I have read that C does not support dynamic function calls. My program has an ever growing number of test cases implemented as separate functions like -
int testcase1(void);
int testcase2(void);
int testcase3(void);
Each time I add a new test case, I also have have to add the call to my main function like -
int main(int argc, char **argv){
assert(!testcase1());
assert(!testcase2());
assert(!testcase3());
}
I would prefer to call something like assert(!testcase*()) where * matches any string which resolves to a valid function name in my program.
Can you think of a more convenient solution?
If you all your testcases have same signature then you can use an array of function pointers:
void (*func[])() = { testcase1, testcase2 };
for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(func)/sizeof(func[0]); i++) {
assert(!func[i]());
}
The best solution is likely to write a few extra lines of code when you add new test cases - it really isn't a big issue. I would recommend something along the lines of the function pointer array, as suggested in another answer.
However, just to show that everything is possible in C if you throw ugly macros at the problem, here is a not recommended alternative:
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#define TEST_CASES \ // list of "x macros"
X(testcase1) \
X(testcase2) \
X(testcase3)
#define X(func) bool func (void); // declare function prototypes
TEST_CASES
#undef X
bool (*const test_cases[])(void) = // array of read-only function pointers
{
#define X(func) &func, // point at each function
TEST_CASES
#undef X
};
int main (void)
{
for(size_t i=0; i<sizeof(test_cases)/sizeof(test_cases[0]); i++)
{
assert(test_cases[i]());
}
}
bool testcase1 (void) { puts(__func__); return true; }
bool testcase2 (void) { puts(__func__); return true; }
bool testcase3 (void) { puts(__func__); return false; }
Output:
testcase1
testcase2
testcase3
Assertion failed!
For each new test case, you would only have to write a function definition and then add it to the "x macro" list TEST_CASES. However, you need very good reasons to introduce ugly tricks like these in production code!
You can use function pointers. Read also about closures (but C99 or C11 don't have them) and callbacks.
Many operating systems provide dynamic loading. On POSIX operating systems (such as Linux or MacOSX) you can get a function pointer (actually an address) from its name in some library (or in the program executable) using dlopen & dlsym. Other operating systems may provide similar functionalities.
At last, you should consider having your testing main function be generated by some script (or some program emitting C code), using metaprogramming techniques. So you would write something which generates the C code of your testing main having a long sequence of assert, and improve your build procedure (e.g. your Makefile if using make) to run appropriately that specialized C code generator. Details are of course specific to your code. You might add some conventions (e.g. add some special comment to be parsed by your test generator, etc...).
I decided to follow #Nominal Animal and #Basile Starynkevitch's approach. In mymainprog.c, I added -
int runtests(void){
void *testh;
int (*testp)(void);
char *dlmsg;
int rc;
char funcname[8];
int testnum;
testh = dlopen("libsmtests.so", RTLD_LAZY);
if (!testh){
printf("%s\n", dlerror());
return 1;
}
dlerror();
for (testnum =1; testnum < 1000; testnum++){
sprintf(funcname,"testcase%d", testnum);
*(void **) (&testp) = dlsym(testh, funcname);
dlmsg = dlerror();
if (dlmsg == NULL) {
rc = (*testp)();
printf("%s called, rc=%d\n", funcname, rc);
}
}
dlclose(testh);
return 0;
}
I add my testcases to a separate file (testcases.c) like this -
int testcase1(void){
return [some testcase expression]
}
int testcase2(void){
return [another testcase expression]
}
and then compile it as a shared library with position-independant code (-fPIC) to libsmtests.so. The advantage is slightly less typing since I don't need to code a call to testNNNN() after adding the implementation of a new functionint testcaseNNN(void) to testcases.c
Disclaimer: asked over at perlmonks.
I hope I'm describing and depicting my issue properly... In XS, I'm trying to send a callback into an external library's function, where the callback has Perl specific functions. The XSUB is passed as a function pointer to an external C function. The XSUB callback being sent in turn calls back to a sub in the `main` perl application:
void callback(){
dSP;
PUSHMARK(SP);
call_pv("p_callback", G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS);
}
// example extern call
externFunc(&callback);
This segfaults. I think it's because the external library doesn't understand the perl functions that are being called. Things work fine if I call the C `callback()` function directly though.
