I am confused a bit about .bin files. Basically in Linux we use elf, .ko type of files for upgrading the box or to copy in it . But, while upgrading a NAND flash in router or any Networking Gaint products why always .bin files is preferred. Is this is something like converged mix of all the OS related files. Does it possible to see the contents of a bin file. How to play with it. It is something like contents of BootROM. How is is prepared? How do we create and test on this. How Linux support for this. Any historical reasons behind this?
Speaking about routers, those files are usually just snapshots of a router's flash memory, probably compressed and with some headers added. Typical things are a compressed squashfs image or simply gzip'ed snapshot of memory.
There is no such thing as .bin format, it's just a custom array of bytes and every vendor interprets it in some vendor-specific way. Basically this extension means “it's not your business what's in the file, our device/software will handle it”. You can try to identify (thnk, reverse-engineer) what's actually in those files by using file utility or just looking at those files through a hex editor and trying to guess what's going on.
Related
I am tying to scan usb msc in stm32 for audio files. This mp3 files are scattered in many folders which are unknown to the application.
First I scan for directories in the root folder and find folders then I scan folders for mp3 files.
This is very time consuming and for depth of 8 folders with many files in each folder.
Is there any Way to Scan for just for folders which have mp3 file in them using a better approach.
Directory structure for testing is something like this:
It is not clear what your problem might be since you have not provided any code to see how you are scanning, or quantative information on the file/folder structure ("many files" is rather vague), or even specified the media type used.
However a solution that might overcome all the variables of filesystem performance, hardware I/O, driver implementation and media type and make access more deterministic regardless, is to maintain a separate index file or database in a single file in the root directory to map each MP3 file to its path so you need only search the index/database for the MP3 you need (or use it to directly list all MP3's without scanning the file system).
If you maintain that file sorted (or a separate index file that is sorted) then you can use a binary search to find a specific file. Or simply use a real database - though that might be a rather heavyweight solution for this purpose. You might even load the metadata into memory for even faster access, and write it to the filesystem only if it changes.
Either way, the solution I suggest is to isolate your application from the variability of the filesystem/media, and the lack of scalability of FAT in general by maintaining your own "metadata" file(s) indicating what is stored and where so that you can use that to access the files directly without file system scanning using findfirst/findnext semantics, and recursion which is always best avoided, but is the obvious way to scan a directory tree.
Incidentally this is precisely how iTunes works for example. The "iTunes Library.xml" contains meta-data about "songs" including their location. Clearly you need not have anything quite that detailed, but the principle is the same and there may be merit in using XML or JSON for your application given a suitable library for updating and accessing such a file.
By doing that, the performance is more directly within your control rather than dependent on the filesystem, media and/or device driver level. However you still have some control/responsibility over the media and its interface (SPI, SDIO, USB or whatever), and the device I/O layer (DMA, interrupts, polled, bit-banged), and while you may have little control over the choice of FAT and the ELM FatFs implementation, you can certainly impact its performance greatly at the device driver, hardware interface and physical media level.
I want to upgrade my systems in the field using the uboot FIT images.
My system is a custom firmware, booted by uboot. So far the FIT filesystem works very good. It provides a shasum verified upload. I am using uboot scripts to update stuff on the target.
One intriguing type defined in uboot docs is type "filesystem". The actual content could be several things, like maybe tar'ed bunch of files, or an actual collection of separate individual files in one chunk in the FIT.
In another FIT question, Tom Rini implied that a filesystem is really just a binary blob. What goes into it is my problem and that uboot could then just mmc write ... or usb write ... to create the new filesystem on some partition. Is this really the case?
How can I build a filesystem (say FAT), on a host build computer for packaging with FIT?
Thanks, Steve
The creation of a filesystem image will depend on the filesystem itself. In many cases, build systems such as OpenEmbedded or buildroot can help you here as they will create the images for you.
