Another ? for you. How can I work off of the results of 2 Conditional Formats & have just the results of those conditions highlighted. The 2 Conditional Formats results are in (column C & G) & I need to have the results highlighted in (column A)... A's 3 arguments are as follows:
condition1 cell value equal to 0, No Format
condition2 formula is =$G27>=LARGE($G$27:$G$150,10), Bold Format
condition3 formula is =$C27>=LARGE($C$27:$C$150,10), Colored Red
Another quandry...
This is just like the fizzbuzz programmer test.
So, without writing the code for you: I'll recommend a loop through a 'listobject(table)' followed by setting the range values using '.interior.colorindex' or 'font.colorindex' properties.
OK, without using code...
- Format your table as a table using "Format as Table" function
- In the "Table" menu, select the "Total Row" checkbox
- Set your Total formula for Cols C and G as =LARGE([ColC],10) and =LARGE([ColG],10), respectively.
- In Conditional Formatting, set up two rules as follows:
- =$B28>=$D$[TotalRowlNumber]
- =$B28>=$C$[TotalRowNumber]
- You shouldn't need a condition for =0 since you are not changing any formats.
How does that work?
Here's a sample table:
ID Col A Col C Col G
____________________________
1 50.66 51.33 97.17
2 16.09 83.39 97.37
3 b71.94 69.77 28.06
4 21.60 20.59 21.14
5 33.62 65.58 39.21
6 21.96 34.59 17.99
7 br80.94 93.02 96.84
8 b70.53 37.53 29.60
9 32.06 37.38 0.15
10 br89.81 67.02 6.85
11 br89.76 64.65 74.00
12 47.94 46.06 1.71
13 b61.19 34.19 90.13
14 br79.11 35.77 86.97
15 39.89 79.15 77.88
16 br93.20 8.01 13.99
17 31.84 18.12 95.61
18 br99.78 19.99 3.89
19 38.94 32.12 18.56
20 13.17 22.23 61.82
21 br75.75 51.42 28.32
22 b55.89 49.93 76.30
23 br72.78 82.46 27.07
24 b57.20 31.26 76.90
25 6.46 6.85 2.78
Total 51.33 74.00
Use the LARGE() formula to get the 10th largest value in the TOTAL row.
Then reference this cell in the condition.
So, any number larger than 51.33 will be bold and any number larger than 74.00 will be bold red. (Note, I used random number generator, so the numbers may be good or bad.)
Also, I added a 'b' tag and an 'r' note where cells will be formatted bold and red, respectively.
Related
Good morning,
I have an issue with extracting the correct handicap value within the following table:
K L M
Handicap York Hereford
0 1287 1280
1 1285 1275
2 1280 1271
3 1275 1268
4 1270 1265
5 1268 1260
6 1265 1258
7 1260 1254
8 1255 1250
9 1253 1246
I also have these 2 lines of sample score/round data:
G H I
Round Score Handicap
York 1269 5
York 1270 4
Hereford 1269 XXX
Hereford 1270 XXX
If for instance someone on a York, gets a score of 1269, they should get a handicap of 5, which this formula achieves:
INDEX($K$7:$K$16,MATCH($H7,$L$7:$L$16,-1))+1
However this formula only works on the one column $L$7:$L$16
Similarly, the 2ns score is calculated with the following formula:
=INDEX($K$8:$K$17,MATCH($H8,$L$8:$L$17,-1))
What I'd like to do is, build that out so if I changed the round to a Hereford, with the exact same score, the cell would automatically calculate that the handicap should be 3.
Is this possible, maybe with an array?
Regards,
Andrew.
With ms365, try:
Formula in I2:
=XLOOKUP(H2,FILTER(L$2:M$11,L$1:M$1=G2),K$2:K$11,"NB",-1,-1)
I would avoid using OFFSET because it is a volatile function.
