When and when not to use {{...}} inside the AngularJS view file? - angularjs

I am trying to use a video player (the jwplayer) inside my AngularJS project. This post consists with 2 parts: part 1 for background, part 2 is my question. Thanks.
PART 1: Solving the "Error loading player: No playable sources found" problem.
At first the video is not showed, just a black rectangle on the page ui, and a quite misleading console message saying "No suitable players found and fallback enabled".
Hours later I happened to change the jwplayer size configuration from "height:450, width:800" to "height:'100%', width:'100%'". This time jwplayer shows a message on the page ui: "Error loading player: No playable sources found".
That gives me direction. My jwplayer usage looks like this:
<!-- this is my index.html -->
<div id="jw_container">Loading the player ...</div>
<script>
var player = jwplayer("jw_container").setup({
file:"{{model.my_video.video_url}}",
......
Change that file line to a hardcoded absolute video url will work, indicating that is the real problem. So eventually I got:
file: angular.element(document.getElementById('ng-wrapper')).scope().model.my_video.video_url,
and then problem solved, for now. (But still ugly, not intuitive, in my opinion.)
================================ SEPARATOR ===================
PART 2: My real question
Coming from the world of traditional template engines, one might tend to use {{...}} wherever he wants. But in AngularJS, situation is different.
Besides the above example, this is another example bit me before:
<img title="{{my_title}}" src='logo.png'> <!-- This works -->
<img src="{{my_image}}"> <!-- This doesn't. Use ng-src instead. -->
So in general, when and when not to use {{...}} inside the AngularJS view file?

Only for Part 1: If you're working with jwplayer and Angular then I highly recommend calling jwplayer from Angular as opposed to the other way round (what you're doing).
e.g.
myModule.controller('MyController', function ($scope, stuffINeed) {
jwplayer.key = "myKey";
jwplayer("myElement").setup({
file: "MyFileName"
});
As long as jwplayer.js has been loaded (link in index.html or use something like require.js) you're good to go!

Wrap the Jw Player as a Directive. You can use something like this: https://github.com/ds62987/angular-jwplayer

Trying to give my own thoughts on this topic.
Rule #1: Never write {{...}} inside AngularJS's <script>...</script> tag. Simply because AngularJS's template system doesn't work in thay way. Instead, use this:
//This is the usage in the view
angular.element(document.getElementById('the_id')).scope().foo
Alternatively, you can define an extra helper in view file:
//This is another usage in the view
function bar(foo) {
//do something with foo
}
and then use your model in a "usual" way via controller file:
//This is inside controller file
function YourCtrl($scope) {
bar($scope.foo);
}
That is it.
Yet I am still not sure when and when not to use {{...}} inside the html part of view. Leave this part to be answered by someone else. (I am now just a new AngularJS learner in week 2.)

Edit : I added test plunker : http://plnkr.co/edit/BMGN4A
Can you provide a full example? Because I write as below but get message Cannot read property 'videoUrl' of undefined although I have $scope.videodata.videoUrl = "bla bla"; in my controller.
<script type="text/javascript">
jwplayer("myElement").setup({
file: angular.element(document.getElementById('myElement')).scope().videodata.videoUrl,
image : "http://i3.ytimg.com/vi/2hLo6umnjcQ/mqdefault.jpg",
autostart : "false",
id : 'playerID',
width: '700px',
height: '400px',
primary : "flash",
stretching : "uniform",
modes : [{
type : 'html5'
}, {
type : 'download'
}, {
type : 'flash',
src : 'player.swf'
}]
});
</script>

