Can I run a function instead of routing on otherwise in Angular? - angularjs

As my question asks, I want to know if that is possible. Why I want this? I am required to keep the link when the request fails so I use states in my bootstrap template instead of templates for the error pages. Now I need to catch everything that isn't registered and I need to tell my main controller to change the state if the route is not found. I checked the documentation, of course but it hasn't enlightened me so please help me out here if you can.
$httpProvider.otherwise(function () {
// code here
});
Is something like this possible?

Related

Non-angular page opened with click - angular not defined using ignoreSynchronization or waiting for Angular without

After a lot of research, and tinkering, I can't seem to actually get my Protractor test to do anything else other than have an Angular related error, even though I am using browser to avoid Angular being detected at all.
The test involves an Angular app, opening a dropdown in it, and clicking on the link for the console; the console opens a non-Angular admin page in a separate window.
So based on the many informative SO posts I found, I first used this...
browser.driver.getAllWindowHandles().then(function(handles) {
browser.driver.switchTo().window(handles[1]).then(function() {
//expect for new window here
});
});
Which appeared to work, as I could get to the window through repl pretty easily.
The issue is when either of the following were added...
browser.driver.getAllWindowHandles().then(function(handles) {
browser.driver.switchTo().window(handles[1]).then(function() {
expect(browser.getLocationAbsUrl()).toContain('/console/login.jsp');
expect(browser.driver.findElement(By.css('th.login')).getText()).toEqual('Login');
});
});
One expect check the URL and the other checks for the header element on the page, which is a table header. When I run this, I get the following:
Error while waiting for Protractor to sync with the page: "angular could not be found on the window"
When I decide to use browser.ignoreSynchronization = true, both in the function, or in a beforeEach, with or without a following afterEach setting it to false, I get the following:
JavascriptError: angular is not defined
I can't seem to get any "useful" errors to help me debug it, and trying it in repl does not help, as I get the same issue.
To be comprehensive, trying my URL expect without getting the second window will give me the root, and the other will fail.
Just doing one or the other will cause the same problem.
Changing to regular syntax (element(by.css...)) does not change things.
So much for my first question...
It appears that my use of browser.getLocationAbsUrl() is meant to be used for an Angular page, and was causing my issue...
Essentially, even though I believed I was using pure Webdriver calls, that call still required Angular on the page to work...
As stated in another post, the use of browser.driver.getCurrentUrl() is a non-Angular call using Webdriver, and fixed the problem. Thus, the final code is the following...
browser.sleep(1000); //to wait for the page to load
browser.driver.getAllWindowHandles().then(function(handles) {
browser.driver.switchTo().window(handles[1]).then(function() {
expect(browser.driver.getCurrentUrl()).toContain('/console/login.jsp');
expect(browser.driver.findElement(By.css('th.login')).getText()).toEqual('Login');
});
});
This works without setting ignoreSynchronization, BTW.
I realized it would probably be something relatively simple to fix it, just didn't expect I'd get it that quickly (I intended on submitting the question last night, but posted it this morning instead).
In any case, I hope this will at least be a good reference for anyone else facing the same issue.
Seems like getLocationAbsUrl is angular abs url.
Try using the native driver getCurrentUrl instead.
-- expect(browser.getLocationAbsUrl()).toContain('/console/login.jsp');
++ expect(browser.driver.getCurrentUrl() ...

Linking to external URL with different domain from within an angularJS partial

All I am trying to do is include an anchor tag inside the html of a partial that links to an external site. Were this standard html, the code would simply be:
google
As simple as this is, I cannot seem to find a working solution for getting past angular intercepting the route (or perhaps replacing my anchor with the https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/directive/a directive unintentionally?).
I have scoured SO and the rest of the web and seen a myriad of solutions for dealing with: links within the same domain, routing within the SPA, routing within a page (ala $anchorScroll) but none of these are my issue exactly.
I suspect it may having something to do with using $sce but I am an Angular n00b and not really sure how to properly use that service. I tried the following in my view controller:
$scope.trustUrl = function(url) {
return $sce.trustAsResourceUrl(url);
}
with the corresponding:
<a ng-href="{{ trustUrl(item) }}">Click me!</a>
(as described here: Binding external URL in angularjs template)
but that did not seem to do the trick (I ended up with just href="{{" in the rendered page).
Using a plain vanilla anchor link like this:
google
also failed to do the trick (even though some online advised that standard href would cause a complete page reload in angular: AngularJS - How can I do a redirect with a full page load?).
I also tried adding the target=_self" attribute but that seemed to have no effect either.
Do I need to write a custom directive as described here?
Conditionally add target="_blank" to links with Angular JS
This all seems way too complicated for such a simple action and I feel like I am missing something obvious in my n00bishness, at least I hope so because this process is feeling very onerous just to link to another url.
Thanks in advance for any solutions, advice, refs or direction.
It turns out that I did in fact have all anchor links in the page bound to an event listener and being overridden. Since that code was fundamental to the way the page worked I did not want to mess with it. Instead I bypassed it by using ng-click to call the new url as follows:
HTML:
<a class="navLinkHcp" href="{{hcpurl}}" title="Habitat Conservation Plan" target="_blank" ng-click="linkModelFunc(hcpurl)">Habitat Conservation Plan</a>
Controller:
$scope.hcpurl = 'http://eahcp.org/index.php/about_eahcp/covered_species';
$scope.linkModelFunc = function (url){
console.log('link model function');
$window.open(url);
}
And voila! Good to go.
Thanks again to KevinB for cluing me in that this was probably the issue.

