How to push datapoints in real time AmCharts - angularjs

I am working on a real time AmCharts in my AngularJS application and I wanted to know how I could push datapoints into the chart. The following is the code in my controller:
$http.get(hostNameService.getHostName()+"/dashboard/itemValue")
.then(function (response) {$scope.item = response.data.items;
function generateChartData(){
var chartData = [];
for (var i = 0; i < $scope.item.length; i++ ) {
var itemId = $scope.item[i].itemId;
var avail = $scope.item[i].itemAvailability;
chartData.push( {
"itemId": itemId,
"avail": avail
} );
}
return chartData;
}
/**
* Create the chart
*/
var chart = AmCharts.makeChart( "toolAvailability", {
"type": "serial",
"theme": "light",
"zoomOutButton": {
"backgroundColor": '#000000',
"backgroundAlpha": 0.15
},
"dataProvider": generateChartData(),
"categoryField": "itemId",
"graphs": [ {
"id": "g1",
"valueField": "avail",
"bullet": "round",
"bulletBorderColor": "#FFFFFF",
"bulletBorderThickness": 2,
"lineThickness": 2,
"lineColor": "#b5030d",
"negativeLineColor": "#0352b5",
"hideBulletsCount": 50
} ],
"chartCursor": {
"cursorPosition": "mouse"
}
} )
/**
* Set interval to push new data points periodically
*/
// set up the chart to update every second
setInterval( function() {
// normally you would load new datapoints here,
// but we will just generate some random values
// and remove the value from the beginning so that
// we get nice sliding graph feeling
// remove datapoint from the beginning
chart.dataProvider.shift();
// for (var i = 0; i < $scope.item.length; i++ ) {
// var itemId = $scope.item[i].itemId;
// var avail = $scope.item[i].itemAvailability;
// }
chart.dataProvider.push( {// not sure how I can push the json data here
date: //need to push the value here,
visits: //need to push the value here
} );
chart.validateData();
}, 1000 );
});
My chart is getting data from a web service. The web service returns 10 items and each item availability should be updated in real time. I am using itemId and availability in the chart. Initially I am able to load the data in the chart. But when the chart shifts one value how should I push the new value. Can anyone let me know how I could achieve this functionality.

I was able to achieve this by making the following changes in my code. I added the following function and called this function in the set timeout function. So for every shift in the chart one value will be pushed into the chart.
function pushNewData(index){
var itemId = $scope.tools[index].itemId;
var avail = $scope.tools[index].availability;
chart.dataProvider.push( {
itemId: itemId,
avail: avail
} );
}
var i =0;
setInterval( function() {
chart.dataProvider.shift();
pushNewData(i);
if(i < $scope.items.length - 1){
i++;
}else{
i = 0;
}
chart.validateData();
}, 1000 );

