How to intercept AngularJS $http logging for display in page - angularjs

I want to intercept console log message from AngularJS and display them in a div on the page. I need this in order to debug ajax traffic in a PhoneGap app.
This is an example of the kind of errors I want to capture:
I tried this Showing console errors and alerts in a div inside the page but that does not intercept Angular error messages.
I also tried the solution gameover suggested in the answers. No luck with that either. Apparently $http is handling error logging differently.

I guess the answer you tried has the right idea but you're overriding the wrong methods. Reading here I can see angularJs uses $log instead of console.log, so to intercept you can try to override those.
Something like this:
$scope.$log = {
error: function(msg){document.getElementById("logger").innerHTML(msg)},
info: function(msg){document.getElementById("logger").innerHTML(msg)},
log: function(msg){document.getElementById("logger").innerHTML(msg)},
warn: function(msg){document.getElementById("logger").innerHTML(msg)}
}
Make sure to run that after importing angular.js.
EDIT
Second guess, override the consoleLog method on the LogProvider inner class on angular.js file:
function consoleLog(type) {
var output ="";
//arguments array, you'll need to change this accordingly if you want to
//log arrays, objects etc
forEach(arguments, function(arg) {
output+= arg +" ";
});
document.getElementById("logger").innerHTML(output);
}

I've used log4javascript for this purpose. I create the log object via
var log = log4javascript.getLogger('myApp')
log.addAppender(new log4javascript.InPageAppender());
I then use this in a value dependency, and hook into it where needed (e.g. http interceptor).
A more lightweight approach might be to use $rootScope.emit and then have a component on your main page which prepends these log messages to a visible div, but this will require you to change all your calls to console.log (or redefine the function in your js).

I think that this message is not even displayed from AngularJS. It looks like an exception which has not been caught in any JavaScript (angular.js just appears on top of your stack because that's the actual location where the HTTP request is being sent).
Take a look at ng.$exceptionHandler. That should be the code you seem to be interested in. If not, take a quick web search for „JavaScript onerror“ which should tell you how to watch for these kinds of errors.

I would rather user an $http interceptor.
Inside the responseError function, you can set a property on a service that will be exposed to the div's scope.

Related

Non-angular page opened with click - angular not defined using ignoreSynchronization or waiting for Angular without

After a lot of research, and tinkering, I can't seem to actually get my Protractor test to do anything else other than have an Angular related error, even though I am using browser to avoid Angular being detected at all.
The test involves an Angular app, opening a dropdown in it, and clicking on the link for the console; the console opens a non-Angular admin page in a separate window.
So based on the many informative SO posts I found, I first used this...
browser.driver.getAllWindowHandles().then(function(handles) {
browser.driver.switchTo().window(handles[1]).then(function() {
//expect for new window here
});
});
Which appeared to work, as I could get to the window through repl pretty easily.
The issue is when either of the following were added...
browser.driver.getAllWindowHandles().then(function(handles) {
browser.driver.switchTo().window(handles[1]).then(function() {
expect(browser.getLocationAbsUrl()).toContain('/console/login.jsp');
expect(browser.driver.findElement(By.css('th.login')).getText()).toEqual('Login');
});
});
One expect check the URL and the other checks for the header element on the page, which is a table header. When I run this, I get the following:
Error while waiting for Protractor to sync with the page: "angular could not be found on the window"
When I decide to use browser.ignoreSynchronization = true, both in the function, or in a beforeEach, with or without a following afterEach setting it to false, I get the following:
JavascriptError: angular is not defined
I can't seem to get any "useful" errors to help me debug it, and trying it in repl does not help, as I get the same issue.
To be comprehensive, trying my URL expect without getting the second window will give me the root, and the other will fail.
Just doing one or the other will cause the same problem.
Changing to regular syntax (element(by.css...)) does not change things.
So much for my first question...
It appears that my use of browser.getLocationAbsUrl() is meant to be used for an Angular page, and was causing my issue...
Essentially, even though I believed I was using pure Webdriver calls, that call still required Angular on the page to work...
As stated in another post, the use of browser.driver.getCurrentUrl() is a non-Angular call using Webdriver, and fixed the problem. Thus, the final code is the following...
browser.sleep(1000); //to wait for the page to load
browser.driver.getAllWindowHandles().then(function(handles) {
browser.driver.switchTo().window(handles[1]).then(function() {
expect(browser.driver.getCurrentUrl()).toContain('/console/login.jsp');
expect(browser.driver.findElement(By.css('th.login')).getText()).toEqual('Login');
});
});
This works without setting ignoreSynchronization, BTW.
I realized it would probably be something relatively simple to fix it, just didn't expect I'd get it that quickly (I intended on submitting the question last night, but posted it this morning instead).
In any case, I hope this will at least be a good reference for anyone else facing the same issue.
Seems like getLocationAbsUrl is angular abs url.
Try using the native driver getCurrentUrl instead.
-- expect(browser.getLocationAbsUrl()).toContain('/console/login.jsp');
++ expect(browser.driver.getCurrentUrl() ...

