I'm using tabs in an html page and I'm trying to declare one controller for each tab.
<div class="tab-content">
<div class="tab-pane active" id="customerInfo">
#customerList()
</div>
<div class="tab-pane" id="communities">
#communityList()
</div>
For the first tab I declare my controller in "customerList" like this :
<div class="block full" ng-controller="customerCtrl">
and I tried the same thing with the second tab but it didn't work. Any help please.
This is possible and judging from here you can do this as simple as:
<body ng-app="">
<div class="tab-content">
<div class="tab-pane active" id="customerInfo" ng-controller="customerListcontroller">
#customerList()
</div>
<div class="tab-pane" id="communities" ng-controller="communityListcontroller">
#communityList()
</div>
</div>
</body>
There are few things you might be doing wrong:
forget to put ng-app="app" to wrap your controllers
From the question there is a div omission. Make sure this is not the case in the code
Not defining your controllers properly.
Not calling the file containing the controller in the HTML file
It should be a minor fix. You can also take a look at this.
Related
I want to show the elements that contain displayCategory.name with the ng-click above it, but it's not working as expected.
.divider-row
.row-border(ng-hide="showMe")
.row.row-format
.col-xs-12.top-label
Find where you stand
%hr.profile
.row.labelRow
.col-xs-12
%ul
%li(ng-repeat='category in service.categories')
.clear.btn.Category(ng-click='thisCategory(category) ; showMe = true') {{category.name}}
.divider-row
.row-border(ng-show="showMe")
.row.row-format
.col-sm-12.col-md-12.top-label.nopadLeft
What do you think about {{displayCategory.name}}
I dropped your haml into a converter and this is what it spat out (clearly incorrect):
<div class="divider-row">
<div class="row-border">(ng-hide="showMe")
<div class="row row-format">
<div class="col-xs-12 top-label">
Find where you stand
</div>
</div>
<hr class="profile"/>
<div class="row labelRow">
<div class="col-xs-12">
<ul>
<li>(ng-repeat='category in service.categories')
<div class="clear btn Category">(ng-click='thisCategory(category) ; showMe = true') {{category.name}}</div>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="divider-row"></div>
<div class="row-border">(ng-show="showMe")
<div class="row row-format">
<div class="col-sm-12 col-md-12 top-label nopadLeft">
What do you think about {{displayCategory.name}}
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
So after some quick googling I found that you should be writing it like this:
.divider-row
.row-border{"ng-hide" => "showMe"}
.row.row-format
.col-xs-12.top-label
Find where you stand...
As that will convert to what you need:
<div class="divider-row">
<div class="row-border" ng-hide="showMe">
<div class="row row-format">
<div class="col-xs-12 top-label">
Find where you stand
Using curly braces instead of round ones for attributes
I cannot run your code to verify, but I think the problem is that the binding property showMe should be replaced with some object like status.showMe.
For example, define $scope.status = { showMe: false}; outside the ng-repeat (in your controller maybe).
Please check a working demonstration: http://jsfiddle.net/jx854d3y/1/
Explanations:
ng-repeat creates a child scope for each item. The child scope prototypical inherits from the parent scope. In your case, the primitive showMe is assigned to the child scope. While you use it outside the ng-repeat, where it tries to get the value from the parent scope, which is undefined. That is why it is not working.
Basic rule is: always use Object, instead of primitive types, for binding.
For more details, please refer to: https://github.com/angular/angular.js/wiki/Understanding-Scopes
I'm learning AngularJs and I got to a small brick wall...
when I want to split items into tabs, my template is exactly the same for all the tabs, the only small change if the model used in the ng-repeat, as an example:
<!-- Tab panes -->
<div class="tab-content">
<div role="tabpanel" class="tab-pane fade in active" id="tier6">
<div ng-include="'partials/vehicles-6-details.html'"></div>
</div>
<div role="tabpanel" class="tab-pane fade" id="tier8">
<div ng-include="'partials/vehicles-8-details.html'"></div>
</div>
<div role="tabpanel" class="tab-pane fade" id="tier10">
<div ng-include="'partials/vehicles-10-details.html'"></div>
</div>
</div>
This way I have to create 3 exact files, where the template is:
<ul class="list-unstyled list-inline list-tier">
<li ng-repeat="tank in tankInfoLevel6" data-sortby="{{playersByTankId[tank].length}}">
<span class="badge">{{playersByTankId[tank].length}}</span>
<img ng-src="{{tankInfo[tank].image}}" alt="" class="tank-img"
pop-over title="Tank fans" fans="tanksFans[tank]" />
<br><b>{{tankInfo[tank].name_i18n}}</b>
<br>({{tankInfo[tank].type_i18n}})
</li>
</ul>
and the only change is tankInfoLevel6 by tankInfoLevel8 and tankInfoLevel10 respectively.
How can I use a simple file?
I've tried:
<div ng-include="'partials/vehicles-details.html'"
ng-init="tierTanks = tankInfoLevel6"></div>
and also with onLoad and onInclude without any good results.
The output is showing the last tab contents in all tabs, so it seems that it loads all but the last call with tankInfoLevel10 is the one that overrides all the tabs.