To select the appropriate column, you can use another MATCH:
MATCH($G7,$L$6:$M$6,0)
will return the column number. This makes it simple if you more than just York and Hereford columns.
Then, to return the matching line:
=MATCH($H7,INDEX($L$7:$M$16,0,MATCH($G7,$L$6:$M$6,0)),-1)
Note the use of 0 for the Row argument in the INDEX function which will return the entire column (all the rows).
Since your handicaps are sequential, as written this formula returns the same values as does yours. But I don't think it is correct since both formulas return 1 for a 1287 York.
You probably need to subtract one from the result of the formula.
=MATCH($H7,INDEX($L$7:$M$16,0,MATCH($G7,$L$6:$M$6,0)),-1)-1
Reference your lookup range with an OFFSET() function, and for the third parameter (which is column offset), use a MATCH() on the headers.
The formula on your first row would be:
=INDEX($K$7:$K$16,MATCH(H7,OFFSET($L$7:$M$16,0,MATCH(G7,$L$6:$M$6,0)-1,ROWS($L$7:$M$16),1),-1))+1
I need to extract data from one tab (extracted data) to another tab and validate the data in the following way:
if 0% assign 3
if from 0 till -10% assign 2
if from -10% and more assign 1
if from 0% till 10% assign 4
if from 10% and more assign 5
here is the link to the file https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1f8SFi2hNP6Anav7G7BYWyK-fasPk1pT1A2HFJblT-FI/edit?usp=sharing
I suggest you use two vlookups.
If you have a tab called 'Ranges' with the following two columns:
Percentage Result
-1000% 1
-10% 2
0% 3
10% 4
11% 5
Then the formula in cell B1 on the 'calculations' tab would be something like:
=arrayformula({"Con Potential";iferror(vlookup(vlookup(A2:A,'Extracted data'!A:D,4,0),Ranges!A:B,2,1),)})
Delete all data below cell B1 for the arrayformula to work correctly.
The second vlookup references col D on the 'Extracted data' tab because that is the percentage I think you are comparing? If not, alter 4 in the vlookup to another column.
If it helps, please see:
https://stackoverflow.com/help/someone-answers
NB: In place of Ranges!A:B you could use a fixed array:
=arrayformula({"Con Potential";iferror(vlookup(vlookup(A2:A,'Extracted data'!A:D,4,0),{-10,1;-0.1,2;0,3;0.1,4;0.11,5},2,1),)})
If you want to temporarily see the fixed array in case you want to edit any values, place this in a cell somewhere out of the way:
={-10,1;-0.1,2;0,3;0.1,4;0.11,5}
, is used to bump to a new column, ; is used as a return.
Relevance
Looking at 'Relevance' lookup from 'Position Delta' and this table in your sheet:
Since a 'position delta' value of 10 cannot both have a relevance of 5 and 4, I've made the assumption that 10 gets 5. If that is incorrect, then I'll adjust the boundaries.
Add this to cell C1 on the 'calculations' tab (clearing all cells below):
=arrayformula({"Relevance";iferror(vlookup(vlookup(calculations!A2:A,'Extracted data'!A:D,3,0),{0,5;11,4;21,3;31,2;41,1;51,0},2,1),)})
The fixed array {0,5;11,4;21,3;31,2;41,1;51,0} has these values:
0 5
11 4
21 3
31 2
41 1
51 0
If you need to change the boundaries so 10 is a 4, not 5, then change the vlookup to use this fixed range {0,5;10,4;20,3;30,2;40,1;50,0}:
0 5
10 4
20 3
30 2
40 1
50 0
vlookup is incremental and anything up to 11 will get 5, then 11 to 20 will get 4, 21 to 30 will get 3 and so on.
,1) in the vlookup at the far right gets the nearest value match until 'position delta' has reached the next boundary.
