I'm getting errors when I attempt to run my project deployed to app engine. I see issues like:
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.seattleglassware.AuthServletSupport$$anonfun$finishOAuth2Dance$1$$anonfun$apply$33$$anonfun$apply$34$$anonfun$apply$37$$anonfun$apply$40$$anonfun$apply$41$$anonfun$apply$42$$anonfun$apply$45$$anonfun$apply$47$$anonfun$apply$48$$anonfun$apply$49
The class name looks reasonable (well, for certain values of reasonable - this is code generated by the Scala compiler). I see the file in my local web/WEB-INF/classes/com directory and I can decompile it with javap (so I don't think it's corrupt or anything silly like that.) Everything works fine running on a local debug server.
Even more strange, I can pour all the .class files in web/WEB-INF/classes into a jar file like this:
cd to the web/WEB-INF/classes directory
jar cf ../lib/classes.jar .
And now, if I upload the project (pressing the deploy button in Eclipse), I don't see those ClassNotFoundException errors. Delete the jar file, re-upload the project, get the errors again.
I'm wondering if there's some sort of limit on the names of .class files? Or something else happening in the deployment process that's causing this to happen?
EDIT: running from the command line made this much more clear (using maven now):
SEVERE: Invalid character in filename: WEB-INF/classes/com/seattleglassware/AuthServletSupport$$anonfun$finishOAuth2Dance$1$$anonfun$apply$33$$anonfun$apply$34$$anonfun$apply$37$$anonfun$apply$40$$anonfun$apply$41$$anonfun$apply$42$$anonfun$apply$45$$anonfun$apply$47$$anonfun$apply$48$$anonfun$apply$49.class
But it still looks to me like that's a valid filename.
The inclusion of "special" characters in the file name may be the issue here.
There is currently an open issue regarding "special" characters in project file names.
Issue 2211: Special characters are not supported in the filenames in the project
The original issue was reported by a Python App Engine user, however if you look in the comments you'll see that it apparently affects Java users as well.
Related
I fought for 8 hours yesterday getting my Java FX (11) Standalone JAR to work at all. I finally did, and now when I run it via java -jar myjar.jar (with path info for fx components), it at least "works" inasmuch as I can see my "own application's" error messages and message boxes lol.
This app needs to connect to SQL Server. It works FINE in IDE (IntelliJ). For JAR, I did not include the SQL Server driver as it is signed. No big deal - figure I'd just deploy it too and put it in the path. However, the JAR file can not "see" the driver (or the class - not sure) when run. Here is the info:
SQL Server driver is mssql-jdbc-8.2.2.jre11.jar
My connection Code is:
connection = DriverManager.getConnection(connectString); and connectString = "jdbc:sqlserver://localhost:1433;database=mydatabase;userName=myuser;password=mypword"
Again - this WORKS FINE in IDE. However, run from jar, it gets "java.sql.SQLException: No suitable driver found for jdbc:sqlserver://localhost:1433;database=mydatabase;userName=myuser;password=mypword"
I have put the mssql-jdbc-8.2.2.jre11.jar into the same directory as the jar. I have included it in the MANIFEST.MF with Class-Path: mssql-jdbc-8.2.2.jre11.jar and also tried it in a "lib" subdirectory from the jar file with Class-Path: /lib. Nothing Works! I just keep getting the "no suitable driver" error. The full manifest file looks like:
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Class-Path: /lib
Main-Class: com.product.Launcher
Here is the full call from command line that actually launches the app: java --module-path C:/Users/KMatson/Documents/JetBrains/openjfx-11.0.2_windows-x64_bin-sdk/javafx-sdk-11.0.2/lib/ --add-modules javafx.controls,javafx.fxml,javafx.graphics -jar myjar.jar This does run the app, but as soon as app tries to connect to SQL, I get the error.
Also tried the old-style Class.forName("com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerDriver") to no avail even thought it should not be necessary, and isn't needed run from IDE.
This is driving me crazy and has taken WAY more time than it should. I'm new to all this, and hope it is something simple I am overlooking or unaware of. Any help MUCH appreciated.
