I am developing an AngularJS application. To ship the code in production, I'm using this Grunt configuration/task:
grunt.registerTask( 'compile', [
'sass:compile', 'copy:compile_assets', 'ngAnnotate', 'concat:compile_js', 'uglify', 'index:compile'
]);
It's really hard to debug, and it's kind of a question to people who already ran into such problems and can point to some direction.
My main module is including those submodules:
angular
.module('controlcenter', [
'ui.router',
'ui.bootstrap',
'templates-app',
'templates-common',
'authentication',
'api',
'reports',
'interceptors',
'controlcenter.websites',
'controlcenter.users',
'controlcenter.campaigns',
'controlcenter.reports',
'controlcenter.login'
])
.run(run);
The error I get is following:
Uncaught Error: [$injector:modulerr] Failed to instantiate module controlcenter due to:
Error: [$injector:modulerr] Failed to instantiate module controlcenter.websites due to:
Error: State 'websites'' is already defined
If I remove the websites module, I get the same error for
controlcenter.users.
I am using the ui-router to handle routing inside the app.
After my build process (for integration testing), everything works just fine:
grunt.registerTask( 'build', [
'clean', 'html2js', 'jshint', 'sass:build',
'concat:build_css', 'copy:build_app_assets', 'copy:build_vendor_assets',
'copy:build_appjs', 'copy:build_vendorjs', 'copy:build_vendorcss', 'index:build', 'karmaconfig',
'karma:continuous'
]);
So maybe ngAnnotate or or concat/uglify are doing weird things here?
UPDATE 1:
It has something to do with my configuration of the modules. Here is the code:
angular
.module('controlcenter.websites',
[
'ui.router'
]
)
.config(config);
config.$inject = ['$stateProvider'];
function config($stateProvider) {
$stateProvider.state( 'websites', {
url: '/websites',
views: {
"main": {
controller: 'WebsitesController',
templateUrl: 'websites/websites.tpl.html'
}
}
});
}
When I change the name of the state to websites_2, I get an error
with 'websites_2 is already defined'.
When I remove the module completely, the next one hast the same problem inside the config file. So is the structure wrong?
Update 2:
The problem seems concat related.
It takes every JS file and adds it one after another to one, bigger file. All of my modules are at the end. The last module always has the problem with 'state already defined'. So it's not just the order of the modules appending to each other, it's something elsse...
Update 3:
I placed my code (I've excluded every Controller-Code and functions, just the scaffold) in a gist. This is the outcome after my compile process, without uglifying it.
Issue:
You have multiple files that contains a config function to configure your module, like this:
angular
.module('controlcenter.websites', [])
.config(config);
function config() {
// ...
}
The problem is that after you concatenate all files you end up with a big file with multiple declarations of config. Because of JavaScript's variable hoisting, all declarations are moved to the top and only the very last of them is evaluated, and this one is:
function config($stateProvider) {
$stateProvider.state( 'websites', {
url: '/websites',
views: {
"main": {
controller: 'WebsitesController',
templateUrl: 'websites/overview/websites.tpl.html'
}
},
data : {requiresLogin : true }
});
}
Hence, each time you .config(config) a module, you are telling Angular to configure your module with that particular configuration function, which means that it executes multiple times and tries to define the state websites more than once.
Solution:
Wrap each JavaScript file code with a closure. This way you will avoid declaring a variable/function more than once:
(function (angular) {
'use strict';
angular
.module('controlcenter.website.details', ['ui.router'])
.config(config);
config.$inject = ['$stateProvider'];
function config($stateProvider) {
$stateProvider
.state( 'websiteDetails', {
url: '/websiteDetails/:id',
views: {
"main": {
controller: 'WebsiteDetailsController',
templateUrl: 'websites/details/website.details.tpl.html'
}
},
data : {requiresLogin : true }
})
.state( 'websiteDetails.categories', {
url: '/categories',
views: {
"detailsContent": {
templateUrl: 'websites/details/website.details.categories.tpl.html'
}
},
data : {requiresLogin : true }
})
;
}
})(window.angular);
Edit:
I strongly recommend you wrap your files into closures. However, if you still don't want to do that, you can name your functions according to their respective modules. This way your configuration function for controlcenter.website.details would become controlcenterWebsiteDetailsConfig. Another option is to wrap your code during build phase with grunt-wrap.
window.angular and closures: This is a technique I like to use on my code when I'm going to uglify it. By wrapping your code into a closure and giving it a parameter called angular with the actual value of window.angular you are actually creating a variable that can be uglified. This code, for instance:
(function (angular) {
// You could also declare a variable, instead of a closure parameter:
// var angular = window.angular;
angular.module('app', ['controllers']);
angular.module('controllers', []);
// ...