Is there some magic that I can do to make the external library "see" the Perl C functions, or am I doing something wrong?
Here's the code I'm testing with:
use warnings;
use strict;
use Inline ('C' => 'DATA', libs => '-lwiringPi');
init();
setInterrupt(27, 3);
# direct call
callback();
# on() triggers the external function and sends
# it the callback
on(27);
sub p_callback {
print "in perl callback\n";
}
__DATA__
__C__
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <wiringPi.h>
void init();
void on(int pin);
void off(int pin);
void setInterrupt(int pin, int edge);
void callback();
void init(){
printf("in init\n");
wiringPiSetup();
}
void on(int pin){
pinMode(pin, 1);
digitalWrite(pin, 1);
}
void off(int pin){
digitalWrite(pin, 0);
pinMode(pin, 0);
}
void setInterrupt(int pin, int edge){
wiringPiISR(pin, edge, &callback);
}
void callback(){
dSP;
PUSHMARK(SP);
call_pv("p_callback", G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS);
}
Output:
in init
in perl callback
Segmentation fault
If I remove the perl specific C calls from within the callback and just do a `printf()` or other pure-C work, things proceed without a segfault.
Just came across this question and thought I'd give it my own answer as I did resolve it some time ago.
There were some important bits I was missing to set the Perl context, as well as within the C exec_perl_callback() function.
use warnings;
use strict;
use Inline 'C';
use Inline 'NoClean';
sub p_callback {
print "hello, world from perl!\n";
}
exec_perl_callback('p_callback');
__END__
__C__
#define PERL_NO_GET_CONTEXT
PerlInterpreter * mine;
void callback(char* perl_callback){
PERL_SET_CONTEXT(mine);
dSP;
ENTER;
SAVETMPS;
PUSHMARK(SP);
PUTBACK;
exec_perl_callback(perl_callback, G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS);
FREETMPS;
LEAVE;
}
Output:
hello world, from perl!
I got a c library, that needs some callbacks,
they are handled in a linked list.
the python callable are those:
def callback_exit():
print("exiting.")
sys.exit(0)
# never reached
return c_int(0)
def hw_print_int():
print("foo")
return c_int(0)
I add them to the list like this:
SFR_COMM=CFUNCTYPE(c_voidp)
class MyClass:
def add_SFR_callback(self,operation_number,callback):
all_callbacks=c_voidp.in_dll(self.memlib,"sfr_comms")
my_callback=self.memlib.newSFRCommand(c_uint(operation_number),callback)
new_all_callbacks=self.memlib.new_SFRCommandHolder(my_callback,all_callbacks)
self.memlib.set_sfr_comms(new_all_callbacks)
my_class_object.add_SFR_callback(0xff,SFR_COMM(callback_exit))
my_class_object.add_SFR_callback(0xff,SFR_COMM(hw_print_int))
this works fine, until the callback is called, then I receive just a SIGSEGV.
Important: the SIGSEGV tells me, that it is an "Ungültiger Maschinenbefehl" (Translation: invalid processor directive or something like that)
So I just do not know how I can fix it.
This is the c code:
struct _SFRCommandHolder * sfr_comms;
#define DEBUG
unsigned int SpecialFunctionRegister_exec(unsigned int val)
{
struct _SFRCommandHolder * curr=sfr_comms;
unsigned int ret=-1;
while (curr!=NULL)
{
#ifdef DEBUG
printf("( %zd => %zd => %zd ) %u ?= %u",curr,curr->com,curr->com->funct,curr->com->val,val);
#endif
if(curr->com->val==val)
{
#ifdef DEBUG
printf("\t\tTRUE\n");
#endif
ret=curr->com->funct(); // <= SIGSEGV here
#ifdef DEBUG
printf("callback done.\n");
#endif
}
#ifdef DEBUG
else
{
printf("\t\tFALSE\n");
}
#endif
curr=curr->next;
}
return ret;
}
I do not think, that sys.exit is a problem, as it worked a few commits before just fine.
