I'm developing a winform program in which I need to send and receive SMS messages.
I have no problem sending SMS, but I don't know how to inform when a new message has been received via a GSM modem. I want to have an acknowledgement like an interrupt or event, when a new message has been received.
As far as I know I should work to at+CNMI or at+CNMA, but unfortunately I can't find an example or suitable reference for those. Furthermore, I need to know how to get delivery message or how to handle that?
AT+CNMI and AT+CNMA are standard AT commands defined in the spec 3GPP TS 27.005, available here.
For confirmation of successful delivery, see section 3.5.1 of this document which is the description for "Send message, +CMGS".
When you are defining new port in your connection to connect, you should get a data received trigger to it.
SerialPort port = new SerialPort();
//...
port.DataReceived += new SerialDataReceivedEventHandler(port_DataReceived);
and in that trigger:
private void port_DataReceived(object sender, SerialDataReceivedEventArgs e)
{
SerialPort sp = (SerialPort)sender;
MessageBox.Show(sp.ReadExisting()); //Data received
}
Related
I am using apache camel 3.8 and trying to make a simple tcp server that sends the request message back to the client (the client I am using is PacketSender).
The problem is, if the process() method takes too long an empty response is sent back by netty in the background after 15ms, even if the process() is still in the Thread.sleep hold.
If I do not let the method (thread) sleep, the response is sent with the received content immediatly.
How can I manage it, that netty is waiting until I finished my process and send the response I set in the exchange message body?
Here is the route I am using:
fromF("netty:tcp://%s:%d?sync=true&synchronous=true&disconnectOnNoReply=false&connectTimeout=100000", host, receivePort)
.bean(HL7Request.class, "process", BeanScope.Request);
The bean process method looks like this, for simulation purpose of my long taking process I used a Thread.sleep:
public void process(Exchange exchange) throws Exception {
try {
CamelContext context = exchange.getContext();
exchange.setException(null);
Thread.sleep(5000); // <-- Here the method stopps for 5 seconds but the response is sent by netty anyway
String content = exchange.getMessage().getBody(String.class);
System.out.println(content);
}
catch (Exception e) {
exchange.setException(e);
}
}
PacketSender receives an empty response
Thank you.
Regards,
Florian
I think it was an issue with PacketSender Software. It perfectly works using command line telnet.
More details to the bug
I am setting up a Camel Route with ackMode=NONE meaning acknowlegements are not done automatically. How do I explicitly acknowledge the message in the route?
In my Camel Route definition I've set ackMode to NONE. According to the documentation, I should be able to manually acknowledge the message downstream:
https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/master/components/camel-google-pubsub/src/main/docs/google-pubsub-component.adoc
"AUTO = exchange gets ack’ed/nack’ed on completion. NONE = downstream process has to ack/nack explicitly"
However I cannot figure out how to send the ack.
from("google-pubsub:<project>:<subscription>?concurrentConsumers=1&maxMessagesPerPoll=1&ackMode=NONE")
.bean("processingBean");
My PubSub subscription has an acknowledgement deadline of 10 seconds and so my message keeps getting re-sent every 10 seconds due to ackMode=NONE. This is as expected. However I cannot find a way to manually acknowledge the message once processing is complete and stop the re-deliveries.
I was able to dig through the Camel components and figure out how it is done. First I created a GooglePubSubConnectionFactory bean:
#Bean
public GooglePubsubConnectionFactory googlePubsubConnectionFactory() {
GooglePubsubConnectionFactory connectionFactory = new GooglePubsubConnectionFactory();
connectionFactory.setCredentialsFileLocation(pubsubKey);
return connectionFactory;
}
Then I was able to reference the ack id of the message from the header:
#Header(GooglePubsubConstants.ACK_ID) String ackId
Then I used the following code to acknowledge the message:
List<String > ackIdList = new ArrayList<>();
ackIdList.add(ackId);
AcknowledgeRequest ackRequest = new AcknowledgeRequest().setAckIds(ackIdList);
Pubsub pubsub = googlePubsubConnectionFactory.getDefaultClient();
pubsub.projects().subscriptions().acknowledge("projects/<my project>/subscriptions/<my subscription>", ackRequest).execute();
I think it is best if you look how the Camel component does it with ackMode=AUTO. Have a look at this class (method acknowledge)
But why do you want to do this extra work? Camel is your fried to simplify integration by abstracting away low level code.
