I'm trying to read some data from Processing and write it to a file. The data is correct, since I can plot it without problem. However, when I attempt to write it to a file it throws me the following error:
Error, disabling serialEvent() for /dev/ttyACM0
null
Specifically, I've found out where the problem is. It's in this function:
void serialEvent(Serial myPort) {
int inByte = myPort.read();
if (inByte >= 0 && inByte <= 255)
{
// This is what makes the problem arise
output.println("test: " + inByte);
// ...
}
}
I've even changed the line output.println(); with this and then the same function works, printing it to the correct file (but it's obviously not what I want):
// This does work
point(mouseX, mouseY);
output.println(mouseX);
Any idea where the problem might be? I'm using arduino and it passes values from 0 to 255 from serial. The values seem correct, since I can plot them without problem. I've also tried changing println() for print() with no luck.
EDIT. After some testing, I find this really odd. This works:
point(mouseX, mouseY);
output.println(inByte);
While, without the point(), it doesn't work (same error). As a temporary solution, I can put the output.println at the end of the function, but this is obviously not a long-term solution.
I ended up doing a simple check in my code:
if (output != null) {
output.println(t + " " + inByte);
}
It just works. However, I think that polymorphism would be even better here. Having an object that absorbs the text if the output is not initialized, and that prints it to the file if it is.
I had the same problem but here is my solution and it works perfectly.
at the beginning of the code write sth like this:
boolean outputInitialized = false;
after output = createWriter(filename.txt); put following:
outputInitialized = true;
the output.print function has to be included in an if-function:
if (outputInitialized) {
output.println(filename);
}
Related
Well, I certainly should go to python since I did several functions of this type, keyboard event and mouse event, but decide to try to learn the windows api.
My goal is to know when button 1 of the mouse is pressed.
I created this file in a very beginner way, it returns in mouseData only 0.
The curious thing is that whenever I run it, it flashes my monitor at short intervals in blinks, but between 1 second with it off. Very strange that, execution is not viable.
Could someone help me understand and try to execute to see if it is only here.
Code:
int main()
{
DWORD mouseData = 0;
MOUSEINPUT tagMouse;
tagMouse.dx = 0;
tagMouse.dy = 0;
tagMouse.mouseData = mouseData;
tagMouse.dwFlags = MOUSEEVENTF_XDOWN;
tagMouse.dwExtraInfo = 0;
INPUT tagInput;
tagInput.type = INPUT_MOUSE;
tagInput.mi = tagMouse;
while (true) {
if (GetAsyncKeyState(VK_DELETE)) break;
SendInput(1, &tagInput, sizeof(INPUT));
printf("KEYWORD: %d\n", mouseData);
Sleep(500);
}
system("pause");
return 0;
}
I can reproduce your reported 'symptoms' - and the effect is really brutal!
Now, while I cannot offer a full explanation, I can offer a fix! You have an uninitialized field in your tagMouse structure (the time member, which is a time-stamp used by the system). Setting this to zero (which tells the system to generate its own time-stamp) fixes the problem. So, just add this line to your other initializer statements:
//...
tagMouse.dwExtraInfo = 0;
tagMouse.time = 0; // Adding this line fixes it!
//...
Note: I, too, would appreciate a fuller explanation; however, an uninitialized field, to me, smells like undefined behaviour! I have tried a variety of other values (i.e. not zero) for the time field but haven't yet found one that works.
The discussion here on devblogs may help. This quote seems relevant:
And who knows what sort of havoc that will create if a program checks
the timestamps and notices that they are either from the future or
have traveled back in time.
I am trying to run the code
function [ outStruct ] = loadfile( filename )
fid = fopen(filename,'r');
vector=[];
i=1;
while ~feof(fid)
line=fget1(fid);
vector(i)=AnotherFunction(line);
i=i+1;
end
end
But I keep getting the error message 'Undefined function 'fget1' for input arguments of type 'double''.
This whole function is mostly a copy of something we did in class, where it seemed to run fine, so I don't know the problem here.
I think you mean fgetl, not fget1. Note that the last letter in the first one is an L, while in the second (your version) you've put a one.
I'm attempting to write a function that will pull text from different sources (Ethernet client/Serial/etc.) into a single line, then compare them and run other functions based on them. Simple..
And while this works, I am having issues when trying to call a simple Serial.println() from a function OTHER than loop().
So far, I have around 140 lines of code, but here's a trimmed down version of the portion that's causing me problems:
boolean fileTerm;
setup() {
fileTerm = false;
}
loop() {
char character;
String content="";
while (Serial.available()) {
character = Serial.read();
content.concat(character);
delay(1);
}
if (content != "") {
Serial.println("> " + content);
/** Error from Serial command string.
* 0 = No error
* 1 = Invalid command
*/
int err = testInput(content);
}
int testInput(String content) {
if (content == "term") {
fileTerm = true;
Serial.println("Starting Terminal Mode");
return 0;
}
if (content == "exit" && fileTerm == true) {
fileTerm = false;
Serial.println("Exiting Terminal Mode");
return 0;
}
return 1;
}
(full source at http://pastebin.com/prEuBaRJ)
So the point is to catch the "term" command and enter some sort of filesystem terminal mode (eventually to access and manipulate files on the SD card). The "exit" command will leave the terminal mode.
