after some research and study of examples I implemented a pagniation with a filter function.
Im very new to angular, so I need your help if this application is ok or it has some bugs/logical errors.
The target is to select a collection (in this application load1 or load2) and create new objects, manipulate existing, or delete some of them. On every update of the data, it has to be checked if the pagination is synchronous to the collection size.
If the user enters something into the search field, a watcher in the controller is fired for updating the filtered data:
$scope.$watch('search.name', function (newVal, oldVal) {
$scope.filtered = filterFilter($scope.items, {name: newVal});
}, true);
I would be very happy if some of you angular pros can look into this code and give me some feedback. I want to use this in a productive system, so every answer would be great!
Here is a working plunkr: http://plnkr.co/edit/j9DVahEm7y1j5MfsRk1F?p=preview
Thank you!
Watchers are heavy if you use them explicitly throughout your large application.
Use ng-change instead. Also, by passing true to that watcher means you're deep watching which is really a bad thing to do, since it will check each property of the object in the array which is performance intensive.
Since I can't see that you need old and new value for a reason, you can simply use $scope.search.name. Whenever you type in something, $scope.search.name has the updated value. Just need to call a function on ng-change.
DEMO: http://plnkr.co/edit/TWjEoM3oPdfrHfcru7LH?p=preview
Remove watch and use:
$scope.updateSearch = function () {
$scope.filtered = filterFilter($scope.items, {name: $scope.search.name});
};
In HTML:
<label>Search:</label> <input type="text" ng-model="search.name" placeholder="Search" ng-change="updateSearch()" />
Previous answer is still the correct, but you will have to make sure to replace the "page" inside the pagination tag and change it to ng-model.
From the changelog (https://github.com/angular-ui/bootstrap/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
Since 0.11.0:
Both pagination and pager are now integrated with ngModelController.
page is replaced from ng-model.
Related
I don't know if i titled my question correctly but here is what i want to achieve and what i have so far (simplified as much as possible):
What I have so far:
For each Visitor I create a "Visitor" Object:
{
name:"Bob",
mouseX:"31", // The mouseposition is constantly updated
mouseY:"400",
messages:[
{text:"Message Text",prop:"other property"},
{text:"Another Message"}
]
}
After that I bind the Object to the scope:
$scope.helpers({
visitor: () => Visitors.findOne({"_id":id})
});
The Messages are shown inside a ng-repeat over the visitor.messages model:
<div ng-repeat="msg in visitor.messages">
<span class="text {{msg.class}}"> {{msg.text}} </span>
</div>
Another Visitor can send a new Message with:
Visitors.update(
{_id: visitor._id},
{$push: {messages: {"text":"New Message"}}}
);
What I want to do
When Bob receives a new message i want to trigger the function newMessageArrived() and to animate the new Message in.
The Problem and what i tried so far
First i tried to use angular:angular-animate package and animate new messages with css-classes but ng-enter triggered for alle messages each time visitor.mouseX was updated and even if nothing other than the messages in the Visitors-Object where pushed still ng-enter triggered for all messages instead only for the new ones.
Thats ok because i guess that the whole DOM is rebuild when the Visitor-Object changes. Now i tried to simply watch the messages prop of the Visitors-Object like:
scope.$watch("visitor.messages", function ( newValue, oldValue ) {
newMessageArrived()
});
Again newMessageArrived() is triggering with each update to the Visitors-Object. Of course i could catch this stupidly with something like checking the length of the messages array but in my understanding even using $watch without this is wrong already.
The Question
So what is the Angular-Meteor way of reacting on changes in a property of a MongoDB Cursor (Object)?
Please consider my examples are extremly simplified to focus on my problem but also i am new to Meteor and not even very experienced in Angular. Also this is for a "proof of concept" project and not for any commercial or professional context, so security, performance and maintainability are not as crucial as usual.
Thanks for your time and hopefully for any help
I found a solution I guess.
Uringo from Angular-Meteor explained in another similar question on Github:
#gooor this is how Meteor's autorun works. it executes on every change
on any reactive thing inside it and a Meteor cursor is a reactive
object. If you want to re-run something only when field is changing
you can use Angular's $watch:
$scope.$watch('field', function(){ console.log('calling');
this.foos = Foos.find({field: this.field}); });
In my particular case I needed to add true as the third parameter to the $watch function. Therefore newMessageArrived() is only called when the property messages is changed.