So when you use ackMode=AUTO Camel automatically commits your successfully processed messages (when the message has successfully passed the whole route) and rolls back your not processable messages.
I am working on newtwork event based socket application.
When client has sent some data and there is something to be read on the socket, FD_READ network event is generated.
Now according to my understanding, when server wants to write over the socket, there must be an event generated i.e. FD_WRITE. But how this message will be generated?
When there is something available to be read, FD_READ is automatically generated but what about FD_WRITE when server wants to write something?
Anyone who can help me with this confusion please?
Following is the code snippet:
WSAEVENT hEvent = WSACreateEvent();
WSANETWORKEVENTS events;
WSAEventSelect(newSocketIdentifier, hEvent, FD_READ | FD_WRITE);
while(1)
{ //while(1) starts
waitRet = WSAWaitForMultipleEvents(1, &hEvent, FALSE, WSA_INFINITE, FALSE);
//WSAResetEvent(hEvent);
if(WSAEnumNetworkEvents(newSocketIdentifier,hEvent,&events) == SOCKET_ERROR)
{
//Failure
}
else
{ //else event occurred starts
if(events.lNetworkEvents & FD_READ)
{
//recvfrom()
}
if(events.lNetworkEvents & FD_WRITE)
{
//sendto()
}
}
}
FD_WRITE means you can write to the socket right now. If the send buffers fill up (you're sending data faster than it can be sent on the network), eventually you won't be able to write anymore until you wait a bit.
Once you make a write that fails due to the buffers being full, this message will be sent to you to let you know you can retry that send.
It's also sent when you first open up the socket to let you know it's there and you can start writing.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms741576(v=vs.85).aspx
The FD_WRITE network event is handled slightly differently. An
FD_WRITE network event is recorded when a socket is first connected
with a call to the connect, ConnectEx, WSAConnect, WSAConnectByList,
or WSAConnectByName function or when a socket is accepted with accept,
AcceptEx, or WSAAccept function and then after a send fails with
WSAEWOULDBLOCK and buffer space becomes available. Therefore, an
application can assume that sends are possible starting from the first
FD_WRITE network event setting and lasting until a send returns
WSAEWOULDBLOCK. After such a failure the application will find out
that sends are again possible when an FD_WRITE network event is
recorded and the associated event object is set.
So, ideally you're probably keeping a flag as to whether it's OK to write, right now. It starts off as true, but eventually, you get a WSAEWOULDBLOCK when calling sendto, and you set it to false. Once you receive FD_WRITE, you set the flag back to true and resume sending packets.
I am facing an issue for ConnectionListener implementation in java mail on Store object.
My disconnect method and close method not called if I disconnect my internet connection.
My Code snippets are :
this.store.addConnectionListener(new ConnectionListenerImplmentedClass);
this.store.connect(HOST, USER_NAME, PASSWORD);
public void opened(ConnectionEvent e) {
LOGGER.info("Connection opened...");
}
public void disconnect(ConnectionEvent e) {
LOGGER.info("Connection opened...");
}
public void close(ConnectionEvent e) {
LOGGER.info("Connection opened...");
}
Please suggest me where I am doing wrong...
It depends on your operating system when and if you'll be notified if you "disconnect" your internet connection. Usually you'll only be notified if you're actually doing something that uses the connection. If your program is just sitting and waiting for events, you may never be notified.
Going on what Bill Shannon said, it sounds like you need to perform a periodic check to see if the connection is still alive. Javadocs suggest overriding the Service.isConnected() method in order to verify that any connection to the message store is still alive.
http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/api/javax/mail/Service.html#isConnected()
isConnected
public boolean isConnected()
Is this service currently connected?
This implementation uses a private boolean field to store the connection state. This method returns the value of that field.
Subclasses may want to override this method to verify that any connection to the message store is still alive.
Returns:
true if the service is connected, false if it is not connected
UPDATE: The plot thickens. I changed my channel name and it is suddenly working (which means it wasn't a problem with my push service, since I'm getting the same HTTP response from the Microsoft Push Notification server).