OK - here is the (intermediate) answer that worked for me. Apparently, having the "--module path" declaration in the cmd line was overriding the Class-path in the MANIFEST somehow. Either that or something was - dunno - didn't think i had a "modular" project. I'm not building from Maven, and module-info is not active.
Anyway - I simply put the driver jar in the "module path" I use from cmd, and it worked. I'm now trying to figure out how to make this thing "double clickable" so i don't have to issue from cmd line or use a batch file.
I'm facing a problem right now and I don't really know how to get more informations about it.
I've converted a desktop application through Microsoft's Desktop App Converter, made some manual modifications about the visual assets, and rebundled it through "makeappx.exe". Then I signed it.
Everything went fine. Except that when I double click the appx to check it, I have the following window:
Appx Error
Which roughly translates as "Couldn't open the appx or appxbundle file" and "Reason: Failure caused by an unknown reason".
This does not helps me a lot :/
However, if I try to install the package through a simple "Add-appxpackage MyPackage.appx", it works perfectly fine.
Could anyone help me find some leads on what's happening here? I've already checked the event viewer as explained here but I couldn't find anything unusual.
Thanks,
Skefrep
It seems the Microsoft team has taken notice of this problem and investigated this appropriately.
-Here is their solution-
The problem can be because when you convert an app with DesktopBridge the resources are signed with the manifest info and store that info in the .pri files you found in PackageFiles folder. Later, when you change something like the Publisher or the Name this signature doesn't match. To fix this you only need to recreate the .pri files.
rm *.pri. Remove the old .pri files.
cd C:\foo\PackageFiles\. Change current directory to the PackageFiles folder. This step is important for the next step.
makepri createconfig /cf priconfig.xml /dq en-US. Create a configuration file for the resources.
makepri new /pr "C:\foo\PackageFiles" /cf "C:\foo\PackageFiles\priconfig.xml". Generate the new *.pri files.
Then you can make the package as usual: MakeAppx, etc.
You can find more information about this problem in "Failed due to unknown reasons" error when you try to sideload a Desktop Bridge app - App Consult Team.
I have the following files which I would like to upload to Artifactory as a 9.8.0 versioned artifact.
NOTE: The first two files DO NOT have an extension (they are executable files i.e. if you open them/cat on it, you'll see junk characters).
Folder/files of a given version 9.8.0 in CVS is like:
com.company.project/gigaproject/v9.8.0/linux/gigainstall
com.company.project/gigaproject/v9.8.0/solaris/gigainstall
com.company.project/gigaproject/v9.8.0/win32/gigainstall.exe
com.company.project/gigaproject/v9.8.0/gigafile.dtd
com.company.project/gigaproject/v9.8.0/gigaanotherfile.dtd
com.company.project/gigaproject/v9.8.0/giga.jar
com.company.project/gigaproject/v9.8.0/giga.war
Uploading the above files which have an extension is very easy... You log in to Artifactory as an administrator/user which has access to deploy artifacts, click on "Deploy" tab, browse for the Artifactory file and once you select the file, click on "Upload" button.
Next you'll see a screen (like shown above). You'll tweak what you want in the fields on this page and once you click on "Deploy Artifact", you are done. All you have to make sure is you select the correct file.extension file while uploading and make sure the file extension is shown in the "Target Path" box correctly (with the version -x.x.x, etc.).
My questions:
Question 1: How do I upload an artifact which doesn't have an extension? It seems like Artifactory by default takes an artifact as a .jar extension. How can I upload the "gigainstall" artifact as shown in the folder/file structure above for both Linux and Solaris? I see I can use the artifact name as gigainstall-linux and gigainstall-solaris and differentiate it, but I am not sure how to tell Artifactory that this artifact doesn't have any extension.
I don't think the development team will start generating this artifact with a proper extension (as this artifact may be hard coded everywhere in other projects where they are currently getting it from CVS/SVN source control somewhere - which is itself a bad practice to store an artifact in a source control version tool).