Related

OnsenUI loads page in text, via a splitter

I have previously created a web app, and now I would like to integrate it with OnsenUI to enable my app to be used on all mobile devices as well as the web.
I am using a splitter in a toolbar which will be the header of all pages, and it will redirect the user to other pages when they click an item in it. Clicking the home item successfully redirects to the home page (index, which is already loaded correctly). However, clicking any of the other items in the splitter redirects me to the requested page, but shows the content of the file in text format instead of actually rendering the page. It looks like the following, except it's all jumbled together with no spaces:
searchForTrainer.jade:
//-ons-template(id='searchForTrainer.jade')
ons-page(ng-controller='SearchController' ng-init='showme = false; getAllTrainers();')
ons-toolbar
.left
ons-toolbar-button(ng-click='mySplitter.left.open()')
ons-icon(icon='md-menu')
.center
| Search Trainer
// ***** I cut off the rest of the file for simplicity
// ***** I should still be able to see the toolbar if the page loads correctly
Here is the content of index.jade:
doctype html
html
head
link(rel='stylesheet' href='https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.6/css/bootstrap.min.css')
link(rel='stylesheet', href='/stylesheets/style.css')
link(rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' href='/stylesheets/jquery.datetimepicker.css')
link(rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' href='/stylesheets/ratings.css')
link(rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' href='/stylesheets/searchTrainerTab.css')
link(rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' href='/onsenui/css/onsenui.css')
link(rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' href='/onsenui/css/onsen-css-components.css')
block loadfirst
script(src='https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.5.7/angular.min.js')
script(src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.12.3.min.js"
integrity="sha256-aaODHAgvwQW1bFOGXMeX+pC4PZIPsvn2h1sArYOhgXQ=" crossorigin="anonymous")
script(src='/onsenui/js/onsenui.js')
script(src='/onsenui/js/angular-onsenui.js')
script(src='https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.6/js/bootstrap.min.js')
script(src='/angular/fitnessapp.js')
script(data-require='angular-credit-cards#*', data-semver='3.0.1', src='https://rawgit.com/bendrucker/angular-credit-cards/v3.0.1/release/angular-credit-cards.js')
script(async='', defer='', src='https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/js?key=AIzaSyDcVf7YAPNwa8gUsMCOZNQZA31s5Ojf2n8&libraries=places')
body
ons-splitter(var='mySplitter', ng-controller='RootController as splitter')
ons-splitter-side(side='left', width='220px', collapse='', swipeable='')
ons-page
ons-list
ons-list-item(ng-click="splitter.load('index.jade')", tappable='')
| Home
ons-list-item(ng-click="splitter.load('searchForTrainer.jade')", tappable='')
| Search Trainer
ons-list-item(ng-click="splitter.load('searchForEvent.jade')", tappable='')
| Search Event
ons-list-item(ng-click="splitter.load('trainerAddEvent.jade')", tappable='')
| Create Event
ons-list-item(ng-click="splitter.load('userProfile.jade')", tappable='')
| Profile
ons-list-item(ng-click="splitter.load('addPayment.jade')", tappable='')
| Payment
ons-list-item(ng-click="splitter.load('userSettings.jade')", tappable='')
| Settings
ons-list-item(ng-click="splitter.load('trainerSignup.jade')", tappable='')
| Trainer Application
ons-list-item(ng-click="href='/logout'", tappable='')
| Logout
ons-splitter-content(page='index.jade')
ons-template(id='index.jade')
ons-page(ng-controller='MapController' ng-init='getEvents()')
ons-toolbar
.left
ons-toolbar-button(ng-click='mySplitter.left.open()')
ons-icon(icon='md-menu')
.center
| Fitness App
//-.right
a(href='https://www.paypal.com/webapps/mpp/paypal-popup', title='How PayPal Works', onclick="javascript:window.open('https://www.paypal.com/webapps/mpp/paypal-popup','WIPaypal','toolbar=no, location=no, directories=no, status=no, menubar=no, scrollbars=yes, resizable=yes, width=1060, height=700'); return false;")
img(src='https://www.paypalobjects.com/webstatic/mktg/logo/bdg_now_accepting_pp_2line_w.png', border='0', alt='Now Accepting PayPal')
//- google maps stuff
ons-input#pac-input.controls(type='text', placeholder='Search Box')
div#map.col-md-12
ons-bottom-toolbar
.center
| Fitness App
block scripts
script.
// ***** I cut out javascript related to Google Maps for simplicity
here is the splitter load page function I am using in my angular file:
this.load = function(page) { console.log("The page is: " + page);
mySplitter.content.load(page)
.then(function() {
mySplitter.left.close();
});
};
Has anyone successfully built an Onsen app using Jade?
UPDATE
When I leave the code in html instead of jade, everything works correctly. When I convert it back to jade it shows up as text again.
UPDATE 2
Using Solution 1 from the selected answer, I realized and solved my problem with the guidance from the selected answer on my other post:
Answer
By the looks of it you seem to be using Jade on the server side.
To solve the problem I see a couple possible solutions.
Solution 1:
Make sure that whatever Onsen UI is receiving is pure HTML. You're free to use Jade, but as it stands Onsen does not have Jade bundled inside, so there is no way for it to support it out of the box. However as long as Onsen sees only html it should be fine.
The reason why the ons-template(id='index.jade') works initially is actually because when you serve the page you are actually serving actual html, so when onsen starts the contents of that template are actually pure html.
In searchForTrainer.jade it seems that you are giving it raw jade, which it does not know how to handle. You can handle this on the server side, making sure that the request for the searchForTrainer returns html. Returning jade.renderFile('searchForTrainer.jade') from the server instead of the jade file itself should solve the issue.
Solution 2:
As you noticed as long the contents are inside the initial page everything will be fine. So you could just put all your ons-templates inside the initial page.
If you want to retain your current file structure you can just do
include searchForTrainer.jade
while having an ons-template tag in the file itself. That way in the end the result will be a page with the template already converted into html.
Solution 3:
The final option is to give the raw jade files, but help Onsen understand Jade, so that it can use them properly. To do that you need to include jade.js and modify Onsen UI so that it uses it.
However since Onsen does not currently provide an official API for switching template engines whatever hack we use now might break in the future. It's possible that in the near future a feature like that may be implemented, but in order to do it now we need to wrap some of onsen's internal functions.
Here's a simple example to do it.
module.run(function($onsen) {
var old = $onsen.normalizePageHTML;
ons._internal.normalizePageHTML = $onsen.normalizePageHTML = function(html) {
return old(jade.render(html, {}));
};
});
And here's also a working Demo showing this solution in action.
Note: that demo actually checks for a comment // jade at the beginning just to be safe.
Which solution to choose?
Solution 1 - I think this makes most sense as it retains a clear separation of concerns. If you want to change the templating engine it should be handled only in one place. Onsen does not need to know what you're using on the server as long as it gets what it wants.
Solution 2 - Not the best way to solve the problem, but it may be the easiest to use if you just want things to work. One minus is that with it you would load all the templates at the beginning, which may not be very good.
Solution 3 - While this solution can work I would suggest avoiding it as handling jade on the frontend would result in poor performance. It's could be an option if you actually decide not to rely on the server.

