I Know I am missing out on something which I am not able to figure out. Need your help guys.
Basically I want to create multiple thumbnails, for which, the data I am storing in a variable and then trying ng repeat to get the details, but no success. Please help. Here is the plunker for the same. Without directive, using ng-include, its working fine, but with directive, nothing is getting displayed.
directive code:-
app.directive('thumbnail', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
templateUrl: 'UI/templates/thumbnail.html',
scope: {
}
}
});
https://plnkr.co/edit/q9dWaLpYFusgwGhZDCYF?p=preview
app.directive('thumbnail', function() {
return {
restrict: 'AE',
templateUrl: 'UI/templates/thumbnail.html',
}
});
app.directive('thumbnail', function() {
return {
restrict: 'AE',
templateUrl: 'UI/templates/thumbnail.html',
}
});
removing isolated scope, will make the data defined in controller available in directive. if you still want to use isolated scope pass the data using = operator
Updated plunker withe the working with directive.
[https://plnkr.co/edit/Yr8DsPb3kt5Jz3CNFGnM?p=preview][1]
Related
I'm having two directives and I'm trying to call one directive inside another directive's templateUrl with some attribute but I'm not able to get the compiled attribute value in the second directive. Code is like this:
1st directive
app.directive('myDir', function() {
return {
link: function(scope, element, attrs, controller) {
scope.myVal='hello';
},
templateUrl: 'directive1.html',
scope: {}
}
directive.html
<div>
<child-dir attrval="{{myVal}}"></child-dir>
<div>
2nd directive
app.directive('childDir', function() {
return {
templateUrl: template(element,attrs) {
alert(attrs.attrval);
},
scope: {}
}
Here, attrs.attrval is coming like this {{myVal}}.
but I want the value hello. Can anyone help me?
Please note two things here:
1) I'm using templateUrl.
2) I'm passing a scope variable's value as an attribute to the child directive.
I had the same problem and finally found the solution (probably not the best, but it's working for me). Your example is a litte bit different from mine, but I suppose in your example would be:
Parent directive and directive.html equals, but child directive:
app.directive('childDir', function() {
return {
templateUrl: template(element,attrs) {
attrs.$observe("attrval", function(){
alert(attrs.attrval);
});
},
scope: {}
}
When template is set in parent directive the value is not set yet, but child directive is trying to use it. With 'observe', child directive can force refresh when attrval is really set.
If not works for you, tell me and I will post parts of my code in case it would be useful.
I'm trying to create a custom component (directive) which is composed of an <input> box and a [-] and [+] buttons. Currently, the example below only implements the input box.
So, say I have the following HTML for my directive:
<my-input ng-blur="onBlur($event)" ng-focus="onFocus($event)"></my-input>
And for testing purposes, I use this code:
app.run(function ($rootScope) {
$rootScope.onBlur = function ($event) {
console.log('onBlur', $event);
};
$rootScope.onFocus = function ($event) {
console.log('onFocus', $event);
};
});
Now I want to create my custom <my-input> directive which has an <input> box on the template and I need the ng-blur and ng-focus set on <my-input> to respond to blur/focus events on the input box.
I have the following solution almost working: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/KpELmj
1) I have a feeling that this can be achieved in a much better way, I just can't seem to do it. Thoughts?
2) $event seems to be undefined and I can't understand why. Thoughts?
Ok figured it out. Doron's answer was a good starting point for research, but now I think I have what you are looking for. The key is you have to use & in the link section in order to get it to execute the expression.
.directive('myInput', function($timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {
data: '=',
blur: '&myBlur' //this is the key line
},
template: '<input ng-blur="blur($event)" ng-model="data">'
}
})
This is how you use it:
<my-input my-blur="runBlurFunc()"></my-input>
If you really want to define the function on the root scope, you can use $scope.$root.onBlur() instead of runBlurFunc()
Hope I got your question right, did you try to use the link function?
app.directive('myInput', function () {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {
ngBlur: '&',
ngFocus: '&'
},
bindToController: true,
controller: controllerFn,
controllerAs: 'ctrl',
link:function(scope){
scope.onBlur = function(ev){
console.log(ev);
}
scope.onFocus = function(ev){
console.log(ev);
}
},
template: '[-]<input ng-blur="onBlur($event)" ng-focus="onFocus($event)"></input>[+]'
}
});
I'm writing a directive that uses two-way binding.My directive looks like this:
bankSearch.directive('bankSearch',
function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {
bankDetail: '='
},
templateUrl: "angular/views/self_signup/bank_search.html",
link: function(scope) {
//Now when link function runs, scope.bankDetail is undefined.