Question 2: How would I tell a build system (for example, Gradle) to consume a non-extensioned artifact during, let's say, 'compile' task. In build.gradle under section dependencies { .. }, I will add something like as shown below, but I am not sure for non-extensioned files (the first two in the folder/file structure I mentioned above).
dependencies {
//compile 'com.company.project:gigainstall-linux:9.8.0#'
//compile 'com.company.project:gigainstall-linux:9.8.0#??????'
//compile 'com.company.project:gigainstall-linux:9.8.0#""'
//compile 'com.company.project:gigainstall-linux:9.8.0#"none"'
//compile 'com.company.project:gigainstall-linux:9.8.0#"NULL_or_something"'
// The following will easily get giga.jar version giga-9.8.0.jar from Artifactory repository
compile 'com.company.project:giga:9.8.0'
// The following will easily get giga.war
compile 'com.company.project:giga:9.8.0#war'
// Similarly, other extension based artifacts can be fetched from Artifactory
compile 'com.company.project:gigafile:9.8.0#dtd'
compile 'com.company.project:gigaanotherfile:9.8.0#dtd'
}
Answer 1 (will cover 2 as well in a different sense): Using Artifactory "Artifact Bundle" feature section under "Deploy" tab can do the TRICK for AT LEAST uploading the artifacts in a way we want, by creating a zip file first (containing the structure and artifacts in it) --OR you can upload the artifacts using/calling Artifactory REST API way.
High level idea:
Create a zip file called gigaproject.zip OR anyname.zip/.tar/compressed file which Artifactory can read. Inside the zip, create the structure - how these artifacts will be loaded to Artifactory
i.e.
gigaproject.zip will contain the following folders/structure/files.
Case 1:
com/company/project/gigaproject/9.8.0/linux/gigainstall
com/company/project/gigaproject/9.8.0/solaris/gigainstall
com/company/project/gigaproject/9.8.0/win32/gigainstall.exe
com/company/project/gigaproject/9.8.0/gigafile.dtd
com/company/project/gigaproject/9.8.0/gigaanotherfile.dtd
com/company/project/gigaproject/9.8.0/giga.jar
com/company/project/gigaproject/9.8.0/giga.war
NOTE: In case 1 example, I didn't use any -x.x.x in the filename (i.e. I'm using plain and simple giga.jar instead of giga-9.8.0.jar).
The above Upload/Deploy will result the files (as shown in the following snapshot):
So, we have achieved what we wanted. Actually (visibly speaking yes), but not in a way Artifactory usually stores these artifacts (as they should -x.x.x version embedded in the file name and where artifact id should match the artifact filename). Now, if you want to consume the following in a Gradle build file, you CANNOT as first, you haven't uploaded the filename with -x.x.x version name in it, secondly, the artifact id in our case 1 tree was "gigaproject" (after com/company/project folder), so Gradle way of defining what artifact id and what artifact file name you want won't work.
compile 'com.company.project:gigaproject:CANNOTSAY_HOW_TO_GET_GIGA_JARorGIGAINSTALL_with_without_extension'
Conclusion: It's possible to upload any files (with/without extension in Artifactory) in any structure but it depends how your build system will consume it or will be able to consume it or not.
- I deleted the structure I just created with case 1 .zip file from Artifactory repository to try next case#2 and deleted the .zip file I created.
Case 2:
Let's create an individual versioned file name for each artifact and also create structure in the format - how Artifactory actually stores them (an artifact as seen in a repository in a tree view) and create a .zip file containing that structure. Let's use the same "Artifact Bundle" feature to upload this .zip file to upload individual artifacts that we need in Artifactory - where artifact-id (second value which we mention while trying to consume it) would match the artifactfile name in Artifactory.
Folder/file structure for the .zip file:
com/company/project/gigainstall/9.8.0/gigainstall-9.8.0.linux
com/company/project/gigainstall/9.8.0/gigainstall-9.8.0.solaris
com/company/project/gigainstall/9.8.0/gigainstall-9.8.0.exe
com/company/project/gigafile/9.8.0/gigafile-9.8.0.dtd
com/company/project/gigaanotherfile/9.8.0/gigaanotherfile-9.8.0.dtd
com/company/project/giga/9.8.0/giga-9.8.0.jar
com/company/project/giga/9.8.0/giga-9.8.0.war
NOTE: This time, we'll be using the same "Artifact Bundle" feature and for similar files (gigainstall under both Linux/Solaris folders), I took the approach of creating gigainstall folder (containing gigainstall-9.8.0.linux and gigainstall-9.8.0.solaris file names) i.e. when we'll consume these artifacts in Gradle under dependencies { ... } section for compile, we'll use x.x.x# way to fetch these artifacts from Artifactory.