Can I run a function instead of routing on otherwise in Angular?

As my question asks, I want to know if that is possible. Why I want this? I am required to keep the link when the request fails so I use states in my bootstrap template instead of templates for the error pages. Now I need to catch everything that isn't registered and I need to tell my main controller to change the state if the route is not found. I checked the documentation, of course but it hasn't enlightened me so please help me out here if you can.
$httpProvider.otherwise(function () {
// code here
});
Is something like this possible?

How to implement callback in ngHistory in Pubnub?

When trying to retrieve the history message in the on event , the loading time is too long.
The spinner show and hides too fast. But the message is not yet loaded.
How can we calculate or get the exact time to make the history load?
$scope.limit = 100
PubNub.ngHistory( {
channel : $scope.channel,
limit : $scope.limit
});
$rootScope.$on(PubNub.ngMsgEv($scope.channel), function(ngEvent, payload) {
**ActivityIndicator.showSpinner();**
$scope.$apply(function(){
$scope.messages.push(payload.message);
});
$(".messages-wrap").scrollTop($(".messages-wrap")[0].scrollHeight);
**ActivityIndicator.hideSpinner();**
});
Thank you so much for trying out the PubNub AngularJS API! I'll try
to provide some help. There is a little bit of a difference between
the PubNub JS API and the PubNub AngularJS API in this case.
Background
Behind the scenes, The PubNub JS API history() method returns instantly,
and invokes the callback when the given "page" of history is retrieved.
The AngularJS API, in its quest for simplifying this interaction, does not
take a callback - instead, it calls $rootScope.$broadcast() for each message
in the returned history payload.
In this version of the AngularJS API, it's not currently possible to "get inside"
the 'ngHistory' method to provide a callback. However, there are 2 solutions
available to you: one has always been there, and the second one I just added
based on your feedback.
Solutions
1) See codepen here (http://codepen.io/sunnygleason/pen/afqmh). There is an "escape hatch" in the PubNub AngularJS API that lets you call the JS API directly for advanced use cases, called jsapi. You can call PubNub.jsapi.history({channel:theChannel,limit:theLimit,callback:theCallback}). The only thing to keep in mind is that this will not fire message events into the $rootScope, and you will need to call $rootScope.$apply() or $scope.$apply() to make sure any changes you make to $scope within the callback function are propagated properly to the view.
2) See codepen here (http://codepen.io/sunnygleason/pen/JIsek). If you prefer a promise-based approach, I just added an ngHistoryQ() function to version 1.2.0-beta.4 of the PubNub AngularJS API. This will let you write code like:
PubNub.ngHistoryQ({channel:theChannel,limit:theLimit}).then(function(payload) {
payload[0].forEach(function(message) {
$scope.messages.push(message);
}
});
You can install the latest version of the AngularJS SDK using 'bower install pubnub-angular'.
With either of these solutions, you should be able to display and hide your spinner
accordingly. The only difference is in #2, you'll want to write code like this:
var historyPromise = PubNub.ngHistoryQ({channel:theChannel,limit:theLimit});
showSpinner();
historyPromise.then(function(payload) {
// process messages from payload[0] array
hideSpinner();
});
Does this help? Let me know what you think. Thank you again so much for trying this out.
Can you programmatically turn the spinner on at history call time, and programmatically disable it at callback time?

