Adding things above and below bootstrap fixed navbar - angularjs

I am trying to add a banner above my fixed-top navbar. I have looked around and understand some basic concepts on how to do this but my example is a little more complex and I am getting a little lost.
User can add a custom banner to the top of my page. If this happens I need to push everything (including the fixed navbar) down the height of the banner (say 20 px).
I have created a class that I can apply to the nav element:
.top-banner-nav {
top: 20px;
}
Navbar:
<nav class="navbar navbar-default navbar-fixed-top" ng-class="{'top-banner-nav': banner == true}">
That works great to push the static navbar down 20px if there is a banner. However I have to problems.
When you have a static navbar like this you have to add a top padding to the body to push the body content below the banner. Now all of the sudden I would need to push the body content down 70px. Not sure if there is a good way to make this happen dynamically.
I have another static navbar directly underneath the very top navbar. When I move the very top navbar down 20px I need to move this other navbar down 20px as well. Unfortunately this lower nav is fixed as well with top: 50px to place it right below the upper navbar.
I have a plunker here that demonstrates the problem. And I am not really sure where to go from here. Might have to mess with things in javascript, but I would like to try and avoid that is at all possible to avoid things jumping around on page load.
http://plnkr.co/edit/DYYMz1?p=preview

I looked at your plunker. I made some changes to your CSS and HTML to accomplish what you are looking for. The change I made to the HTML was the body tag. The new tag looks like this:
<body ng-controller="MainController" ng-class="{'bodyModified': banner == true}">
The new CSS file looks like this:
body {
padding-top: 50px; Need this to move down body under fixed header
}
.bodyModified {
padding-top: 20px;
}
.settings-nav {
position: relative;
right: 0;
left: 0;
background-color: #E2E2E2;
z-index: 1029;
top:0px;
}
.settings-content {
padding-top: 70px;
}
.top-banner-nav {
position: relative;
margin: 0;
height: 20px;
}
.top-banner {
position: fixed;
right: 0;
left: 0;
top:0;
margin-bottom: 0px;
background-color: #FFFF00;
}
You can also use javascript and jQuery to accomplish this as well. Hope that helps. Let me know how it goes.
Here is a plunker demonstrating the changes
http://plnkr.co/edit/39LhQA2gdMremnTOGXe4?p=preview

you can try jquery solution for this.for example if you are using top-nav-fixed-banner class you can code something like this.
function fixBannerHeight(){
var bannerHeight = $(".top-banner-div").height();
$(".top-nav-fixed-banner").each(function(e){
var height = $(this).height();
bannerHeight = bannerHeight + height;
})
$('.top-banner-div').css({"height":bannerHeight+"px"});
}
call fixBannerHeight() when you are adding dynamically banner.
Hope this helps.

Related

scss and flexbox with logos in two different layouts

I am runnning across an issue in which I am not sure how to solve.
I have a grid system doing the following, BUT I will do a standard "div" solution. But here is my dilemna.
I have a "LogoComponent" That displays my companies logo on the left, and a partner's logo on the right.
I have two headers that display in two different conditions.
Centered Display (just the logos)
Left Aligned Display (left aligned logos, with other content on the right)
Caveats: the "partner logo" needs to confine within the div/space as sometimes the svg's are large, so I "can" offer a height, but not a width.
The image shows the two views. The "LogoComponent" I am having an issue as I was using a flexbox, but not sure that is gonna work since why I try to make it "left" as a component, it moves off the container div. Any ideas how to solve this?
I can solve it, but I feel it will be too generalized, as I'm looking to make this "LogoComponent" be wide enough for the logos, and then appropriately resize if the partner logo is there or not.
As said in the comment, you can center LogoComponent using margin: 0 auto; when it's the :only-child.
If it's not the only child, using margin-right: auto; will push all other content to the right as we are in a flex container.
.parent {
display: flex;
}
.LogoComponent {
margin-right: auto;
}
.LogoComponent:only-child {
margin: 0 auto;
}
/* for styling only */
.LogoComponent {
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
background-color: lightblue;
}
/* for styling only */
.OtherContent {
min-width: 200px;
background-color: lightgreen;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="LogoComponent"></div>
</div>
<hr>
<div class="parent">
<div class="LogoComponent"></div>
<div class="OtherContent"></div>
</div>