OK, once "Artifact Bundle" Deploy/Upload was successfully complete, I got the following message.
Successfully deployed 7 artifacts from archive: gigaproject.zip (1 seconds).
Now, let's see how it looks like in Artifactory while searching for one of the artifact/in Tree view. You can see we have the files now in place, with filename-x.x.x.extension way so that I can consume them easily in Gradle.
In Gradle build file (build.gradle), I'll mention:
dependencies {
compile "com.company.project:gigainstall:9.8.0#linux"
compile "com.company.project:gigainstall:9.8.0#solaris"
compile "com.company.project:gigainstall:9.8.0#linux"
compile "com.company.project:giga:9.8.0
compile "com.company.project:giga:9.8.0#war
compile "com.company.project:gigafile:9.8.0#dtd
compile "com.company.project:gigaanotherfile:9.8.0#dtd
}
OH OH!! - That didn't work, see below for Gradle error. Why? - Artifactory Bundle upload/deploy feature uploads a zip file content what you have in the .zip but it DOES NOT create a .pom file per artifact it deploys. Thus, making the Gradle build to fail. May be in Ant this might succeed. This occurred for each individual .jar/.war/.dtd/etc file. I'm just showing one error example.
While doing gradle clean build
Could not resolve all dependencies for configuration ':compile'.
> Could not resolve com.company.project:gigafile:0.0.0.
Required by:
com.company.project:ABCProjectWhichConsumesGIGAProjectArtifacts:1.64.0
> Could not GET 'http://artifactoryserver:8081/artifactory/ext-snapshot-local/com/company/project/gigafile/0.0.0/gigafile-0.0.0.pom'. Received status code 409 from server: Conflict
Case 3: Let's take a simple approach (workaround but will save a lot of pain).
Create gigaproject.zip file with the following structure, this approach takes - No x.x.x version value embedded in the individual artifact/filename in the folder/file structure. We will use "Single Artifact" approach (which will create the .pom for gigaproject.zip file automatically during the upload/deploy process provided by Artifactory). You'll still be able to get gigainstall file without needing any extension to its name using this approach. During the upload/deploy step, as you already have seen, you upload gigaproject.zip and artifactory will upload it to a given Target Repository as "gigaproject-x.x.x.zip" where x.x.x is 9.8.0 in our case. See the image snapshot below.
gigaproject/linux/gigainstall
gigaproject/solaris/gigainstall
gigaproject/win32/gigainstall.exe
gigaproject/gigafile.dtd
gigaproject/gigaanotherfile.dtd
gigaproject/gigaproject.zip
gigaproject/giga.jar
gigaproject/giga.war
Now, upload it in Artifactory using "Single Artifact" feature. Click "Deploy Artifact" once you tweak the values for GroupId, ArtifactId, Version, etc.
Once this is uploaded. You'll see in the zip artifact in the target repository (I took a bad example, usually this would be libs-snapshot-local or libs-release-local instead of ext-...), you'll be able to consume the ZIP artifact directly in Graddle:
dependencies {
// This is the only line we need now.
compile "com.company.project:gigaproject:9.8.0#zip"
}
Once the .zip is available to Gradle build system, now you can tell Gradle to unpack this .zip file somewhere in your build/workspace area where you can feed the actual(unpacked) files (gigainstall, .dtd, .jar, .war, etc.) to the build process/steps.
PS: Case# 1 and 2 would have worked for Ant I guess.
Answer 2:
If you have uploaded a non-extensioned file in either way. Make sure you have manually created/uploaded its POM file as well (i.e. if I uploaded gigainstall-9.8.0 as an artifact under com/company/project/gigainstall/9.8.0/gigainstall-9.8.0, then at the same level, I have to/should create it's POM file (see a simple template .pom file for a custom jar artifact or while uploading an extensioned file via "Single Artifact" deploy, you'll see what POM Editor window shows you) and upload both so that Gradle won't error out saying no POM conflict/error. Ant might not need pom (I didn't check that).
