I have many class in my library almost 300, and I want to generate instance name by loop. In other words I wanna instead of this approach(witch has many code line):
X:This is my problem:
var cm1: Cm1 = new Cm1();
var cm2: Cm2 = new Cm2();
var cm3: Cm3 = new Cm3();
...
use like this approach (less than 10 code lines):
Y:I think this is solution:
for (var i: uint = 1; i < 4; i++)
{
var getChildByName("cm" + i): getChildByName("Cm" + i) = new getChildByName("Cm" + i);
}
but I know above code does not work, is there any way to make them !
-What am I actually trying to solve?
Make many variable by a few line code and save time and size app!
-Why do I have ~300 classes and why are you trying to create them in a loop at once?
This is about to data of request application!
-What do these classes do that you unconditionally need one of each all at the same time?
Because those data would show at first time!
First, it is better to store the classes in an Array or Object rather than an external variable for each item. if you want to access them by name, better to use object:
var classList:Object=new Object();
Then in your loop:
for(var i:uint=1;i<NumberOfClasses;i++){
classList["cm"+i.toString()]=new (getDefinitionByName("Cm"+i.toString()) as Class)();
}
getDefinitionByName is used to make Constructors using String;
Note: if your classes contain a package directory, you should include it. for example:
getDefinitionByName("myclasses.cm.Cm123")();
Then you can access them using Bracket syntax:
classList["cm123"].prop=val;
And don't forget to:
import flash.utils.getDefinitionByName;
I Hope it will help.
EDIT
to use Array instead of object, the loop should be:
for(var i:uint=1;i<NumberOfClasses;i++){
classList[i]=new (getDefinitionByName("Cm"+i.toString()) as Class)();
}
then to access them:
addChild(classList[0]);//0 or any other index;
Related
I am learning how to build apps and working with Swift for this project.
I had a buddy help me pull data in from a website and it looks like he created classes with variables and mapped them to certain extensions (IE "Username") so when I call the variable data such as profile I would call it. The below uses luck_30 able to store "Stats.luck_30"
luck_30.text = profile.luck_30
So inside one of my variables that is in this "Profile" class is setup into an array. I can pull the array out of the class, but I can't seem to do for while statement replacing the [#] with a variable from the for command.
func aliveWorkers(profile: Profile) -> NSNumber{
var myworkers : Array = profile.workers!
//this test works and returns the proper value
var testworker: NSNumber = myworkers[0].alive!
println("The satus of the test worker is " + testworker.description)
/* This code is giving error "Could not find member alive" it does not ifor var
for ifor in myworkers{
var thisworker: NSNumber = myworkers[ifor].alive! as NSNumber
}
*/
return 42
}
Your variable ifor is not a counter, it is an actual object. You could do something like this:
for worker in myWorkers {
let workerIsAlive = worker.alive!
}
Alternatively, if you need the index,
for i in 0 ..< myWorkers.count {
let worker = myWorkers[i]
let workerIsAlive = worker.alive!
}
If you need both:
for (i, worker) in enumerate(myWorkers) {
let workerIsAlive = worker.alive!
}
And as a matter of style, I would stay away from NSNumber and use Int or Bool or whatever the data actually is. Also, it looks like the alive variable should not be optional, as you're unwrapping it everywhere. To avoid "mysterious" crashes later, you may want to think about making it a non-optional type.
when using a for in loop, your loop variable isn't an index, its the objects you're looping through. so..
func aliveWorkers() {
var myworkers = [1, 2, 3]
//this test works and returns the proper value
let testworker = myworkers[0]
print("The satus of the test worker is \(testworker)")
for ifor in myworkers {
print(ifor)
}
}
Notice a few things... you don't need to use + to concatenate those strings. you can just use string interpolation. \(variable) inserts the value of variable in the string.
Try to use let instead of var when you don't change the variable. You don't need to explicitly define type on variables either.
I know there are quite similar questions here, but I haven't found the proper details. What would be helpful is definitely an explanation of the problems, and perhaps a base example, that anyone who searches later may be able to apply. (Not asking that you write it for me, I just find the examples helpful) I don't want to upset anyone and am kind of worried to post in a forum...
I am wondering alternatives to creating a screen based off tiles created from an array. I have been having an issue myself trying to access the movieclips that have been placed on screen, and trying to trace to find a way to reference them hasn't been working.
Anyway, take something basic like an array, and connecting it to movieclips, then how to access the movieclip itself once done. So I have been working on this, and used many different online resources, so I'm sure a lot of this is going to look familiar, just in a much messier way.