Related

Issues with AnyGantt

Im using AnyGantt, but Im having problems setting it up correctly.
Here is the full code:
var endpoint = '/api/chart/data/'
var label = []
var start = []
var end = []
var werk = []
$.ajax({
method: 'GET',
url: endpoint,
success: function(data){
labels = data.label
start = data.start
end = data.end
uplant = data.werk
var obj = {}
var finalArray = []
for (var i = 1; i <= start.length; i++) {
var first = { id: i, name: uplant[i] }
obj = { ...obj, ...first }
var periods = { id: labels[i], start: start[i - 1], end: end[i - 1] }
if (obj.periods) {
obj.periods.push(periods)
} else {
obj.periods = [periods]
}
finalArray.push(obj)
}
anychart.onDocumentReady(function () {
var data = finalArray;
var treeData = anychart.data.tree(data, "asTable");
chart = anychart.ganttResource();
chart.data(treeData);
chart.getTimeline().scale().minimum("2018-01-01");
chart.getTimeline().scale().maximum("2020-01-01");
var dataGrid = chart.dataGrid();
dataGrid.column(0)
.title('#')
.width(30)
.cellTextSettings({hAlign: 'center'});
dataGrid.column(1)
.title('Werk')
.width(60)
.cellTextSettings({hAlign: 'left'})
.format(function () {
return this.name;
});
chart.getTimeline().horizontalScrollBar().enabled(true);
/* chart.getTimeline().periods().edit(true); */
chart.getTimeline().edit(true);
chart.getTimeline().tooltip(false);
chart.getTimeline().elements().labels(false);
chart.container("containerx");
chart.draw();
chart.fitAll();
});
},
error:function(error_data){
console.log("error")
console.log(error_data)
}});
I can't click and move the periods (tasks) and I cant scroll.
Thank you very much for any suggestions
Please find below a screenshot of the chart:
Please find below a screenshot of the chart:
Scale range
You are applying the scale min/max correctly:
chart.getTimeline().scale().minimum("2018-01-01");
chart.getTimeline().scale().maximum("2020-01-01");
But then you override the default scale and it drops the min/max settings:
var dateTimeScale = anychart.scales.dateTime();
var dateTimeTicks = dateTimeScale.ticks();
chart.xScale(dateTimeScale);
There's no need to do this! The default Gantt Chart is already a dateTime type. Solution - simply remove those three lines above from your code.
LiveEdit
Your line chart.getTimeline().periods().edit(true); is correct, but due to a little bug in the current version 8.7.0 (Aug 2019) this setter doesn't work for types of elements. To avoid it replace this line with the following line chart.getTimeline().edit(true);.
Scrollers
The Gantt chart doesn't support x/yScrollers, only simple scroll bars.
The following methods the Gantt chart doesn't support:
chart.xScroller(true);
chart.yScroller(true);
For zooming, you can use one of the API functions. This subject is described in detail in the Gantt zooming article.