So I have an old dictionary on my pc, pretty old that I cannot find
any track of it's developer or the website (I guess it hasnt even been released
as an official software). I have a personal project of mine and I might need some
of this words translated (about 200-300) and I see that inside the data folder that
contains the database/list of files but Im unable to extract or read this files.
Is there any way to extract or convert these .bin files to a text format or something
readable. I've used some tools like (alcohol 120%, isobuster, magiciso, Izarc) but with
no luck. I keep getting and error message saying it is not a valid cd image file.
So I'm thinking maybe this type of .bin files are not like .bin or .iso cd files that
you can mount and read and something else might be in this case.
If you have any information kindly reply with
your suggestions.
Thank you alot.
You can try using the strings utility to extract the strings out of the file. It comes with any Linux distribution and if you are on Windows, you can get it from Windows Sysinternals.
If you are lucky and the words are not encoded, you may be able to get at the data you are looking for.
.bin is one of those extensions that has been way overused, and could be anything... What did the file come from originally? Do you need to convert these words and store them back in the original file (in their transformed form), and then expect the original app to work correctly?
I used Sphinx4 for some time which really fits my needs. I load a recognizer, pass the audio data to it and use the recognized String in my application.
Right now I'm working on a C application (C++ is unfortunately not an option) where I need something similar and thought that I could use Sphinx3 which is written in C.
The problem is that I don't really know how it is used inside an application and there is no "Hello World"-example as Sphinx4 provides it.
I already compiled and installed sphinxbase and sphinx3 and now I can include the sphinx header files in my application.
Now to my questions:
Is there a "simple" and well documented example application that uses sphinx3 from a C environment?
How can I load up the sphinx3 engine and call a recognizer with my binary audio data?
OR: Do I need to start an application like "sphinx3_decode" and call it from my own application? If so, is there an example application for that?
Thank you in advance!
Best regards,
Robert
It's not recommended to use Sphinx3. From the website:
Sphinx-3 is CMU’s large vocabulary speech recognition system. It’s
older C based decoder that we continue to maintain. It’s planned to
make it obsolete in the future, it’s still most accurate decoder for
large vocabulary tasks. We are using it as a baseline to check the
recognizer accuracy. This decoder is only intended for researchers who
want to evaluate bleeding edge methods in ASR like tree search method.
If you need to use a decoder you should use pocketsphinx. You can find the tutorial and the API documentation on the website
http://cmusphinx.sourceforge.net/wiki/tutorialpocketsphinx
http://cmusphinx.sourceforge.net/api/pocketsphinx/pocketsphinx_8h.html
I Recently worked on an Intregated Project on Punjabi Language.
Here are some steps that we used...
First we recorded the punjabi audio data in a vaccumed room in 16000 hz sample rate.
Then we took the recorded data and segmented it using Praat Software into small wav and raw files of 2 to 30 sec and saved them in a folder named train.
Then we took a system having Linux ie. Ubuntu and installed the required plug in like autoconfig, automake etc and untarred Sphinx 3 along with 4 packages that are cmuclmtk, pocketsphinx, sphinxbase, sphinxtrain.
Then according to the small wav files we made many files like transcription, dic, phone, filler, file id, ccs etc.
Then we opened the terminal and typed –"sphinx_fe” to check the whether the sphinx is functional or not.
Then we created an folder named “man” and then in terminal wrote its path.
Then we run the command- “sphinxtrain –t man setup”. By running this command an folder named “etc” will be formed in “man” folder containing files “feat_paramas” & ”config”.
Changes were made in the in the config file according to our data.
Then we moved all the files that we created before ie. transcription, dic in the etc folder in that is located in man folder.
Then we placed ‘lang1.sh” script in etc folder and remaining 4 scripts in man folder.
Then we opened the path for etc folder in terminal and run command- “lang1.sh”
Then we run series of commands in terminal – “mfcgen2.sh” then “verify3.sh” then “hmm4.sh” and at last “end-test.sh” to get the final result.
Rest if you have worked on Sphinx 4 then you may know about the files that are mentioned above in the steps. I hope this helps you.
