %ld\n", i, results[i]);
return 0;
}
Output:
0: 112
1: 10
2: 5
3: 42
4: 7
5: 3
More efficient than going through character by character?
Not possible, because you must look at every character to know that it is not an integer.
Now, given that you have to go though the string character by character, I would recommend simply casting each character as an int and checking that:
//string tmp = ""; declared outside of loop.
//pseudocode for inner loop:
int intVal = (int)c;
if(intVal >=48 && intVal <= 57){ //0-9 are 48-57 when char casted to int.
tmp += c;
}
else if(tmp.length > 0){
array[?] = (int)tmp; // ? is where to add the int to the array.
tmp = "";
}
array will contain your solution.
Just because I've been writing Python all day and I want a break. Declaring an array will be tricky. Either you have to run it twice to work out how many numbers you have (and then allocate the array) or just use the numbers one by one as in this example.
NB the ASCII characters for '0' to '9' are 48 to 57 (i.e. consecutive).
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
char *input = "pt112par0ah salin10n m5:isstupid::42$%&%^*%7first3";
int length = strlen(input);
int value = 0;
int i;
bool gotnumber = false;
for (i = 0; i < length; i++)
{
if (input[i] >= '0' && input[i] <= '9')
{
gotnumber = true;
value = value * 10; // shift up a column
value += input[i] - '0'; // casting the char to an int
}
else if (gotnumber) // we hit this the first time we encounter a non-number after we've had numbers
{
printf("Value: %d \n", value);
value = 0;
gotnumber = false;
}
}
return 0;
}
EDIT: the previous verison didn't deal with 0
Another solution is to use the strtok function
/* strtok example */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
int main ()
{
char str[] = "pt112parah salin10n m5:isstupid::42$%&%^*%7first3";
char * pch;
printf ("Splitting string \"%s\" into tokens:\n",str);
pch = strtok (str," abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz:$%&^*");
while (pch != NULL)
{
printf ("%s\n",pch);
pch = strtok (NULL, " abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz:$%&^*");
}
return 0;
}
Gives:
112
10
5
42
7
3
Perhaps not the best solution for this task, since you need to specify all characters that will be treated as a token. But it is an alternative to the other solutions.
And if you don't mind using C++ instead of C (usually there isn't a good reason why not), then you can reduce your solution to just two lines of code (using AXE parser generator):
vector<int> numbers;
auto number_rule = *(*(axe::r_any() - axe::r_num())
& *axe::r_num() >> axe::e_push_back(numbers));
now test it:
std::string str = "pt112parah salin10n m5:isstupid::42$%&%^*%7first3";
number_rule(str.begin(), str.end());
std::for_each(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(), [](int i) { std::cout << "\ni=" << i; });
and sure enough, you got your numbers back.
And as a bonus, you don't need to change anything when parsing unicode wide strings:
std::wstring str = L"pt112parah salin10n m5:isstupid::42$%&%^*%7first3";
number_rule(str.begin(), str.end());
std::for_each(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(), [](int i) { std::cout << "\ni=" << i; });
and sure enough, you got the same numbers back.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <math.h>
int main(void)
{
char *input = "pt112par0ah salin10n m5:isstupid::42$%&%^*%7first3";
char *pos = input;
int integers[strlen(input) / 2]; // The maximum possible number of integers is half the length of the string, due to the smallest number of digits possible per integer being 1 and the smallest number of characters between two different integers also being 1
unsigned int numInts= 0;
while ((pos = strpbrk(pos, "0123456789")) != NULL) // strpbrk() prototype in string.h
{
sscanf(pos, "%u", &(integers[numInts]));
if (integers[numInts] == 0)
pos++;
else
pos += (int) log10(integers[numInts]) + 1; // requires math.h
numInts++;
}
for (int i = 0; i < numInts; i++)
printf("%d ", integers[i]);
return 0;
}
Finding the integers is accomplished via repeated calls to strpbrk() on the offset pointer, with the pointer being offset again by an amount equaling the number of digits in the integer, calculated by finding the base-10 logarithm of the integer and adding 1 (with a special case for when the integer is 0). No need to use abs() on the integer when calculating the logarithm, as you stated the integers will be non-negative. If you wanted to be more space-efficient, you could use unsigned char integers[] rather than int integers[], as you stated the integers will all be <256, but that isn't a necessity.