Consider this simple query which use full text searching on the Keywords field:
DECLARE #searchTerm VARCHAR(500) = 'painted'
SELECT * FROM StockCatalogueItems
WHERE (CONTAINS(KeyWords, #searchTerm))
This works as expected, but I need to do the same using a Dapper.net parameterised query. When using stored procedures, I create the full text parameter like this: "\"painted*\""
But using the same approach this doesn't work using dapper. No results are returned. This is the line in the query where I use the parameter:
AND (CONTAINS(KeyWords, #search))
and it's passed to the query like so:
return _context.Database.Connection.Query<StockProfileMatrix>(basequery, new
{
search = searchTerm
}
I can only assume that dapper is sanitising the string somehow, removing quotes perhaps?
Any ideas?
This works for me. However the tech stack am working on is .net core RTM and "Dapper": "1.50.0-rc3",
_dbConnection.QueryAsync<Guid>(#"select br.Id from Brand br where CONTAINS(br.Text,#Name)",new {Name = $"\"*{name}*\""}))
For completeness, I'll answer the question. The query syntax is correct, but the way in which the full-text parameter is created was obviously not. I created an extension method that formats the parameter:
public static string ToFullText(this string str)
{
string searchTerm = null;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(str))
{
string[] keywords = str.Trim().Split(null);
foreach (var keyword in keywords)
{
searchTerm += string.Format("\"{0}*\" AND ", keyword);
}
if (searchTerm != null)
searchTerm = searchTerm.Substring(0, searchTerm.LastIndexOf(" AND "));
}
return searchTerm;
}
Then I call the method when I pass the parameter in to the dapper query:
_context.Database.Connection.Query<dynamic>(query, new
{
search = filter.SearchTerm.ToFullText()
});
Related
trying to return string builder in a loop. is this workable.. I am collecting a list with each(), then appending 'it' to "scriptBldr_" to create a different object name each time to hold the string. then I collect the object names in a list. And trying to return using a for loop for each object name. But it's failing.
List.each {
String builderstring = "scriptBldr_" + it.replaceAll (/"/, '')
StringBuilder $builderstring = StringBuilder.newInstance()
if (ValidUDA == "Region") {
$builderstring <<"""
XYZCode
"""
StringBuilders.add(builderstring)
}
}
for(item in StringBuilders)
{
return item
}
I guess the following code does what you intended to code:
def myList = ['Hello "World"', 'asb"r"sd']
def ValidUDA = "Region"
def builders = [:]
myList.each {
String builderstring = "scriptBldr_" + it.replaceAll (/"/, '')
builders[builderstring] = StringBuilder.newInstance()
if (ValidUDA == "Region") {
builders[builderstring] <<"""
XYZCode
"""
}
}
return builders
A return statement will immediatly return from the method and hence will exit the loop and only called once. So, I guess, what you wanted to achieve is to return a list of StrinngBuilders.
some hints:
it is unusual in Groovy to start a variable with $ and you can run into problems with such a naming
when asking a question on SO, try to come up with a working example. As you can see, you example was missing some definitions
Update: as you've stated in you comment that you tryed to create dynamic variable names, I've updated the code to use maps. The returned map now contains the StringBuilders together with their names.
How to map the OLE DB source SQL command query parameters with variables using EzAPI ?
Basically I need to do something like below.
Thanks in advance.
Here is how I had to do it for SSIS 2012. I had to find the GUID of the variable in question and set it that way.
EzOleDbSource source = new EzOleDbSource(this);
source.Connection = sourceconnection;
source.SqlCommand = sourcecomannd;
source.AccessMode = AccessMode.AM_SQLCOMMAND;
source.SetComponentProperty("ParameterMapping", "\"Parameter0:Input\",{C2BCD5B0-1FDB-4A74-8418-EEF9C1D19AC3};");
To get the GUID you can query the Variables in the EZPackage object.
Application a = new Application();
var package = a.LoadPackage(packagelocation, null);
var ezpackage = new EzPackage(package);
var firstOrDefault = ezpackage.Variables.OfType<Microsoft.SqlServer.Dts.Runtime.Variable>()
.AsQueryable()
.FirstOrDefault(x => x.Name.Equals("MyParameter"));
if (firstOrDefault != null)
{
var guid =
firstOrDefault.ID;
}
I have accepted Geek's answer because it is the real answer for my question. But I found instead of mapping variables to parameters we can use variables directly in the query. For example: exec your_sp_name "#[User::your_variable_name]"
UPDATE : Above method is not working.
Use the the accepted answer method. To take the GUID of the variable, I used the follwing method.
string guid = string.Empty;
foreach (var x in this.Variables)
{
if (x.Name == "cdc_capture_log_id")
{
guid = x.ID;
}
}
Where this = EzPackage. Same as above.
I have a solution that works for what I want, but I'm hoping to get some slick LINQ types to help me improve what I have, and learn something new in the process.
The code below is used verify that certain column names exist on a spreadsheet. I was torn between using column index values or column names to find them. They both have good and bad points, but decided to go with column names. They'll always exist, and sometimes in different order, though I'm working on this.
Details:
GetData() method returns a DataTable from the Excel spreadsheet. I cycle through all the required field names from my array, looking to see if it matches with something in the column collection on the spreadsheet. If not, then I append the missing column name to an output parameter from the method. I need both the boolean value and the missing fields variable, and I wasn't sure of a better way than using the output parameter. I then remove the last comma from the appended string for the display on the UI. If the StringBuilder object isn't null (I could have used the missingFieldCounter too) then I know there's at least one missing field, bool will be false. Otherwise, I just return output param as empty, and method as true.