To me, however, this is not a solution. How will I be able to test this and KNOW my users are getting their push notifications if I'm getting the same response when it's not working as I do when it is?
[ORIGINAL POST]
I've been trying to get push notifications sent to my Windows Phone 7 device, but I'm having very big problems that I can't find any answers for. I'll start with the c# code.
I set up push notifications using the following C# code.
private HttpNotificationChannel channel;
private static string PUSH_CHANNEL = "MySpecialPushChannel";
private Uri PushUri = null;
private bool IsPushRegistered = false;
public void StartPushSubscription()
{
try
{
channel = HttpNotificationChannel.Find(PUSH_CHANNEL);
}
catch
{}
if (channel != null)
{
PushUri = channel.ChannelUri;
if (!channel.IsShellTileBound)
channel.BindToShellTile();
}
else
{
channel = new HttpNotificationChannel(PUSH_CHANNEL);
channel.ChannelUriUpdated += new EventHandler<NotificationChannelUriEventArgs>(channel_ChannelUriUpdated);
channel.HttpNotificationReceived += new EventHandler<HttpNotificationEventArgs>(channel_HttpNotificationReceived);
channel.ErrorOccurred += new EventHandler<NotificationChannelErrorEventArgs>(channel_ErrorOccurred);
try
{
channel.Open();
channel.BindToShellTile();
}
catch (Exception err)
{
channel = null;
IsPushRegistered = false;
// Code to try again
}
}
}
void channel_ChannelUriUpdated(object sender, NotificationChannelUriEventArgs e)
{
PushUri = e.ChannelUri;
IsPushRegistered = true;
}
I'm following the standard WP7 push structure:
Find the HttpNotificationChannel (or start a new one)
Register event handler to get the push notification uri back
Open the channel
Bind to the tile
Handle the channel Uri (which we send to our service to await the happy day when we send the push notification
OK... so far so good. No errors, I get my Uri, send it to my service just fine. I pin my app to the start screen and my service sends a push request to the Uri (sending just the count so that I get a little push count number in the upper right hand corner). I get back an HTTP 200 status with the following:
DeviceConnectionStatus => Connected
NotificationStatus => Received
SubscriptionStatus => Active
And then... nothing. No push status shows up on my app. I've now tried it on my device, in the emulator, on another device, and with multiple servers and the result is always the same. Everything looks like it is working except for the fact that it doesn't work.
To me, however, this is not a solution. How will I be able to test this and KNOW my users are getting their push notifications if I'm getting the same response when it's not working as I do when it is?
The answer is, you can't. It's a limitation of how WP7 handles notifications.
For structured notifications like Tile and Toast, if you get the Connected/Active/Received/200 response, then you can know that MPNS accepted your notification request. However, this does not mean that you have sent a valid XML payload.
The component that handles parsing XML is the Push Client, the process running on the phone that accepts push notifications and deals them out to appropriate applications, displays the toast, etc.
If you have sent invalid XML, there is absolutely no indication that you've done so. At most, if you try to send the notification again to that same push channel URI, you'll get a 404 in response. Apparently getting an invalid XML payload for a specific application makes that application's push channel close, requiring you to go through the whole procedure again.
I've discovered this while debugging with our server team, and through trying to get the phone to display an alternate live tile. The only advice I can offer you is to quadruple-check your XML.
You will get errors in your error event handler for your push notification channel for Toast notifications that have invalid XML, since you are able to send/receive toast notifications while the application is active.
If anyone from Microsoft is reading this, PLEASE provide more thorough documentation on possible error states in the push notification system. We also need an event handler for Tile notifications, or at least allow us to receive tile notifications while the app is in the foreground and fire the notification channel error event so that we can be aware that our XML payload is invalid.
Especially if your web service isn't built with WCF, .NET, Azure, and whatever, working with Push Notifications on WP7 is like wandering blind.
Documentation for an exception message reading "InvalidOperationException(Failed to open channel)" should not read: "This exception is raised when the notification channel failed to open. Try opening the notification channel again." (reference)
are you getting the URL from each device? you need to get a URL from the push notification sevice for each device everytime your device connects,
when it does you need to find a way of retrieving the url from each client,
once you do that and your still not receiving push notifications then I would write to microsoft to see if they can see anything to do with the push notifications