I have an Angular SPA running on a SharePoint 2013 page. In the code, I'm using $q to pull data from 10 different SharePoint lists using REST and then merging them into one JSON object for use in a grid. The code runs and outputs the intended merged data but it's leaky and crashes the browser after a while.
Here's the code in the service:
factory.getGridInfo = function() {
var deferred = $q.defer();
var list_1a = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListA", "column1,column2,column3");
var list_1b = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListB", "column1,column2,column3");
var list_2a = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListC", "column4");
var list_2b = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListD", "column4");
var list_3a = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListE", "column5");
var list_3b = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListF", "column5");
var list_4a = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListG", "column6");
var list_4b = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListH", "column6");
var list_5a = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListI", "column7");
var list_5b = CRUDFactory.getListItems("ListJ", "column7");
$q.all([list_1a, list_1b, list_2a, list_2b, list_3a, list_3b, list_4a, list_4b, list_5a, list_5b])
.then(function(results){
var results_1a = results[0].data.d.results;
var results_1b = results[1].data.d.results;
var results_2a = results[2].data.d.results;
var results_2b = results[3].data.d.results;
var results_3a = results[4].data.d.results;
var results_3b = results[5].data.d.results;
var results_4a = results[6].data.d.results;
var results_4b = results[7].data.d.results;
var results_5a = results[8].data.d.results;
var results_5b = results[9].data.d.results;
var combined_1 = results_1a.concat(results_1b);
var combined_2 = results_2a.concat(results_2b);
var combined_3 = results_3a.concat(results_3b);
var combined_4 = results_4a.concat(results_4b);
var combined_5 = results_5a.concat(results_5b);
for(var i = 0; i < combined_1.length; i++){
var currObj = combined_1[i];
currObj["column4"] = combined_2[i].column4;
currObj["column5"] = combined_3[i].column5;
currObj["column6"] = combined_4[i].column6;
currObj["column7"] = combined_5[i].column7;
factory.newObjectArray[i] = currObj;
}
deferred.resolve(factory.newObjectArray);
},
function (error) {
deferred.reject(error);
});
return deferred.promise;
};
Here's the REST call in CRUDFactory:
factory.getListItems = function (listName, columns){
var webUrl = _spPageContextInfo.webAbsoluteUrl + "/_api/web/lists/getByTitle('"+listName+"')/items?$select="+columns+"&$top=5000";
var options = {
headers: { "Accept": "application/json; odata=verbose" },
method: 'GET',
url: webUrl
};
return $http(options);
};
And then here's the controller bit:
$scope.refreshGridData = function(){
$scope.hideLoadingGif = false;
$scope.GridData = "";
GlobalFactory.getGridInfo()
.then(function(){
$scope.GridData = GlobalFactory.newObjectArray;
$scope.hideLoadingGif = true;
});
};
UPDATE 1: Per request, Here's the HTML (just a simple div that we're using angular-ui-grid on)
<div ui-grid="GridOptions" class="grid" ui-grid-selection ui-grid-exporter ui-grid-save-state></div>
This code starts by declaring some get calls and then uses $q.all to iterate over the calls and get the data. It then stores the results and merges them down to 5 total arrays. Then, because my list structure is proper and static, I'm able to iterate over one of the merged arrays and pull data from the other arrays into one master array that I'm assigning to factory.newObjectArray, which I'm declaring as a global in my service and using as my grid data source.
The code runs and doesn't kick any errors up but the issue is with (I believe) the "getGridInfo" function. If I don't comment out any of the REST calls, the browser uses 45 MB of data that doesn't get picked up by GC which is then compounded for each click until the session is ended or crashes. If I comment out all the calls but one, my page only uses 18.4 MB of memory, which is high but I can live with it.
So what's the deal? Do I need to destroy something somewhere? If so, what and how? Or does this relate back to the REST function I'm using?
UPDATE 2: The return result that the grid is using (the factory.newObjectArray) contains a total of 5,450 items and each item has about 80 properties after the merge. The code above is simplified and shows the pulling of a couple columns per list, but in actuality, I'm pulling 5-10 columns per list.
At the end of the day you are dealing with a lot of data, so memory problems are potentially always going to be an issue and you should probably consider whether you need to have all the data in memory.
The main goal you should probably be trying to achieve is limiting duplication of arrays, and trying to keep the memory footprint as low as possible, and freeing memory as fast as possible when you're done processing.
