I am new to WPF and I want to make a program that is like a game. The common technique I see is to update your game in a dispatch timer (say every 10ms). But this is not ideal for me.
In XNA's update method, there is a 'elapsed' time parameter. Knowing how much time the last frame actually used is very helpful for me to decide what I do in the next frame. Is there any similar technique in WPF?
For some reason I have to use WPF and cannot use XNA.
Related
A custom control I am creating needs to draw many "items" in its client space. A call to Invalidate() would trigger a new paint cycle wherein all items would be redrawn.
Now when there are many items and a lot of navigation happens within the control, things need to be optimized; so I need to trigger a paint cycle where only one or two items are drawn. I store references to these items so that the paint method (OnPaint) knows it's a "quicky".
The difficulty is that when OnPaint is executed, it is hard to know if other Invalidate() calls have been made in the meantime. In that case it should do a "normal", complete paint.
I do make use of the clip rectangle. Of course I could check if the clip rectangle in OnPaint has become the whole of the client rectangle, a sign that Invalidate() was called, but this is not 100% safe. I thought of other similar solutions but they seem hacky.
What is the way this problem is usually, or best, solved?
The solution here would be to employ a double buffering approach with the BufferedGraphics class. This way you won't have so much tricky stuff going on in your OnPaint and you'll be able to paint whenever, whatever.
MSDN: Double Buffered Graphics (under "Manually Managing Buffered Graphics")
Here's a useful example:
Custom Drawing Controls in C# – Manual Double Buffering
In case a screen of a WPF application contains lots of primitive controls, its rendering becomes sluggish. What are the recommended ways to improve the responsiveness of a WPF application in such a case, apart from adding fewer controls and using more powerful videocard?
Is there a way to somehow use offscreen buffering or something like that?
Our team was faced with problems of rendering performance. In our case we have about 400 transport units and we should render chart of every unit with a lot of details (text labels, special marks, different geometries etc.).
In first our implementations we splitted each chart into primitives and composed whole unit's chart via Binding. It was very sad expirience. UI reaction was extremely slow.
So we decided to create one UI element per each unit, and render chart with DrawingContext. Although this was much better in performance aspect, we spent about one month improving rendering.
Some advices:
Cache everything. Brushes, Colors, Geometries, Formatted Texts, Glyphs. (For example we have two classes: RenderTools and TextCache. Rendering process of each unit addresses to shared instance of both classes. So if two charts have the same text, its preparation is executed just once.)
Freeze Freezable, if you are planning to use it for a long time. Especially geometries. Complex unfreezed geometries execute HitTest extremely slow.
Choose the fastest ways of rendering of each primitive. For example, there is about 6 ways of text rendering, but the fastest is DrawingContext.DrawGlyphs.
Use profiler to discover hot spots. For example, in our project we had geometries cache and rendered appropriate of them on demand. It seemed to be, that no improvements are possible. But one day we thought what if we will render geometries one time and cache ready visuals? In our case such approach happened acceptable. Our unit's chart has just several states. When data of chart is changed, we rebuild DrawingVisual for each state and put them into cache.
Of course, this way needs some investments, it's dull and boring work, but result is awesome.
By the way: when we turned on WPF caching option (you could find link in answers), our app hung up.
I've had the same perf issue with a heavily customized datagrid since one year, and My conclusion is:
there is basically nothing you can do
on your side (without affecting your
app, i.e.: having fewer controls or
using only default styles)
The link mentioned by Jens is great but useless in your case.
The "Optimizing WPF Application Performance" link provided by NVM is almost equally useless in my experience: it just appeals to common sense and I am confident you won't learn anything extraordinary either reading. Except one thing maybe: I must say this link taught me to put as much as I can in my app's resources. Because WPF does not reinstanciate anything you put in resource, it simply reuses the same resource over and over. So put as much as you can in there (styles, brushes, templates, fonts...)
all in all, there is simply no way to make things go faster in WPF just by checking an option or turning off an other. You can just pray MS rework their rendering layer in the near future to optimize it and in the meantime, try to reduce your need for effects, customized controls and so on...
Have a look at the new (.NET 4.0) caching option. (See here.)