Table copied as Text
Column1 Column2 Column3 Column4 Column5 Column6
A AA AAA 100 95 92
A AA AAA 85 83 81
A AA BBB 200 199 160
A BB AAA 65 55 49
B AA AAA 89 88 83
B AA BBB 150 149 145
B BB AAA 140 135
B BB BBB 190 185
B AA AAA 510
AA
AAA BBB
A 173 160
B 593 145
and some more explanation
Basically i want the sum of "Column 6" for the given criteria but the data in Column 6 can only be entered after some delay w.r.t. Column 1, Column 2, Column 3 & Column 4.
Till Column 6 data is entered, i want excel to use the number available in Column 5 which is also entered after some delay w.r.t. Column 1, Column 2, Column 3 & Column 4 but before Column 6.
And till Column 5 data is entered, i want excel to use the number available in Column 4.
Now I am familiar with two SUM/IF arrangements as included below in post.
First one is array sum/if arrangement which is convenient to write but results in terribly long calculation time with 1.5 seconds for just one column and I have over 100 columns in one sheet and about 9 sheets.
Second one is using SUMIFS which requires extensive time to write but relatively better calculation time of 0.5 seconds for column but is still quite high.
Now I need to do away with the array arrangement but doing so will take quite some time and I want to know if there is any better/other arrangement.
Just let me know other arrangement which can get the required result and I will check the arrangement for calculation timing. If the other arrangement is also convenient to write than that is a plus.
This is my table:
And I want to add the right most columns which are not empty i.e. have a number in it, but with the criteria for the first three columns in cell D15.
I only found option to add image. Please let me know how to upload excel file.
enter image description here
Can somebody please suggest an alternate to this array formula so it can calculate way faster
{=SUM(
IF(
($B$2:$B$10=$C15)*
($C$2:$C$10=$C$13)*
($D$2:$D$10=D$14)>0,
IF(
$G$2:$G$10<>"",
$G$2:$G$10,
IF(
$F$2:$F$10<>"",
$F$2:$F$10,
$E$2:$E$10))))}
I have tried below which reduces the calculation time to 1/3 but it is too much typing for the large data I am dealing with
=SUMIFS(
$G$2:$G$10,
$B$2:$B$10,$C15,
$C$2:$C$10,$C$13,
$D$2:$D$10,H$14,
$G$2:$G$10,"<>"&"")
+SUMIFS(
$F$2:$F$10,
$B$2:$B$10,$C15,
$C$2:$C$10,$C$13,
$D$2:$D$10,H$14,
$G$2:$G$10,"="&"",
$F$2:$F$10,"<>"&"")
+SUMIFS(
$E$2:$E$10,
$B$2:$B$10,$C15,
$C$2:$C$10,$C$13,
$D$2:$D$10,H$14,
$G$2:$G$10,"="&"",
$F$2:$F$10,"="&"")
If you're OK with using a helper column (which you should be), you can use this formula in a helper cell and drag down. (In my example at bottom, this formula is in cell H2 and drag down.)
= INDEX(E2:G2,MATCH(-1E+300,E2:G2,-1))
This gets all of the data in either column 4 5 or 6 all into one column.
Then you can use a simpler SUMIFS formula in cell D15:
= SUMIFS($H$2:$H$10, // Sum range (helper column)
$B$2:$B$10,$C15, // Criteria 1 (A or B)
$C$2:$C$10,$C$13, // Criteria 2 (AA or BB)
$D$2:$D$10,D$14) // Criteria 3 (AAA or BBB)
See below, working example:
DISCLAIMER
This answer will simplify your formulas, but I'm not sure if this will help with the performance problems you are experiencing. SUMIFS in itself I don't see being likely the cause of long calculation times. Probably you are experiencing long calculation times because other parts of your spreadsheet are using inefficient formulas and/or formulas involving volatile cells, but that is just a guess because I have no idea what the rest of your spreadsheet looks like.
I have below set of data.