Please consider the following. You mention the actual number of columns being returned are more than your example so I have taken that into account.
factory.getGridInfo = function () {
var deferred = $q.defer(),
// list definitions
lists = [
{ name: 'ListA', columns: ['column1', 'column2', 'column3'] },
{ name: 'ListB', columns: ['column1', 'column2', 'column3'], combineWith: 'ListA' },
{ name: 'ListC', columns: ['column4'] },
{ name: 'ListD', columns: ['column4'], combineWith: 'ListC' },
{ name: 'ListE', columns: ['column5'] },
{ name: 'ListF', columns: ['column5'], combineWith: 'ListE' },
{ name: 'ListG', columns: ['column6'] },
{ name: 'ListH', columns: ['column6'], combineWith: 'ListG' },
{ name: 'ListI', columns: ['column7'] },
{ name: 'ListJ', columns: ['column7'], combineWith: 'ListI' },
],
// Combines two arrays without creating a new array, mindful of lenth limitations
combineArrays = function (a, b) {
var len = b.length;
for (var i = 0; i < len; i = i + 5000) {
a.unshift.apply(a, b.slice(i, i + 5000));
}
};
$q.all(lists.map(function (list) { return CRUDFactory.getListItems(list.name, list.columns.join()); }))
.then(function (results) {
var listResultMap = {}, var baseList = 'ListA';
// map our results to our list names
for(var i = 0; i < results.length; i++) {
listResultMap[lists[i].name] = results[i].data.d.results;
}
// loop around our lists
for(var i = 0; i < lists.length; i++) {
var listName = lists[i].name, combineWith = lists[i].combineWith;
if(combineWith) {
combineArrays(listResultMap[combineWith], listResultMap[listName]);
delete listResultMap[listName];
}
}
// build result
factory.newObjectArray = listResultMap[baseList].map(function(item) {
for(var i = 0; i < lists.length; i++) {
if(list.name !== baseList) {
for(var c = 0; c < lists[i].columns.length; c++) {
var columnName = lists[i].columns[c];
item[columnName] = listResultMap[list.name][columnName];
}
}
}
return item;
});
// clean up our remaining results
for (var i = 0; i < results.length; i++) {
delete results[i].data.d.results;
delete results[i];
}
deferred.resolve(factory.newObjectArray);
},
function (error) {
deferred.reject(error);
});
return deferred.promise;
};
I would suggest to add some sort of paging option... It's perhaps not a great idea to add all results to one big list.
Next i would suggest against ng-repeat or add a "track by" to the repeat function.
Check out: http://www.alexkras.com/11-tips-to-improve-angularjs-performance/
Fiddler your queries, the issue is probably rendering all the elements in the dom... Which could be kinda slow ( investigate)
Related
I'm trying to get a list of quantities (identified as cantidad) chosen of each product (as id) to my flask controller. Since wtform didn't adapted well to my needs I had to use json and jQuery, but no matter what I do, the list of objects is seen as empty in the controller, even if in the frontend it does has something inside.
This is the JavaScript:
This function posts the order which should be a list of quantities with id assigned:
<script type="text/JavaScript">
function setPedido(order){
console.log(order);
$.ajax({
url: "{{url_for('main.pedido')}}",
type: 'POST',
data: JSON.stringify(order),
contentType: 'application/json;charset=UTF-8',
success: function(response) {
if (response.redirect) {
window.location.href = response.redirect;
}
}
});
};
When "pedido" (order) button is clicked, gets all assigned quantities and their respective product IDs:
$(".btnPedido").click(function(){
var order = []
$(function() {
var lines = $(".btnAgregar.active")
for(var i = 0; i < lines.length; i++) {
console.log(lines[i]);
order.push({
'id': $(lines[i]).closest("tr").find('.btnPedido').val(),
'cantidad' : $(lines[i]).closest("tr").find('.inpCantidad').val()
});
}
});
setPedido(order);
});
This marks each quantity input as ready to order:
$(".btnAgregar").click(function(){
if($(this).val() == 0){
$(this).val(1);
$(this).text("Agregado");
}else{
$(this).val(0);
$(this).text("Agregar");
}
$(this).toggleClass('btn-info btn-success active');
});
</script>
This shows in the console:
And this in flask controller (notice data):
The problem was at this function, paying better attention i declared a function inside another function, wich is executed at a different scope than setPedido(order), at wich point it stills empty.
To make it worse, the console.log inside the inner function where misleading.