So my initial concerns where wrong but when someone has a better, more meteorish solution i would appreciate.
Assuming a given form such as <form name="myForm">, it's easy enough to watch for validity, error, dirty state, etc. using a simple watch:
$scope.$watch('myForm.$valid', function() {
console.log('form is valid? ', $scope.myForm.$valid);
});
However, there doesn't appear to be an easy way to watch if any given input in this form has changed. Deep watching like so, does not work:
$scope.$watch('myForm', function() {
console.log('an input has changed'); //this will never fire
}, true);
$watchCollection only goes one level deep, which means I would have to create a new watch for every input. Not ideal.
What is an elegant way to watch a form for changes on any input without having to resort to multiple watches, or placing ng-change on each input?
Concerning the possible duplicate and your comment:
The directive solution in that question works, but it's not what I had in mind (i.e. not elegant, since it requires blur in order to work).
It works if you add true as third parameter for your $watch:
$scope.$watch('myFormdata', function() {
console.log('form model has been changed');
}, true);
Further information see the docs.
Working Fiddle (check console log)
Another more angular way would be to use angular's $pristine. This boolean property will be set to false once you manipulate the form model:
Fiddle
Based on my experience with my forms (new dev, but working with Angular for a while now), the elegant way to watch a form for changes is actually not to use any type of watch statement at all actually.
Use the built-in Angular boolean $pristine or $dirty and those values will change automatically on any input field or checkbox.
The catch is: it will not change the value if you add or splice from an array which had me stumped for a while.
The best fix for me was to manually do $scope.MyForm.$setDirty(); whenever I was adding or removing from my different arrays.
Worked like a charm!
I'm using typeahead through in my AngularJS project and I would like to have it select the entry if I type the full value and click out of the field.
I've put together an example of what I mean
http://plnkr.co/edit/NI4DZSXofZWdQvz0Y0z0?p=preview
<input class='typeahead' type="text" sf-typeahead options="exampleOptions" datasets="numbersDataset" ng-model="selectedNumber">
If I type in 'two' and click on 'two' from the drop down then I get the full object {id: 2, name: 'two'}. This is good, if however I type 'two' and click to the next field without selecting is there a way to accept the top of the list on loss of focus on a text field?
I'm not sure if I'd want to have that sort of functionality in my app. The user hasn't actually selected anything. So selecting something for them would introduce frustrations.
But I do understand that often odd requirements are needed. In this case, I'd attack it using ngBlur. Assign a function to be called on blur. You can grab the contents of ng-model and then loop through your data (assuming static & not being sent via server) to find a match.
You can most likely just look at the source code of your typeahead directive and strip out the part does the comparison and then choose the first item in the array.
Unfortunately the underlying component does not emit any events for this condition. This will make the solution more complex. However when the value is being entered and the Typehead magic has happened you can supplement those events and catch them to update your ngModel.
I have created a plnkr based on your plnkr and although have not cleaned up but it is a working plnkr doing by far what you need.
The gist of this is following code however you can put this code wherever best suited
The explanation below:
//Crux - this gets you the Typeahead object
var typeahead = element.data('ttTypeahead');
//This gets you the first
var datum = typeahead.dropdown.getDatumForTopSuggestion();
if (datum){
//you can do lot of things here however
//..I tried to - fill in the functionality best suited to be provided by Typeahead
//for your use case. In future if Typeahead gets this
//..feature you could remove this code
typeahead.eventBus.trigger("hasselections", datum.raw, datum.datasetName);
}
In the above code you can also save the datum somewhere in the scope for doing whatever you like with it later. This is essentially your object {num: 'Six'} Then you may also use ngBlur to set it somewhere (however the plnkr I created doe snot need these gimmicks.)
Then further down - ngModel's value is set as below
element.bind('typeahead:hasselections', function(object, suggestion, dataset) {
$timeout(function(){
ngModel.$setViewValue(suggestion);
}, 1);
//scope.$emit('typeahead:hasselections', suggestion, dataset);
});
I'm with EnigmaRM in that ngBlur seems to be the way to do what you want. However, I agree with the others that this could be somewhat strange for the end users. My implementation is below (and in plnkr). Note that I trigger on ngBlur, but only apply the model if and only if there is only one match from Bloodhound and the match is exact. I think this is probably the best of both worlds, and hope it should give you enough to go on.