Edit:
calling hw_print_int works just fine, but callback_exit does not work.
btw: if I do not add hw_print_int, callback_exit works, too
output:
( 13185760 => 13136448 => 139994994819144 ) 3 ?= 255 FALSE
( 13038864 => 13034576 => 139994994819088 ) 255 ?= 255 TRUE
Ungültiger Maschinenbefehl (Speicherabzug geschrieben)
In here, you have pointers to struct _SFRCommandHolder but where does the data live? Where did you allocated a struct _SFRCommandHolder?
If the response is "nowhere", your code has undefined behaviour as sfr_comms may have any value (and especially non NULL value); this result in curr->com causing segmentation fault almost everytime.
The problem is, that the python garbage collection removes
objects without (strong) reference to them.
From https://docs.python.org/3/library/ctypes.html#callback-functions
Note
Make sure you keep references to CFUNCTYPE() objects as long as they are used from C code. ctypes doesn’t, and if you don’t, they may be garbage collected, crashing your program when a callback is made.
Also, note that if the callback function is called in a thread created outside of Python’s control (e.g. by the foreign code that calls the callback), ctypes creates a new dummy Python thread on every invocation. This behavior is correct for most purposes, but it means that values stored with threading.local will not survive across different callbacks, even when those calls are made from the same C thread.
It seems like it is not enough to reference to them using the struct _SFRCommandHolder *.
So adding another reference is enough:
class MyClass:
def __init__(self,*args):
# ...
self.refs=[]
def add_SFR_callback(self,operation_number,callback):
all_callbacks=c_voidp.in_dll(self.memlib,"sfr_comms")
my_callback=self.memlib.newSFRCommand(c_uint(operation_number),callback)
new_all_callbacks=self.memlib.new_SFRCommandHolder(my_callback,all_callbacks)
self.memlib.set_sfr_comms(new_all_callbacks)
self.refs.append(callback)
I am facing an issue with calling of mruby VM in C. I could invoke the mruby vm and execute the ruby code from C. I could also trigger the methods defined in the ruby code as well. But I am facing issue while trying to read the return value of the ruby method. I have provided my example scenario below.
CODE:
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <mruby.h>
#include <mruby/compile.h>
int main(void)
{
mrb_state *mrb = mrb_open();
char code[] = "def helloworld() return'OK' end";
printf("Executing Ruby code from C!\n");
mrb_load_string(mrb, code);
mrb_load_string(mrb, "helloworld()");
// How to read the return value?
return 0;
}
I am not sure if this is the right way of calling the ruby methods? I couldnt find any documentation or examples on the web. Anyone who tried calling ruby code via c (using mruby) can you please help me?
Regards,
The return value of mrb_load_string() is the value of the last evaluated expression. But it's also mrb_undef_value() on failure that happened during parsing or code generation like a syntax error. In general the exc member of mrb_state is non-null if there was an uncaught exception:
mrb_value rv = mrb_load_string(mrb, "helloworld()");
if (mrb->exc) { // if uncaught exception …
if (!mrb_undef_p(rv)) { // … during execution/run-time
mrb_print_error(mrb); // write backtrace and other details to stderr
}
}
else {
mrb_p(mrb, rv); // similar to Kernel#p
}
If you only want to call a method, the mrb_funcall() family of functions can be used:
mrb_value rv = mrb_funcall(mrb, mrb_top_self(mrb), "helloworld", 0);
Or:
mrb_value rv = mrb_funcall_argv(mrb, mrb_top_self(mrb), mrb_intern_cstr(mrb, "helloworld"), 0, NULL);
Then the parser and code generator won't be used, thus it'll be faster and unless they're used elsewhere, the executable or (shared) library will be much smaller too. Plus mrb_undef_value() isn't a possible return value, otherwise checking for an uncaught exception and retrieving the return value can be done in the same way.
I was thinking today about the try/catch blocks existent in another languages. Googled for a while this but with no result. From what I know, there is not such a thing as try/catch in C. However, is there a way to "simulate" them?