$(".btnPedido").click(function(){
var order = []
$(function() {
var lines = $(".btnAgregar.active")
for(var i = 0; i < lines.length; i++) {
console.log(lines[i]);
order.push({
'id': $(lines[i]).closest("tr").find('.btnPedido').val(),
'cantidad' : $(lines[i]).closest("tr").find('.inpCantidad').val()
});
}
});
setPedido(order);
});
The correct way to do it is:
$(".btnPedido").click(function(){
var order = []
var lines = $(".btnAgregar.active")
for(var i = 0; i < lines.length; i++) {
console.log(lines[i]);
order.push({
'id': $(lines[i]).closest("tr").find('.btnPedido').val(),
'cantidad' : $(lines[i]).closest("tr").find('.inpCantidad').val()
});
}
setPedido(order);
});
I have 2 API calls.
The second API call depends on the Property ID returned to make the second API call to check if each of these properties has parking.
If it does, then I add details of that property to an object and push the object into an Array.
The second API call is nested inside the first. After I've looped through all the properties, I check if the Array length is more than 0, if it is then I can display the returned properties in page, else it shows an error.
The problem is even when there are properties returned with parking, the else statement or error function executes, as well as displaying properties on the page.
Is there a way to complete the nested Promise before checking if my Array is more than 0?
Here's my code:
$scope.viewPropertyList = function(latlong) {
$scope.locationError = false;
var latlongArray = latlog.split('::');
var searchLat_scope = latlongArray[0];
var searchLon_scope = latlongArray[1];
if (searchLat_scope && searchLon_scope) {
var data = Property.getAllProperties({
dest: 'property',
apikey: API_KEY,
lat: encodeURIComponent(searchLat_scope),
limit: 10,
lon: encodeURIComponent(searchLon_scope)
}).$promise.then(function(success) {
var propertyMarkers = [];
$scope.dbMarkers = 0;
for (var i = 0, l = success.property.length; i < l; i++) {
(function(i) {
Property.getProperty({
dest: 'property',
propertyId: success.property[i].name,
apikey: API_KEY
}).$promise.then(function(propertyData) {
for (var j = 0, k = propertyData.services.length; j < k; j++) {
if (propertyData.services[j].name === "parking") {
var obj = {
"propertyName": success.property[i].propertyName,
"telephone": success.property[i].telephone,
"postcode": success.property[i].address.postcode,
"city": success.property[i].address.city,
"county": success.property[i].address.county,
"addressLine1": success.property[i].address.addressLine1
};
propertyMarkers.push(obj);
}
}
if (propertyMarkers.length != 0) {
$scope.dbMarkers = propertyMarkers;
$scope.selectedLat = searchLat_scope;
$scope.selectedlog = searchLon_scope;
} else {
$scope.locationErr = true;
$scope.errorMsg = "No properties found";
}
});
})(i);
}
}, function(error) {
$scope.locationErr = true;
$scope.errorMsg = "Something went wrong, please try again";
});
}
}
Two main things :
there's no attempt to aggregate multiple promises generated in a loop.
the if (propertyMarkers.length > 0) {...} else {...} is too deeply nested.
Minor :
the inner iteration can break as soon as 'parking' is found. If it continued and further 'parking' was found, then duplicate markers would be created.
$scope.viewPropertyList = function(latlong) {
$scope.locationError = false;
var latlongArray = latlog.split('::');
var searchLat_scope = latlongArray[0];
var searchLon_scope = latlongArray[1];
if (searchLat_scope && searchLon_scope) {
Property.getAllProperties({
dest: 'property',
apikey: API_KEY,
limit: 10,
lat: encodeURIComponent(searchLat_scope),
lon: encodeURIComponent(searchLon_scope)
}).$promise.then(function(success) {
var propertyMarkers = [];
$scope.dbMarkers = 0;
// create an array of promises by mapping the array `success.property`.
var promises = success.property.map(function(prop) {
return Property.getProperty({
dest: 'property',
propertyId: prop.name,
apikey: API_KEY
}).$promise.then(function(propertyData) {
for (var j=0, k=propertyData.services.length; j<k; j++) {
if (propertyData.services[j].name === 'parking') {
propertyMarkers.push({
'propertyName': prop.propertyName,
'telephone': prop.telephone,
'postcode': prop.address.postcode,
'city': prop.address.city,
'county': prop.address.county,
'addressLine1': prop.address.addressLine1
});
break; // 'parking' is found - no point iterating further
}
}
});
});
/* ******** */
// Aggregate `promises`
$q.all(promises).then(function() {
// This block is now un-nested from its original position,
// and will execute when all `promises` have resolved.
if (propertyMarkers.length > 0) {
$scope.dbMarkers = propertyMarkers;
$scope.selectedLat = searchLat_scope;
$scope.selectedlog = searchLon_scope;
} else {
$scope.locationErr = true;
$scope.errorMsg = 'No parking found';
}
});
/* ******** */
}).catch(function(error) {
$scope.locationErr = true;
$scope.errorMsg = 'Something went wrong, please try again';
});
} else {
$scope.locationErr = true;
$scope.errorMsg = 'Problem with lat/lng data';
}
}
Notes :
that the outer iteration is now coded as success.property.map(), which returns promises and avoids the need for an IIFE.