Extension styling breaks after being published [duplicate]

I wrote a Google Chrome extension, which popups a dialog with an autocomplete field and it's own style, but there are some sites where my CSS gets totally broken, which doesn't look very nice.
I know about isolating styles with iFrames, but in Google Chrome extension there is no way to isolate my HTML and CSS in this way. Another method is to wrap all my stuff into a separated div with it's own id and relative styles for that id, and I do so, but it seems that it doesn't work on some sites with "hard" tags style overloading or "!important" directives in the CSS code.
So, I want to know is there any way to really isolate my styles in z convenient way or it's my bad carma to overload every little CSS property to fix one or another style issue for each site?
By the way: I set up my manifest to load all the things at the "document_end", but I see it's not being applied to the stylesheets which is every time loaded whenever the DOM is ready.
At the time of asking the question, your only option was to either use iframes, or stylesheets with a very high specificity and explicitly set all properties that might affect styles. The last method is very cumbersome, because there will always be some property that is overlooked by you. Consequently, the only usable method for isolating stylesheets was to use iframes.
The solution to this problem -isolation of styles without iframes- is Shadow DOM (since Chrome 25). You can find a tutorial at HTML5 Rocks. For a real-world Chrome extension that uses Shadow DOM to isolate styles, see Display #Anchors (source code here).
As I've recently gone through the gauntlet of this issue, I want to share some information I think is valuable.
First, Rob W's answer is correct. Shadow DOM is the correct solution to this problem. However, in my case not only did I need CSS isolation, I also needed JavaScript events. For example, what happens if the user clicks a button that lives within the isolated HTML? This gets really ugly with just Shadow DOM, but we have another Web Components technology, Custom Elements, to the rescue. Except that as of this writing there is a bug in chrome that prevents custom element in chrome extensions. See my questions here and here and the bug here.
So where does that leave us? I believe the best solution today is IFrames, which is what I went with. The article shahalpk linked is great but it only describes part of the process. Here's how I did it:
First, create an html file and js file for your isolated widget. Everything inside these files will run in an isolated environment in an iframe. Be sure to source your js file from the html file.
//iframe.js
var button = document.querySelector('.my-button');
button.addEventListener('click', function() {
// do useful things
});
//iframe.html
<style>
/* css */
</style>
<button class='my-button'>Hi there</button>
<script src='iframe.js'></script>
Next, inside your content script create an iframe element in javascript. You need to do it in javascript because you have to use chrome.extension.getURL in order to grab your iframe html file:
var iframe = document.createElement('iframe');
iframe.src = chrome.extension.getURL("iframe.html");
document.body.appendChild(iframe);
And that's it.
One thing to keep in mind: If you need to communicated between the iframe and the rest of the content script, you need to chrome.runtime.sendMessage() to the background page, and then chrome.tabs.sendMessage from the background page back to the tab. They can't communicate directly.
EDIT: I wrote a blog post detailing everything I learned through my process, including a complete example chrome extension and lots of links to different information:
https://apitman.com/3/#chrome-extension-content-script-stylesheet-isolation
In case my blog goes down, here's the sources to the original post:
Blog post
Example source
Either use all
.some-selector {
all: initial;
}
.some-selector * {
all: unset;
}
or use Shadow DOM
Library
function Widget(nodeName, appendTo){
this.outer = document.createElement(nodeName || 'DIV');
this.outer.className = 'extension-widget-' + chrome.runtime.id;
this.inner = this.outer.createShadowRoot();
(appendTo || document.body).appendChild(this.outer);
}
Widget.prototype.show = function(){
this.outer.style.display = 'block';
return this;
};
Widget.prototype.hide = function(){
this.outer.style.display = 'none';
return this;
};
Usage
var myWidget = new Widget();
myWidget.inner.innerHTML = '<h1>myWidget</h1>';
You can access the widget contents via myWidget.inner and the outer via myWidget.outer.
Styles
/*
* Reset Widget Wrapper Element
*/
.extension-widget-__MSG_##extension_id__ {
background: none;
border: none;
bottom: auto;
box-shadow: none;
color: black;
cursor: auto;
display: inline;
float: none;
font-family : "Helvetica Neue", "Helvetica", "Arial", sans-serif;
font-size: inherit;
font-style: normal;
font-variant: normal;
font-weight: normal;
height: auto;
left: auto;
letter-spacing: 0;
line-height: 100%;
margin: 0;
max-height: none;
max-width: none;
min-height: 0;
min-width: 0;
opacity: 1;
padding: 0;
position: static;
right: auto;
text-align: left;
text-decoration: none;
text-indent: 0;
text-shadow: none;
text-transform: none;
top: auto;
vertical-align: baseline;
white-space: normal;
width: auto;
z-index: 2147483648;
}
/*
* Add your own styles here
* but always prefix them with:
*
* .extension-widget-__MSG_##extension_id__
*
*/
.extension-widget-__MSG_##extension_id__{
position: fixed;
top: 100px;
margin: 0 auto;
left: 0;
right: 0;
width: 500px;
}
.extension-widget-__MSG_##extension_id__::shadow h1 {
display: block;
margin: 0 auto;
padding: 20px;
background-color: yellow;
border: 10px solid green;
font-size: 20px;
text-align: center;
}
I recently created Boundary, a CSS+JS library to solve problems just like this. Boundary creates elements that are completely separate from the existing webpage's CSS.
Take creating a dialog for example. After installing Boundary, you can do this in your content script
var dialog = Boundary.createBox("yourDialogID", "yourDialogClassName");
Boundary.loadBoxCSS("#yourDialogID", "style-for-elems-in-dialog.css");
Boundary.appendToBox(
"#yourDialogID",
"<button id='submit_button'>submit</button>"
);
Boundary.find("#submit_button").click(function() {
// some js after button is clicked.
});
Elements within #yourDialogID will not be affected by the existing webpage. And find() function returns a regular jQuery DOM element so you can do whatever you want with it.
Hope this helps. Please let me know if you have any question.
https://github.com/liviavinci/Boundary
Use iframes. It's a workaround, but works fine.
Maxime has written an article on it.

