Is it possible for mustache lambda function to access its view instance this?
Backbone.View.extend ({
initialize: function (options) {
this.collection = options.collection // large backbone.collection
},
parseContent: function (){
return function (id, render){
//this.collection is undefined below
return this.collection.get (render (id)).get ('stuff);
}
}
});
Tried _.bind (this.parseContent, this) inside initialize (), this still carry the model context inside parseContent ().
My current workaround is saving this.collection to my app root namespace and access from there. Wondering is there a cleaner way to do this as intended above?
Appreciate your advice.
If you're going to pass around the function returned by parseContent, you should
bind that function before returning it with _.bind,
and use _.bindAll in initialize to force this in parseContent on each instance.
Your view could be written as
Backbone.View.extend ({
initialize: function (options) {
_.bindAll(this, 'parseContent');
// you don't need this.collection = options.collection
// collection is part of the special variables handled By Backbone
},
parseContent: function (){
var f = function (id, render){
console.log(this.collection);
}
return _.bind(f, this);
}
});
And a demo http://jsfiddle.net/nikoshr/VNeR8/
Related
I have extend this function inside Backbone.view
toggle: function () {
var sempurna = _.after(array_obj.length, this.render);
_.each(array_obj, function (v,k) {
v.perormSomething();
delete array_obj[key];
sempurna();
}, this);
}
And so I thought that I could render the view straight away the loop is completed. But somehow the this keyword is refering to window instead of the view. How do I point to the intended this to view.
The this is set to window because your are calling sempurna() without the dot notation (so without any explicit receiving object).
To fix this you need to _.bind (or use the browser native bind if available) your sempurna to this:
toggle: function () {
var sempurna = _.bind(_.after(array_obj.length, this.render), this);
_.each(array_obj, function (v,k) {
v.perormSomething();
delete array_obj[key];
sempurna();
}, this);
}
Demo JSFiddle.
My code is below, when I run it, it shows error - <HTMLAudioElement> has no method 'set'.
Why it''s happening? I've bound my functions to model, but it seems to work wrongly:
var Player = Backbone.Model.extend({
initialize: function(){
_.bind(this.ontimeupdate, this);
_.bind(this.onprogress, this);
},
setAudio: function(ogglink, mp3link, ontimeupdate){
var el = document.createElement("audio");
el.addEventListener('timeupdate', this.ontimeupdate);
this.audiotag = el;
},
ontimeupdate: function() {
this.set("curtime", this.currentTime);
}
});
Unlike bindAll (which you should be using as you make several binds), bind only returns the binded function (equivalent to ECMA's bind method). So...
this.ontimeupdate = _.bind(this.ontimeupdate, this);
this.onprogress = _.bind(this.onprogress, this);
Or
_.bindAll(this);
Or
_.bindAll(this, 'ontimeupdate', 'onprogress');
If you're binding those methods to this (your Player instance) then your ontimeupdate method should probably look more like this:
ontimeupdate: function() {
this.set("curtime", this.audiotag.currentTime);
}
I'm creating an application for Phonegap using Backbone framework and Parse.com as backend service. I create an object with Parse.com (corresponding to Backbone models).
This object has a saveDraftToP() method that calls the Parse.com function save().
After this method is called from a view, I'd like to retrieve the updated object.
To do so I'm binding the 'change' event to the model but the Parse assigned ID is undefined.
Here is the code of the model:
var Match = Parse.Object.extend("Match", {
states: {'DRAFT': 0, 'RUNNING': 1, 'ENDED': 2},
saveDraftToP: function () {
var self = this;
this.save({
user: Parse.User.current(),
ACL: new Parse.ACL(Parse.User.current()),
state: self.states.DRAFT
}, {
success: function (result) {
self = result;
},
error: function (e) {
}
});
}
});`
And here is the code for the view:
var vmNuovaPartita = Parse.View.extend({
template: Handlebars.compile(template),
model: new Match(),
collection: new HintCollection(),
initialize: function () {
this.bind("change:model", console.log(this.model.id) , this);
},
render: function (eventName) {
var match = this.model.toJSON();
$(this.el).html(this.template(match));
return this;
}
});
I'm not quite sure why you have a save function wrapped in another save-like function. :-)
Say you have something like myMatch which is an object.
Through your UI, a button click saves the object data. You can just use myMatch.save({attr:val, ...}) straight out of the box. Backbone (and Parse) by default are optimistic. That means, you it will set the values of the model with the expectation that persisting to the server will succeed.
Thus, you don't need to retrieve anything extra. You already have the model in it's most current state.
To have a model view that responds to these changes, I'd design the view a little differently.
var vmNuovaPartita = Parse.View.extend({
template: Handlebars.compile(template),
initialize: function () {
this.model.on('change', this.render);
},
render: function (eventName) {
var match = this.model.toJSON();
$(this.el).html(this.template(match));
return this;
}
});
var myView = new vmNuovaPartita({
model: myModel
});
I'd initialize the model outside of the view, then pass it in as an option when you generate a new view. When you pass a model in as an option, it's special and will be attached directly to the view ... view.model which you can refer inside your view code as this.model
In the init we place a listener on the model for change events, then fire off a rerender of the view. Or a nicer way to go about this sort of thing is to throw in the newer Backbone Events with the .listenTo() method.
Background:
I am making changes to an application that uses backbone.js with Handlebars as the templating engine. After a change event fires I need to create html that is appended to the current DOM structure which is basically just a spit-out of information that is contained in the model. This change needed to fit in the already established application structure.