Sure, there is assert and other tricks but nothing like try/catch, that also catch the raised exception. Thank you
C itself doesn't support exceptions but you can simulate them to a degree with setjmp and longjmp calls.
static jmp_buf s_jumpBuffer;
void Example() {
if (setjmp(s_jumpBuffer)) {
// The longjmp was executed and returned control here
printf("Exception happened here\n");
} else {
// Normal code execution starts here
Test();
}
}
void Test() {
// Rough equivalent of `throw`
longjmp(s_jumpBuffer, 42);
}
This website has a nice tutorial on how to simulate exceptions with setjmp and longjmp
http://www.di.unipi.it/~nids/docs/longjump_try_trow_catch.html
You use goto in C for similar error handling situations.
That is the closest equivalent of exceptions you can get in C.
Ok, I couldn't resist replying to this. Let me first say I don't think it's a good idea to simulate this in C as it really is a foreign concept to C.
We can use abuse the preprocessor and local stack variables to give use a limited version of C++ try/throw/catch.
Version 1 (local scope throws)
#include <stdbool.h>
#define try bool __HadError=false;
#define catch(x) ExitJmp:if(__HadError)
#define throw(x) {__HadError=true;goto ExitJmp;}
Version 1 is a local throw only (can't leave the function's scope). It does rely on C99's ability to declare variables in code (it should work in C89 if the try is first thing in the function).
This function just makes a local var so it knows if there was an error and uses a goto to jump to the catch block.
For example:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#define try bool __HadError=false;
#define catch(x) ExitJmp:if(__HadError)
#define throw(x) {__HadError=true;goto ExitJmp;}
int main(void)
{
try
{
printf("One\n");
throw();
printf("Two\n");
}
catch(...)
{
printf("Error\n");
}
return 0;
}
This works out to something like:
int main(void)
{
bool HadError=false;
{
printf("One\n");
{
HadError=true;
goto ExitJmp;
}
printf("Two\n");
}
ExitJmp:
if(HadError)
{
printf("Error\n");
}
return 0;
}
Version 2 (scope jumping)
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <setjmp.h>
jmp_buf *g__ActiveBuf;
#define try jmp_buf __LocalJmpBuff;jmp_buf *__OldActiveBuf=g__ActiveBuf;bool __WasThrown=false;g__ActiveBuf=&__LocalJmpBuff;if(setjmp(__LocalJmpBuff)){__WasThrown=true;}else
#define catch(x) g__ActiveBuf=__OldActiveBuf;if(__WasThrown)
#define throw(x) longjmp(*g__ActiveBuf,1);
Version 2 is a lot more complex but basically works the same way. It uses a
long jump out of the current function to the try block. The try block then
uses an if/else to skip the code block to the catch block which check the local
variable to see if it should catch.
The example expanded again:
jmp_buf *g_ActiveBuf;
int main(void)
{
jmp_buf LocalJmpBuff;
jmp_buf *OldActiveBuf=g_ActiveBuf;
bool WasThrown=false;
g_ActiveBuf=&LocalJmpBuff;
if(setjmp(LocalJmpBuff))
{
WasThrown=true;
}
else
{
printf("One\n");
longjmp(*g_ActiveBuf,1);
printf("Two\n");
}
g_ActiveBuf=OldActiveBuf;
if(WasThrown)
{
printf("Error\n");
}
return 0;
}
This uses a global pointer so the longjmp() knows what try was last run.
We are using abusing the stack so child functions can also have a try/catch block.
Using this code has a number of down sides (but is a fun mental exercise):
It will not free allocated memory as there are no deconstructors being called.
You can't have more than 1 try/catch in a scope (no nesting)
You can't actually throw exceptions or other data like in C++
Not thread safe at all
You are setting up other programmers for failure because they will likely not notice the hack and try using them like C++ try/catch blocks.
In C99, you can use setjmp/longjmp for non-local control flow.