LLimit ULimit Col C
1 3 a
3 5 b
5 11 c
11 15 d
15 17 e
17 20 f
in col D if i enter 3.5 i need result in col E as "b" (corrosponding value to lowerlimit and upper limit). I have used If or statement, However is there a way i can do this using Index, Match or array. I tried and it works absolutely fine with the limit numbers (like 5, 11, 17, 3 etc) but not working with between numbers like 14 (between 11 and 14).
Below is what i used
{=INDEX(F5:F10,MATCH(1,(((D5:D10)>=H4)*((E5:E10)>=H4))*1,0))}
Was trying to attach workbook, but don't know how to do it.
Try this
Assuming D2=3.5 then
In E2
=INDEX(C2:C7,SUMPRODUCT((A2:A7<=D2)*(B2:B7>=D2)*(ROW(C2:C7)-ROW(C2)+1)))
Edit:
To exclude the lower boundary, try this
=INDEX(C2:C7,SUMPRODUCT((A2:A7<D2)*(B2:B7>=D2)*(ROW(C2:C7)-ROW(C2)+1)))
Use Vlookup as follow:
=VLOOKUP(D2,$A$2:$C$7,3)
$A$2:$C$7 is your initial table LLimit ULimit Col C
Vlookup will look in the first column for the value <= D2 and return the corresponding value in column 3
Update
For non sorted column A your Formula needs a modification:
={INDEX($C$2:$C$7,MATCH(1,($A$2:$A$7<=D2)*($B$2:$B$7>=D2),0),1)}
You wrote the same condition >= for both limit
{=INDEX($F$5:$F$10,MATCH(1,((($D$5:$D$10)<=H4)*(($E$5:$E$10)>=H4))*1,0))}
I am having difficulties with making an array formula work the way I want it to work.
Out of a column of dates which is not sorted, I want it to extract values into a new column. The formula below identifies the required cells of a given month and year, but they appear in their original row rather than on top of the output range. Moreover, I want all ""/FALSE cells to be excluded from the output array.
=IF((MONTH($I$15:$I$1346)=1)*(YEAR($I$15:$I$1346)=2008),$I$15:$I$1346,"")
In fact, the $I$15:$I$1346 should be dynamic and go to the last filled range (I could make a named range for that)
Part two is to expand on that formula so that it calculates the data that is an two column offset of the data described above.
Is the above possible to build into one cell probably with a combination of IF, INDEX, SMALL and maybe others?
I'm not looking for a filter solution. Hope the above is clear enough and that you can help!
Here's a shortened sample layout:
A B C
1 Date Series_A Series_B
2 03/01/2011 45 20
3 04/01/2011 73 30
4 06/01/2011 95 40
5 08/01/2011 72 50
6 06/02/2011 5 13
7 09/02/2011 12 #N/A
8 05/02/2011 23 65
9 07/03/2011 12 65
Then I want three input cells for the year and and the month and series name (index/match, as there are many more columns with data). If it would be 2011, Feb and Series_A, I want it to calculate the average for that month. In this case it would be (5+12+23)/3. If it would be Feb-2011 and Series_B instead, which has an error, it should show (13+65)/2 rather than an error.
Aside from that I want a separate which will output an array with the data instead without 'holes' in between and with the right 'length'. Example for Feb-2011 in Column C:
A B C D
1 Date Series_A Desired Output Output based on f above
2 03/01/2011 45 5
3 04/01/2011 73 12
4 06/01/2011 95 23
5 08/01/2011 72
6 06/02/2011 5 5
7 09/02/2011 12 12
8 05/02/2011 23 23
9 07/03/2011 12
If I then run a =ISBLANK(C5) it should be true, rather than =""=C5
Hope the edit clarifies
I reached out to various platsforms to get an answer, and here you have one which is ok. Still doesn't fully answer part 1, but works nonetheless.
http://www.excelforum.com/excel-formulas-and-functions/905356-exclude-blank-false-cells-in-in-excel-array-if-formula-output.html