})(window.angular);
Could be easily uglified to this (notice that every reference to angular is replaced by a):
!function(a){a.module("app",["controllers"]),a.module("controllers",[])}(window.angular);
On the other side, an unwrapped code snippet like this:
angular.module('app', ['controllers']);
angular.module('controllers', []);
Would become:
angular.module("app",["controllers"]),angular.module("controllers",[]);
For more on closures, check this post and this post.
If you check it in the concatenated file, do you have the states defined twice? Can it be that you are copying the files twice? Check the temporary folders from where you are taking the files (also in grunt config, what you are copying and what you are deleting...).
So I had the same problem but with the following setup:
yeoman angular-fullstack (using typescript)
Webstorm
With the angular-fullstack configuration, the closures were already implemented (as Danilo Valente suggests) so I struggled quite a bit until I found out that in Webstorm, I had the typescript compiler enabled which compiled all of my *.ts files to *.js. But since Webstorm is so 'smart', it does not show these compiled files in the working tree. Grunt however concatenated of course all files regardless if it is typescript of JS. That's why - in the end- all of my states were defined twice.
So the obvious fix: Disabled typescript compiler of webstorm and deleted all the generated *.js files and it works.
Related
I'm building a Chrome extension and surprisingly, I could create one AngularJS app for the extension side and another for the content script side. The latter is useful to work with a modal-like element injected in the page. I injected this app with this content script:
var myApp = angular.module('ContentApp', []);
/**
* Append the app to the page.
*/
$.get(chrome.runtime.getURL('templates/modal.html'), function(data) {
$($.parseHTML(data)).appendTo('body');
// Manually bootstrapping AngularJS app because template was also manually imported.
angular.element(document).ready(function() {
angular.bootstrap(document, ['ContentApp']);
});
});
The problem comes now that modal.html is getting big and I still have to add more elements. I thought that I could start creating components in Angular and did it like this:
angular.module('ContentApp').
component('greetUser', {
template: 'Hello, {{$ctrl.user}}!',
controller: function GreetUserController() {
this.user = 'world';
}
});
This actually works. I can see the Hello, world message in the rendered page. But when I changed template for templateUrl, it failed:
// This doesn't work
templateUrl: 'templates/component.html',
// Neither does this
templateUrl: 'templates/component.html',
// Although this is similar to the way I got the main template, it didn't worked either
templateUrl: chrome.runtime.getURL('templates/component.html'),
Worth to mention that I added the permission to manifest.json:
"web_accessible_resources": [
"templates/*"
],
The error that I got in the console is this:
Error: [$sce:insecurl] http://errors.angularjs.org/1.5.11/$sce/insecurl?p0=chrome-extension%3A%2F%2Fext_id%2Ftemplates%2Fmodal.html
at chrome-extension://ext_id/scripts/lib/angular.min.js:6:426
at getTrusted (chrome-extension://ext_id/scripts/lib/angular.min.js:154:156)
Does anyone know how to make it work? Or am I asking too much for a Chrome extension?
I found the answer in this link. Thanks to faboolous who pointed me in the right direction ;)
Since templateURL is processed before $scope execution, the proper way to secure a template path in a Chrome extension is this:
// This works. Yay!
angular.module('ContentApp').
component('greetUser', {
templateUrl: ['$sce', function ($sce) {
return $sce.trustAsResourceUrl(chrome.runtime.getURL('templates/component.html'));
}],
controller: function ($scope) {
...
So I am trying to jump on the Angular bandwagon, and I have been tasked with building an SPA, for which I have selected AngularJS with ASP.Net MVC Web API (I am a .Net developer). As a fan of strongly typed languages, I have avoided javascript whenever possible throughout my career, but frameworks like AngularJS and the other libraries & plugins in recent years have made it impossible to ignore. So here I am, asking for some guidance.
I have watched the tutorials, done the sample code projects and done some learning on PluralSight, and I have things working, at least from a foundational perspective. I have a rich background in MVVM and MVC, so SOC is a big thing for me. I like the MVC type of structure that Angular provides, which is largely why I went this route in the first place.
Now let me get to my issue(s). I am initializing my module (currently) in my master page (_Layout.cshtml), which I did while tweaking and experimenting, for the sake of simplicity.