I have met a similar problem and want to share my thoughts and founds. The original problem is caused by a virtualized list box that displays about 25 complex controls (a grid with a text block and a few buttons inside displaying some paths )
To research the issue I used the VisualStudio Application Timeline that allows to how much time it takes to render each control and PerfView to find out what actually WPF is doing to render each control.
By default it took about 12ms to render each item. It is rather long if you need to update the list dynamically.
It is difficult to use PerfView to analyse what heppens inside since WPF renders item in the parent-child hierarchy, but I got the common understanding about internall processes.
WPF does following to render each item in the list:
Parse template using XAML reader. As far as I can see the XAML parsing is the biggest issue.
Apply styles
Apply bindings
It does not take a lot of time to apply styles and bindings.
I did following to improve performance:
Each button has its own template and it takes a lot of time to render it. I replaced Buttons with Borders. It takes about 4-5ms to render each item after that.
Move all element settings to styles. About 3ms.
Create a custom item control with a single grid in the template. I create all child elements in code and apply styles using TryFindResources method. About 2ms in the result.
After all these changes, performance looks fine but still most time is spent on loding the ListControl.Item template and the custom control template.
4. The last step: replace a ListControl with Canvas and Scrollbar controls. Now all items are created at runtime and position is calculated manually using the MeasureOverride and ArrangeOverride methods. Now it takes <1ms to render each item from which 0.5ms is spent on TextBlock rendering.
I still use styles and bindings since they do not affect performance a lot when data is changed. You can imagine that this is not a WPF solution. But I fave a few similar lists in the application and it is possible not to use templates at all.
I have a WinForms data entry form that will have upwards of 1500 questions. I have the questions broken into sections, and each section will have an unkown number of questions. Each section is its own user control and has rows (2 panels, 2 labels, a textbox, and another user control) created and added dynamically for each question. The section controls are then added to the form.
My problem is that the process takes a lot of time, even with using TPL (Task Parallel Library). I would ultimately like to create/add the controls and allow the user to start entering data at the same time. The controls are going into a scrollable panel. While the user is entering data, that data will need processed on a local database...so more threading could be necessary.
I have tried working with TPL, which I am new to, by having all the controls added to a list during processing and then sorted and added to the form after the Parallel.ForEach was complete...takes about 20 seconds for over 1200 questions.
I also tried utilizing a BackgroundWorker component. Using the BWC seems to be the faster of the two, but there is a race condition for the ProgressChanged() eventhandler and not all controls get added...not to mention the way the form looks with all the rerendering.
Am i just using TPL wrong? What's the best way to go about this? Is there another way or do I just make the user stick out the wait?
Thanks
Am i just using TPL wrong? What's the best way to go about this? Is there another way or do I just make the user stick out the wait?
Most likely, you can use TPL, and get the same response time as BW, but a nicer API for this type of operation.
The trick here is to get a TaskScheduler setup for UI interaction, and then use the Task class to push the controls back onto the UI thread as they're ready. I have a blog post on this specific subject which shows how to get a TaskScheduler setup to use with UI threads.
However, I would recommend keeping these in memory and pushing them in batches, to avoid constantly re-rendering the UI. This is likely to be an issue no matter what you're doing.
That being said - I'd question your overall visual design here - if you're trying to display over 1200 questions to the user, some form of paging is probably a much nicer approach than a huge scrollable container. If you page these, you could load and process the first few (which is probably near instantaneous, since you mentioned you can process about 50 questions/second), and then continue loading the others after the first few questions have been displayed.
I'm working on a game-like app which has up to a thousand shapes (ellipses and lines) that constantly change at 60fps. Having read an excellent article on rendering many moving shapes, I implemented this using a custom Canvas descendant that overrides OnRender to do the drawing via a DrawingContext. The performance is quite reasonable, although the CPU usage stays high.
However, the article suggests that the most efficient approach for constantly moving shapes is to use lots of DrawingVisual instances instead of OnRender. Unfortunately though it doesn't explain why that should be faster for this scenario.
Changing the implementation in this way is not a small effort, so I'd like to understand the reasons and whether they are applicable to me before deciding to make the switch. Why could the DrawingVisual approach result in lower CPU usage than the OnRender approach in this scenario?