So, Is there a more slick, all-in-one way to check if fields are missing, and somehow report on them?
private bool ValidateFile(out string errorFields)
{
data = GetData();
List<string> requiredNames = new [] { "Site AB#", "Site#", "Site Name", "Address", "City", "St", "Zip" }.ToList();
StringBuilder missingFields = null;
var missingFieldCounter = 0;
foreach (var name in requiredNames)
{
var foundColumn = from DataColumn c in data.Columns
where c.ColumnName == name
select c;
if (!foundColumn.Any())
{
if (missingFields == null)
missingFields = new StringBuilder();
missingFieldCounter++;
missingFields.Append(name + ",");
}
}
if (missingFields != null)
{
errorFields = missingFields.ToString().Substring(0, (missingFields.ToString().Length - 1));
return false;
}
errorFields = string.Empty;
return true;
}
Here is the linq solution that makes the same.
I call the ToArray() function to activate the linq statement
(from col in requiredNames.Except(
from dataCol in data
select dataCol.ColumnName
)
select missingFields.Append(col + ", ")
).ToArray();
errorFields = missingFields.ToString();
Console.WriteLine(errorFields);
I have a large solr index, and I have noticed some fields are not updated correctly (the index is dynamic).
This has resulted in some fields having an empty "id" field.
I have tried these queries, but they didn't work:
id:''
id:NULL
id:null
id:""
id:
id:['' TO *]
Is there a way to query empty fields?
Thanks
Try this:
?q=-id:["" TO *]
One caveat! If you want to compose this via OR or AND you cannot use it in this form:
-myfield:*
but you must use
(*:* NOT myfield:*)
This form is perfectly composable. Apparently SOLR will expand the first form to the second, but only when it is a top node. Hope this saves you some time!
According to SolrQuerySyntax, you can use q=-id:[* TO *].
If you have a large index, you should use a default value
<field ... default="EMPTY" />
and then query for this default value.
This is much more efficient than q=-id:["" TO *]
You can also use it like this.
fq=!id:['' TO *]
If you are using SolrSharp, it does not support negative queries.
You need to change QueryParameter.cs (Create a new parameter)
private bool _negativeQuery = false;
public QueryParameter(string field, string value, ParameterJoin parameterJoin = ParameterJoin.AND, bool negativeQuery = false)
{
this._field = field;
this._value = value.Trim();
this._parameterJoin = parameterJoin;
this._negativeQuery = negativeQuery;
}
public bool NegativeQuery
{
get { return _negativeQuery; }
set { _negativeQuery = value; }
}
And in QueryParameterCollection.cs class, the ToString() override, looks if the Negative parameter is true
arQ[x] = (qp.NegativeQuery ? "-(" : "(") + qp.ToString() + ")" + (qp.Boost != 1 ? "^" + qp.Boost.ToString() : "");
When you call the parameter creator, if it's a negative value. Simple change the propertie
List<QueryParameter> QueryParameters = new List<QueryParameter>();
QueryParameters.Add(new QueryParameter("PartnerList", "[* TO *]", ParameterJoin.AND, true));
you can do it with filter query
q=*:*&fq=-id:*
A note added here, to make the field searchable first, it needs the field type in SOLR schema set to "indexed = true". Then you can use "field_name:*" for string type and "field_name:[* TO *]" for numeric type.
I am using SL 4, WCF RIA Services against Entity Framework 4.0. I have an Entity, Visit, that has a string Status field. I have a search screen where I need to display results that have StatusA or StatusB. I am struggling to find a way to specify a client-side query that specifies a collection of statuses that should be matched. If I was to write what I want in SQL it would look something like:
select * from Visit where Status in ('StatusA', 'StatusB');
Client side, it appears to be straightforward to chain Where methods for a WhereAnd effect:
var query = this.PqContext.GetVisitsQuery();
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(this.PracticeName))
{
query = query.Where(v => v.PracticeName.ToUpper().Contains(this.PracticeName.ToUpper()));
}
if (this.VisitDateAfter.HasValue)
{
query = query.Where(v => v.VisitDate > this.VisitDateAfter);
}
if (this.VisitDateBefore.HasValue)
{
query = query.Where(v => v.VisitDate < this.VisitDateBefore);
}
However, I can't seem to find a straightforward way to do a WhereOr style operation. I have tried this:
var statuses = new List<string>();
if (this.ShowStatusA)
{
statuses.Add("StatusA");
}
if (this.ShowStatusB)
{
statuses.Add("StatusB");
}
if (statuses.Any())
{
query = query.Where(BuildContainsExpression<Visit, string>(e => e.Status, statuses));
}
Where BuildContainsExpression looks like:
private static Expression<Func<TElement, bool>> BuildContainsExpression<TElement, TValue>(Expression<Func<TElement, TValue>> valueSelector, IEnumerable<TValue> values)
{
if (null == valueSelector)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("valueSelector");
}
if (null == values)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("values");
}
ParameterExpression p = valueSelector.Parameters.Single();
if (!values.Any())
{
return e => false;
}
var equals =
values.Select(
value =>
(Expression)Expression.Equal(valueSelector.Body, Expression.Constant(value, typeof(TValue))));
var body = equals.Aggregate<Expression>(Expression.Or);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TElement, bool>>(body, p);
}
But this throws a "Bitwise operators are not supported in queries." exception. Any clues? Is there an alternative way to build an expression tree that works here or do I need to pass all the parameters over to the server and use the BuildContainsExpression there?
Your time and your guidance are much appreciated.
You can create a query method such as the following in your domain service:
GetVisitsByStatus(string[] statusList) {
// create the LINQ where clause here
}
And then from the client, call context.GetVistsByStatusQuery(string[]).
Not all of LINQ is (or even can) be exposed over the URL, so there are always cases where you need to use simple parameters, and have the middle tier construct the LINQ expressions that eventually define the query that goes to the back-end data store.
Hope that helps.