$scope.validateValue = function() {
typedValue = $scope.selectedNumber;
if(typedValue.num !== undefined && typedValue.num !== null)
{
return;
}
numbers.get(typedValue, function(suggestions) {
if(suggestions.length == 1 && suggestions[0].num === typedValue) {
$scope.selectedNumber = suggestions[0];
}
});
};
in the controller I have:
$scope.foo = new Foo('test'); // foo.property now 'test'
in the view I have
<input type="text" ng-model="foo.property" />
But I don't really want foo.property to be changed directly.
I want it to be changed by calling a 'set method' for it, like
foo.setProperty('new-value');
So I know I could do something with watch like so:
$scope.$watch('myObject.property', function(newValue,oldValue) {
myObject.setProperty(newValue);
}
But I'll have this situation many times over again, so my question is if I can do this more automatically for every Foo?
or: How can I best implement something in Angular so that every time someFoo.property is used as a ng-model it is changed by calling someFoo.setProperty(newValue)?
You can call the setter method on blur event:
<input type type="text" ng-model="data.property" ng-blur="foo.setProperty(data.property)">
or use ng-change="foo.setProperty(data.property)"
You basically want the foo.property model to not be changed due to User Interaction, yes? Why don't you disable the input box using HTML, which will make sure no user interaction ever changes the input value, and then use $watch? $watch is the perfect way to handle what you require. And as long as it is not a deep watch, there's no performance concern either.
I am working on a SPA that pulls in customer data from one $resource call, and gets some generic preference data from another $resource call.
The preference data is sent as an array, which I want to use to populate a series of checkboxes, like so:
<div ng-repeat="pref in fieldMappings.mealPrefs">
<input type="checkbox"
id="pref_{{$index}}"
ng-model="customer.mealPrefs"
ng-true-value="{{pref.name}}" />
<label class="checkbox-label">{{pref.name}}</label>
</div>
When a user clicks one or more checkboxes, I want the values represented in that array of checkboxes to be mapped to an array nested inside a customer object, like so:
.controller( 'AppCtrl', function ( $scope, titleService, AccountDataService ) {
// this is actually loaded via $resource call in real app
$scope.customer = {
"name": "Bob",
"mealPrefs":["1", "3"]
};
// this is actually loaded via $resource call in real app
$scope.fieldMappings.mealPrefs = [
{'id':"1", 'name':"Meat"},
{'id':"2", 'name':"Veggies"},
{'id':"3", 'name':"Fruit"},
{'id':"4", 'name':"None"}
];
});
I have tried setting up ng-click events to kick off functions in the controller to manually handle the logic of filling the correct part of the customer object model, and $watches to do the same. While I have had some success there, I have around 2 dozen different checkbox groups that need to be handled somehow (the actual SPA is huge), and I would love to implement this functionality in a way that is very clean and repeatable, without duplicating lots of click handlers and setting up lots of $watches on temporary arrays of values. Anyone in the community already solved this in a way that they feel is pretty 'best practice'?
I apologize if this is a repeat - I've looked at about a dozen or more SO answers around angular checkboxes, and have not found one that is pulling values from one object model, and stuffing them in another. Any help would be appreciated.
On a side-note, I'm very new to plunkr (http://plnkr.co/edit/xDjkY3i0pI010Em0Fi1L?p=preview) - I tried setting up an example to make it easier for folks answer my question, but can't get that working. If anyone wants to weigh in on that, I'll set up a second question and I'll accept that answer as well! :)
Here is a JSFiddle I put together that shows what you want to do. http://jsfiddle.net/zargyle/t7kr8/
It uses a directive, and a copy of the object to display if changes were made.
I would use a directive for the checkbox. You can set the customer.mealPrefs from the directive. In the checkbox directive's link function, bind to the "change" event and call a function that iterates over the customer's mealPrefs array and either adds or removes the id of the checkbox that is being changed.
I took your code and wrote this example: http://plnkr.co/edit/nV4fQq?p=preview