How to prevent webpage styling getting affected by inject chrome extension's styling [duplicate]

I wrote a Google Chrome extension, which popups a dialog with an autocomplete field and it's own style, but there are some sites where my CSS gets totally broken, which doesn't look very nice.
I know about isolating styles with iFrames, but in Google Chrome extension there is no way to isolate my HTML and CSS in this way. Another method is to wrap all my stuff into a separated div with it's own id and relative styles for that id, and I do so, but it seems that it doesn't work on some sites with "hard" tags style overloading or "!important" directives in the CSS code.
So, I want to know is there any way to really isolate my styles in z convenient way or it's my bad carma to overload every little CSS property to fix one or another style issue for each site?
By the way: I set up my manifest to load all the things at the "document_end", but I see it's not being applied to the stylesheets which is every time loaded whenever the DOM is ready.
At the time of asking the question, your only option was to either use iframes, or stylesheets with a very high specificity and explicitly set all properties that might affect styles. The last method is very cumbersome, because there will always be some property that is overlooked by you. Consequently, the only usable method for isolating stylesheets was to use iframes.
The solution to this problem -isolation of styles without iframes- is Shadow DOM (since Chrome 25). You can find a tutorial at HTML5 Rocks. For a real-world Chrome extension that uses Shadow DOM to isolate styles, see Display #Anchors (source code here).
As I've recently gone through the gauntlet of this issue, I want to share some information I think is valuable.
First, Rob W's answer is correct. Shadow DOM is the correct solution to this problem. However, in my case not only did I need CSS isolation, I also needed JavaScript events. For example, what happens if the user clicks a button that lives within the isolated HTML? This gets really ugly with just Shadow DOM, but we have another Web Components technology, Custom Elements, to the rescue. Except that as of this writing there is a bug in chrome that prevents custom element in chrome extensions. See my questions here and here and the bug here.
So where does that leave us? I believe the best solution today is IFrames, which is what I went with. The article shahalpk linked is great but it only describes part of the process. Here's how I did it:
First, create an html file and js file for your isolated widget. Everything inside these files will run in an isolated environment in an iframe. Be sure to source your js file from the html file.
//iframe.js
var button = document.querySelector('.my-button');
button.addEventListener('click', function() {
// do useful things
});
//iframe.html
<style>
/* css */
</style>
<button class='my-button'>Hi there</button>
<script src='iframe.js'></script>
Next, inside your content script create an iframe element in javascript. You need to do it in javascript because you have to use chrome.extension.getURL in order to grab your iframe html file:
var iframe = document.createElement('iframe');
iframe.src = chrome.extension.getURL("iframe.html");
document.body.appendChild(iframe);
And that's it.
