I've encountered a problem while programming on C with SDL2. I have rendered to a texture simple images of squares that are transparent in the center. But when I draw the texture on which they are rendered they are not see-through. I've tried even changing the transparency of the rendered texture with SDL_SetTextureAlphaMod() but it isn't changing anything. If I change the alpha on the textures that are being rendered(the squares). They get dimmer but still they cover anything behind them. So I'm open to suggestions.
This is an image where I have lowered the alpha on the squares textueres:http://imgur.com/W8dNbBY
First off, you have two methods in SDL2 if you want to have a transparent image.
Method 1: (Static Method)
Use an image editing software and directly change the alpha value there, it will carry on to SDL2.
Method 2: (Dynamic Method)
SDL_SetTextureBlendMode(texture, SDL_BLENDMODE_BLEND);//This sets the texture in blendmode
alpha = xx //this section should be where you alter the alpha value. You can make fade in-fade out effects, etc... Just put the changes here.
SDL_SetTextureAlphaMod(texture, alpha); //sets the alpha into the texture
SDL_RenderCopy(renderer, texture, NULL, &rect); //Redraws the image with a fresh, new alpha ~
Related
I am trying to find the Contours using
cvFindContours( gray, storage, &contour, sizeof(CvContour), CV_RETR_LIST, CV_CHAIN_APPROX_SIMPLE, cvPoint(0, 0));
and Canny but i am not able to dectect it.
Is there any way i can detect it.( all the processing is done in c)
First equalize image for better contrast. It will increase noise and other textures also but object will be quite visible.
Now, find gradient, it will evade most of gradual color and noise and some texture.
Now you can experiment with some thresholding, it will give good edge and region around shadow and object both.
To remove noise and texture, whole image can be median blurred with large kernel and then thresholded to get interesting region mask.
You can try multiple iteration of above method also. It lots of accuracy is not required, try blurring out texture.
I have installed GLUT and Visual Studio 2010 and found some tutorials on OpenGL basics (www.opengl-tutorial.org) and 2D graphics programming. I have advanced knowledge in C but no expirience with graphics programming...
For project (astronomy - time scales) , i must create one object in center of window and make other 5 objects (circles,dots...) to rotate around centered object with respect to some equations (i can implement them and solve). Equations is for calculating coordinates of that 5 objects and all of equations have parameter t (as time). For creating animation i will vary parameter t from 0 to 2pi with some step and get coordinates in different moments. If task was to print new coordinates of objects it would be easy to me but problem is how to make animation of graphics. Can i use some functions of OpenGL for rotation/translation ? How to make an object to move to desired location with coordinates determined by equation? Or i can redraw object in new coordinates every millisecond? First thing i thought was to draw all objects, calculate new coordinates, clear screen and draw all objects in new coordinates and repeat that infinitely..(it would be primitive but will work?)
Here is screen shot of that objects - http://i.snag.gy/ht7tG.jpg . My question is how to make animation by calculating new coordinates of objects each step and moving them to new location. Can i do that with basics in OpenGL and good knowledge of C and geometry? Any ideas from what to start? Thanks
Or i can redraw object in new coordinates every millisecond? First
thing i thought was to draw all objects, calculate new coordinates,
clear screen and draw all objects in new coordinates and repeat that
infinitely..
This is indeed the way to go. I would further suggest that you don't bother with shaders and vertex buffers as is the OpenGL 3/4 way. What would be easiest is called "immediate mode", deprecated by OpenGL 3/4 but available in 1/2/3. It's easy:
glPushMatrix(); //save modelview matrix
glTranslatef(obj->x, obj->y, obj->z); //move origin to object center
glBegin(GL_TRIANGLES); //start drawing triangles
glColor3f(1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f); //a nice red one
glVertex3f(0.0, +0.6f, 0.0f);
glVertex3f(-0.4f, 0.0f, 0.0f);
glVertex3f(+0.4f, 0.0f, 0.0f); //almost equilateral
glEnd();
glPopMatrix(); //restore modelview matrix/origin
Do look into helper libraries glu (useful for setting up the camera / the projection matrix) and glut (should make it very easy to set up a window and basic controls and drawing).
It would probably take you longer to set it up (display a rotating triangle) than to figure out how to use it. In fact, here's some code to help you get started. Your first challenge could be to set up a 2D orthogonal projection matrix that projects along the Z-axis, so you can use the 2D functions (glVertex2).
First thing i thought was to draw all objects, calculate new coordinates, clear screen and draw all objects in new coordinates and repeat that infinitely..(it would be primitive but will work?)