Which configuration management tool is the best for FPGA designs, specifically Xilinx FPGA's programmed with VHDL and C for the embedded (microblaze) software?
There isn't a "best", but configuration control solutions that work for software will be OK for FPGAs - the flow is very similar. I use Subversion at work and git at home, and wrote a little on 'why' at my blog.
In other answers, binary files keep getting mentioned - the only binary files I deal with are compilation products (equivalent to software object and executables), so I don't keep them in the version control repository, I keep a zipfile for each release/tag that I create with all the important (and irritatingly slow to reproduce) ones in.
I don't think it much matters what revision control tool you use -- anything that you would consider good in general will probably be OK here. I personally use Git for a sizable Verilog + software project, and I'm quite happy with it.
What will bite you in the ass -- no matter what version control you use -- is this: The Xilinx tools don't generally respect a clean division between "input" and "output" or between (human edited) "source" and (opaque) "binary." Many of the tools like to store some state information, like a last-run time or a hash value, in their "input" files meaning that you'll get lots of false changes. Coregen does this to its .xco files, and project navigator (the main GUI) does this to its .xise files. Also, both tools have a habit of inserting or removing lines for default-valued parameters, seemingly at random.
The biggest issue I've encountered is the work-flow with Coregen: In many cases, at least one of the following is true:
You have to manually edit the HDL files produced by Coregen.
The parameters that went into Coregen are stored somewhere other than the .xco file (usually in what looks like an output file).
You have to copy-and-paste the output from Coregen into your top-level design.
This means that there is no single logical source/master location for your input to the core-generating process. So even if you have the .xco file under version control, there's no expectation that the design you're running corresponds to it. If you re-generate "the same" core from its nominal inputs, you probably won't get the right outputs. And don't even think about merging.
I suggest CM tools that support version labeling and binary files. Most Software CM applications are fine with ASCII text files. They may just store a "difference" file rather than the entire file for updates.
My recommendations: PVCS, ClearCase and Subversion. DO NOT USE Microsoft SourceSafe. I don't like it because it only supports one label per revision.
I've seen Perforce and Subversion used in a couple of FPGA-intensive companies.
We use Perforce, and its great. You can have your code that lives in Linux-land checked in side-by-side with your Specs and Docs that live in Windows-land. And you get branching, labels, etc.
I've seen everything from Clearcase to RCS used, and it is really all okay for this kind of thing. The important thing is to get a good set of check-in policies established for your group, and make sure they stick to it.
And have automated nightly regressions. That way, when someone breaks the rules, they can be identified and publicly shamed.
I have personally used Perforce, Subverion, git and ClearCase for FPGA projects. Since VHDL and C are just text files, any works fine. However be sure to capture the other project and contraint files and any libraries you use.
Also think about what to do with the outputs, e.g. log file and bitstreams. Both tend to be big and the bitstreams are binaries.
Previously I used Subversion but have switched to git two years ago. Git handles FPGA design files just as well as it handles every other text and binary file. Git is all you need for version controlling your files and artifacts.
For building the designs, I recommend just using a single ISE project called "ise" (living in a subdirectory called "ise/"). You can take a look at my (very modest) FPGA open-source project on github for the file layout. I don't bother storing the ISE files at all since they are easy to regenerate. The only things I save are the Verilog files and some ISIM waveform config files. In other projects that use coregen I save the coregen.cgp project file and all of the *.xco scripts for regenerating cores. Then I use a Makefile for actually running coregen on the *.xco files. There are a few other Xilinx-specific files you should version control too: *.ucf, *.coe, *.xcf, etc.
I experimented with using Makefiles and the Xilinx command-line tools but found that ISE did a much better job tracking dependencies and calling the tools with the right arguments. Just don't make the mistake of trying to version control your ise/ project files or you will go mad. Xilinx has something like 300 different file types which change every release. If you want to save a file, you can try the ISE project file itself with a .xise extension. Anything that is hard to recreate, like the golden bitfile that you know works and took 6 hours to build, you might want to copy that and configuration manage it explicitly.