Passing data to new page using Onsenui - angularjs

I am trying to call an API end point once a user clicks a button holding a myNavigator.pushPage() request. However,I can not get the $scope data generated from the $http.get request to be passed to the new page.
If I test using console.log('test'); inside the .success of the $http.get request I successfully get the log info in the console but any data held in $scope.var = 'something'; does not gets passed to the page! Really confused!
$scope.historyDetails = function(id){
var options = {
animation: 'slide',
onTransitionEnd: function() {
$http.get('http://xxx-env.us-east-1.elasticbeanstalk.com/apiget/testresult/testId/'+id).success(function(data) {
$scope.testscore = 'something'; // this is not getting passed to page!
console.log('bahh'); // But I see this in console
});
}
};
myNavigator.pushPage("activity.html", options);
}
Page:
<ons-page ng-controller="HistoryController">
...
<span style="font-size:1.2em">{{testscore}} </span><span style="font-size:0.5em;color:#555"></span>
...
</ons-page>

Yes, that's so because both pages has different controllers, resulting in different scopes. One can not access variables from one scope to another.
Hence one solution in this case can be using rootScope service.
Root Scope is parent scope for all scopes in your angular application.
Hence you can access variable of root scopes from any other scope, provided that you are injecting $rootScope service in that controller.
to know more about rootScope check this link.
Good luck.
Update 1:
check these articles
http://www.dotnet-tricks.com/Tutorial/angularjs/UVDE100914-Understanding-AngularJS-$rootScope-and-$scope.html
https://toddmotto.com/all-about-angulars-emit-broadcast-on-publish-subscribing/

As Yogesh said the reason you're not getting your values is because if you look at $scope.testscore and try to find where is the $scope defined you will see that it's an argument for the controller function (thus it's only for that controller).
However we can see that the controller is attached to the page and you are pushing another page.
So in that case you have several options:
Use the $rootScope service as Yogesh suggested (in that case accept his answer).
Create your own service/factory/etc doing something similar to $rootScope.
(function(){
var historyData = {};
myApp.factory('historyData', function() {
return historyData;
});
})();
Technically you could probably make it more meaningful, but maybe these things are better described in some angular guides.
If you have multiple components sharing the same data then maybe you could just define your controller on a level higher - for example the ons-navigator - that way it will include all the pages. That would be ok only if your app is really small though - it's not recommended for large apps.
If this data is required only in activity.html you could just get it in that page's controller. For example:
myApp.controller('activityController', function($scope, $http) {
$http.get(...).success(function(data) {
$scope.data = data;
});
}
But I guess you would still need to get some id. Anyway it's probably better if you do the request here, now you just need the id, not the data.
You could actually cheat it with the var directive. If you give the activity page <ons-page var="myActivityPage"> then you will be able to access it through the myActivityPage variable.
And the thing you've been searching for - when you do
myNavigator.pushPage("activity.html", options);
actually the options is saved inside the ons-page of activity.html.
So you can do
myNavigator.pushPage("activity.html", {data: {id: 33}, animation: 'slide'});
And in the other controller your id will be myActivityPage.options.data.id.
If you still insist on passing all the data instead of an id - here's a simple example. In the newer versions of the 2.0 beta (I think since beta 6 or 7) all methods pushPage, popPage etc return a promise - which resolve to the ons-page, making things easier.
$scope.historyDetails = function(id){
myNavigator.pushPage("activity.html", {animation: 'slide'}).then(function(page) {
$http.get('...' + id).success(function(data) {
page.options.data = data;
});
});
});
Side note: You may want to close the question which you posted 5 days ago, as it's a duplicate of this one (I must've missed it at that time).

Related

AngularJS shared service not acting as singleton between modules

I have seen numerous flavors of this question, but cannot seem to find the right answer for my issue.
The problem with the following is the service cannot share data between the other modules/controllers. It does not act as a singleton. Meaning, if I add windows in dashboard and call windowService.getWindows() I will see the windows I added. But if I do the same from myWidget after adding them via the dashboard, or vice versa, the collection in the service is empty as if the other module/controller hasn't added anything. What am I doing wrong here? I expected a single collection of windows to be retained by the service and be accessible from either of my other modules.
Module 1
var dashboard = angular.module('dashboard', [windowServiceModule]);
dashboard.controller('DashboardController', function DashboardController(windowService) {...stuff});
Module 2
var myWidget = angular.module('myWidget', [windowServiceModule]);
myWidget.controller('MyWidgetController', function MyWidgetController(windowService) {...stuff});
Service
var windowServiceModule = angular.module('windowService', []);
windowServiceModule.service('windowService', function() {
var windows = [];
this.addWindow = function(win)
{
this.windows.push(win)
}
this.getWindows = function()
{
return this.windows;
}
});
EDIT: while walking through other answers, I tried this: Share a single service between multiple angular.js apps
That exposed a part of the problem, I think. The above suggests iterating over a $rootScope collection, but in my case, there is only one $rootScope in the collection and it is not the same between dashboard and myWidget. As it is, myWidget is in an iframe and now I'm thinking I need to take a different approach, currently testing a solution similar to the link I left in the comments.
Ok, I'm pretty sure my initial code would have worked fine if the myWidget wasn't being loaded in an iframe. I have a dashboard that can open windows embedded or popped out and I wanted to use the service to manage the windows and handle passing state back and forth since popping out the iframe requires a reload of the page.
Anyways, I now have something like this in place in the service and it is working:
var windowServiceModule = angular.module('windowService', []);
windowServiceModule.service('windowService', function($window) {
...stuff
var parentScope = $window.parent.getScope();
...other stuff
After that you can access anything in the parent's scope with parentScope. I pass in the angular $window.
Just for reference, getScope() already existed in the parent JSP file. This is what is looks like:
function getScope()
{
return angular.element($("#DashboardController")).scope();
}