<script>
angular.module('xcmApp', ['ngRoute', 'ngResource'])
.config(function ($routeProvider) {
$routeProvider
.when('/',
{
controller: 'companiesController',
templateUrl: 'views/companylist.html'
})
.when('/Reports',
{
controller: 'reportsController',
templateUrl: 'views/reportlist.html'
})
.otherwise({ redirectTo: '/' })
})
.factory('companiesFactory', ['$resource',
function ($resource) {
return $resource('/api/companies', {}, {
query: { method: 'GET', params: {}, isArray: true }
});
}
])
.controller('companiesController', function ($scope, companiesFactory) {
$scope.Companies = companiesFactory.query();
});
</script>
But now that I am ready to move on to deeper concepts, I want to break my scripts out into their appropriate files. Namely, app.js and associated controllers/factories/services etc. However when I move that script into app.js and reference it in _Layout.cshtml, it errors:
<script src="~/app.js"></script>
Error: [$injector:unpr] Unknown provider: a
Now there's no point in continuing to break out into controller files etc. when I can't even get the app.js to work right, so here I am stuck. I know there are some brilliant AngularJS devs on here that probably know what I'm missing before even reading this far, and I am grateful for your assistance.
Anyone who can highlight my oversight will be a superstar for me today. Thanks in advance!
EDIT:
Here is my Stack Trace:
0x800a139e - JavaScript runtime error: [$injector:modulerr] Failed to instantiate module xcmApp due to:
Error: [$injector:unpr] Unknown provider: a
http://errors.angularjs.org/1.3.15/$injector/unpr?p0=a
at Anonymous function (http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.3.15/angular.js:4015:13)
at getService (http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.3.15/angular.js:4162:11)
at invoke (http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.3.15/angular.js:4191:9)
at runInvokeQueue (http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.3.15/angular.js:4109:11)
at Anonymous function (http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.3.15/angular.js:4118:11)
at forEach (http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.3.15/angular.js:323:11)
at loadModules (http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.3.15/angular.js:4099:5)
at createInjector (http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.3.15/angular.js:4025:3)
at doBootstrap (http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.3.15/angular.js:1452:5)
at bootstrap (http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.3.15/angular.js:1473:5)
http://errors.angularjs.org/1.3.15/$injector/modulerr?p0=xcmApp&p1=Error%3A%20%5B%24injector%3Aunpr%5D%20Unknown%20provider%3A%20a%0Ahttp%3A%2F%2Ferrors.angularjs.org%2F1.3.15%2F%24injector%2Funpr%3Fp0%3Da%0A%20%20%20at%20Anonymous%20function%20(http%3A%2F%2Fajax.googleapis.com%2Fajax%2Flibs%2Fangularjs%2F1.3.15%2Fangular.js%3A4015%3A13)%0A%20%20%20at%20getService%20(http%3A%2F%2Fajax.googleapis.com%2Fajax%2Flibs%2Fangularjs%2F1.3.15%2Fangular.js%3A4162%3A11)%0A%20%20%20at%20invoke%20(http%3A%2F%2Fajax.googleapis.com%2Fajax%2Flibs%2Fangularjs%2F1.3.15%2Fangular.js%3A4191%3A9)%0A%20%20%20at%20runInvokeQueue%20(http%3A%2F%2Fajax.googleapis.com%2Fajax%2Flibs%2Fangularjs%2F1.3.15%2Fangular.js%3A4109%3A11)%0A%20%20%20at%20Anonymous%20function%20(http%3A%2F%2Fajax.googleapis.com%2Fajax%2Flibs%2Fangularjs%2F1.3.15%2Fangular.js%3A4118%3A11)%0A%20%20%20at%20forEach%20(http%3A%2F%2Fajax.googleapis.com%2Fajax%2Flibs%2Fangularjs%2F1.3.15%2Fangular.js%3A323%3A11)%0A%20%20%20at%20loadModules%20(http%3A%2F%2Fajax.googleapis.com%2Fajax%2Flibs%2Fangularjs%2F1.3.15%2Fangular.js%3A4099%3A5)%0A%20%20%20at%20createInjector%20(http%3A%2F%2Fajax.googleapis.com%2Fajax%2Flibs%2Fangularjs%2F1.3.15%2Fangular.js%3A4025%3A3)%0A%20%20%20at%20doBootstrap%20(http%3A%2F%2Fajax.googleapis.com%2Fajax%2Flibs%2Fangularjs%2F1.3.15%2Fangular.js%3A1452%3A5)%0A%20%20%20at%20bootstrap%20(http%3A%2F%2Fajax.googleapis.com%2Fajax%2Flibs%2Fangularjs%2F1.3.15%2Fangular.js%3A1473%3A5)
REMINDER:
My problem is not that it doesn't work, it DOES WORK. It just STOPS working when I take the Javascript out of my HTML page and place it into a referenced app.js file.