How do I get /mylink#sectionid to work in angularjs?

If I wasn't using angular, then the route mylink would be loaded, then the browser would scroll down to the sectionid section.
In Angular it doesn't scroll. I read some completely crazy whacky solutions involving injecting multiple modules and having crazy unique URLs. I refuse to do things like this.
I want my href values to remain standard. Is there any way in Angular to do this?
Keep in mind, if "mylink" was already loaded, then the links work fine, but if I'm on a different page, say "home", then I navigate to mylink#sectionid, then the scrolling won't occur.
(I mean... if Angular can't do this, I would consider that a bug. It'd be absurd to not support a regularly used syntax since the 90s that is still used today)
EDIT: I think the issue may be the amount of AJAX on this website.
It is certainly possible, you will need to inject in $anchorScroll into your controller
The example from the angular site:
function ScrollCtrl($scope, $location, $anchorScroll) {
$scope.gotoBottom = function (){
// set the location.hash to the id of
// the element you wish to scroll to.
$location.hash('bottom');
// call $anchorScroll()
$anchorScroll();
};
}
From anther route you could handle this via parameter being passed into the route and scroll upon initialization based upon the route param.
I'm not a big fan of my solution, but I listen to onRouteChange, then inject anchorScroll and simply call anchorScroll after a 1000 ms timeout and because the hash is already set nothing more needs to be done. [giving time for all angular stuff to work its self out (the site I'm working on has entirely too much AJAX, but I don't have control of the data yet, so there is nothing I can do about that)]
Anywho, manually initiating anchor scroll works. If anyone knows a better way to do this, that'd be swell.

How to redirect in AngularJS without rendering template

I'm trying to redirect to an external page from my AngularJS file if the user enter a special url, for instance /test. I have gotten this to work in multiple different ways but all the different ways show a "flash" of the design from index.html. I would like it to go direct without rendering any html at all!
Here is a fiddle of one of the examples, but it is not the best place to test since I cant redirect from jsiffle.net :-)
$routeProvider.when("/test", {
resolve: {
controller: "Redirect"
}
});
Also had one example where I just used a controller and a empty template in the routing, but it gave me the same result.
Any ideas?
If you know the URL(routing) then use,
$location.path('the_URL');

How to intercept AngularJS $http logging for display in page

I want to intercept console log message from AngularJS and display them in a div on the page. I need this in order to debug ajax traffic in a PhoneGap app.
This is an example of the kind of errors I want to capture:
I tried this Showing console errors and alerts in a div inside the page but that does not intercept Angular error messages.
I also tried the solution gameover suggested in the answers. No luck with that either. Apparently $http is handling error logging differently.
I guess the answer you tried has the right idea but you're overriding the wrong methods. Reading here I can see angularJs uses $log instead of console.log, so to intercept you can try to override those.
Something like this:
$scope.$log = {
error: function(msg){document.getElementById("logger").innerHTML(msg)},
info: function(msg){document.getElementById("logger").innerHTML(msg)},
log: function(msg){document.getElementById("logger").innerHTML(msg)},
warn: function(msg){document.getElementById("logger").innerHTML(msg)}
}
Make sure to run that after importing angular.js.
EDIT
Second guess, override the consoleLog method on the LogProvider inner class on angular.js file:
function consoleLog(type) {
var output ="";
//arguments array, you'll need to change this accordingly if you want to
//log arrays, objects etc
forEach(arguments, function(arg) {
output+= arg +" ";
});
document.getElementById("logger").innerHTML(output);
}
I've used log4javascript for this purpose. I create the log object via
var log = log4javascript.getLogger('myApp')
log.addAppender(new log4javascript.InPageAppender());
I then use this in a value dependency, and hook into it where needed (e.g. http interceptor).
A more lightweight approach might be to use $rootScope.emit and then have a component on your main page which prepends these log messages to a visible div, but this will require you to change all your calls to console.log (or redefine the function in your js).
I think that this message is not even displayed from AngularJS. It looks like an exception which has not been caught in any JavaScript (angular.js just appears on top of your stack because that's the actual location where the HTTP request is being sent).
Take a look at ng.$exceptionHandler. That should be the code you seem to be interested in. If not, take a quick web search for „JavaScript onerror“ which should tell you how to watch for these kinds of errors.
I would rather user an $http interceptor.
Inside the responseError function, you can set a property on a service that will be exposed to the div's scope.

Resources