Extra error handling added
If I got your problem right, you want all Property.getProperty promises of success.property are resolved before going to the success function to check propertyMarkers length.
In that case, you need $q.all to resolve all the Property.getProperty promises for you.
In your for (var i = 0, l = success.property.length; i < l; i++) { appends all the promises into an array
Property.getProperty({
dest: 'property',
propertyId: success.property[i].name,
apikey: API_KEY
})
then use $q.all(arrPromises).then(function(propertyData) { to do the following check.
One more thing worth to mention, promise chaining can be easily achieved by $promise.then(successFn, failFn).then(successFn, failFn).then.... Every time you call then() will create another promise which allows you to chain to next promise and pass value to the next.
I have a generic grid component.
on click of menu item corresponding grid is displayed in independent tabs.
on rendering the grid component, store data is set dynamically and grid is populated.
The problem if I open two grids in two tabs, on navigating to the first tab, grid data is not displayed as the store data is set to second grid data.
Hoping to find solution.Thank you
code in main controller:
OnMenuItemClick: function(c){
var nodeText = c.text,
tabs = Ext.getCmp('app-tab'),
tabBar = tabs.getTabBar(),
tabIndex;
for(var i = 0; i < tabBar.items.length; i++) {
if (tabBar.items.get(i).getText() === nodeText) {
tabIndex = i;
}
}
if (Ext.isEmpty(tabIndex)) {
/* Note: While creating the Grid Panel,here we are passing the Menu/Grid Id along with it for future reference */
tabs.add(Ext.create('DemoApp.view.grid.GenericGrid',{title:nodeText,gridId:c.id,overflowY: 'scroll',closable:true}));
tabIndex = tabBar.items.length - 1 ;
}
tabs.setActiveTab(tabIndex);
}
code in generic grid controller:
renderGridMetadata: function(genericGrid) {
var store = Ext.getStore("DemoApp.store.GenericGrid"),
gridId = genericGrid.up().gridId,
resourceURL = "resources/data/" + gridId + ".json";
var serviceInput = Util.createServiceResponse(gridId);
/*Dynamically add the proxy URL to the ViewModel
DemoApp.model.GenericGrid.getProxy().setUrl(resourceURL);*/
Ext.getBody().mask("Loading... Please wait...", 'loading');
Ext.Ajax.request({
url: Util.localGridService,
method: 'POST',
headers: {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
'SM_USER': 'arun.x.kumar.ap#nielsen.com',
'SM_SERVERSESSIONID': 'asdfadsf'
},
jsonData: {
getConfigurationAndDataRequestType: serviceInput
},
success: function(conn, response, options, eOpts) {
Ext.getBody().unmask();
var data = Util.decodeJSON(conn.responseText);
/* Apply REST WebServices response Metadata to the Grid */
var recordsMetaData = data.getConfigurationAndDataReplyType.gridConfigDataResponse.data.record;
var jsonMetaDataArray = [];
for (var c = 0; c < recordsMetaData.length; c++) {
var jsonMetaDataObject = {};
var text = data.getConfigurationAndDataReplyType.gridConfigDataResponse.data.record[c].displayName;
var dataIndex = data.getConfigurationAndDataReplyType.gridConfigDataResponse.data.record[c].columnName;
jsonMetaDataObject["text"] = text;
jsonMetaDataObject["dataIndex"] = dataIndex;
jsonMetaDataArray.push(jsonMetaDataObject);
}
/* Apply REST WebServices response data to the Grid */
var recordsData = data.getConfigurationAndDataReplyType.gridDataResponse.record;
var jsonDataArray = [];
for (var r = 0; r < recordsData.length; r++) {
var columnsData = data.getConfigurationAndDataReplyType.gridDataResponse.record[r].column;
var jsonDataObject = {};
for (var c = 0; c < columnsData.length; c++) {
jsonDataObject[columnsData[c].columnId] = columnsData[c].columnValue;
}
jsonDataArray.push(jsonDataObject);
}
store.setData(jsonDataArray);
genericGrid.reconfigure(store, jsonMetaDataArray);
},
failure: function(conn, response, options, eOpts) {
Ext.getBody().unmask();
Util.showErrorMsg(conn.responseText);
}
});
store.load();
}
});
Most likely there is only one instance of DemoApp.store.GenericGrid.