angular-foundation and angular-translate: apply translation into attribute back-text

I'm using angular-translation and angular-foundation modules with AngularJS and have defined Foundation top-bar like this:
<top-bar custom-back-text="true" back-text="My back text">
[...]
</top-bar>
I need to apply translate filter to My back text. Already tried these two solutions but with no success:
example 1 - CODE
<top-bar custom-back-text="true" back-text="'BACK.KEY' | translate">
example 1 - TEXT IN MENU
BACK.KEY
example 2 - CODE
<top-bar custom-back-text="true" back-text="{{ 'BACK.KEY' | translate }}">
example 2 - TEXT IN MENU
'BACK.KEY' | translate
Do I something wrong or is there no possibility to achieve this with these two modules?
Used versions
angular-translate: 2.4.2
angular-foundation: 0.5.1
If you check the js source code of foundation you will find this piece of code that handles back button
if (settings.custom_back_text == true) {
$('h5>a', $titleLi).html(settings.back_text);
} else {
$('h5>a', $titleLi).html('« ' + $link.html());
}
$dropdown.prepend($titleLi);
So it creates new element and adds to dropdown, result of which is that it copies the value you specified in the back_text. By that time "translate" is not resolved so it copies whatever you put there.
A quick hack to do to solve it you could listen for language change by doing
$rootScope.$on("$translateChangeSuccess", function...
As you can see in the piece of code from foundation.js it creates "a" element inside "h5", so you can do something like this
$rootScope.$on("$translateChangeSuccess", function(){
angular.element(".dropdown h5>a").html($filter('translate')('BACK'))
})
where "BACK" is the key used for translation.
But keep in mind that it's not a good practice to manipulate DOM inside controller, so you may create directive for that.
Though there may be better way to achieve it, this could be just quick hack to do the thing.