That's exactly how it works. With GLUT, you set a display function that gets called when GLUT thinks it's time to draw a new frame. In this function, clear the screen, draw the objects and flush it to the screen. Then just instruct GLUT to draw another frame, and you're animating!
Might want to keep track of the time inbetween frames so you can animate things smoothly, but I'm sure you can figure that part out.
OpenGL is really just a drawing library. It doesn't do animation, that's up to you to implement. Clear/draw/flush is the commonly used approach for it though.
Note: with 'flush' I mean glFlush(), although GLUT in multi-buffer mode requires glutSwapBuffers()
The red book explains the proper way to draw models that can first be translated, rotated, scaled and so on: http://www.glprogramming.com/red/chapter03.html
Basically, you load the identity, perform transforms/rotations/scales (which one you want first matters - again the book explains it), draw the model as though it was at the origin at normal scale and it'll be placed in its new position. Then you can load identity and proceed with the next one. Every frame of an animation, you glClear() and recalculate/redraw everything. (It sounds expensive, but there's usually not much you can cache between draws).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZNdfVwkttM - you can see all of the problem described on this video if you can't see pictures.
All of walls in all images below have a semitransparent PNG texture. Each square wall, floor and ceiling tile is a separate GeometryModel3D (I know that is no good for performance but...). The floor and the ceiling of the central cube have no any geometry and textures - so they have a color the same as Window.Background (black). But the effect considered appears in any way of transparency obtaining: texture for ImageBrush with transparency, Material.Color (for example DiffuseMAterial.Color) where Color has alpha channel, ImageBrush as material where ImageBrush has Opacity - all the way I have the same problem.
All of walls consists of two triangles. Where are no explicit normals , because I define triangle indices so normals culculated automatically by WPF.
http://imagepost.ru/images/i/ma/image00001.png
It also haven't any back material or extra triangles from the back side.
As you can see there is no problem if you look only from +Z to -Z (standing on the blue square and looking to the red square - that is the second picture).
But if you look backward (from red to blue - the first picture) there is no transparency!
Well, I desided to look from the yellow square (third picture).
And then I walked nearer - you can see what was happening (pictures from 4 to 6).
There are no geometry construction error or texture mapping error or lighting error! It is some kind of clipping, I guessed! In addition there are some interested pictures 7 and 8 to prove my guess.
The last picture shows the white background of the window that hosted Viewport3D (previous was black), and my guess about clipping confirmed - WPF just not painted this part of the scene and we can see the window background!
BUT! If this happens from various looks, why the look from +Z to -Z (second picture) seems well?!
You need to sort the triangles based on their distances from the viewpoint. Only then, wpf will be able to blend the transparent textures.
DirectX is able to blend triangles on top of each other but only when drawing them back to front
http://www.ericsink.com/wpf3d/2_Transparency.html
In WPF, I want to use a pixel shader to modify a composite image i.e. a new image overlaid on top of a previously shaded image. The new image comes in as a largely transparent image except where there is data (think mathematical functions - sine wave, etc). Anyway this process needs to repeat pretty rapidly - compose the currently shaded texture with a new image and then shade the composite image. The problem is that I don't know how to access the previously shaded texture from within my shader.
Basically, you need to add a Texture2D variable in your shader, then set that parameter as the texture you need to access before drawing the new one (i'm unsure of that process in WPF). You do something like this:
//blahblahblah variables here
Texture2D PreviousTexture;
Sampler PreviousTextureSampler = Sampler2D { Texture = PreviousTexture; };
//blahblahblah code here
then you can sample the texture with a tex2D call.
I was wondering was the best way to invert the color pixels in the frame buffer is. I know it's possible to do with glReadPixels() and glDrawPixels() but the performance hit of those calls is pretty big.
Basically, what I'm trying to do is have an inverted color cross-hair which is always visible no matter what's behind it. For instance, I'd have an arbitrary alpha mask bitmap or texture, have it render without depth test after the scene is drawn, and all the frame buffer pixels under the masked (full alpha) pixels of the texture would be inverted.
I've been trying to do this with a texture, but I'm getting some strange results, also all the blending options I still find confusing.
Give something like this a try:
glEnable(GL_COLOR_LOGIC_OP);
glLogicOp(GL_XOR);
// render geometry
glDisable(GL_COLOR_LOGIC_OP);
how about:
glEnable (GL_BLEND);
glBlend (GL_ONE_MINUS_DST_COLOR, GL_ZERO);