Why should I put '#' before the path when routing with AngularJS? - angularjs

When routing in Angular views we add the following. I don't understand the need to add #; if I remove it, I get a 404 Error.
a href="#/AddNewOrder"

Putting # in URL indicates start of the hash part, which is used to address elements inside a single page. In modern single-page web applications, this can be used to address application states.
If you don't put the # there, you're changing the path, which means you're creating a new URL and prompting the browser to load the content at that new URL instead of the current page.
As other posters have suggested, you don't have to use hashes when using html5mode. I left it out, because it brings a few challenges of its own, which I feel to be outside the scope of the question.

enter link description hereYou don't have to. You can configure your URLs to look like normal URLs, but in reality they will still work the same way.
Check https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/$location
And refer to html5mode
It will only work in modern browsers though. Old browsers will still show the hash. But the cool thing is that you can write your URLs the old/normal way.

# or fragment identifier is a way to indicate a specific portion of a single document. Without the #, the url corresponds to a different page.
For example www.yoursite.com/page links to the /page location of your website, while www.yoursite.com/#/location points to the same index page of your website but at a specfic point in the web page #location, or in your case, a different template view.
Angular routing can not load different templates for different server urls. It is specifically designed for single-page applications and any loading of partial views or templates has to happen on the same web-page or location. Hence only the fragment part of the url changes when using angularjs routing.
More information about fragments can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fragment_identifier

Related

referrer in segment.io analytics.page() in a SPA

I am trying to integrate segment.io to work with Angular. My angular app is a SPA so I have to add some code to my components to allow segment to register the page visits.
In the code used to register page visits, there is a property called referrer that, according to the docs is:
Full URL of the previous page. Equivalent to document.referrer from
the DOM API.
The problem I am having is the referrer property value sometimes just remains empty, or sticks to one page even if I move to several other different pages.
So my questions are:
Does referrer mean links outside my app or also the previous routes visited within my app?
Am I supposed to set this manually in the app?
Yes, you're supposed to set it manually in your existing pageview hits to Segment.
Basically, in your case, referrer would be just the previous route. If the previous route doesn't exist, then use the document.referrer.
And yes, organically, if your app doesn't have a previous route, then document.referrer may contain an outside url, which is completely fine and expected.
Also, Segment provides pretty neat support for questions like this, so you can confirm with them.

Add an additional page to an Angular SPA

The Scenario
I'm developing the front-end (CSS only) of an Angular SPA.
I'm not especially familiar with Angular routing.
I'd like to add a standalone page containing Bootstrap components just for development purposes (yes, I know this means it won't be a single page application anymore). This way I have one unified view with all the components so I don't have to switch back and forth while working on the CSS. It also acts as documentation for the Bootstrap for the other devs to refer to.
What I've tried
I originally added a bootstrap.html page to the app folder, alongside the app's index.html This worked at first, but has now stopped working. What would be the best/standard way to achieve something like this?
Update: I've managed to fix some of the JS errors, so the page is up and running again. My question remains though: "is there a way of adding a standalone page that is considered standard/best practise, or is it literally just add a separate HTML page at the app root?"
If you use a target='_self' in your linking anchor tag, this should force a full page reload, and that will avoid the angular routing - which is where I expect your request is getting hijacked (by design).
e.g.
link
Answering your updated question
Not to my knowledge, since (as you correctly pointed out) this mixes the SPA design pattern.

Angular html5mode prevents links outside of base href to be loaded

My setup is as follows:
I have a website for which I would like one of the pages to be handled by angular (javascript heavy one).
I have set base href for this specific page only as <base href="/myangularpage">
This page is being controlled over only by url params. There is only one page like this. No routing. I handle the state using url parameters only. Example url: http://domain.com/myangularpage?param1=2&param2=3
However this page contains links to some other pages which should be followed and not handled by angular. Like /external-page. By external I mean they are on the same domain but have different base.
However setting up html5mode causes those links to be "push stated".
According to the docs and the answer to Angularjs Normal Links with html5Mode /external-page has a different base so should not be handled by angular.
But the problem is it is!
Tried adding / to the base url but I got a meaningless exception. I don't want the trailing slash in my page url so this isn't a real solution anyway.
EDIT:
So it seems it works when my base url has a trailing slash and I serv the page with an url which contains the slash. But I don't want the slash as it is a single page only.