Issue:
I have created a new view that uses a Handlebars template and the model to create the html. I then instantiate that view and call the render function and append the output using JQuery. What I am noticing is that when the html is rendered the model that is passed in because attributes on the $el instead of filling in the template (like I think it should).
View I'm altering:
$.hart.TestView = Backbone.View.extend({
tagName: "li",
template: Handlebars.compile($('#templateOne').html()),
initialize: function () {
this.model.on('change', function () {
this.createMoreInfoHtml();
}, this);
},
selectSomething: function () {
this.$el.removeClass('policies');
this.createMoreInfoHtml(); //function created for new view stuff
},
createMoreInfoHtml: function () {
var id = this.$el.attr('data-id', this.model.get("ID"));
$('.info').each(function () {
if ($(this).parent().attr('data-id') == id
$(this).remove();
});
var view = new $.hart.NewView(this.model, Handlebars.compile($("#NewTemplate").html()));
$('h1', this.$el).after(view.render().el);
},
render: function () {
... //render logic
}
});
View I Created:
$.hart.NewView = Backbone.View.extend({
initialize: function (model, template) {
this.model = model;
this.template = template;
},
render: function () {
this.$el.html(this.template({ info: this.model }));
this.$el.addClass('.info');
return this;
}
});
Json the is the model:
{
"PetName":"Asdfasdf",
"DateOfBirth":"3/11/2011 12:00:00 AM",
"IsSpayNeutered":false,
"Sex":"F",
"SpeciesID":2,
"ID":"ac8a42d2-7fa7-e211-8ef8-000c2964b571"
}
The template
<script id="NewTemplate" type="text/html">
<span>Pet Name: </span>
<span>{{this.PetName}}</span>
</script>
So now to the question: What am I doing wrong? Why are the properties of the model being created as attributes on the $el instead of filling in the template? Can someone please direct me as to how to get the results I am looking for?
Let's skip the problem Jack noticed.
The way you're creating your view is just wrong. It may work as you get the expected arguments in the initialize function, but it has unexpected behaviors you don't see. See the View's constructor:
var View = Backbone.View = function(options) {
this.cid = _.uniqueId('view');
this._configure(options || {});
Now let's have a look at this _configure method:
_configure: function(options) {
if (this.options) options = _.extend({}, _.result(this, 'options'), options);
_.extend(this, _.pick(options, viewOptions));
And of course...
var viewOptions = ['model', 'collection', 'el', 'id', 'attributes', 'className', 'tagName', 'events'];
Ok here we are... Basically when passing the model as the options argument, you're passing an object with an attributes key (the attributes of your model). But this attributes key is also used in the View to bind attributes to its element! Therefore the behavior your noticed.
Now, other wrong thing. You're compiling your template each time you create a new function, but not using it as a singleton either. Put your template in the view:
$.hart.NewView = Backbone.View.extend({
template: Handlebars.compile($("#NewTemplate").html(),
And change your view's creation to make the whole thing work:
new $.hart.NewView({model: this.model});
Oh, and get rid of this useless initialize method. You're just doing things Backbone already does.
Does anyone know which event is fired after a view is rendered in backbone.js?
I ran into this post which seems interesting
var myView = Backbone.View.extend({
initialize: function(options) {
_.bindAll(this, 'beforeRender', 'render', 'afterRender');
var _this = this;
this.render = _.wrap(this.render, function(render) {
_this.beforeRender();
render();
_this.afterRender();
return _this;
});
},
beforeRender: function() {
console.log('beforeRender');
},
render: function() {
return this;
},
afterRender: function() {
console.log('afterRender');
}
});
Or you can do the following, which is what Backbone code is supposed to look like (Observer pattern, aka pub/sub). This is the way to go:
var myView = Backbone.View.extend({
initialize: function() {
this.on('render', this.afterRender);
this.render();
},
render: function () {
this.trigger('render');
},
afterRender: function () {
}
});
Edit: this.on('render', 'afterRender'); will not work - because Backbone.Events.on accepts only functions. The .on('event', 'methodName'); magic is made possible by Backbone.View.delegateEvents and as such is only available with DOM events.
As far as I know - none is fired. Render function is empty in source code.
The default implementation of render is a no-op
I would recommend just triggering it manually when necessary.
If you happen to be using Marionette, Marionette adds show and render events on views. See this StackOverflow question for an example.
On a side note, Marionette adds a lot of other useful features that you might be interested in.
I realise this question is fairly old but I wanted a solution that allowed the same custom function to be called after every call to render, so came up with the following...
First, override the default Backbone render function:
var render = Backbone.View.prototype.render;
Backbone.View.prototype.render = function() {
this.customRender();
afterPageRender();
render();
};
The above code calls customRender on the view, then a generic custom function (afterPageRender), then the original Backbone render function.
Then in my views, I replaced all instances of render functions with customRender:
initialize: function() {
this.listenTo(this.model, 'sync', this.render);
this.model.fetch();
},
customRender: function() {
// ... do what you usually do in render()
}
Instead of adding the eventhandler manually to render on intialization you can also add the event to the 'events' section of your view. See http://backbonejs.org/#View-delegateEvents
e.g.
events: {
'render': 'afterRender'
}
afterRender: function(e){
alert("render complete")
},
constructor: function(){
Backbone.View.call(this, arguments);
var oldRender = this.render
this.render = function(){
oldRender.call(this)
// this.model.trigger('xxxxxxxxx')
}
}
like this http://jsfiddle.net/8hQyB/