Frankly, I only guess because I see that you call Ext.getStore("DemoApp.store.GenericGrid") that implies the store is declared in stores:["DemoApp.store.GenericGrid"] array probably in the application class.
If a store is declared this way then Ext automatically creates one instance of it setting storeId to the string listed in stores:[]. Hence, Ext.getStore() returns that instance.
If you want to have two independent instances of the grid you have to create store instances yourself preferably in initComponent override.
This problem has me stumped.
For some reason, the autoincrementing key generator in indexedDB resets after performing and update on an existing object with a put-transaction, leading to overwrites of data in the database.
For my app, I'm using a self written IndexedDB service for angularJS with all the basic CRUD functions implemented.
I may also add that I'm developing with Ionic Framework, even though I doubt that is to blame.
Considering the service is a work-in-progress, I've let the key path for an object store default to "id" with an autoincrementing strategy.
The indices for the given store, nevertheless, are up to the user to decide in a specific object.
As an example:
dbHelper.objectStores = [{'employees',
indices: [{indexName: 'name', isUnique: false},
{indexName: 'phone', isUnique: true}]}];
This would, unless already created in the db, create the object store 'employees' with indices 'name' and 'phone', where 'phone' would have to be a unique value while 'name' would not.
Here is the implementation of the openDB function.
Please note that dbHelper.objectStores is supposed to be empty as it's up to the user to assign these properties before opening the db(or else it is defaulted).
angular.module('dbProvider', [])
.factory('$db', ['$window', function($window) {
// DB Object
var dbHelper = {};
// Properties - Are given defaults unless assigned manually by user before openDB is invoked.
dbHelper.dbName = 'defaultDB';
dbHelper.dbVersion = 1;
dbHelper.objectStores = [];
dbHelper.openDB = function(onCompleteCallback, onErrorCallback) {
console.log('Atempting to open db with name ' + dbHelper.dbName + '.');
var request = $window.indexedDB.open(dbHelper.dbName, dbHelper.dbVersion);
// Invoked by indexedDB if version changes
request.onupgradeneeded = function(e) {
console.log('Version change. Current version: ' + dbHelper.dbVersion);
var db = e.target.result;
e.target.transaction.onerror = onErrorCallback;
if(dbHelper.objectStores.length === 0) {
dbHelper.objectStores.push({name:'defaultStore', indices: []});
}
for(var store in dbHelper.objectStores) {
if(db.objectStoreNames.contains(dbHelper.objectStores[store].name)) {
console.log(dbHelper.objectStores[store].name + ' deleted.');
db.deleteObjectStore(dbHelper.objectStores[store].name);
}
var newStore = db.createObjectStore(dbHelper.objectStores[store].name, {keyPath: "id", autoIncrement: true});
for(var index in dbHelper.objectStores[store].indices) {
newStore.createIndex(dbHelper.objectStores[store].indices[index].indexName,
dbHelper.objectStores[store].indices[index].indexName,
{unique : dbHelper.objectStores[store].indices[index].isUnique});
}
console.log(dbHelper.objectStores[store].name + ' created.');
}
};
request.onsuccess = function(e) {
console.log('DB ' + dbHelper.dbName + ' open.');
dbHelper.indexedDB.db = e.target.result;
onCompleteCallback();
};
request.onerror = onErrorCallback;
};
Here are some of the CRUD functions(the ones in question):
dbHelper.findItemWithIndex = function(keyValue, storename,
onCompleteCallback,onErrorCallback) {
var db = dbHelper.indexedDB.db;
var trans = db.transaction([storename], "readwrite");
var store = trans.objectStore(storename);
var index = store.index(keyValue.key);
index.get(keyValue.value).onsuccess = function(event) {
onCompleteCallback(event.target.result);
};
};
dbHelper.addItemToStore = function(item, storename,
onCompleteCallback, onErrorCallback) {
var db = dbHelper.indexedDB.db;
var trans = db.transaction([storename], "readwrite");
var store = trans.objectStore(storename);
var request = store.add(item);
trans.oncomplete = onCompleteCallback;
request.onerror = onErrorCallback;
};
dbHelper.deleteItemFromStore = function(itemId, storename,
onCompleteCallback, onErrorCallback) {
var db = dbHelper.indexedDB.db;
var trans = db.transaction([storename], "readwrite");
var store = trans.objectStore(storename);
var request = store.delete(itemId);
trans.oncomplete = onCompleteCallback;
request.onerror = onErrorCallback;
};
dbHelper.updateItem = function(item, storename, onCompleteCallback, onErrorCallback) {
var db = dbHelper.indexedDB.db;
var trans = db.transaction([storename], "readwrite");
var store = trans.objectStore(storename);
var request = store.put(item);
trans.oncomplete = onCompleteCallback;
request.onerror = onErrorCallback;
};
Finally, the code from the controller where the transactions are invoked.