what is the difference between hashbang and HTML5 pushState? [duplicate]

I'm asking this because a couple of times now, I've tried to play around with the $locationProvider.html5Mode(true) command along with <base href="/"> and ran into a lot of errors calling the scripts/styles/images for my project. I guess there must be something I am doing wrong, but is there a certain folder structure you should follow so you don't run into these errors? Or is there a specific way that the base href works that I'm not quite understanding?
Recently, I thought I'd try it on a very, very small app. It's effectively a static website, but I want to take advantage of Angular's routing to make sure all of the pages can load instantly. So my structure would be something like this:
my-project
css
images
js
angular
app.js
app.routes.js
mainCtrl.js
views
home.html
about.html
contact.html
index.html
So I know that this folder structure isn't great, but I'll only be using Angular in this project for routing, nothing more, so it fits my needs.
I put into the head <base href="/">, put in body ng-app and ng-controller, and inside the body put a <div ng-view> somewhere too.
I added in the $locationProvider.html5Mode(true) and tried the app out. All of my scripts are then being loaded as http://localhost:8888/script.js which is incorrect. The project is located in a folder so that index.html is located in http://localhost:8888/my-project/index.html. So, it should be loading the scripts from http://localhost:8888/my-project/js/angular/app.js for example.
Is there something that I'm not understanding about the base href? Eventually I may host this app somewhere online, so I want the URLs to scripts etc to all be relevant to the file really. Anyone have any ideas?
Alright, so above the base href tag I would have my CSS styles which would be linked as css/style.css and at the bottom of my body tag I would have my scripts loaded as js/init.js or js/angular/app.js for example. This would try to load it as if the js folder is located directly at localhost:8888/js.
The Angular framework is a Single Page Application (SPA) that is able to run in a browser by essentially tricking the browser into running code snippets rather than make server calls, by making use of the "hash" (#) page anchor. Normally, a URL with a # would jump to a specific anchor point in the page; in the case of Angular or other similar SPA frameworks, the # is redirected to a code segment instead.
Ideally, you would like to not have to reference this # in your page URLs. This is where Html5Mode comes into play. Html5Mode is able to hide the #, by using the HTML5 Push State (aka history API).
When Html5Mode is enabled, the normal links on the page are silently replaced by Angular with event listeners. When these events are triggered, the current page is pushed into the browser history, and the new page is loaded. This gives the illusion that you are navigating to a new page, and even allows for the back button to operate.
This is all fine when you are dealing with links which are clicked from within the running application, but relying on event listeners can't work if you navigate to the page from an external source, where Angular isn't loaded into memory yet. To deal with this, you must be loading your pages from a web server which supports URL rewrites. When the server receives a request for a URL that there isn't a physical page for, it rewrites the URL to load the base HTML page, where Angular can be loaded and take over.
When Angular receives a request for a route which has been rewritten in this manner, it must first determine what the intended route was. This is where the Base HTML Tag comes into play. Angular uses the Base reference to help it to determine which part of the URL is on the server, and which part is a client route. Essentially, where the # in the URL would be if Html5Mode was not enabled.
Unfortunately, Base is an HTML Tag that is used by the browser for more than just Angular. The browser also uses this tag to determine the correct location to load scripts and resources using relative paths from, regardless of the path in the location bar. In general, this isn't a problem if all of the scripts and resources are relative to the location of the Index.html file. When Base is omitted, the browser will load scripts from the apparent base path determined by the current URI. However, once you provide it, the browser will use whatever value you have supplied.
In general, unless you are hosting angular on a sub-page of your site and you want your users to expect something specific in the URL string, you should always control the base on your server, and use Base="/" on the client side.

After removing the # from url, I lost direct access to my urls

in order to make nice urls, I decide to remove the # from my ulrs using the tip from the following question Removing the fragment identifier from AngularJS urls (# symbol) Now, I realized that my urls are not working if I try a direct access to them. from the given example in the related question if put the url below directly in the browser http://localhost/phones
I'll get a 404.
Any idea how to solve this?
You need to write server side code that will generate the page that you were previously depending on the client-side JavaScript to generate.
This will then be the initial view for that URL.
If the client supports JavaScript (and the JavaScript doesn't fail for any reason) it will then take over for future interactions.
Otherwise, the regular links and forms you (should) have in the page will function as normal without JS.

Resources