We are porting a D6 application to XE3.
In D6 I inherited a complex code which used shared datasets and datasources everywhere.
This worked well in D6.
After we could run the XE3 version, we experienced that lookup combo boxes changed.
On dropdown they reset the other dropdown's keyvalues (everywhere in the program)!
If two dropdowns use on dataset, and if I click on the first to down it, and select, on down the second keyvalue changed to NULL; and reverse - if I click on the second, the first's keyvalue change to NULL...
This is global in this program, so I need to find fast solution.
May somebody have any information about this "bug" (or "feature"? :-) ), or have a solution in his/her hand?
Thanks for any answer!
This is intentional. Take a look at the implemention of TCustomDBLookupComboBox.ListLinkDataChanged; in Vcl.DBCtrls. You will find the comment:
{ Fix for Defect# 204311, Non-bound control should clear when list datasource changes }
Solution: put your datasets on a data module. Instantiate that for every form, so every form works with a separate instance of the dataset. Make sure you set the name of the data module to an empty string after instantiation, or the Delphi streaming system will still use the first correctly named instance when hooking up the form's datasources with the datasets.
When the data module(s) are in the form's uses clause (interface or implementation doesn't matter) the IDE will still offer you their components through the Object Inspector.
You will want to put the database connection on a different data module that you only instantiate once (possibly automatically).
Related
I am developing a web app using Oracle ADF. I have a bounded task flow. In that I have a search page like below.
I have created the above two forms using view object data controls.
Searching is performing well. But my problem is when I go some where else in my application using menus provided left side and come back to the search page , the page is not getting refreshed. I am getting a search page that contains old search results. At this point of time if I am trying to make any changes am getting some error called "Another user with this id already modifed data ....". After this error my app is not running. Means what ever am trying to do its showing the same error.
So I need to make this: "When ever the user come to this form, He should get fresh form. It should not contain old search results.
Please help me. How do I achieve this.
Thank you.
There are 2 ways of doing it:
1) Set your task flow as ISOLATED, from Task Flow Overview tab -> Behaviour -> Share Data Control with calling task flow -> unchecked (or isolated, if you are using JDev 12c)
This will ensure you always start FRESH when accessing the page, but it will potentially create a performance overhead because entire View Object cache will be recreated (requeried) on page load. Nevertheless, it is the quickest solution.
2) You may create a default Method Call Activity in your task flow from where you may call a AM's custom method that resets the view criteria. The method will be placed on application module's implementation class and it may look like this:
public void initTaskFlow() {
this.getViewObject1().executeEmptyRowSet();
}
This will clean the result data. If you want to reset the querying parameters as well, you can use this example:
http://www.jobinesh.com/2011/04/programmatically-resetting-and-search.html
When you made any changes to any viewObject then excute this viewObject to match entity state and viewState , i think excuting viewObject will solve your issue
Ashish
I'm trying to use a single controller for two parts of a large form. I've successfully done this with one controller, but another refuses to work in both parts.
To explain how I did this. I created two directives which pull in separate templates for vehicle information. Make, model, body type and so on. The custom tags are as follows:
<my-sale-vehicle-form ng-controller="vehicleFormCtrl as sale_vform"></my-sale-vehicle-form>
<my-trade-vehicle-form ng-controller="vehicleFormCtrl as trade_vform"></my-trade-vehicle-form>
As you can see each uses the vehicleFormCtrl controller as an alias allowing me to display data from each alias and load data from the controller into the form fields.
Now I figured if this will work I should be able to display multiple instances of a custom warranty form using the same technique as seen below. I attempted it, but I can't seem to get it to work in the same way. I've checked over the templates and each refers to the right alias. Usually what happens is that one will work, or neither will work. If I remove the second instance the first will work. I just can't wrap my brain around why this works in one situation and not the other. I do not get any errors in the console either. Any advice is appreciated. Thanks.
<my_pack0-warranty-form ng-controller="customWarrantyFormCtrl as custwarforma"></my_pack0-warranty-form>
<my_pack1-warranty-form ng-controller="customWarrantyFormCtrl as custwarformb"></my_pack1-warranty-form>
I'm trying to write a common test module for a localized application.
The first issue I'm having is the fact that MenuItems do not support controlname attributes. Currently my menu items are located via text or accessiblename attribute. Is there a way to support controlname attribute?
I've tried to make text and accessiblename attribute point to a variable and then bind the variable to some external dictionary. As I understand the external data sources are treated as rows which contain various data items for a single variable. I don't see a way to use external data sources that treat first column as variable name and second column as variable value. Is there a way to achieve such functionality?