Is there a way to make this work neatly?
What about ng-repeat?
<div ng-repeat="tankItem in tankItems">
<div ng-include="'partials/vehicles-details.html'"></div>
</div>
In template use tankItem.
Wouldn't a directive work better here, using an attribute to pass/reference the tankItems list?
I've seen this question and seen it answered but not in any way I can use or understand. The question is very specific and simple but somehow the answers are a bit over my head.
All I want to do is have a very simple menu work. when i menu item is clicked, I need it to of course use my angular controller function to handle it. I want all of that on the angular side. It actually does work when I simply use the elements directly without declaratively making my own.
So this works just fine and my ng-click is successfuly calling my acceptedSelect() in my controller:
<core-menu>
<div ng-repeat="order in acceptedOrders" ng-click="acceptedSelect(order)">
<paper-item class="my-paper-item" >
<div class="order-list-item">
<div class="order-number">{{order.Order}}</div>
<div class="order-date"> {{order.Date}} </div>
<div style="clear: both"></div>
<div class="order-address">
{{order.Property}}
</div>
</div>
</paper-item>
</div>
</core-menu>
But i do the same thing by wrapping the paper element in a polymer-element, it doesn't work. So this will not work:
<polymer-element name="my-app" attributes="refresh">
<template>
<style>
...
</style>
<core-menu>
<div ng-repeat="order in acceptedOrders" ng-click="acceptedSelect(order)">
<paper-item class="my-paper-item" >
<div class="order-list-item">
<div class="order-number">{{order.Order}}</div>
<div class="order-date"> {{order.Date}} </div>
<div style="clear: both"></div>
<div class="order-address">
{{order.Property}}
</div>
</div>
</paper-item>
</div>
</core-menu>
</template>
<script>
Polymer('my-app', {
});
<my-app></my-app>
I'm just not sure what I can do to make this work. Any help is greatly appreciated.
I am building a wizard in angular using the angular-ui bootstrap modal component.
In my main page, I am already using ng-views for navigation.
The goal is to create a modal wizard on one of these pages. As far as I can see,
nested ng-views are not supported. If possible, I would like to keep each step of
the wizard as an external resource.
A terrible way to accomplish this at the moment is something to this effect:
<div id="wizardModal" class="modal hide">
<div class="modal-header">
<div ng-show="isCurrentStep(1)">
<p>Step1 header</p>
</div>
<div ng-show="isCurrentStep(2)">
<p>Step2 header</p>
</div>
<div ng-show="isCurrentStep(3)">
<p>Step3 header</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="modal-body">
<div ng-show="isCurrentStep(1)">
<p>Step1 body</p>
</div>
<div ng-show="isCurrentStep(2)">
<p>Step2 body</p>
</div>
<div ng-show="isCurrentStep(3)">
<p>Step3 body</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="modal-footer">
<div ng-show="isCurrentStep(1)">
<p>Step1 footer</p>
</div>
<div ng-show="isCurrentStep(2)">
<p>Step2 footer</p>
</div>
<div ng-show="isCurrentStep(3)">
<p>Step3 footer</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Obviously, the above is unacceptable and will create maintenance nightmares.
Is there a clean approach to accomplishing the same effect?
Using ng-include worked like a charm, thanks.
You can find a tutorial about creating a wizard-style app using ng-view and ngRouter here.
I believe this approach is much better since you can have individual controllers per step that inherit the scope from the host form thus keeping all the data but separating the logic.
My index.html page is like as follows:
<div id="sidepanel" data-ng-controller="ListCtrl">
<li data-ng-repeat="record in records">
{{record.id}}
<input type="checkbox" data-ng-model="addwidget">
</li>
</div>
<div id="main">
<div data-ng-view></div>
</div>
for this data-ng-view i have another page recordlist.html in that i have following code:
<div data-ng-controller="ListCtrl">
<ul class="design">
<li data-ng-repeat="record in records">
<div data-ng-switch data-on="record.category">
<div data-ng-switch-when="reporting1">
<div id="{{record.id}}" data-ng-show="addwidget">{{record.description}}</div>
</div>
<div data-ng-switch-when="reporting2">
<div id="{{record.id}}" data-ng-hide="addwidget">{{record.description}}</div>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
My question is i want to show the first div when i check the checkbox & when i uncheck it i want to show the second div.When both of the data-ng-model & data-ng-hide/show are on the same page then it works fine but in my case it present on two different pages.
Is it correct ? How can i implement this. Need Help.Thanks.
The problem is that you are setting addwidget in the first controller, but is trying to use it in the second. Controllers are not singletons.
So, in this situation:
<div id="sidepanel" data-ng-controller="ListCtrl">
...
</div>
<div id="main">
<div data-ng-view>
<div data-ng-controller="ListCtrl">
</div>
</div>
</div>
You got two separated controllers and scopes. And you are setting addwidget in the first trying to read in the second.
You can either bind it to the root scope $root.addwidget or use a service share to the states.
As you have many records, binding directly to root is a problem, as all of them are going to share the same state. So you gonna need an object in the rootScope and bind the option by id $root.addwidget[record.id]. Made a pretty simplified modification here.