ng-google-chart how to expose draw() method

I've created a sample of my chart below using
nicholas bering, API Promise. I faked the $http data callback in my demo below.
My question is how to correctly access the draw() method of the chart after it is already displayed in the browser?
In my demo below, I create a google.visualization.DataView() so I can access the hideRows() method. Once that occurs, the documentation says I need to call on the draw() method to repaint the chart with the newly altered row information.
In this case I'm trying to let the user hide rows of items where the quantity being displayed is zero (row 2 "Olives" in my data). Once I get this working, I will let the user toggle other things but for now I'm trying to keep my question simple.
But this is where I get lost... the draw() method as I understand it should already exist on the original chart I created. How does one expose the draw() method of the original chart without having to poke at the DOM with a document.getElementById('myBarChart'). This seems so unlike everything Angular.
Here is my code:
<div ng-controller="ChartsController as ChartsController"
ng-init="ChartsController.init()">
<button ng-click="ChartsController.ToggleZeroDistributionOff()">No Zeros</button><br>
<div google-chart chart="chartMe" id="myBarChart" />
</div>
now my controller:
'use strict';
app.controller('ChartsController', ['$scope', '$http', '$q', 'googleChartApiPromise', function ($scope, $http, $q, googleChartApiPromise) {
this.name = "ChartsController";
this.$inject = ['$scope', '$q', '$http', 'googleChartApiPromise'];
$scope.chartMe = {};
this.init = function () {
// simulated $http callback data returned in promise
var dataPromise = {
"data": [
{"itemname": "Mushrooms", "qty": 13 },
{"itemname":"Onions", "qty": 11},
{"itemname":"Olives", "qty": 0},
{"itemname":"Zucchini", "qty": 1},
{"itemname": "Pepperoni", "qty": 27 }
]
}
// bind data and chart loading before building the my chart
$q.all({ data: dataPromise, api: googleChartApiPromise })
.then(apiLoadSuccess);
};
function apiLoadSuccess(result) {
$scope.chartMe.type = 'BarChart';
//create a new DataTable loaded with data from the HTTP response
$scope.chartMe.data = new google.visualization.DataTable();
$scope.chartMe.data.addColumn('string', 'Item Name/Units');
$scope.chartMe.data.addColumn('number', 'Qty');
// create an array to hold index of items
var aNoQty = [];
var aQty = [];
var aRows = [];
for (var i = 0; i < result.data.data.length; i++) {
var oData = [];
aRows.push(i);
oData[0] = result.data.data[i].itemname;
oData[1] = result.data.data[i].qty;
// which items quanity exist
if (result.data.data[i].qty > 0) {
aQty.push(i);
} else {
aNoQty.push(i);
};
// now add the row
$scope.chartMe.data.addRow(oData);
};
$scope.aNoQty = aNoQty;
$scope.aQty = aQty;
$scope.chartMe.options = {
title: "Item(s) Distributed",
isStacked: false,
displayExactValues: true,
};
};
this.ToggleZeroDistributionOff = function () {
$scope.chartMe.view = new google.visualization.DataView($scope.chartMe.data);
$scope.chartMe.view.hideRows($scope.aNoQty)
// this seems like the wrong way to attach to existing chart...
// i'm referring to using document.getElementById() - not very Angular !
// but how else to expose the draw() method ??
var myChart = new google.visualization.BarChart(document.getElementById('myBarChart'));
// now draw() method is expoised
myChart.draw($scope.chartMe.view.toDataTable(), $scope.chartMe.options)
}
}]);
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
Thank you WhiteHat for your suggestion. It worked both ways but in my case found your first answer to be easier to work with.
I posted a complete solution below:
'use strict';
app.controller('ChartsController', ['$scope', '$http', '$q',
'googleChartApiPromise', function ($scope, $http, $q, googleChartApiPromise) {
this.name = "ChartsController";
this.$inject = ['$scope', '$q', '$http', 'googleChartApiPromise'];
$scope.chartMe = {};
this.init = function () {
// simulated $http callback data returned in promise
var dataPromise = {
"data": [
{"itemname": "Mushrooms", "qty": 13 },
{"itemname":"Onions", "qty": 11},
{"itemname":"Olives", "qty": 0},
{"itemname":"Zucchini", "qty": 1},
{"itemname": "Pepperoni", "qty": 27 }
]
}
// bind data and chart loading before building the my chart
$q.all({ data: dataPromise, api: googleChartApiPromise })
.then(apiLoadSuccess);
};
function apiLoadSuccess(result) {
$scope.chartMe.type = 'BarChart';
//create a new DataTable loaded with data from the HTTP response
$scope.chartMe.data = new google.visualization.DataTable();
$scope.chartMe.data.addColumn('string', 'Item Name/Units');
$scope.chartMe.data.addColumn('number', 'Qty');
// create an array to hold index of items
var aNoQty = [];
var aQty = [];
var aRows = [];
for (var i = 0; i < result.data.data.length; i++) {
var oData = [];
aRows.push(i);
oData[0] = result.data.data[i].itemname;
oData[1] = result.data.data[i].qty;
// which items quanity exist
if (result.data.data[i].qty > 0) {
aQty.push(i);
} else {
aNoQty.push(i);
};
// now add the row
$scope.chartMe.data.addRow(oData);
};
$scope.aNoQty = aNoQty;
$scope.aQty = aQty;
$scope.chartMe.options = {
title: "Item(s) Distributed",
isStacked: false,
displayExactValues: true,
};
// chart view used later
$scope.chartMe.view = new google.visualization.DataView($scope.chartMe.data);
// grab a reference to the chart
$scope.chartMe.myChart = new google.visualization.BarChart(document.getElementById('myBarChart'));
};
this.ToggleZeroDistributionOff = function () {
// $scope.chartMe.view = new google.visualization.DataView($scope.chartMe.data);
$scope.chartMe.view.hideRows($scope.aNoQty)
// draw() method exists so refresh with new view
$scope.chartMe.myChart.draw($scope.chartMe.view.toDataTable(), $scope.chartMe.options)
}
}]);
This worked for me and opened lots of new options.
Thanks! Another way to hide rows as a response to an input in the view, assuming that you don't have that much data, is to use ng-change and set
the value of the cells in your row(s)/column(s) to = null. You'll have to find all the cells that you want to set to null because you can't simply set the
whole row or column to null. One by one. The advantage is that you can stick to the simple way of using ng-google-charts. Again this might make things easier only for small charts. You can also write a function which does a push() to the table an put in the ng-change of your input to do insert data from the view. If you ng-change affects directly the DataTable, make a variable that stores the original values, that way you can hide and then restore columns or rows.
https://www.w3schools.com/angular/ng_ng-change.asp