}
}
});
Html of template-url:
`<div class="row-fluid">
<input id="ifsc-code" class="span12" type="text" name="ifscCode"
ng-model="bankDetail.bankBranch.ifscCode"
should-be-ifsc
ng-keypress="onPressEnter($event, bankSearch.ifscCode.$valid)">
</div>`
This is how I'm using the directive:
`<bank-search
bank-detail="bankSearchModel.bankDetail">
</bank-search>`
I was under the impression that link function runs after linking(watchers setup) is done. If I'm correct then why am I getting undefined for scope.bankDetail inside my link function.
I'm new to Angular. Thanks for the help!
Might be bankSearchModel.bankDetail defines after directive is rendered. In case it is loaded from $http or something else. Try
link: function(scope) {
scope.$watch('bankDetail', function(val){
console.log(val);
});
}
And you'll see all changes of that variable.
I have a directive myDirective with variable type. If I run <my-directive type="X"> I want the directive to use templateUrl: x-template.html.
If I do <my-directive type="Y"> I want the directive to use templateUrl: y-template.html.
This is my current directive.
app.directive('myDirective', function() {
var myDirective = {
templateUrl: 'X-template.html',
restrict: 'E',
scope: {
type: '='
},
};
return myDirective;
});
I read thru stackoverflow and angular documentation but have not found anything that I need.
I am now trying to do something along the lines of:
if ($scope.type === 'X') {
templateUrl: 'X-template.html',
}
else if ($scope.type === 'Y') {
templateUrl: 'Y-template.html',
}
But do not know where to do it.
Do you guys know if this is possible and how?
Angular will accept a function as the template option, so you could do something like so:
.directive('myDirective', function () {
return {
templateUrl: function (tElement, tAttrs) {
if (tAttrs) {
if (tAttrs.type === 'X') {
return 'X-template.html';
}
if (tAttrs.type === 'Y') {
return 'Y-template.html';
}
}
}
}
});
For more info, see the documentation for the $compile service.
You can work around this issue using ng-include inside compile:
app.directive('myDirective', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
compile: function(element, attrs) {
element.append('<div ng-include="\'' + attrs.type + '-template.html\'"></div>');
}
}
});
fiddle
If you're willing to live on the bleeding edge with a build on the 1.1.x code path (note the warning attached to every 1.1.x build notes entry so I don't dilute this answer by repeating it again here), you're in luck--this very feature was just added in the 1.1.4 release on April 3rd. You can find the release notes for 1.1.4 here and the feature's task log includes a Jasmine test that demonstrates how to use the new functionality.
If you're more conservative and are using a 1.0.x release, then you won't be able to accomplish this as easily, but it can be done. Mark Rajcok's solution looks like it would fit your requirements as-stated, but I would just add a few additional notes:
Aside from its 1.1.4 release, compile-time directives don't support modification at runtime.
As of 1.1.4, you can safely modify the attributes of compile-time directives, but only from another compile-time directive.
You may want to consider replaceWith() instead of append() since <my-directive> is not a standard-defined HTML element type.
If your X and Y templates contain additional directives, I don't think you'll be able to pass attributes on <my-template> through to the root element of your template so easily.
A directive with replace: true will transfer attributes from the source element to its replacement root, but I do not think that ngInclude will do the same from is host to the root of the included template.
I also seem to recall that ngInclude does not require that its template have exactly one root element.
You could perhaps preserve attributes on a replacement parent by using replaceWith() instead of append() and wrapping the <div ng-include=""> tag within a <div></div>. The outer <div> could hold attributes and would still be accessible after the <div ngInclude> element replaced itself with loaded content.
Be aware that ngInclude creates a new scope. This subjects you to a flashing yellow klaxons warning about the dangers of primitive scope models. For more information, see this fine page from Angular's GitHub depot.
I can propose another alternative for those on 1.0.x, but it involves a fair amount of code. It's a more heavy-weight operation, but it has the upside of not only being able of switching between templates, but full-fledged directives as well. Furthermore, its behavior is more readily dynamic.
app.directive('myDirective', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
replace: true,
templateUrl: 'partials/directive/my-directive.html',
link: function(scope, element, attrs, ctrl) {
// You can do this with isolated scope as well of course.