How to use $resource in AngularJS properly for building a client app?

I've been following this tutorial http://draptik.github.io/blog/2013/07/28/restful-crud-with-angularjs/. I implemented a Grails backend with it instead of the Java one in the tutorial.
I've got the data coming back and forth, with one issue. If I create/update/delete a user, I don't see the changes reflected on my user list when I am redirected back. I have to refresh the page to see the updates.
Looking at the network traffic for an edit, it looks like it does a PUT and fires off the GET before the PUT is complete. Assuming this is because $resource returns a promise so things can be done asynchronously. So how do I handle this so that when $location redirects me, my list is up to date?
I'm guessing the options are to wait for the PUT to complete before redirecting/querying for the list, or to somehow manually manage the $scope.users to match the request?
Or maybe this tutorial is just a bad example? Maybe there is a better way to do it (still using $resource)?
Note: I've seen Restangular out there, and I've seen $http with success callbacks, but I would like to understand the situation above.
One way to overcome this issue would be to not redirect to the list page, till you get a callback, and then do a redirect. You can show some busy indicator till that time. The resource call looks like this.
resource.update(config,data,function() { //gets called on success},
function(error) { //gets called on failure});
In real life scenario waiting for the response of update makes sense as you want to handle the error and success scenarios on the same page.
I don't see your code anywhere so i'm just assuming (based on what you wrote and your current problem)
You are probably doing a full (or partial) get each time you changed a user and (re)binding the result to your scope. Doing this in the callback of the resource should actually start the digest cycle angular does to update modified objects. If you had been doing the fetching outside $resource - for example with custom/jquery ajax you would need to execute $scope.$apply()
What i really don't understand you would need to wait for the callback. You already know you added/modified a user. Instead of 'detaching' that user from your scope, modify it, post it to your rest server, then wait for callback, and reinserting it into the scope - why not modify it directly in the list/array you put on your scope?
var users = Users.get(function () {
$scope.users = users.record; // bind the resulting records to the scope
});
$scope.updateUser = function (user) {
resource.update(...); //pseudo
};
Then in your html, you will keep a reference to the currentUser and the div-list will update automaticly.
<div ng-repeat="user in users" ng-click="currentUser=user">{{user.Name}}</div>
<input ng-model="currentUser.Name">
<button ng-click="updateUser(currentUser);">Update</button>
If you don't want to see the update in the list while you type, but only once your callback fires or when you hit the button, would would instead use another ng-model for your input like this:
<input ng-model="tempUser.Name">
And you would then copy the value other in either the updateUser method or in the resource callback like this:
$scope.updateUser = function (user) {
user.Name = $scope.tempUser.Name; // should update automaticly
resource.update(...) // pseudo
}
Hope it helped!

"Failed to execute 'postMessage'" error from Froogaloop via AngularJS directive

I wrote an AngularJS directive for vimeo videos with built in play/pause functionality using their froogaloop library.
It's works great! The only issue is that I get the following error when the page first loads.
Failed to execute 'postMessage' on 'DOMWindow': The target origin provided ('http://player.vimeo.com') does not match the recipient
window's origin
Am I initializing the froogaloop object wrong in the directive?
Any suggestions would be most appreciated.
You can check it out the plunker here: http://plnkr.co/edit/GKWNk3LhX0MR3lhpfqyA
I recommend to execute the code in the onLoad event from <iframe>. Then you are ensured that the code will execute when iframe is ready for receiving messages.
There are plenty ways to do it:
You can use jQuery if you already have it in your project: $('iframe').load(callback) or
write an EventListener: iframe_element.addEventListener('load', callback) or
use plain onload callback: iframe_element.onload = callback.
Where callback is the method which uses Froogaloop.
But you have to know that some of those solutions might have some drawbacks on some old/MS browsers browsers.
For me it looks like angularjs triggers Player API before actually rendering the iframe on the page. At least if I postpone scope.$watch it works fine:
$timeout(function() {
scope.$watch('controlBoolean', function() {/* your code goes here */});
});

Resources