How to merge REST call results in Angular app more efficiently

I have an Angular SPA running on a SharePoint 2013 page. In the code, I'm using $q to pull data from 10 different SharePoint lists using REST and then merging them into one JSON object for use in a grid. The code runs and outputs the intended merged data but it's leaky and crashes the browser after a while.
Here's the code in the service:
factory.getGridInfo = function() {
var deferred = $q.defer();
var list_1a = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListA", "column1,column2,column3");
var list_1b = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListB", "column1,column2,column3");
var list_2a = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListC", "column4");
var list_2b = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListD", "column4");
var list_3a = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListE", "column5");
var list_3b = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListF", "column5");
var list_4a = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListG", "column6");
var list_4b = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListH", "column6");
var list_5a = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListI", "column7");
var list_5b = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListJ", "column7");
$q.all([list_1a, list_1b, list_2a, list_2b, list_3a, list_3b, list_4a, list_4b, list_5a, list_5b])
.then(function(results){
var results_1a = results[0].data.d.results;
var results_1b = results[1].data.d.results;
var results_2a = results[2].data.d.results;
var results_2b = results[3].data.d.results;
var results_3a = results[4].data.d.results;
var results_3b = results[5].data.d.results;
var results_4a = results[6].data.d.results;
var results_4b = results[7].data.d.results;
var results_5a = results[8].data.d.results;
var results_5b = results[9].data.d.results;
var combined_1 = results_1a.concat(results_1b);
var combined_2 = results_2a.concat(results_2b);
var combined_3 = results_3a.concat(results_3b);
var combined_4 = results_4a.concat(results_4b);
var combined_5 = results_5a.concat(results_5b);
for(var i = 0; i < combined_1.length; i++){
var currObj = combined_1[i];
currObj["column4"] = combined_2[i].column4;
currObj["column5"] = combined_3[i].column5;
currObj["column6"] = combined_4[i].column6;
currObj["column7"] = combined_5[i].column7;
factory.newObjectArray[i] = currObj;
}
deferred.resolve(factory.newObjectArray);
},
function (error) {
deferred.reject(error);
});
return deferred.promise;
};
Here's the REST call in CRUDFactory:
factory.getListItems = function (listName, columns){
var webUrl = _spPageContextInfo.webAbsoluteUrl + "/_api/web/lists/getByTitle('"+listName+"')/items?$select="+columns+"&$top=5000";
var options = {
headers: { "Accept": "application/json; odata=verbose" },
method: 'GET',
url: webUrl
};
return $http(options);
};
And then here's the controller bit:
$scope.refreshGridData = function(){
$scope.hideLoadingGif = false;
$scope.GridData = "";
GlobalFactory.getGridInfo()
.then(function(){
$scope.GridData = GlobalFactory.newObjectArray;
$scope.hideLoadingGif = true;
});
};
UPDATE 1: Per request, Here's the HTML (just a simple div that we're using angular-ui-grid on)
<div ui-grid="GridOptions" class="grid" ui-grid-selection ui-grid-exporter ui-grid-save-state></div>
This code starts by declaring some get calls and then uses $q.all to iterate over the calls and get the data. It then stores the results and merges them down to 5 total arrays. Then, because my list structure is proper and static, I'm able to iterate over one of the merged arrays and pull data from the other arrays into one master array that I'm assigning to factory.newObjectArray, which I'm declaring as a global in my service and using as my grid data source.