Within a single scope, the generic, structured coding pattern for C in the presence of multiple resource allocations and multiple exits uses goto, like in this example. This is similar to how C++ implements destructor calls of automatic objects under the hood, and if you stick to this diligently, it should allow you for a certain degree of cleanness even in complex functions.
While some of the other answers have covered the simple cases using setjmp and longjmp, in a real application there's two concerns that really matter.
Nesting of try/catch blocks. Using a single global variable for your jmp_buf will make these not work.
Threading. A single global variable for you jmp_buf will cause all kinds of pain in this situation.
The solution to these is to maintain a thread-local stack of jmp_buf that get updated as you go. (I think this is what lua uses internally).
So instead of this (from JaredPar's awesome answer)
static jmp_buf s_jumpBuffer;
void Example() {
if (setjmp(s_jumpBuffer)) {
// The longjmp was executed and returned control here
printf("Exception happened\n");
} else {
// Normal code execution starts here
Test();
}
}
void Test() {
// Rough equivalent of `throw`
longjump(s_jumpBuffer, 42);
}
You'd use something like:
#define MAX_EXCEPTION_DEPTH 10;
struct exception_state {
jmp_buf s_jumpBuffer[MAX_EXCEPTION_DEPTH];
int current_depth;
};
int try_point(struct exception_state * state) {
if(current_depth==MAX_EXCEPTION_DEPTH) {
abort();
}
int ok = setjmp(state->jumpBuffer[state->current_depth]);
if(ok) {
state->current_depth++;
} else {
//We've had an exception update the stack.
state->current_depth--;
}
return ok;
}
void throw_exception(struct exception_state * state) {
longjump(state->current_depth-1,1);
}
void catch_point(struct exception_state * state) {
state->current_depth--;
}
void end_try_point(struct exception_state * state) {
state->current_depth--;
}
__thread struct exception_state g_exception_state;
void Example() {
if (try_point(&g_exception_state)) {
catch_point(&g_exception_state);
printf("Exception happened\n");
} else {
// Normal code execution starts here
Test();
end_try_point(&g_exception_state);
}
}
void Test() {
// Rough equivalent of `throw`
throw_exception(g_exception_state);
}
Again a more realistic version of this would include some way to store error information into the exception_state, better handling of MAX_EXCEPTION_DEPTH (maybe using realloc to grow the buffer, or something like that).
DISCLAIMER: The above code was written without any testing whatsoever. It is purely so you get an idea of how to structure things. Different systems and different compilers will need to implement the thread local storage differently. The code probably contains both compile errors and logic errors - so while you're free to use it as you choose, TEST it before using it ;)
This is another way to do error handling in C which is more performant than using setjmp/longjmp. Unfortunately, it will not work with MSVC but if using only GCC/Clang is an option, then you might consider it. Specifically, it uses the "label as value" extension, which allows you to take the address of a label, store it in a value and and jump to it unconditionally. I'll present it using an example:
GameEngine *CreateGameEngine(GameEngineParams const *params)
{
/* Declare an error handler variable. This will hold the address
to jump to if an error occurs to cleanup pending resources.
Initialize it to the err label which simply returns an
error value (NULL in this example). The && operator resolves to
the address of the label err */
void *eh = &&err;
/* Try the allocation */
GameEngine *engine = malloc(sizeof *engine);
if (!engine)
goto *eh; /* this is essentially your "throw" */
/* Now make sure that if we throw from this point on, the memory
gets deallocated. As a convention you could name the label "undo_"
followed by the operation to rollback. */
eh = &&undo_malloc;
/* Now carry on with the initialization. */
engine->window = OpenWindow(...);
if (!engine->window)
goto *eh; /* The neat trick about using approach is that you don't
need to remember what "undo" label to go to in code.
Simply go to *eh. */
eh = &&undo_window_open;
/* etc */
/* Everything went well, just return the device. */
return device;
/* After the return, insert your cleanup code in reverse order. */
undo_window_open: CloseWindow(engine->window);
undo_malloc: free(engine);
err: return NULL;
}
If you so wish, you could refactor common code in defines, effectively implementing your own error-handling system.