scope.type = attrs.type;
}
}
);
my-directive.js
<div ng-switch on="{{type}}">
<div ng-switch-where="X" ng-include="X-template.html"></div>
<div ng-switch-where="Y" ng-include="Y-template.html"></div>
</div>
my-directive.html
This is my version for optionally overriding a default template
templateUrl: function (elem, attrs) {
if (attrs.customTemplate) {
return '/path/to/components/tmpl/' + attrs.customTemplate + '.html';
} else {
return '/path/to/components/tmpl/directive.html';
}
}
e.g on a directive
<div my-directive custom-template="custom"></div>
I solve this problem so:
app.directive("post", function ($templateCache, $compile) {
function getTemplate(mode) {
switch (mode) {
case "create":
return "createPost.html";
case "view":
return "viewPost.html";
case "delete":
return "deletePost.html";
}
}
var defaultMode = "view";
return {
scope: {},
restrict: "AE",
compile: function (elem, attrs, transclude) {
return function ($scope, $element, $attr) {
function updateTemplate() {
$element.html("");
$compile($templateCache.get(getTemplate($scope.mode)).trim())($scope, function (clonedElement, scope) {
clonedElement.appendTo($element);
});
}
$scope.mode = $attr.mode || defaultMode;
$scope.$watch("mode", updateTemplate);
}
}
}
});
It's probably not the best way to do this, but I have no extra scope.
Ok, this might help someone here :-)
To inject your custom attr into your link or controller function use the following.
I'm at work right now but will post a fiddle later if I get a chance :-)
.directive('yourDirective', function() {
return {
restrict: 'EA',
template: '<div></div>', // or use templateUrl with/without function
scope: {
myAttibute: '#myAttr' // adds myAttribute to the scope
},
link: function(scope) {
console.log(scope.myAttibute);
}
}
}
// HTML ""
// Console will output "foo"
Angular newbie here. I am trying to figure out what's going wrong while passing objects to directives.
here's my directive:
app.directive('walkmap', function() {
return {
restrict: 'A',
transclude: true,
scope: { walks: '=walkmap' },
template: '<div id="map_canvas"></div>',
link: function(scope, element, attrs)
{
console.log(scope);
console.log(scope.walks);
}
};
});
and this is the template where I call the directive:
<div walkmap="store.walks"></div>
store.walks is an array of objects.
When I run this, scope.walks logs as undefined while scope logs fine as an Scope and even has a walks child with all the data that I am looking for.
I am not sure what I am doing wrong here because this exact method has worked previously for me.
EDIT:
I've created a plunker with all the required code: http://plnkr.co/edit/uJCxrG
As you can see the {{walks}} is available in the scope but I need to access it in the link function where it is still logging as undefined.
Since you are using $resource to obtain your data, the directive's link function is running before the data is available (because the results from $resource are asynchronous), so the first time in the link function scope.walks will be empty/undefined. Since your directive template contains {{}}s, Angular sets up a $watch on walks, so when the $resource populates the data, the $watch triggers and the display updates. This also explains why you see the walks data in the console -- by the time you click the link to expand the scope, the data is populated.
To solve your issue, in your link function $watch to know when the data is available:
scope.$watch('walks', function(walks) {
console.log(scope.walks, walks);
})
In your production code, just guard against it being undefined:
scope.$watch('walks', function(walks) {
if(walks) { ... }
})
Update: If you are using a version of Angular where $resource supports promises, see also #sawe's answer.
you may also use
scope.walks.$promise.then(function(walks) {
if(walks) {
console.log(walks);
}
});
Another solution would be to add ControllerAs to the directive by which you can access the directive's variables.
app.directive('walkmap', function() {
return {
restrict: 'A',
transclude: true,
controllerAs: 'dir',
scope: { walks: '=walkmap' },
template: '<div id="map_canvas"></div>',
link: function(scope, element, attrs)
{
console.log(scope);
console.log(scope.walks);
}
};
});
And then, in your view, pass the variable using the controllerAs variable.
<div walkmap="store.walks" ng-init="dir.store.walks"></div>
Try:
<div walk-map="{{store.walks}}"></div>
angular.module('app').directive('walkMap', function($parse) {
return {
link: function(scope, el, attrs) {
console.log($parse(attrs.walkMap)(scope));
}
}
});
your declared $scope.store is not visible from the controller..you declare it inside a function..so it's only visible in the scope of that function, you need declare this outside:
app.controller('MainCtrl', function($scope, $resource, ClientData) {
$scope.store=[]; // <- declared in the "javascript" controller scope
ClientData.get({}, function(clientData) {
self.original = clientData;
$scope.clientData = new ClientData(self.original);
var storeToGet = "150-001 KT";
angular.forEach(clientData.stores, function(store){
if(store.name == storeToGet ) {
$scope.store = store; //declared here it's only visible inside the forEach
}
});
});
});