The code runs and doesn't kick any errors up but the issue is with (I believe) the "getGridInfo" function. If I don't comment out any of the REST calls, the browser uses 45 MB of data that doesn't get picked up by GC which is then compounded for each click until the session is ended or crashes. If I comment out all the calls but one, my page only uses 18.4 MB of memory, which is high but I can live with it.
So what's the deal? Do I need to destroy something somewhere? If so, what and how? Or does this relate back to the REST function I'm using?
UPDATE 2: The return result that the grid is using (the factory.newObjectArray) contains a total of 5,450 items and each item has about 80 properties after the merge. The code above is simplified and shows the pulling of a couple columns per list, but in actuality, I'm pulling 5-10 columns per list.
At the end of the day you are dealing with a lot of data, so memory problems are potentially always going to be an issue and you should probably consider whether you need to have all the data in memory.
The main goal you should probably be trying to achieve is limiting duplication of arrays, and trying to keep the memory footprint as low as possible, and freeing memory as fast as possible when you're done processing.
Please consider the following. You mention the actual number of columns being returned are more than your example so I have taken that into account.
factory.getGridInfo = function () {
var deferred = $q.defer(),
// list definitions
lists = [
{ name: 'ListA', columns: ['column1', 'column2', 'column3'] },
{ name: 'ListB', columns: ['column1', 'column2', 'column3'], combineWith: 'ListA' },
{ name: 'ListC', columns: ['column4'] },
{ name: 'ListD', columns: ['column4'], combineWith: 'ListC' },
{ name: 'ListE', columns: ['column5'] },
{ name: 'ListF', columns: ['column5'], combineWith: 'ListE' },
{ name: 'ListG', columns: ['column6'] },
{ name: 'ListH', columns: ['column6'], combineWith: 'ListG' },
{ name: 'ListI', columns: ['column7'] },
{ name: 'ListJ', columns: ['column7'], combineWith: 'ListI' },
],
// Combines two arrays without creating a new array, mindful of lenth limitations
combineArrays = function (a, b) {
var len = b.length;
for (var i = 0; i < len; i = i + 5000) {
a.unshift.apply(a, b.slice(i, i + 5000));
}
};
$q.all(lists.map(function (list) { return CRUDFactory.getListItems(list.name, list.columns.join()); }))
.then(function (results) {
var listResultMap = {}, var baseList = 'ListA';
// map our results to our list names
for(var i = 0; i < results.length; i++) {
listResultMap[lists[i].name] = results[i].data.d.results;
}
// loop around our lists
for(var i = 0; i < lists.length; i++) {
var listName = lists[i].name, combineWith = lists[i].combineWith;
if(combineWith) {
combineArrays(listResultMap[combineWith], listResultMap[listName]);
delete listResultMap[listName];
}
}
// build result
factory.newObjectArray = listResultMap[baseList].map(function(item) {
for(var i = 0; i < lists.length; i++) {
if(list.name !== baseList) {
for(var c = 0; c < lists[i].columns.length; c++) {
var columnName = lists[i].columns[c];
item[columnName] = listResultMap[list.name][columnName];
}
}
}
return item;
});
// clean up our remaining results
for (var i = 0; i < results.length; i++) {
delete results[i].data.d.results;
delete results[i];
}
deferred.resolve(factory.newObjectArray);
},
function (error) {
deferred.reject(error);
});
return deferred.promise;
};
I would suggest to add some sort of paging option... It's perhaps not a great idea to add all results to one big list.
Next i would suggest against ng-repeat or add a "track by" to the repeat function.
Check out: http://www.alexkras.com/11-tips-to-improve-angularjs-performance/
Fiddler your queries, the issue is probably rendering all the elements in the dom... Which could be kinda slow ( investigate)