/* Put at the beginning of a function that may fail. */
#define declthrows void *_eh = &&err
/* Cleans up resources and returns error result. */
#define throw goto *_eh
/* Sets a new undo checkpoint. */
#define undo(label) _eh = &&undo_##label
/* Throws if [condition] evaluates to false. */
#define check(condition) if (!(condition)) throw
/* Throws if [condition] evaluates to false. Then sets a new undo checkpoint. */
#define checkpoint(label, condition) { check(condition); undo(label); }
Then the example becomes
GameEngine *CreateGameEngine(GameEngineParams const *params)
{
declthrows;
/* Try the allocation */
GameEngine *engine = malloc(sizeof *engine);
checkpoint(malloc, engine);
/* Now carry on with the initialization. */
engine->window = OpenWindow(...);
checkpoint(window_open, engine->window);
/* etc */
/* Everything went well, just return the device. */
return device;
/* After the return, insert your cleanup code in reverse order. */
undo_window_open: CloseWindow(engine->window);
undo_malloc: free(engine);
err: return NULL;
}
A quick google search yields kludgey solutions such as this that use setjmp/longjmp as others have mentioned. Nothing as straightforward and elegant as C++/Java's try/catch. I'm rather partial to Ada's exception handling myself.
Check everything with if statements :)
This can be done with setjmp/longjmp in C. P99 has a quite comfortable toolset for this that also is consistent with the new thread model of C11.
In C, you can "emulate" exceptions along with automatic "object reclamation" through manual use of if + goto for explicit error handling.
I often write C code like the following (boiled down to highlight error handling):
#include <assert.h>
typedef int errcode;
errcode init_or_fail( foo *f, goo *g, poo *p, loo *l )
{
errcode ret = 0;
if ( ( ret = foo_init( f ) ) )
goto FAIL;
if ( ( ret = goo_init( g ) ) )
goto FAIL_F;
if ( ( ret = poo_init( p ) ) )
goto FAIL_G;
if ( ( ret = loo_init( l ) ) )
goto FAIL_P;
assert( 0 == ret );
goto END;
/* error handling and return */
/* Note that we finalize in opposite order of initialization because we are unwinding a *STACK* of initialized objects */
FAIL_P:
poo_fini( p );
FAIL_G:
goo_fini( g );
FAIL_F:
foo_fini( f );
FAIL:
assert( 0 != ret );
END:
return ret;
}
This is completely standard ANSI C, separates the error handling away from your mainline code, allows for (manual) stack unwinding of initialized objects much like C++ does, and it is completely obvious what is happening here. Because you are explicitly testing for failure at each point it does make it easier to insert specific logging or error handling at each place an error can occur.
If you don't mind a little macro magic, then you can make this more concise while doing other things like logging errors with stack traces. For example:
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#define TRY( X, LABEL ) do { if ( ( X ) ) { fprintf( stderr, "%s:%d: Statement '%s' failed! %d, %s\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, #X, ret, strerror( ret ) ); goto LABEL; } while ( 0 )
typedef int errcode;
errcode init_or_fail( foo *f, goo *g, poo *p, loo *l )
{
errcode ret = 0;
TRY( ret = foo_init( f ), FAIL );
TRY( ret = goo_init( g ), FAIL_F );
TRY( ret = poo_init( p ), FAIL_G );
TRY( ret = loo_init( l ), FAIL_P );
assert( 0 == ret );
goto END;
/* error handling and return */
FAIL_P:
poo_fini( p );
FAIL_G:
goo_fini( g );
FAIL_F:
foo_fini( f );
FAIL:
assert( 0 != ret );
END:
return ret;
}
Of course, this isn't as elegant as C++ exceptions + destructors. For example, nesting multiple error handling stacks within one function this way isn't very clean. Instead, you'd probably want to break those out into self contained sub functions that similarly handle errors, initialize + finalize explicitly like this.
This also only works within a single function and won't keep jumping up the stack unless higher level callers implement similar explicit error handling logic, whereas a C++ exception will just keep jumping up the stack until it finds an appropriate handler. Nor does it allow you to throw an arbitrary type, but instead only an error code.