The strategy here, is that the item is added to the db using the addItemToStore function the first time it is persisted, and then afterwards the updateItem function.
After adding the first time, the object is immediately fetched in order to keep working on it with the assigned id from the db.
$scope.updateTemplate = function() {
console.log('Saving..');
var onCompleteCallback = {};
if(!$scope.formTemplate.firstSave) {
onCompleteCallback = $scope.updateModel;
} else {
$scope.formTemplate.firstSave = false;
onCompleteCallback = $scope.setId;
}
$db.updateItem($scope.formTemplate, $scope.objectStore.name,
onCompleteCallback, $scope.dbError);
};
$scope.newItem = function() {
$db.addItemToStore($scope.formTemplate, $scope.objectStore.name,
$scope.setId, $scope.dbError);
};
$scope.setId = function() {
$db.findItemWithIndex(
{key: 'title',
value: $scope.formTemplate.title},
$scope.objectStore.name,
function(result) {
console.log(JSON.stringify(result));
$scope.formTemplate = result;
},
function(error) {
$scope.dbError(error);
});
}
It's here everything goes to hell.
I add an object, go back to another view and find it in the list with id=1.
I add another object, go back to the list view, and there it is with id=2.
And so forth and so forth..
Then, after updating either of the objects with the $scope.updateTemplate function, which also works like a charm, things get interesting:
The next object added gets id=1 and totally erases good old numero uno from earlier.
The next objects also get id's that cause them to replace the already existing objects.
What could cause this?
For testing I'm using Safari 8 in OS 10.10 and I'm deploying to an LGG2 with KitKat 4.4.2.
To be honest, I skimmed, but I saw this, "Safari 8" - the latest iOS and Safari have serious bugs with IndexedDB: http://www.raymondcamden.com/2014/9/25/IndexedDB-on-iOS-8--Broken-Bad
In iOS9, many of the IndexedDb bugs are fixed, but not all. We are currently testing on iOS9 Beta 2 and this particular bug that you found is not fixed.
We were able to work around this problem by not using autoincrement on our object stores. We just manually find the max key value and increment that.
Inserting an object looks something like this:
var store = db.transaction([entity], "readwrite").objectStore(entity);
store.openCursor(null, "prev").onsuccess = function (event) {
var maxKey = event.target.result.key || 0;
object.id = maxKey + 1;
store.add(object);
}
I want to populate an array of objects with data pulled from a getJSON function.
I'm currently doing it object by object, but know it'd be much cleaner with a for loop...
Here's the getJSON:
$.getJSON("http://www.reddit.com/r/pics.json?jsonp=?",
function(data) {
var imageurl1 = data.data.children[0].data.url;
var imagecaption1 = data.data.children[0].data.title;;
var commentlink1 = "http://www.reddit.com" + data.data.children[0].data.permalink;
var imageurl2 = data.data.children[1].data.url;
var imagecaption2 = data.data.children[1].data.title;
var commentlink2 = "http://www.reddit.com" + data.data.children[1].data.permalink;
}
And here's the array I'm using the data for
var lightboximages = [
{
src: imageurl1,
caption: imagecaption1,
comments: commentlink1
}, {
src: imageurl2,
caption: imagecaption2,
comments: commentlink2
}]
Any help with the loop would be much appreciated!
Not tested, but this is the idea:
$.getJSON("http://www.reddit.com/r/pics.json?jsonp=?",
function(data) {
var lightboxArray = [];
for (var i=0; i<data.data.children.length; i++) {
var child = data.data.children[i];
var lightboxObj = {"src":child.data.url, "caption":child.data.title, "comments":child.data.permalink};
lightboxArray.push(lightboxObj);
}
// now call some function to process the array we've built
});