From Pro WPF in C# 2008:
The problem posed by these
applications isn't the complexity of
the art, but the sheer number of
individual graphic elements. Even if
you replace your Path elements with
lighter weight Geometry objects, the
overhead will still hamper the
application's performance. The WPF
solution for this sort of situation is
to use the lower-level visual layer
model. The basic idea is that you
define each graphical element as a
Visual object, which is an extremely
lightweight ingredient that has less
overhead than a Geometry object or a
Path object.
What it boils down to is that every single one of those ellipses and lines you're creating is a separate FrameworkElement; that means it supports not only hit testing, but also layout, input, focus, events, styles, data-binding, resources, and animation. That's a pretty heavy-weight object for what you're trying to do! The Visual object skips all of that and inherits directly from DependencyObject. It still provides support for hit-testing, coordinate transformation, and bounding-box calculations, but none of the other stuff that the shapes support. It's far more lightweight and would probably improve your performance immensely.
EDIT:
Ok, I misread your question the first time around.
In the case that you are using OnRender, it really depends how you are creating the visuals and displaying them. If you are using a DrawingContext and adding all of the visuals to a single element, this is no different than using the DrawingVisual approach. If you were creating a separate element for each Visual created, then this would be a problem. It seems to me that you are doing things the right way.
Everyone in the answers got it wrong. The question is whether rendering shapes directly in the drawing context is faster than creating DrawingVisual. The answer is obviously 'yes'. Functions such as DrawLine, DrawEllipse, DrawRectangle etc. do not create any UI Element. DrawingVisual is much slower because it does create a UI Element, although a lightweight one. The confusion in the answers is because people simply copy/paste the DrawingVisual performs better than distinct UIElement shapes statement from MSDN.
I thought Petzold explains in this paragraph;
The ScatterPlotVisual class works by
creating a DrawingVisual object for
each DataPoint. When the properties of
a DataPoint object change, the class
only needs to alter the DrawingVisual
associated with that DataPoint.
Which builds on an earlier explanation;
Whenever the ItemsSource property
changes, or the collection changes, or
a property of the DataPoint objects in
the collection changes,
ScatterPlotRender calls
InvalidateVisual. This generates a
call to OnRender, which draws the
entire scatter plot.
Is this what your asking about?
By the way, this is a fairly recent high-performance WPF tutorial, many tens of thousands of points in that plot, it is 3D rendered and animated also (even uses mouse input to drive some of the transforms).
In my tests however (panning animations), I notice no difference in speed. I would say that using a host element for many drawing visuals is a bit faster. This approach where you build your visual tree with many visuals gives you more control. Moreover, when you want to do a complex hit testing, the filtering process is faster because you can skip entire "branches" of visuals
I'm trying to learn WPF animations and am currently confused by quite a few things:
I used tools like processing, where you have a simple method which is called n times per minute, where n is the frame rate.
The way to do animations in WPF is to modify a property. If i use for example DoubleAnimation then a double is increased as the animation proceeds. But this is not exactly what I want. I want that in every cycle some properties are increased, some are modified by random and some are modified by user interaction. How can I do this in WPF?
What is also confusing me is the fact that WPF supports multiple animations at the same time. How does this work? Is there a thread for every animation or just one for all animations.
I used gdi with c# some time ago. I even could use multiple threads for drawing; As far as I remember I just had to insert all the drawing commands in some queue and then windows took care of them.. I have no idea how this is handled with WPF.
On a basic level, WPF animations are just the same as any other kind of animation: internally a timer ticks and some properties are modified which lead to a different picture when drawn to the screen.
WPF does all the leg work for you to be able to specify animations relative to wall-clock time, like "move that box at 3mm per second to the left". For more complex scenarios you might want to code up your own Animation, see the Custom Animation Overview article on the MSDN.
Regarding threading, WPF works the same as GDI: There is one Thread that handles all the interaction with the WPF model and you can only talk to WPF Controls if you're running on this thread. You can use the Dispatcher to "send" code to this thread if you are free threading. Actual drawing to DirectX is done in a separate thread, but that is of no concern to casual users of the API.
You can run several animations at the same time by putting them into a StoryBoard.
You can use the animation's BeginTime to get one animation to start after another.
You can use the key frames version (DoubleAnimationUsingKeyFrames) or the path version (DoubleAnimationUsingPath) to create complex non-linear animations.