dynamic header/menu in angularjs

While transitioning an existing angular site, I encountered an annoying problem. The initial symptom was that a certain controller was not running it's initialize function immediately following the login. I logged and I tracked, and eventually I realized it was a design flaw of the page. Essentially, index.html contains a <header>, <ng-view>, and <footer>. There are a couple of ng-if attributes that live in the header that I want to evaluate after the login, but since the view is the only thing that is reloaded, it was not reinitializing the header controller, and thus not updating the ng-if values.
Then I was reminded of ngInclude, which seems like the perfect solution, until I got it hooked up and realize that doesn't work either. It loads the template the first time, and doesn't reinitialize when the view changes. So then I got the bright idea of passing the HeaderController to another controller or service, and controlling this one stubborn boolean value through a proxy of sorts. That also didn't work. Then I tried putting a function and a boolean into another service, and mirroring that property in the header controller, but thus far I have not gotten this working.
I have done plenty of research about multiple views in the index, and so far I hear a lot about this ui-router, but I'm still not convinced that is the way I want to go. It does not seem to be a simple solution. I have not tried putting the ng-include into the templates yet either, because then I feel like that is going back in time to when we had to update 100 pages every time we changed the menu.
I lost a whole day to this. If anyone could tell me how to trigger the evaluation of this one property in my header controller which I would like to live outside the other templates, please let me know!
Ok so you need to know in your HeaderController when the view has reloaded. There's a number of ways of doing this but the easier and maybe the more correct in this particular case is with an event.
So when you are refreshing the view you just do this, let's say you need the new value of ob1 and ob2 variables.
// ViewController
$rootScope.$emit('viewRefresh', {ob1: 'newvalue1', ob2: 'newvalue2'});
And in your HeaderController you need to listen for that event, and set on your $scope the new values for those attrs (if you're not using controller as syntax).
// HeaderController
$rootScope.$on('viewRefresh', function onRefresh(event, data) {
$scope.ob1 = data.ob1;
$scope.ob2 = data.ob2;
})
Another Solution
Sharing a Promise through a Service (using $q)
function HeaderService($q) {
var defer = $q.defer();
return {
getPromise: function() {return defer.promise},
notify: function(data) {defer.notify(data)}
}
}
function HeaderController(HeaderService) {
var vm = this;
HeaderService.getPromise().then(function(data) {
vm.ob1 = data.ob1;
vm.ob2 = data.ob2;
})
}
function ViewController(HeaderService) {
var data = {ob1: 'newvalue1', ob2: 'newvalue2'};
HeaderService.notify(data)
}

using data from a callback from Ebay api in Angularjs

I am trying to use the ebay api in an angular.js app.
The way the api works by itself is to pass data to a callback function and within that function create a template for display.
The problem that I am having is in adding the data returned from the callback to the $scope. I was not able to post a working example as I didnt want to expose my api key, I am hoping that the code posted in the fiddle will be enough to identify the issue.
eBayApp.controller('FindItemCtrl', function ($scope) {
globalFunc = function(root){
$scope.items = root.findItemsByKeywordsResponse[0].searchResult[0].item || [];
console.log($scope.items); //this shows the data
}
console.log($scope.items); //this is undefined
})
http://jsfiddle.net/L7fnozuo/
The reason the second instance of $scope.items is undefined, is because it is run before the callback function happens.
The chances are that $scope.items isn't updating in the view either, because Angular doesn't know that it needs to trigger a scope digest.
When you use the Angular provided async APIs ($http, $timeout etc) they have all been written in such a way that they will let Angular know when it needs to update it's views.
In this case, you have a couple of options:
Use the inbuilt $http.jsonp method.
Trigger the digest manually.
Option number 1 is the more sensible approach, but is not always possible if the request is made from someone else's library.
Here's an update to the fiddle which uses $http.jsonp. It should work (but at the moment it's resulting in an error message about your API key).
The key change here is that the request is being made from within Angular using an Angular API rather than from a script tag which Angular knows nothing about.
$http.jsonp(URL)
.success($scope.success)
.error($scope.error);
Option 2 requires you to add the following line to your JSONP callback function:
globalFunc = function(root){
$scope.items = root.findItemsByKeywordsResponse[0].searchResult[0].item || [];
console.log($scope.items); //this shows the data
$scope.$apply(); // <--
}
This method tells Angular that it needs to update it's views because data might have changed. There's a decent Sitepoint article on understanding this mechanism, if you are interested.