Systematically coding this way (i.e. - with a single entry and single exit point) also makes it very easy to insert pre and post ("finally") logic that will execute no matter what. You just put your "finally" logic after the END label.
Warning: the following is not very nice but it does the job.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
typedef struct {
unsigned int id;
char *name;
char *msg;
} error;
#define _printerr(e, s, ...) fprintf(stderr, "\033[1m\033[37m" "%s:%d: " "\033[1m\033[31m" e ":" "\033[1m\033[37m" " ‘%s_error’ " "\033[0m" s "\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, (*__err)->name, ##__VA_ARGS__)
#define printerr(s, ...) _printerr("error", s, ##__VA_ARGS__)
#define printuncaughterr() _printerr("uncaught error", "%s", (*__err)->msg)
#define _errordef(n, _id) \
error* new_##n##_error_msg(char* msg) { \
error* self = malloc(sizeof(error)); \
self->id = _id; \
self->name = #n; \
self->msg = msg; \
return self; \
} \
error* new_##n##_error() { return new_##n##_error_msg(""); }
#define errordef(n) _errordef(n, __COUNTER__ +1)
#define try(try_block, err, err_name, catch_block) { \
error * err_name = NULL; \
error ** __err = & err_name; \
void __try_fn() try_block \
__try_fn(); \
void __catch_fn() { \
if (err_name == NULL) return; \
unsigned int __##err_name##_id = new_##err##_error()->id; \
if (__##err_name##_id != 0 && __##err_name##_id != err_name->id) \
printuncaughterr(); \
else if (__##err_name##_id != 0 || __##err_name##_id != err_name->id) \
catch_block \
} \
__catch_fn(); \
}
#define throw(e) { *__err = e; return; }
_errordef(any, 0)
Usage:
errordef(my_err1)
errordef(my_err2)
try ({
printf("Helloo\n");
throw(new_my_err1_error_msg("hiiiii!"));
printf("This will not be printed!\n");
}, /*catch*/ any, e, {
printf("My lovely error: %s %s\n", e->name, e->msg);
})
printf("\n");
try ({
printf("Helloo\n");
throw(new_my_err2_error_msg("my msg!"));
printf("This will not be printed!\n");
}, /*catch*/ my_err2, e, {
printerr("%s", e->msg);
})
printf("\n");
try ({
printf("Helloo\n");
throw(new_my_err1_error());
printf("This will not be printed!\n");
}, /*catch*/ my_err2, e, {
printf("Catch %s if you can!\n", e->name);
})
Output:
Helloo
My lovely error: my_err1 hiiiii!
Helloo
/home/naheel/Desktop/aa.c:28: error: ‘my_err2_error’ my msg!
Helloo
/home/naheel/Desktop/aa.c:38: uncaught error: ‘my_err1_error’
Keep on mind that this is using nested functions and __COUNTER__. You'll be on the safe side if you're using gcc.
Redis use goto to simulate try/catch, IMHO it is very clean and elegant:
/* Save the DB on disk. Return REDIS_ERR on error, REDIS_OK on success. */
int rdbSave(char *filename) {
char tmpfile[256];
FILE *fp;
rio rdb;
int error = 0;
snprintf(tmpfile,256,"temp-%d.rdb", (int) getpid());
fp = fopen(tmpfile,"w");
if (!fp) {
redisLog(REDIS_WARNING, "Failed opening .rdb for saving: %s",
strerror(errno));
return REDIS_ERR;
}
rioInitWithFile(&rdb,fp);
if (rdbSaveRio(&rdb,&error) == REDIS_ERR) {
errno = error;
goto werr;
}
/* Make sure data will not remain on the OS's output buffers */
if (fflush(fp) == EOF) goto werr;
if (fsync(fileno(fp)) == -1) goto werr;
if (fclose(fp) == EOF) goto werr;
/* Use RENAME to make sure the DB file is changed atomically only
* if the generate DB file is ok. */
if (rename(tmpfile,filename) == -1) {
redisLog(REDIS_WARNING,"Error moving temp DB file on the final destination: %s", strerror(errno));
unlink(tmpfile);
return REDIS_ERR;
}
redisLog(REDIS_NOTICE,"DB saved on disk");
server.dirty = 0;
server.lastsave = time(NULL);
server.lastbgsave_status = REDIS_OK;
return REDIS_OK;
werr:
fclose(fp);
unlink(tmpfile);
redisLog(REDIS_WARNING,"Write error saving DB on disk: %s", strerror(errno));
return REDIS_ERR;
}
If you're using C with Win32, you can leverage its Structured Exception Handling (SEH) to simulate try/catch.