Google translate widget appears twice

I have a responsive site that uses the google translate widget. The weird thing is that for some time the widget now appears twice, and this seem to be related to the responsive design because if I place the same widget code on a simple html page it only appears once. I have no idea on how to solve this. Has anyone come across this?
Update.
I have discovered that this is caused by jquery.themepunch.showbizpro.min.js, if I remove that one the widget only appears once. I have not found a way to fix this yet but there might be a way. I found this piece of code.
<script>
function googleTranslateElementInit() {
new google.translate.TranslateElement(
{ pageLanguage: 'sv' },
'google_translate_element'
);
/*
To remove the "powered by google",
uncomment one of the following code blocks.
NB: This breaks Google's Attribution Requirements:
https://developers.google.com/translate/v2/attribution#attribution-and-logos
*/
// Native (but only works in browsers that support query selector)
if(typeof(document.querySelector) == 'function') {
document.querySelector('.goog-logo-link').setAttribute('style', 'display: none');
document.querySelector('.goog-te-gadget').setAttribute('style', 'font-size: 0');
}
//If you have jQuery - works cross-browser - uncomment this
jQuery('.goog-logo-link').css('display', 'none');
jQuery('.goog-te-gadget').css('font-size', '0');
}
</script>
This code remove the logo, so I'm thinking that if I use javascript I could check and remove duplicate occurrences of <select class="goog-te-combo"> then I would only have one left, is that possible?
This happened to me using Bootstrap. I had two instances of the Google Translate code - one instance for larger screen sizes and another that was only visible for smaller screens. Both showed up regardless of screen size. Bootstrap classes like visible-xs and hidden-xs do not seem to affect the display of the Google Translate button.
You can set a global counter and make sure it's only called once.
<div id="google_translate_element"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
var duplicate_google_translate_counter = 0;//this stops google adding button multiple times
function googleTranslateElementInit() {
if (duplicate_google_translate_counter == 0) {
new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en'}, 'google_translate_element');
}
duplicate_google_translate_counter++;
}
</script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://translate.google.com/translate_a/element.js?cb=googleTranslateElementInit"></script>
Had the same problem on RoR. Problem caused by cashing pages with turbolinks. I solved it with deprecating cashing all links in (when script loading it adds attr "data-turbolinks="false" to the body-tag)
Hello to all! I had the same issue and I KNOW is not the best practice but I fixed it with CSS just adding overflow: hidden and a right border on it.
It visually fix the problem until we get a solution and really saved time diving into JS files. Hope it works for you too. Cheers!

Drupal - How to add data-attributes to <li> items of a <ul> Menu

This is such a great script called fullPage.js located here: https://github.com/alvarotrigo/fullPage.js
I managed to load the js file and css file and even with the Void Menu Module, managed to call anchor links, but I'm struggling with the data attributes part of the implementation of this cool code! Any help is greatly appreciated! How do I get data-attributes to work in Drupal 7.25? I mean, I need to add them to the menu, so that the html looks something like this:
<ul id="menu">
<li data-menuanchor="firstPage">First slide</li>
<li data-menuanchor="secondPage">Second slide</li>
<li data-menuanchor="3rdPage">Third slide</li>
<li data-menuanchor="4thpage">Fourth slide</li>
</ul>
Just want to add it to the Main Menu in Drupal. Any idea how? Am trying to implement this on my homepage and using the Adaptive Sub-Theme with Display Suite Module installed, if that helps any.
Have added the following to template.php, but it makes no difference at all:
function MY_THEME_NAME_menu_link(&$variables) {
$variables['element']['#attributes']['data-menuanchor'] = substr($variables['element']['href'], 1);
return theme_menu_link($variables);
}
What am I doing wrong here?
EDIT
You can download the sitemaniacs theme here: http://dream-portal.net/dpdowns/MyProblem.zip
You can just download Adaptive Theme from Drupal here and than copy sitemaniacs to your sites/all/themes folder and than just enable the theme and go to your homepage.
There is also a folder called fullPage that is the example of it working perfectly fine without Drupal.
Files to take note of:
/sites/all/themes/sitemaniacs/scripts/custom.js
/sites/all/themes/sitemaniacs/template.php
/sites/all/themes/sitemaniacs/css/example2.css
/sites/all/themes/sitemaniacs/sitemaniacs.info
Let me know if you need anything else, k?
And Thank YOU!!! What I've done is create 4 Basic Pages, and using the Field Formatter Class Module to give the body field a class (when managing the Display) defined as section, than promoted to front page. Than I used HTML within another Node Type and used NodeBlock Module to output it as a menu item within the Menu Bar section of the blocks, with url <front>. Let me know if you need anything else for this, but I can't get it to work using this simple approach. I've tried tons of ways of doing it also, but no go for me. If you find a method that works, or perhaps something is wrong somewhere else, please please let me know.... I'm pulling out my hair on this one.
Have tried straight HTML, and now getting this:
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'top' of undefined jquery.fullPage.js?mzf0rp:506
scrollPage jquery.fullPage.js?mzf0rp:506
doneResizing jquery.fullPage.js?mzf0rp:889
The first error seems to occur in the scrollPage function on this line here:
var dtop = dest !== null ? dest.top : null;
Looks like dest.top is not defined on .top. Any idea why?
Use the Menu Link Attributes module that will let you add custom attributes per menu item.
for "href" you can use <'front'>#4thpage(front without any “cotation”) in path in menu that you create in Structure > Menus and use the Menu Link Attributes module for other attributes