This takes the array to make the movieclips appear (Im sure at least one part in here is unnecessary, and I'm thinking I'm doing something wrong here that makes it not work out later) So this works, but feels pretty bulky.
Both are from the same main class file.
function makeWorld (anyMap, tileW, tileH) {
var worldWidth = anyMap[0].length;
var worldHeight = anyMap.length;
var MAP = this.addChild(new mapHolder());
function tiler(MAP, i, j, tileW, tileH, tile)
{
MAP.addChild(tile);
tile.x = (j * tileW);
tile.y = (i * tileH);
}
for (var i = 0; i < worldWidth; ++i) {
for (var j = 0; j < worldHeight; ++j) {
var curTile:int = anyMap[i][j];
if (curTile == 101) {
var tile1 = new tileGround();
tiler (MAP, i, j, tileW, tileH, tile1);
...
else {
var tile3 = new empty();
tiler (MAP, i, j, tileW, tileH, tile3);
}
}}}
Then there is attempting to reference it, where I'm having the issue. I don't know what to call this.MAP.tileGround by, and I have tried many things. I've read it's not such a good idea to reference by name when not very advanced so I wanted to avoid that sort of thing too.
addEventListener (Event.ENTER_FRAME, hits);
function hits (event:Event) {
var tileCatchG:MovieClip = this.MAP.tileGround;
if(tileCatchG.hitTestPoint(this.MAP.Char.x + leftBumpPoint.x, this.MAP.Char.y + leftBumpPoint.y, true)){
leftBumping = true;
} else {
leftBumping = false;
}
...
}
Thank you!
In looking over what you're doing a second time it would appear that you should have a reference to the 2-indexed array that represents the map.
You can create a regular (single indexed) Array at the top of the file like
public var tileArray:Array = [];
Then where you create them push them into the array
var tile1 = new tileGround();
tileArray.push(tile1);
then to reference them all you can just run a simple loop
for each(var tile:MovieClip in tileArray)
{
//Do stuff
if(tile instanceof tileGround)
{
//Do stuff specific to tileGround
}
}
Let's say I have an array, each item in the array has a corresponding library item.
I'd like to do something like :
var rando = Math.round(Math.random()*3)
var myArray = new Array ["ball", "wall", "fall"]
var i:myArray[rando] = myArray[rando] new myArray[rando]()
addChild(i)
But, this doesn't work. What's the secret?
Thank You,
Victor Hugo
Surprised no one mentioned getDefinitionByName() here.
Here's some complete code to get your example working:
var myArray = ["ball", "wall", "fall"];
/**
* Creates a random instance based on an input array containing class names as Strings.
* #param The input array containing aforementioned Strings.
* #return The newly created instance.
*/
function createRandom(typeArray:Array):*
{
// Select random String from typeArray.
var selection:String = typeArray[ int(Math.random() * typeArray.length) ];
// Create instance of relevant class.
var Type:Class = getDefinitionByName(selection) as Class;
// Return created instance.
return new Type();
}
// Randomly create and add instance.
var instance:DisplayObject = createRandom(myArray);
addChild(instance);
Ok so there are a bunch of problems with this.
A large one being var i:myArray[rando] = myArray[rando] new myArray[rando]() not really too sure what you're trying to do here.
Anyway I'm going to assume ball, wall and fall are instance names of MovieClips you have in your library. I think you're going to want something like this
var rando:int = Math.floor(Math.random()*3); //As the comments point out this should give you a random
//int between 0 and 2, arrays are 0 indexed so this is what we want if we have 3 items
Now for your array, you're current putting strings in there. Flash has no idea what "ball", etc are.
Try something like this
var myArray:Array = new Array [new ball(), new wall(), new fall()]; //this creates a new instance of your library object and stores it in your array
Now to add one of these to your stage:
addChild(myArray[rando]); //this uses the random number to pull one of the items out of your array
What you're trying to do with var i:myArray[rando] doesn't really make sense. There is no type of myArray[rando] this slot should be holding a MovieClip
If you only have a few choices, it's easier to use a switch-case.
switch (rando) {
case 0:
i = new ball();
break;
case 1:
i = new wall();
break;
case 2:
i = new fall();
break;
}
addChild(i);
I suggest you define the variable i as a MovieClip, in which case it can be instantiated as both ball, wall, fall.
Given that ball, wall and fall are in the library exported to actionscript.