However, whenever I actually compile and type these commands with others into the Serial monitor, I see:
> hello
> term
> test for index.html
> exit
> test
> foo
> etc...
I figure the function is catching those reserved terms and actually processing them properly, but for whatever reason, is not sending the desired responses over the Serial bus.
Just for the sake of proper syntax, I am also declaring the testInput() function in a separate header, though I would doubt this has any bearing on whether or not this particular error would occur.
Any explainable reason for this?
Thanks.
Model: Arduino Uno R3, IDE version: 1.0.4, though this behavior also happened on v1.0.5 in some instances..
It is kinda guessable how you ended up putting delay(1) in your code, that was a workaround for a bug in your code. But you didn't solve it properly. What you probably saw was that your code was too eager to process the command, before you were done typing it. So you slowed it down.
But that wasn't the right fix, what you really want to do is wait for the entire command to be typed. Until you press the Enter key on your keyboard.
Which is the bug in your code right now, the content variable doesn't just contain "term", it also contains the character that was generated by your terminal's Enter key. Which is why you don't get a match.
So fix your code, add a test to check that you got the Enter key character. And then process the command.
Hello I am studying for a test for an intro to C programming class and yesterday I was trying to write this program to print out the even prime numbers between 2 and whatever number the user enters and I spent about 2 hours trying to write it properly and eventually I did it. I have 2 pictures I uploaded below. One of which displays the correct code and the correct output. The other shows one of my first attempts at the problem which didn't work correctly, I went back and made it as similar to the working code as I could without directly copying and pasting everything.
unfortunately new users aren't allowed to post pictures hopefully these links below will work.
This fails, it doesn't print all numbers in range with natural square root:
for (i = 2; i <= x; i++)
{
//non relevant line
a = sqrt(i);
aa = a * a;
if (aa == i);
printf("%d ",i);
}
source: http://i.imgur.com/WGG6n.jpg
While this succeeds, and prints even numbers with natural sqaure root
for (i = 2; i <= x; i++)
{
a = sqrt(i);
aa = a * a;
if (aa == i && ((i/2) *2) == i)
printf("%d ", i);
}
source: http://i.imgur.com/Kpvpq.jpg
Hopefully you can see and read the screen shots I have here. I know that the 'incorrect code' picture does not have the (i/2)*2 == i part but I figured that it would still print just the odd and even numbers, it also has the code to calculate "sqrd" but that shouldn't affect the output. Please correct me if I'm wrong on that last part though.
And Yes I am using Dev-C++ which I've read is kinda crappy of a program but I initally did this on code::blocks and it did the same thing...
Please I would very much appreciate any advice or suggestions as to what I did wrong 2 hours prior to actually getting the darn code to work for me.
Thank you,
Adam
your code in 'that' includes:
if (aa == i);
// ^
printf(...);
[note the ; at the end of the if condition]
Thus, if aa == i - an empty statement happens, and the print always occures, because it is out of the scope of the if statement.
To avoid this issue in the future, you might want to use explicit scoping1 [using {, } after control flow statements] - at least during your first steps of programming the language.
1: spartan programmers will probably hate this statement
Such errors are common. I use "step Over", "Step Into", "Break Points" and "watch window" to debug my program. Using these options, you can execute your program line by line and keep track of the variables used in each line. This way, u'll know which line is not getting executed in the desired way.
I have a function with an absurd number of return points, and I don't want to caveman each one, and I don't want to next through the function. Is there any way I can do something like finish, except have it stop on the return statement?
You can try reverse debugging to find out where function actually returns. Finish executing current frame, do reverse-step and then you should stop at just returned statement.
(gdb) fin
(gdb) reverse-step
There is already similar question
I think you're stuck setting breakpoints. I'd write a script to generate the list of breakpoint commands to run and paste them into gdb.
Sample script (in Python):
lines = open(filename, 'r').readlines()
break_lines = [line_num for line_num, line in enumerate(lines) if 'return' in line and
line_num > first and line_num <= last]
break_cmds = ['b %s:%d' % (filename, line_num) for line_num in break_lines]
print '\n'.join(break_cmds)
Set filename to the name of the file with the absurd function, first to the first line of the function (this is a quick script, not a C parser) and last to the number of the last line of the function. The output ought to be suitable for pasting into gdb.
Kind of a stretch, but the catch command can stop on many kinds of things (like forking, exiting, receiving a signal). You may be able to use catch catch (which breaks for exceptions) to do what you want in C++ if you wrap the function in try/finally. For that matter, if you break on a line inside the finally you can probably single-step through the return after that (although how much that will tell you about where it came from is highly dependent on optimization: common return cases are often folded by gcc).
How about taking this opportunity to break up what seems to be clearly a too-large function?
This question's come up before on SO. My answer from there:
Obviously you ought to refactor this function, but in C++ you can use this simple expedient to deal with this in five minutes:
class ReturnMarker
{
public:
ReturnMarker() {};
~ReturnMarker()
{
dummy += 1; //<-- put your breakpoint here
}
static int dummy;
}
int ReturnMarker::dummy = 0;
and then instance a single ReturnMarker at the top of your function. When it returns, that instance will go out of scope, and you'll hit the destructor.
void LongFunction()
{
ReturnMarker foo;
// ...
}