Go back to the documentation. You are using a bad way of defining your application. Try:
var MyApp = angular.module( 'MyApp', ['ngRoute' , 'ngSanitize']) ;
and then use MyApp to add controllers, filters, etc.
EDIT:
BTW, it is a good practice to write the Javascripts in separate files for SPA (you are not writing a small project I guess).
It looks like you are missing a few declaration pieces related to Dependency Injection in your controller definition.
Before I post the specific code and fixes, I want to mention a useful troubleshooting tool for Dependency Injection issues. Angular has a built in directive ng-strict-di. This directive is a companion to ng-app. From the ng-app documentation:
if this attribute is present on the app element, the injector will be created in "strict-di" mode. This means that the application will fail to invoke functions which do not use explicit function annotation (and are thus unsuitable for minification), as described in the Dependency Injection guide, and useful debugging info will assist in tracking down the root of these bugs.
Now, to the code in your post:
Your controller is not using explicit function annotation. In explicit function annotation, you pass a string array of dependencies, followed by the function. This ensures that even if minification were to rename the function parameters, Angular can still identify which dependency to supply to the function. You have used explicit annotation in parts of your code, but it is missing from your controller definition.
This is classically easy to identify, with Error: [$injector:unpr] Unknown provider: a, even though you never defined a provider named a. ng-strict-di would flag this controller code.
Here is the current code, and the proposed fix.
Instead of:
.controller('companiesController', function ($scope, companiesFactory) {
Try:
.controller('companiesController', ['$scope', 'companiesFactory', function ($scope, companiesFactory) {
I don't have an ASP.net background, but I think that souldn't matter to answer your Angular question.
First declare your modules like this:
angular.module('myModule', []);
and get them im oder files like this:
angular.module('myModule').controller/foactory/....
So your code should look something like this:
//xcmApp.module.js
angular.module('xcmApp', ['ngRoute', 'ngResource']);
//xcmApp.config.js
angular.module('xcmApp').config(function ($routeProvider) {
$routeProvider
.when('/',
{
controller: 'companiesController',
templateUrl: 'views/companylist.html'
})
.when('/Reports',
{
controller: 'reportsController',
templateUrl: 'views/reportlist.html'
})
.otherwise({redirectTo: '/'})
});
//xcmApp.factory.js
angular.module('xcmApp').factory('companiesFactory', ['$resource',
function ($resource) {
return $resource('/api/companies', {}, {
query: {method: 'GET', params: {}, isArray: true}
});
}
]);
//xcmApp.controller.js
angular.module('xcmApp').controller('companiesController', function ($scope, companiesFactory) {
$scope.Companies = companiesFactory.query();
});
EDIT:
Regarding the error, keep in mind that your dependencies must be in the rigth order.
So your index.html (assuming you use don't use a script loader yet) should look like this:
<script src="/*path to angular*/"></script>
<script src="/*path to ngRoute*/"></script>
<script src="/*path to ngResource*/"></script>
<script src="/*path to xcmApp.module.js*/"></script> //setting your app module must come first
<script src="/*path to xcmApp.config.js*/"></script>
<script src="/*path to xcmApp.factory.js*/"></script> //must come before the controller in your case
<script src="/*path to xcmApp.controller.js*/"></script>
According to an excellent explanation of how to add translation using angular-translate (https://technpol.wordpress.com/2013/11/02/adding-translation-using-angular-translate-to-an-angularjs-app/)
I have a breaking my head error and I'm wondering why that happens? And what am I doing wrong?