If you're using C in platforms that don't support setjmp() and longjmp(), have a look at this Exception Handling of pjsip library, it does provide its own implementation
After studying the answers given above, I set up a system that automatically handles nested exceptions well. Here is the code I wrote to test my system:
#include "MyOtherTricks.h"
#include "Exceptions.h"
void Testing_InnerMethod();
void Testing_PossibleExceptionThrower();
void TestExceptionHandling()
{
try
{
Testing_InnerMethod();
Say("The inner method exited without an exception.");
}
catch (Exception)
{
Say("I caught an Exception that the inner method did not catch.");
}
end_try
}
void Testing_InnerMethod()
{
try
{
Say("I am in a try block.");
Testing_PossibleExceptionThrower();
Say("The possible exception thrower didn't throw an exception.");
}
catch (ExceptionSubtype1)
Say("I caught an exception, subtype 1.");
catch (ExceptionSubtype2)
{
Say("I caught an exception, subtype 2.");
Say("I will now rethrow it.");
throw(exception);
}
end_try
}
void Testing_PossibleExceptionThrower()
{
Say("Here is the possible exception thrower.");
throw(new(ExceptionSubtype2)); // To further test exception handling, replace ExceptionSubtype2 in this line with Exception or ExceptionSubtype1, or comment out this line entirely.
Say("No, I won't throw an exception!");
}
The example code relies on two files, Exceptions.h and Exceptions.c. Here is Exceptions.h:
#include <setjmp.h>
extern jmp_buf* Exception_Handler;
#define try do \
{ \
jmp_buf* outerExceptionHandler = Exception_Handler; \
jmp_buf exceptionHandler; \
Exception_Handler = &exceptionHandler; \
Exception exception = (Exception)setjmp(exceptionHandler); \
if (exception != 0) Exception_Handler = outerExceptionHandler; \
if (exception == 0) \
{ \
// The try block goes here. It must not include a return statement or anything else that exits the try...end_try block, because then the outer exception handler will not be restored.
#define catch(exceptionType) Exception_Handler = outerExceptionHandler; \
} \
else if (Object_IsSomeTypeOf(exception, exceptionType)) \
{
// The catch block goes here. It may include a return statement or anything else that exits the try...end_try block. A break statement will exit only the try...end_try block.
#define end_try } \
else \
throw(exception); \
} while(0);
void throw(Exception exception);
And here is Exceptions.c:
#include "MyOtherTricks.h"
#include "Exceptions.h"
jmp_buf* Exception_Handler = 0;
void throw(Exception exception)
{
if (Exception_Handler == 0) FailBecause("Uncaught exception.");
longjmp(*Exception_Handler, (int)exception);
}
Note that this code references some additional methods that I'm not including here (because class inheritance in C is off-topic). To make this code work for you, you'll have to understand this code well enough to replace a few things. In particular, if you want to distinguish between different types of exceptions, you'll need to realize that this code assumes that Object_IsSomeTypeOf(new(ExceptionSubtype1), Exception) returns true and Object_IsSomeTypeOf(new(ExceptionSubtype1), ExceptionSubtype2) returns false, and you'll need to either make your own version of my Object_IsSomeTypeOf macro or replace it with something else.
Perhaps not a major language (unfortunately), but in APL, theres the ⎕EA operation (stand for Execute Alternate).
Usage:
'Y' ⎕EA 'X'
where X and Y are either code snippets supplied as strings or function names.
If X runs into an error, Y (usually error-handling) will be executed instead.