I read in "hadoop design pattern" book, "HBase supports batch queries, so it would be ideal to buffer all the queries we want to execute up to some predetermined size. This constant depends on how many records you can comfortably store in memory before querying HBase."
I tried to search some examples online but couldn't find any, can someone show me the example using java map reduce?
Thanks.
Dan
Is this what you want? You can save HBase Get object in a list and submit the list at the same time. It's a little better than invoke table.get(get) multiple times.
Configuration conf = HBaseConfiguration.create();
pool = new HTablePool(conf, 5);
HTableInterface table = pool.getTable('table');
List<Get> gets = new ArrayList<Get>();
table.get(gets);
Related
My app has profile and work databases (and others) stored locally using Sembast DB.
Please look at the two examples below, which one is a better practice for asynchronous processes?
Example 1:
final profileDBPath = p.join(appDocumentDir.path, dbDirectory, 'profile.db');
final profileDB = await databaseFactoryIo.openDatabase(profileDBPath);
final workDBPath = p.join(appDocumentDir.path, dbDirectory, 'work.db');
final workDB = await databaseFactoryIo.openDatabase(workDBPath);
final workStore = stringMapStoreFactory.store('work');
final profileStore = stringMapStoreFactory.store('profile');
Example 2:
final dbPath = p.join(appDocumentDir.path, dbDirectory, 'database.db');
final database = await databaseFactoryIo.openDatabase(dbPath);
final workStore = stringMapStoreFactory.store('work');
final profileStore = stringMapStoreFactory.store('profile');
So notice that Example 1 is opening two different database files for each profile and work. And Example 2 is using the same database file for both.
The question is which one is better in terms of stability?
For coding simplicity I like Example 2 better but my worry is when in an Async operation Example 2 will crash when they write on the same file at the same time. Any ideas?
Thank you
Example 2 will crash when they write on the same file at the same time
I don't know if that is something your experiment or just an assumption. Sembast database supports multiple concurrent readers and a single writer (single process and single isolate) and will properly use a kind of mutex to ensure data consistency. Concurrent writes will be serialized and should not trigger any crash. And if it does, that's bug that you should fill!
Personally, I would go for a single database, it would allow cross stores transaction for data consistency that 2 databases cannot provide.
I currently have a an application running in the Google App Engine Standard Environment, which, among other things, contains a large database of weather data and a frontend endpoint that generates graph of this data. The database lives in Google Cloud Datastore, and the Python Flask application accesses it via the NDB library.
My issue is as follows: when I try to generate graphs for WeatherData spanning more than about a week (the data is stored for every 5 minutes), my application exceeds GAE's soft private memory limit and crashes. However, stored in each of my WeatherData entities are the relevant fields that I want to graph, in addition to a very large json string containing forecast data that I do not need for this graphing application. So, the part of the WeatherData entities that is causing my application to exceed the soft private memory limit is not even needed in this application.
My question is thus as follows: is there any way to query only certain properties in the entity, such as can be done for specific columns in a SQL-style query? Again, I don't need the entire forecast json string for graphing, only a few other fields stored in the entity. The other approach I tried to run was to only fetch a couple of entities out at a time and split the query into multiple API calls, but it ended up taking so long that the page would time out and I couldn't get it to work properly.
Below is my code for how it is currently implemented and breaking. Any input is much appreciated:
wDataCsv = 'Time,' + ','.join(wData.keys())
qry = WeatherData.time_ordered_query(ndb.Key('Location', loc),start=start_date,end=end_date)
for acct in qry.fetch():
d = [acct.time.strftime(date_string)]
for attr in wData.keys():
d.append(str(acct.dict_access(attr)))
wData[attr].append([acct.time.strftime(date_string),acct.dict_access(attr)])
wDataCsv += '\\n' + ','.join(d)
# Children Entity - log of a weather at parent location
class WeatherData(ndb.Model):
# model for data to save
...
# Function for querying data below a given ancestor between two optional
# times
#classmethod
def time_ordered_query(cls, ancestor_key, start=None, end=None):
return cls.query(cls.time>=start, cls.time<=end,ancestor=ancestor_key).order(-cls.time)
EDIT: I tried the iterative page fetching strategy described in the link from the answer below. My code was updated to the following:
wDataCsv = 'Time,' + ','.join(wData.keys())
qry = WeatherData.time_ordered_query(ndb.Key('Location', loc),start=start_date,end=end_date)
cursor = None
while True:
gc.collect()
fetched, next_cursor, more = qry.fetch_page(FETCHNUM, start_cursor=cursor)
if fetched:
for acct in fetched:
d = [acct.time.strftime(date_string)]
for attr in wData.keys():
d.append(str(acct.dict_access(attr)))
wData[attr].append([acct.time.strftime(date_string),acct.dict_access(attr)])
wDataCsv += '\\n' + ','.join(d)
if more and next_cursor:
cursor = next_cursor
else:
break
where FETCHNUM=500. In this case, I am still exceeding the soft private memory limit for queries of the same length as before, and the query takes much, much longer to run. I suspect the problem may be with Python's garbage collector not deleting the already used information that is re-referenced, but even when I include gc.collect() I see no improvement there.