I've thought about a way to extend RanorexXPath to accept functions. Then I could write something like ...menuitem[text=localizationService.Translate("#ADMINISTRATION") and have Ranorex find the menu item based on the result of localizationService.Translate function. Is there a way to do this?
Finally I've somewhat managed to get the result I need by using global variables and module variables. What I did was create a module that uses localizationService to fill module variables with correct data. Next I bind the module variables to global parameters and use the data in subsequent test. This is quite error prone and difficult to implement for large number of variables. Is there a way to access and set global variables directly from code (without the need to use binding)?
If any of the 4. points is possible please let me know.
The recomendation from Ranorex support team:
In general only the whole menu is a control in WinForms. The elements within that control (MenuItems) can only be recognized via MSAA.
The problem is that the "Name" attribute of the MenuItems is not accessible.
As workaround I would suggest to use the attribute "AccessibleDescription" in your application in order to automate the menu. This attribute can also be used for language independent names.
In automation of a WPF application (using UI Automation; VSTS 2010), we were adding all the Automation IDs in a Resource File manually and then access it one by one. Considering the application can expand any time, manually adding these IDs can become tedious.
So, is there any tool available which can create this for us? i.e. Get all the ids in a hierarchical format and store it in a file (xml or csv), and then we could parse it whenever required.
I was hoping for a tool like UISpy, which not only can spy all the elements but also export the same.
Do such tools exist? Or is there any alternate approach?
Any valuable feedback is highly appreciated.
Thanks!
I do like this:
public static class AutomationIds
{
public static readonly string MyDataGridId= Create();
private static string Create([CallerMemberName] string name = null)
{
return name;
}
}
<DataGrid AutomationProperties.AutomationId="{x:Static local:AutomationIds.MyDataGridId}"
... />
Then in tests
var dataGrid = window.Get<ListView>(AutomationIds.MyDataGridId);
Assign the automation IDs directly in XAML, then parse XAML files since they are XML after all...
Let's see...
First, I think that your data is not hierarchical - just because a control can be dynamically assigned to be a child of another.
If we change the problem to a subset: "how can we get a hierarchical view of the controls at a time t?" then we can answer this with MS UIA, and say, using a simple RawViewWalker (just a simple breadth-first search on the walker, starting from your main window will do - of course while the application is running so that UIA can reach and query it).
But this subset will not satisfy your initial question, because you'll probably see a portion of your whole ui collection (since some will be hidden / not activated yet at time t).
So it becomes very hard to use a UIA based tool (such as uispy) because then you'll have to set the application view to different states to reach all the controls in your application at different times t1, t2...
I would suggest parsing all your xmls at the same time and build a complete tree of the application's "static" control map, which I believe would be closest to what you're asking for.
Given that this is an old question, I doubt it matters anymore, but just wanted to make the distinctions here.
Lets take an example of WinForms applcation and making invoice. On the Invoice form we retrieve a list of products, so the user will be ale to pick products for current invoice. Lets also consider that during this process user realizes that he needs to add a new product (or edit current) to ProductList before he can place it in invoice. So he opens a ProductForm where all the products are retreived (again).
It could also be in opposite order, that user first edits Products, and then without closing the Products Form, opens new Invoice. The principle is that data is two times loaded, and effectively its the same data.
What is the propper way to handle this scenario, so we can tell one form that data is already loaded, and to retrieve that data from memory? And when all the consumers (Forms) of the data are closed, then also the data should be released from memory? Or I am going in wrong direction, and there is a better way?
Thanks,
Goran
Definitelly go with data loaded "twice" or you will introduce much worse problems.
Sharing data means sharing ObjectContext. Even in WinForms application this is considered as bad approach. Check this article (it is about NHibernate but the description is valid for EF as well).
The problem is that ObjectContext is unit of work. If share context between two windows you can easily get into situation where you modify data in first window (without saving them!) and you continue in second window where you push save button but it will save data from both windows! You can't selectively save data only from one window when you share the context.
If the Controls that are using the data are all child controls of a shared Parent control, then you could just pass around the datacontext, so that they all shared the same datacontext.
However, the general use case with databases, which is what backs EF in most cases, is to read the data in each time that it is needed.
A solution to this if as you say you already have the item being used in one form is to just take a Refrence to that item into your new form.
So in the case Where you have an invoice which has a Product List and you want to add to the product list, you could pass the product list from the invoice to the opening product list.
There are some issues with this:
If another user changes the datasource while one has opened it (a.k.a. Concurrency)
Handling save don't save scenarios where they may have made a change in one area that they don't actually want added to the data.
However, unless it is a true performance issues, I would just load the data every time. You can simplify this a lot by using the repository pattern, so you can just call a single method to get a list of products or an invoice, or whatever part of data you need.