Use return data from an angular service resource across all controllers with only one call

I have a custom Web API written in .NET that returns user's information that will be used in my AngularJS application. I want to be able to call my API once, and then use that returned JSON across my entire AngularJS application without having to recall the API within each of my controllers.
I currently have a factory of services, one of which returns all of the client's details I need to use the in rest of the services.
.factory('customApiService', function ($resource) {
return {
userInfo: function(userId, callback){
var api = $resource('../../api/UserInfo/:userId', {
userId: userId
}, {
fetch: 'JSONP',
'query': { isArray: false }
});
api.fetch(function (response) {
callback(response);
});
}
}
)
Now I don't want to call this userInfo service in every controller, but I do want the data to be passed into each without calling my API multiple times.
customApiService.userInfo(userId, function (d) {
var gaProfileId = d.gaProfileId;
var yelpId = d.yelpId;
var tripAdvisorId = d.tripAdvisorId;
var facebookPageName = d.facebookPage;
var twitterHandle = d.twitterHandle;
var clientName = d.clientName;
var searchlightAccountId = d.searchlightAccountId;
var searchlightDomain = d.searchlightDomainId;
}
You can try global variables .
use a $rootScope https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/scope
$rootScope is available in all controllers an templates .Just inject $rootscope in your controller or wherever required.
From what I read of your description and responses to other questions, it sounds like you're trying to make an asynchronous call before the rest of your app starts up. This is possible, but complex, and sort of voids the point of Angular in the first place. As I see it, you have two options:
QUICK HACK: If you really want this kind of behavior, why start your app at all? Do your request first, before you define your app in the first place, then define your app in the result handler for the request.
RIGHT WAY: Alter the behavior of your services and controllers to tolerate not having enough information to fully start. A lot of times this is less difficult than it sounds. Usually you can just chain a promise into their initialization block of code to wait for the data you need. Take a look at Brian Ford's "Angular Modal" project, at the lines of code I've highlighted here:
https://github.com/btford/angular-modal/blob/master/modal.js#L25-L36
This technique sets up a promise to return from the function. If the data it needs is already loaded from the service, it resolves the promise immediately. Otherwise, it makes the call to get what it's after, and you can see later (line 39) that the module uses promise.then() to wait until it has the data it needs to run.
This is a great pattern for both controllers and services when working with asynchronous data.
If using a $resource call instead, note that most $resource calls return a promise in a property called $promise. You can do something like this:
var MyController = function($scope) {
// This will get set soon!
$scope.myData = null;
var myResource = $resource('/path/to/:someId', { someId: '#id' });
myResource.get({ someId: 1 }).$promise.then(function(data) {
$scope.myData = data;
});
};
You can do more things in the .then() resolution callback for the promise, like initialize more parts of your controller, etc. There are also ways you can delay starting your entire controller until the resource is available. One really cool way is if you happen to be using the Angular ui-router module, there is a "resolve" option when defining each route. You can use that to call the $resource as shown above, and ui-router will wait to start your controller/view until it has what it needs.

Initializing/populating select boxes on page load in AngularJS

I'm writing a web application using AngularJS. I use a third-party library (that provides an Angular service) to fetch values from a database, and then use those to initialize some dropdown/select boxes on a page.
So, I have simple select boxes like this:
<div ng-controller="ChoiceCtrl">
<select ng-model="selectedFoo" ng-options="foo in foos"></select>
<select ng-model="selectedBar" ng-options="bar in bars"></select>
</div>
And a corresponding controller that initializes the choices for the select boxes. The service I'm using calls the given callback function after it receives values from the database. (The callback functions could be refactored into one but I'm using separate ones for clarity.)
angular.module('choice').controller('ChoiceCtrl', function($scope, ThirdPartyService) {
$scope.selectedFoo = '';
$scope.selectedBar = '';
$scope.foos = '';
$scope.bars = '';
var fooCallback = function(result) {
$scope.foos = result;
$scope.$apply;
}
var barCallback = function(result) {
$scope.bars = result;
$scope.$apply;
}
ThirdPartyService.asyncGetData('fetchFooOptions', fooCallback);
ThirdPartyService.asyncGetData('fetchBarOptions', barCallback);
});
The database calls are asynchronous and finish after the page has been rendered for the first time, so I manually call $scope.$apply in each callback function.
Is this the right way to initialize dropdown/select boxes in an AngularJS app when the values are fetched asynchronously when loading a page?
I've read tutorials saying that calling $scope.$apply manually is always a "code smell"... But since I'm fetching the values from a database, the operation happens "outside of Angular" which I believe makes those calls justified - and actually necessary.
I'm also wondering if the controller is the right place for these calls. In the tutorials I've read the options are always set in the controller but those sandbox examples never have an asynchronous database call happening.
You should modify three things in your code
The service should return a promise :Refer to documentation of angular for creating promise
Inside service resolve the promise when data is recieved from the server
Inside controller just assign proper values to bar and foos when promise is resolved
Remove $scope.apply since now you are modifying the values inside proper angular scope
Link:Use Promise and service together in Angular

Resources