EDIT:
Following the advice below, I fixed the problem using Projection Queries. Rather than have a separate projection for each custom query, I simply ran the same projection each time: namely querying all properties of the entity excluding the JSON string. While this is not ideal as it still pulls gratuitous information from the database each time, generating individual queries of each specific query is not scalable due to the exponential growth of necessary indices. For this application, as each additional property is negligible additional memory (aside form that json string), it works!
You can use projection queries to fetch only the properties of interest from each entity. Watch out for the limitations, though. And this still can't scale indefinitely.
You can split your queries across multiple requests (more scalable), but use bigger chunks, not just a couple (you can fetch 500 at a time) and cursors. Check out examples in How to delete all the entries from google datastore?
You can bump your instance class to one with more memory (if not done already).
You can prepare intermediate results (also in the datastore) from the big entities ahead of time and use these intermediate pre-computed values in the final stage.
Finally you could try to create and store just portions of the graphs and just stitch them together in the end (only if it comes down to that, I'm not sure how exactly it would be done, I imagine it wouldn't be trivial).
I am trying to update 100's of objects in my Job which is scheduled every two hours.
I have articles table in my Model. All articles are parsed and then different attributes are saved for each article.
First i query to get all unparsed articles and then parse each URL which is saved against article and save the received attributes.
Below is my code
articles = Articles.objects.filter(status = 0) #100's of articles
for art in articles:
try:
url = art.link
result = ArticleParser(URL) #Custom function which will do all the parsing
art.author = result.articleauthor
art.description = result.articlecontent[:5000]
art.imageurl = result.articleImage
art.status = 1
art.save()
except Exception as e:
art.author = ""
art.description = ""
art.imageurl = ""
art.status = 2
art.save()
The thing is when this job is running CPU utilization is very high also DB process utilization is very high. I am trying to pin point when and where it spikes.
Question: Is this the right way to update multiple objects or is there any better way to do it? Any suggestions.
Appreciate your help.
Regards
Edit 1: Sorry for the confusion. There is some explanation to do. The fields like author, desc etc they will be different for every article they will be returned after i parse the URL. The reason i am updating in loop is because these fields will be different for every iteration according to the URL. I have updated the code i hope it helps clearing the confusion.
You are doing 100s of DB operations in a relatively tight loop, so it is expected that there is some load on the DB.
If you have a lot of articles, make sure you have an index on the status column to avoid a table scan.
You can try disabling autocommit and wrapping the whole update in one transaction instead.
From my understanding, you do NOT want to set the fields author, description and imageurl to same value on all articles, so QuerySet.update won't work for you.
Django recommends this way when you want to update or delete multi-objects: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.6/topics/db/optimization/#use-queryset-update-and-delete
1.Better not to use 'Exception', need to specify concretely: KeyError, IndexError etc.
2.Data can be created once. Something like this:
data = dict(
author=articleauthor,
description=articlecontent[:5000],
imageurl=articleImage,
status=1
)
Articles.objects.filter(status=0).update(**data)
To Edit 1: Probably want to set up a periodic tasks celery. That is, for each query to a separate task. For help see this documentation.
I executed some query like "Address:Jack*". It show numFound = 5214 and display 100 documents in results page(I changed default display results from 10 to 100).
How can I get all documents.
I remember myself doing &rows=2147483647
2,147,483,647 is integer's maximum value. I recall using a number bigger than that once and having a NumberFormatException because it couldn't be parsed into an int. I don't know if they use Long nowadays, but 2 billion rows is normally more than enough.
Small note:
Be careful if you are planning to do this in production. If you do a query like * : * and your index is big, you could transferring a couple of gigabytes in that query.
If you know you won't have many docs, go ahead and use integer's max value.
On the other hand, if you are doing a one-time script and just need to dump all results (for example document ID's) then this approach is valid, if you don't mind waiting 3-5 minutes for a query to return.
Don't use &rows=2147483647
Don't use Integer.MAX_VALUE(2147483647) as value of rows in production. This will heavily slow down your query even if you have a small resultset, because solr preallocates a queue in this size. see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7580
I strongly suggest to use Exporting Result Sets
It’s possible to export fully sorted result sets using a special rank query parser and response writer specifically designed to work together to handle scenarios that involve sorting and exporting millions of records.
Or I suggest to use Deep Paging.
Simple Pagination is a easy thing when you have few documents to read and all you have to do is play with start and rows parameters. But this is not a feasible way when you have many documents, I mean hundreds of thousands or even millions.
This is the kind of thing that could bring your Solr server to their knees.
For typical applications displaying search results to a human user,
this tends to not be much of an issue since most users don’t care
about drilling down past the first handful of pages of search results
— but for automated systems that want to crunch data about all of the
documents matching a query, it can be seriously prohibitive.