Underscore templates with backbone boilerplate, correct way of doing it, or is there a better template method

Ok, I am playing around with Backbone, node.js, Underscore, Backbone Boilerplate so I have enough knowledge. Been asking questions like crazy as I still can't quite get my head around it. I am currently attempting to use the Underscore library with Backbone Boilerplate to make a very simple template which will allow me to pass in data; then when the model is updated, change the view which would change the template. I believe this is the correct way of doing it, instead of writing HTML code inside my JS file? Stop me if I'm wrong.
The Backbone Boilerplate has its template .fetch() system which I understand. However it would mean writing HTML in my JS I believe. So I wanted to use Underscore to simply pass information from the model to the view to the modules to render the template again (or I might be able to skip the view completely?).
My question is why won't this work, I think it's because I'm not changing it to JSON.
My HTML template:
<div>
<script id="rtemp" type="text/x-underscore-template">
<span><%= title %></span>
</script>​
</div>
And the JavaScript:
define([
// Global application context.
"app",
// Third-party libraries.
"backbone",
"underscore",
"json2"
],
function(app, Backbone) {
var Attempt = app.module();
Attempt.Model = Backbone.Model.extend({});
Attempt.Collection = Backbone.Model.extend({});
Attempt.Views.Tutorial = Backbone.View.extend ({
template: "app/templates/attempt",
render: function(done) {
var tmpl = app.fetchTemplate(this.template);
//console.info(tmpl);
this.$el.html(tmpl({title: 'This is a title'}))
}
});
return Attempt;
});
When I inspect the element it shows in the <div> however it still has the template script tags around it so doesn't show on the page in HTML. I tried using json2 to convert it to JSON first, but that didn't seem to work unless I did something wrong. Is Underscore the best thing to use? I assumed so as it's a Backbone dependency. Or should I use something else. I just want to avoid writing HTML in my JS.
If I understand you right, you're ending up with this HTML:
<div>
<script id="rtemp" type="text/x-underscore-template">
<span>This is a title</span>
</script>​
</div>
That's the right behavior based on the code you're using but that's clearly not the result you want.
The <script> wrapper for templates is used when you're embedding the template inside an HTML page. This is done so that the browser won't try to interpret your template as HTML and to keep the browser from trying to render it on its own. In such cases, you'd have the template embedded in the HTML page like this:
<!-- Some HTML stuff... -->
<script id="rtemp" type="text/x-underscore-template">
<span><%= title %></span>
</script>​
<!-- Some other HTML stuff... -->
and you'd use it like this:
var t = _.template($('#rtemp').html());
var html = t(...)
The $('#rtemp').html() part extracts just the content of the template's <script> wrapper so _.template would only see <span><%= title %></span> and the final processed template would just be a simple <span>. For example: http://jsfiddle.net/ambiguous/dzPzC/
In your case, you're reading the entire <div><script>...</script></div> as the template and feeding that to _.template. The result is that tmpl({title: 'This is a title'}) still includes the <script>, the browser doesn't know what to do with a <script type="text/x-underscore-template"> so the <span> that you're interested in doesn't get rendered at all.
You don't need the <script> wrapper at all, that's only needed when you're embedding a raw template inside some HTML. Your template only needs the the content of your <script>:
<span><%= title %></span>
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/ambiguous/QuwSX/
The argument that you're passing to the template function:
tmpl({ title: '...' })
is fine, the compiled template function just wants to see a JavaScript object. People talk about passing it JSON and often use the toJSON method to prepare data for the template but that's an abuse of terminology; the template really wants an object and JSON is, technically, a string.

Resources