One thing to keep in mind: If you need to communicated between the iframe and the rest of the content script, you need to chrome.runtime.sendMessage() to the background page, and then chrome.tabs.sendMessage from the background page back to the tab. They can't communicate directly.
EDIT: I wrote a blog post detailing everything I learned through my process, including a complete example chrome extension and lots of links to different information:
https://apitman.com/3/#chrome-extension-content-script-stylesheet-isolation
In case my blog goes down, here's the sources to the original post:
Blog post
Example source
Either use all
.some-selector {
all: initial;
}
.some-selector * {
all: unset;
}
or use Shadow DOM
Library
function Widget(nodeName, appendTo){
this.outer = document.createElement(nodeName || 'DIV');
this.outer.className = 'extension-widget-' + chrome.runtime.id;
this.inner = this.outer.createShadowRoot();
(appendTo || document.body).appendChild(this.outer);
}
Widget.prototype.show = function(){
this.outer.style.display = 'block';
return this;
};
Widget.prototype.hide = function(){
this.outer.style.display = 'none';
return this;
};
Usage
var myWidget = new Widget();
myWidget.inner.innerHTML = '<h1>myWidget</h1>';
You can access the widget contents via myWidget.inner and the outer via myWidget.outer.
Styles
/*
* Reset Widget Wrapper Element
*/
.extension-widget-__MSG_##extension_id__ {
background: none;
border: none;
bottom: auto;
box-shadow: none;
color: black;
cursor: auto;
display: inline;
float: none;
font-family : "Helvetica Neue", "Helvetica", "Arial", sans-serif;
font-size: inherit;
font-style: normal;
font-variant: normal;
font-weight: normal;
height: auto;
left: auto;
letter-spacing: 0;
line-height: 100%;
margin: 0;
max-height: none;
max-width: none;
min-height: 0;
min-width: 0;
opacity: 1;
padding: 0;
position: static;
right: auto;
text-align: left;
text-decoration: none;
text-indent: 0;
text-shadow: none;
text-transform: none;
top: auto;
vertical-align: baseline;
white-space: normal;
width: auto;
z-index: 2147483648;
}
/*
* Add your own styles here
* but always prefix them with:
*
* .extension-widget-__MSG_##extension_id__
*
*/
.extension-widget-__MSG_##extension_id__{
position: fixed;
top: 100px;
margin: 0 auto;
left: 0;
right: 0;
width: 500px;
}
.extension-widget-__MSG_##extension_id__::shadow h1 {
display: block;
margin: 0 auto;
padding: 20px;
background-color: yellow;
border: 10px solid green;
font-size: 20px;
text-align: center;
}
I recently created Boundary, a CSS+JS library to solve problems just like this. Boundary creates elements that are completely separate from the existing webpage's CSS.
Take creating a dialog for example. After installing Boundary, you can do this in your content script
var dialog = Boundary.createBox("yourDialogID", "yourDialogClassName");
Boundary.loadBoxCSS("#yourDialogID", "style-for-elems-in-dialog.css");
Boundary.appendToBox(
"#yourDialogID",
"<button id='submit_button'>submit</button>"
);
Boundary.find("#submit_button").click(function() {
// some js after button is clicked.
});
Elements within #yourDialogID will not be affected by the existing webpage. And find() function returns a regular jQuery DOM element so you can do whatever you want with it.
Hope this helps. Please let me know if you have any question.
https://github.com/liviavinci/Boundary
Use iframes. It's a workaround, but works fine.
Maxime has written an article on it.