Once it's there in Artifactory, the following line should work -- OR comment please if you find another way.
dependencies {
// See nothing mentioned after - x.x.x#
compile "com.company.package:gigainstall:9.8.0#"
}
I'm here again with another case that is getting me out my mind.
So, this is happening, I'm trying to run an executable java class(.jar) as a Windows Service, and all my attempts failed so far. To make it a little easier, I turned my jar into a batch file, wich only executes the jar in background, here is the code:
start "" javaw -jar C:\LocalService.jar
The batch works fine. However I have tried to install this batch as a service by using the next line in cmd:
sc create "LocalService" binPath= "C:\LocalService.bat"
The Service installs correctly, but as soon as I try to start it, it pops up an error (The code error is 1053, says something about the service did not start correctly)
Also, I have try with a software called NSSM (non-sucking service manager) It installs fine too, but the service does not start either.
Do you guys know what am I missing?
By the way, I'm doing all this on Windows 7 Professional.
Thanks!
thanks for your comments
Both tools didnt work for me, sadly. However I was able to do it with a software called Java Service Wrapper. This is not a free software, so I needed to buy a license to get it to work.
The steps were simple:
1.-Create a folder with the name of the service, then inside add 4 folders: lib,bin,logs,conf
2.-On the lib folder you have to copy your jar and also the wrapper.jar and wrapper.dll (these last two are in the zip you download from the website)
3.-Copy 4 files to the bin folder: InstallApp-NT.bat.in, App.bat.in, UnintstallApp-NT.bat.in and wrapper.exe (this last one is the one that defines your license, if you can get a file wrapper.exe from somebody else who had paid a license it will work fine. These file also came in the zip from the website) Remove the .in from the batch files
4.-The most tricky step is this: You have to copy from the wrapper's folder called conf a file called wrapper.conf.in Remove the .in extension and edit it with a tex editor. The most important lines you have to edit are:
wrapper.java.command=C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jre7\bin\java //Specify JRE Path. Will work with eviroment variable
wrapper.java.mainclass=org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperJarApp //Choosing this class means your are using a .jar file to execute when the service starts
wrapper.java.classpath.1=C:\LocalService\lib\wrapper.jar //This one is constant.
wrapper.java.classpath.2=C:\LocalService\lib\LocalService.jar //This is the path to your executable jar
wrapper.java.library.path.1=C:\LocalService\lib //Path to your own lib folder (the you created at the begining)
wrapper.app.parameter.1=C:\LocalService\lib\LocalService.jar // again the path to your jar
Then just execute the InstallApp-NT.bat and start the service and your are done
It worked to me with absolute paths, however according to documentation it will work fine with relative path too.
This is how I solved my problem and I hope someone with the same issue will find this helpful
See you next time!
I'm receiving this error when I attempt to start an app using google app engine :
Loading modules
com.bookmark.Mobile_bookmark
[ERROR] Unable to find 'com/bookmark/Mobile_bookmark.gwt.xml' on your classpath; could be a typo, or maybe you forgot to include a classpath entry for source?
[ERROR] shell failed in doStartup method
I don't have a file called Mobile_bookmark.gwt.xml. My project name is mobile-bookmark
Why is this error occuring ?
If it's looking for Mobile_bookmark.gwt.xml (the wrong file), I'd check how you are starting the server.
For example, under Eclipse, I'd check run configurations --> arguments to see if "Mobile_bookmark" got into there. (you can get to run configurations by selecting the little triangle next to either the green debug or run button you use to start it --- or RUN (menu in eclipse) -- run configurations -- select your project)
Change the file name to whatever *.gwt.xml file you do have. I suspect it's mobile-bookmark.gwt.xml.
Look under /src/yourpath/yourproject/
Your layout is probably like:
/src/yourpath/yourproject/*.gwt.xml
/src/yourpath/yourproject/client
/src/yourpath/yourproject/server