How to set total records dynamically from the controller

Here is the problem,
Server responds with several records in JSON, which number is greater than grid pageSize parameter specified in the Store. The total number is not returning by a server in this JSON with data. The number of such records is known and could be different (this number should be requested from the server in another request). The total number is needed for the pagingtoolbar.
How to tell the proxy reader this number from the view controller?
The only workable solution I found is to override the Ext.data.reader.Json reader with the following code:
Ext.define('MyApp.custom.AnotherReader',{
extend: 'Ext.data.reader.Json',
alias : 'reader.anotherReader',
// разбираем ответ и записываем в store
getResponseData : function(response) {
var st = Ext.decode(response.responseText);
st.total = 5;
//console.log(st);
return st;
}
});
The problem is I cannot dynamically change this total parameter from the viewcontroller.
JSON 1:
[
{
"id":"1",
"user_id":"11",
},
{
"id":"2",
"user_id":"12",
},
{
"id":"3",
"user_id":"13",
},
{
"id":"4",
"user_id":"14",
},
{
"id":"5",
"user_id":"15",
}
]
JSON 2:
{
"records_count": "5"
}
You can do this inside your controller -
// some event handler/ or normal function inside your Controller that you'll call
somFunction: function() {
var me = this;
var store = Ext.getStore(<storeId>); // you can even pass the store
//instance as a parameter to this function
var reader = store.getProxy().getReader();
Ext.override(reader, {
getResponseData : function(response) {
var st = Ext.decode(response.responseText);
st.total = me.getValueYouWant();
return st;
}
});
}

Node.js : control flow with forEach

I am trying to create array from database objects :
I have entity "group" wich hasMany "devices", I want to create array whit all groups and for each groups the list of his devices :
[
{
"group_id": “1”,
"name": “My_group”,
"devices_list": [1, 2, 18]
},
{
"group_id": “2”,
"name": “My_second_group”,
"devices_list": [3, 24]
}
]
I tried several ways like this :
Group.all(function (err, groups) {
var resJson = {};
groups.forEach(function(group, index){
group.devices(function(err, devices){
resJson[index] = group;
console.log(devices);
resJson[index].devices_list = devices;
//End of the loop
if (index == groups.length -1){
send({code: 200, data: resJson});
}
});
});
});
EDIT 1 :
I tried this way too :
var resJson = {};
groups.forEach(function(group, index){
group.devices(function(err, devices){
resJson[index] = group;
resJson[index].devices_list = [];
devices.forEach(function(device,index2){
resJson[index].devices_list.push(device);
});
//End of the loop
if (index == groups.length -1){
send({code: 200, data: resJson});
}
});
});
But finally, my resJson contains only empty groups (groups without device associated), the other groups are not visible. Thus my devices_list are all empty whereas the console.log(devices) display devices.
It seems that the "send" instruction is processed before the treatment of non-empty groups.
What is the rigth way to do this ?
Thank you for your time
Instead of tracking and using an index against the length of the list perhaps you could use an after type of construct. I really enjoy them and they're easy to integrate and serve the perfect purpose for doing something after a set number of times.
First, lets define an after function you can use.
var after = function(amount, fn) {
var count = 0;
return function() {
count += 1;
if (count >= amount) {
fn.apply(arguments);
}
};
};
That should work for you now, let's modify your code sample to use this.
var json = []; // To return, you originally wanted an array.
Group.all(function(err, groups) {
if (err) {
// Handle the error
} else {
var sendJson = after(groups.length, function(json) {
send({code: 200, data: json});
});
groups.forEach(function(group) {
group.devices(function(err, devices) {
if (err) {
// Handle the error...
} else {
group.devices_list = devices;
json.push(group); // This part is different, using this method you'll match the JSON you gave as your "goal"
}
// This is outside the if/else because it needs to be called for every group
// regardless of change. If you do not call this the exact number of times
// that you specified it will never fire.
sendJson(json);
});
}
});
Perhaps something like that might clear up your issue.

Resources