Trouble getting ng-animate working on removing ng-hide

I suspect this is a case of not really understanding CSS3 animations, but in general, I've found Angular animation very frustrating to learn.
So to start, I have a plunker for this: http://plnkr.co/edit/VSIxhDy1qaVuF0j0pxjT?p=preview
As I'm required to show code to get a plunker link going, here's the CSS in the test situation:
#wrapper {
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
}
#wrapper, form, #wrapper > div {
height: 400px;
width: 400px;
}
#wrapper > * {
transition: 10s linear all;
}
form {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
z-index: 1;
}
form.ng-hide-add-active {
top: -100%;
}
#wrapper > div {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
background: #66F;
}
#wrapper.ng-hide.ng-hide-remove-active {
top: 100%;
}
I have a situation where I want to make a form, and if it successfully submits, I want the form to slide up with the success message sliding up under it. The problem is that while I can get the form to slide away, the under div just appears. In fact, it works better on plunker than on my code, where it starts up shown, goes away via animation, then just reappears when the form is submitted. No idea why that's the case, but in general, Angular animations are frustrating me. I tried looking up examples, and many mention using ng-animate="'name'" to create custom classes, but that doesn't seem to work for me. Likewise, the documentation mentions an ng-hide-remove class, but I never see that getting applied.
Is there any advantage to using CSS3 transitions over creating custom animations with the animate module, and just using jQuery to do it? I understand keyframes may be the biggest advantage? This is just making it really hard to do stuff that seems relatively easy in jQuery working...
The examples using ng-animate="'name'" is for versions earlier than Angular 1.2.
For these kind of animations, vision two states for each involved element.
Visible
Hidden
You have a wrapper. Inside the wrapper you have two elements involved in the animation - a form and a div with a message. Now set up your HTML and CSS with the visible state in mind. When visible, both the form and the div should be visible inside the container.
Here is an example based on yours (changed it some for clarity):
#wrapper {
position: absolute;
height: 200px;
width: 200px;
top: 100px;
left: 100px;
border: 1px solid silver;
}
#form {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background-color: #DDFEFF;
transition: all 1s ease-in-out;
}
#submitted {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background-color: gold;
transition: all 1s ease-in-out;
}
Both the form and the div are as large as the wrapper and aligned to the wrappers top, which means in this state they will overlap. This is not a problem however, since they shouldn't be visible at the same time.
Now define their hidden states.
For example, the form should when hidden be located above the wrapper:
#form.ng-hide {
top: -100%;
}
And the div should when hidden be located below the wrapper:
#submitted.ng-hide {
top: 100%;
}
That should be enough but minor tweaks might be needed depending on what AngularJS version you are using.
Demo: http://plnkr.co/edit/FDJFHSaLXdoCK7oyVi7b?p=preview

Drupal 7: Put a loading screen before everything is loaded

My Drupal site takes a while to load, and while it's loading everything looks messed up. So I opted for a simple solution that it's using a loading screen with this kind of solution:
Display a loading bar before the entire page is loaded .
But I have no idea how to implement it in Drupal 7.
Can you please help me with some clues?
Thank you!
.ajax-progress-throbber {
z-index: 1500;
border: 2px solid #C0C0C0;
position: fixed;
background: url('loader.gif') no-repeat center #ccc !important;
opacity:0.6;
padding:20px;
border-radius:10px;
-webkit-border-radius:10px;
-moz-border-radius:10px;
width:100%;
min-width: 100%;
height:100%;
left:0;
top:0;
}
I have done like this by putting this code in my css file and used a loader.gif image which is laso in the same folder where my css file is and use that class . Basically i use loader image every time i trigger ajax. You can use it as you want with according to different class.

Resources