Error:
angular.js:36 Uncaught Error: [$injector:modulerr] http://errors.angularjs.org/1.2.26/$injector/modulerr?p0=app&p1=Error%3A%20…alhost%3A9085%2FScripts%2Fcomponents%2Fangular%2Fangular.min.js%3A18%3A170)
Aim:
Partial loading translations in my entire app
What I've done:
Downloaded (both) via bower and included into the project.
angular-translate
angular-translate-loader-partial
Added them into ReguireJS config file (after Angular)
'angular': '../Scripts/components/angular/angular.min',
'ngAnimate': '../Scripts/components/angular-animate/angular-animate.min',
'ngResource': '../Scripts/components/angular-resource/angular-resource.min',
'ngRoute': '../Scripts/components/angular-route/angular-route.min',
'ngCookies': '../Scripts/components/angular-cookies/angular-cookies.min',
'pascalprecht.translate': '../Scripts/components/angular-translate/angular-translate.min',
'angularTranslate': '../Scripts/components/angular-translate-loader-partial/angular-translate-loader-partial.min'
Added shim:
'pascalprecht.translate': {
deps: ['angular']
},
'angularTranslate': {
deps: ['pascalprecht.translate']
}
In app.js file included dependencies (at the end, after angular stuff):
'pascalprecht.translate',
'angularTranslate',
var app = angular.module('app', ['...',
'pascalprecht.translate',
'angularTranslate' ]);
App.js config
app.config(['$routeProvider', '$locationProvider', '$httpProvider', '$translateProvider', '$translatePartialLoaderProvider',
function ($routeProvider, $locationProvider, $httpProvider, $translateProvider, $translatePartialLoaderProvider) {
Stuff in controllers config:
define(
[
'angular',
'./services/services',
'./controllers/controllers',
'./directives/directives',
'./filters/filters',
'pascalprecht.translate'
],
function(angular) {
'use strict';
var module = angular.module('common', ['common.services', 'common.controllers', 'common.directives', 'common.filters', 'pascalprecht.translate']);
return module;
});
Controller
define(function (require) {
'use strict';
function angularTranslate ($translateProvider, $translatePartialLoaderProvider) {
$translateProvider.useLoader('$translatePartialLoader', {
urlTemplate: '../Translations/locale-{part}.json'
});
$translateProvider.preferredLanguage('en');
}
return angularTranslate;
});
After precisely following above tutorial I still get thi error.
I albo searched in github and stackoverflow but nothing works for me.
Please help!
Short: You dependency management in RequireJS is not correct. The controller's module should require angularTranslate, not pascalprecht.translate.
Long:
At first I would advice you using the official documentation and guide which you will found at https://angular-translate.github.io/
I also recommend using both the latest AngularJS (which is 1.5.x atm) and angular-translate (which is 2.10.x atm).
Additionally, I would also advice using only the non minified versions of libraries because they will give you a much better experience. Minified source files are not for the developer.
And I would also appreciate working demo using JSFiddle, Plnkr or others because they give everyone a running proof of concept/bug.
Said this, it is not clear which version of angular-translate you are using. If you have run bower install angular-translate, you will probably have the latest already -- but the page behind the link you have referenced is made with an older one (about three years old). APIs have changed.
Coming to you actual issue: I would say you have mixed the problems both in AngularJS and RequireJS which leads in such exceptions.
First of all: Your (shim) configuration for RequireJS is misleading/confusing. You should not name the partial loader plugin as angularTranslate.
'angularTranslate': '../Scripts/components/angular-translate-loader-partial/angular-translate-loader-partial.min'
and
'angularTranslate': {
deps: ['pascalprecht.translate']
}
Less confusing would be a name like pascalprecht.translate.partialLoader.
And now the RequireJS module dependency management:
You have defined a shim dependency angularTranslate -> pascalprecht.translate. Whenever the last one will be requested, the first one will be loaded before. That's fine.
You have defined your app depends on both pascalprecht.translate and angularTranslate (which is the partial loader actually). This is fine, but the first one is actually obsolete. It will be available automatically because you have defined the shim dependency already.
However the controller's module only requires the core library pascalprecht.translate.
This means: The dependency management resolver of RequireJS will not wait for the partial loader (no reason it should do this) and therefor it can/will be not available when processing the AJS injections (here: translatePartialLoaderProvider).
Disclaimer: I'm the co-maintainer of the AngularJS plugin angular-translate.
app.js looked like this:
define(
[
...
'pascalprecht.translate',
'angularTranslate',
],
var app = angular.module('app', ['...',
'pascalprecht.translate',
'angularTranslate' ]);
but it should be like:
define(
[
...
'pascalprecht.translate',
'angularTranslate',
],
var app = angular.module('app', ['...',
'pascalprecht.translate' ]);
I've defined submodule angular-translate-loader-partial as normal module and that causes the error. Dependency between both modules (angular-translate and angular-translate-loader-partial) should be made only in requirejs shim.
I'm a complete Angular noob and trying to do some fancy stuff quickly, so forgive me if this is a dumb question.