Just guessing off your limited information but give this a shot.
private function myFunction():void{
var rando = Math.round(Math.random()*3);
var myArray= new Array ["ball", "wall", "fall"];
}
private function generateItem(item:String):void{
switch(item){
case "ball" : generateBall(); break;
case "wall" : generateWall(); break;
case "fall" : generateFall(); break;
}
private function generateBall():void{
//code to generate ball
addChild(ball);
}
private function generateFall():void{
//code to generate fall
addChild(fall);
}
private function generateWall():void{
//code to generate wall
addChild(wall);
}
Change your arrary line to:
var myArray = new Array [ball, wall, fall];
This should work. :)
Marty Wallace gets big praise for steering me down the path of getDefinitionByName(). The example he posted was good, but this example does exactly what I was going for.
http://www.emanueleferonato.com/2011/03/31/understanding-as3-getdefinitionbyname-for-all-eval-maniacs/
I'm using the following array to add children to the stage:
for(var i=0;i<6;i++) {
var aCherry=new cCherry()
aCherry.y=10
aCherry.x=10+100*i
stage.addChild(aCherry)
}
Now I want to modify each cherry based on another array. Something like this:
var cherryLetter:Array=[1,0,0,0,0,0]
for(i=0;i<6;++) {
if(cherryLetter[i]) stage.getChildByName("aCherry")[i].y+=90
}
Clearly stage.getChildByName("aCherry")[i] isn't correct, but coming from JavaScript this makes the most sense to me and should accurately portray what I'm trying to achieve for you guys reading this. So, how would I actually do this? This being getting an array of children added to the stage under a certain name or class (so an array of cCherry would work too, if necessary), then using them in a way similar to the above loop.
Here is my recommendation for how the code might look, based on the desire to use getChildByName() to find the instances of your cCherry class. Please note that I've changed the class name to Cherry in the example (which I recommend, since capitalizing class names is AS3 convention). Also, it's good practice to end statements with semi-colons. While it's usually optional, there are cases where omitting the semi-colon can produce very difficult to track down runtime bugs, so I recommend getting int he habit of using them. I also recommend including type in all your variable declarations, as shown with var aCherry:Cherry, for example.
var i:int;
for(i=0; i<6; ++i)
{
var aCherry:Cherry=new Cherry(); // Note, it's my recommendation that you rename cCherry class to Cherry (convention)
aCherry.y=10;
aCherry.x=10+100*i;
aCherry.name = "aCherry" + String(i); // String() cast for clarity only, not necessary
stage.addChild(aCherry);
}
and
var cherryLetter:Array=[1,0,0,0,0,0];
for(i=0; i<6; ++i)
{
var cherry:Cherry = stage.getChildByName("aCherry" + String(i)) as Cherry;
if(cherry && cherryLetter[i]) cherry.y += 90;
}
I had a hard time trying to word my question properly, so i'm sorry if it seems confusing. Also i'm using the flixel library in flash builder. It may not be that important butcause probably anyone that knows a little more than me or even a little AS3 could probably see what i'm doing wrong.
Anyway, what i'm trying to do is basically create 10 instances of this square object I made. all I have to do is pass it an x an y coordinate to place it and it works. so ive tested if i just do:
var testsquare:Bgsq;
testsquare = new Bgsq(0,0);
add(testsquare);
it works fine and adds a square at 0,0 just like i told it to, but i want to add 10 of them then move the next one that's created 25 px to the right (because each square is 25px)
my problem is that I only ever see 1 square, like it's only making 1 instance of it still.
anyone possibly have an idea what I could be doing wrong?
var counter:int = 0;
var bgsqa:Array = new Array;
for (var ibgs:int = 0; ibgs < 10; ibgs++)
{
bgsqa[counter] = new Bgsq(0,0);
bgsqa[counter].x += 25;
add(bgsqa[counter]);
counter++;
}
There's a lot you're doing wrong here.
First off, you're using a pseudo-iterator (counter) to access array elements through a loop instead of, well, using the iterator (ibgs).
Second, I don't see anything in the array (bgsqa) you're iterating through. It's no wonder you're having problems. Here's what you should do.
var bgsqa:Array = [];
for(var i:int=0;i<10;i++)
{
var bgsq:Bgsq = new Bgsq(i * 25, 0);
add(bgsq);
bgsqa.push(bgsq);
}
That should probably do it if your post is accurate.
for (var ibgs:int = 0; ibgs < 10; ibgs++)
{
bgsqa[counter] = new Bgsq(0,0);
bgsqa[counter].x = counter * 25;
add(bgsqa[counter]);
counter++;
}
They start at 0, so applying += is simply adding 25 to 0. This should do the trick.