I've created a website that uses routing, and I'm using ui-router for the routing instead of the standard Angular router. The theory is still the same - I have an index.html page in the root of my website which is the "master" or "host" page, and loginView.htm, which is a partial, exists in a separate directory.
The mainController for the project is loaded in the index.html page. Referencing this controller does NOT cause an error or problem.
What I'd like to do, in order to keep code manageable and small, is have the custom controller for a partial page lazy load when I load the partial, and then associate that partial page with the newly loaded controller. Makes sense, right? I don't want to load all the controllers by default, because that's a waste of time and space.
So my structure looks like this (if it matters to anyone):
Root
--app/
----admin/
------login/
--------loginView.html
--------loginController.js
--mainController.js
index.html
This is my loginController code. For testing purposes, I have made the mainController code match this exactly.
var loginController = function ($scope, $translate) {
$scope.changeLanguage = function (key) {$translate.use(key); };
};
angular.module('app').controller('loginController', loginController);
Finally, here is my routing code:
function config($stateProvider, $urlRouterProvider, $ocLazyLoadProvider) {
$urlRouterProvider.otherwise("/admin/login");
$stateProvider
.state('login', {
url: "/admin/login",
templateUrl: "app/admin/login/loginView.html",
controller: loginController,
resolve: {
loadPlugin: function ($ocLazyLoad) {
return $ocLazyLoad.load([
{
name: 'loginController',
files: ['app/admin/login/loginController.js']
}
]);
}
}
})
;
}
angular
.module('app')
.config(config)
.run(function ($rootScope, $state) {
$rootScope.$state = $state;
});
Now - if I remove the whole "resolve" section, and change the controller to "mainController", everything works. The page loads, the buttons work, they call the "changeLanguage" function and everything is wonderful.
But I want the "changeLanguage" feature to reside in the loginController because that's the only page that uses it. So when the code looks like it does above, an error fires("Uncaught Error: [$injector:modulerr]") and the partial page fails to load.
I don't understand what I'm doing wrong, and I'm not finding what I need via Google (maybe I just don't know the right question to ask).
Help?
Looking through the docs I cannot find the name property for ocLazyLoad#load.
Try the following:
resolve: {
loadPlugin: function ($ocLazyLoad) {
return $ocLazyLoad.load(['app/admin/login/loginController.js']);
}
}
Or, pre configure it in a config block:
app.config(function ($ocLazyLoadProvider) {
$ocLazyLoadProvider.config({
modules: [{
name: 'loginController',
files: ['app/admin/login/loginController.js']
}]
});
});
// then load it as:
$ocLazyLoad.load('loginController');
I have problems with call a factory in one module from another module. I am using angular.js + require.js.
Here is my code
Module 1:
define(['angular', 'app/admin/app.admin', 'app/admin/account/services'], function (angular, app, services) {
app.controller('MainCtrl', ['$scope', 'providerService', function ($scope, providerService) {
$scope.showMe = false;
$scope.provider = providerService.Providers;
}]);
return app;
});
Module 2
define(['angular', 'app/admin/config/index'], function (angular) {
'use strict';
var service = angular.module('app.admin.account.services', []);
service.factory('providerService', ['app.admin.config',
function (config) {
var providers = [
{ name: 'google+', url: config.AUTH_URL + '/google' },
{ name: 'facebook', url: config.AUTH_URL + '/facebook' }
];
return {
Providers: providers
};
}
]);
return service;
});
When i try to call providerService in module 2 from module 1. I got an error say providerService is not there. Can someone tell me what I did wrong here?
Cheers
It is perfectly fine to use RequireJS and AngularJS together, however the term "module" has different meaning between the two and is a little bit confusing when it comes to dependencies.
In RequireJS a "module" is a typical Javascript file that encapsulates a piece of code. You define the dependencies using RequireJS in order to pass in/around other modules as dependencies and ensure correct script load ordering.
In AngularJS the term "module" specifically means an AngularJS "module", which is a container for a number of controller/services/directive etc. declarations.
You use RequireJS to define the order and dependencies of your script files. You then also need to tell Angular which "Angular modules" your module depends on, essentially importing all of the controllers/services/directives along with it.
In 'app/admin/app.admin' make sure you define the dependencies for your AngularJS module by passing in the 'app.admin.account.services' module as a second parameter e.g.
var app = angular.module('app.admin', ['app.admin.account.services']);
That will then import the 'app.admin.account.services' module into your main module making your providerService available for dependency injection.