This means that if you have a website and are paging search results, a real user do not go so further but consider on the other hand what can happen if a spider or a scraper try to read all the website pages.
Now we are talking of Deep Paging.
I’ll suggest to read this amazing post:
https://lucidworks.com/post/coming-soon-to-solr-efficient-cursor-based-iteration-of-large-result-sets/
And take a look at this document page:
https://solr.apache.org/guide/pagination-of-results.html
And here is an example that try to explain how to paginate using the cursors.
SolrQuery solrQuery = new SolrQuery();
solrQuery.setRows(500);
solrQuery.setQuery("*:*");
solrQuery.addSort("id", ORDER.asc); // Pay attention to this line
String cursorMark = CursorMarkParams.CURSOR_MARK_START;
boolean done = false;
while (!done) {
solrQuery.set(CursorMarkParams.CURSOR_MARK_PARAM, cursorMark);
QueryResponse rsp = solrClient.query(solrQuery);
String nextCursorMark = rsp.getNextCursorMark();
for (SolrDocument d : rsp.getResults()) {
...
}
if (cursorMark.equals(nextCursorMark)) {
done = true;
}
cursorMark = nextCursorMark;
}
Returning all the results is never a good option as It would be very slow in performance.
Can you mention your use case ?
Also, Solr rows parameter helps you to tune the number of the results to be returned.
However, I don't think there is a way to tune rows to return all results. It doesn't take a -1 as value.
So you would need to set a high value for all the results to be returned.
What you should do is to first create a SolrQuery shown below and set the number of documents you want to fetch in a batch.
int lastResult=0; //this is for processing the future batch
String query = "id:[ lastResult TO *]"; // just considering id for the sake of simplicity
SolrQuery solrQuery = new SolrQuery(query).setRows(500); //setRows will set the required batch, you can change this to whatever size you want.
SolrDocumentList results = solrClient.query(solrQuery).getResults(); //execute this statement
Here I am considering an example of search by id, you can replace it with any of your parameter to search upon.
The "lastResult" is the variable you can change after execution of the first 500 records(500 is the batch size) and set it to the last id got from the results.
This will help you execute the next batch starting with last result from previous batch.
Hope this helps. Shoot up a comment below if you need any clarification.
For selecting all documents in dismax/edismax via Solarium php client, the normal query syntax : does not work. To select all documents set the default query value in solarium query to empty string. This is required as the default query in Solarium is :. Also set the alternative query to :. Dismax/eDismax normal query syntax does not support :, but the alternative query syntax does.
For more details following book can be referred
http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-php-integration/book
As the other answers pointed out, you can configure the rows to be max integer to yield back all the results for a query.
I would recommend though to use Solr feature of pagination, and build a function that will return for you all the results using the cursorMark API. The gist of it is you set the cursorMark parameter to '*', you set the page size(rows parameter), and on each result you'll get a cursorMark for the next page, so you execute the same query only with the cursorMark given from the last result. This way you'll have more flexibility on how much of the results you want back, in a much more performant way.
The way I dealt with the problem is by running the query twice:
// Start with your (usually small) default page size
solrQuery.setRows(50);
QueryResponse response = solrResponse(query);
if (response.getResults().getNumFound() > 50) {
solrQuery.setRows(response.getResults().getNumFound());
response = solrResponse(query);
}
It makes a call twice to Solr, but gets you all matching records....with the small performance penalty.
query.setRows(Integer.MAX_VALUE);
works for me!!
When I first started developing this project, there was no requirement for generating large files, however it is now a deliverable.
Long story short, GAE just doesn't play nice with any large scale data manipulation or content generation. The lack of file storage aside, even something as simple as generating a pdf with ReportLab with 1500 records seems to hit a DeadlineExceededError. This is just a simple pdf comprised of a table.
I am using the following code:
self.response.headers['Content-Type'] = 'application/pdf'
self.response.headers['Content-Disposition'] = 'attachment; filename=output.pdf'
doc = SimpleDocTemplate(self.response.out, pagesize=landscape(letter))
elements = []
dataset = Voter.all().order('addr_str')
data = [['#', 'STREET', 'UNIT', 'PROFILE', 'PHONE', 'NAME', 'REPLY', 'YS', 'VOL', 'NOTES', 'MAIN ISSUE']]
i = 0
r = 1
s = 100
while ( i < 1500 ):
voters = dataset.fetch(s, offset=i)
for voter in voters:
data.append([voter.addr_num, voter.addr_str, voter.addr_unit_num, '', voter.phone, voter.firstname+' '+voter.middlename+' '+voter.lastname ])
r = r + 1
i = i + s
t=Table(data, '', r*[0.4*inch], repeatRows=1 )
t.setStyle(TableStyle([('ALIGN',(0,0),(-1,-1),'CENTER'),
('INNERGRID', (0,0), (-1,-1), 0.15, colors.black),
('BOX', (0,0), (-1,-1), .15, colors.black),
('FONTSIZE', (0,0), (-1,-1), 8)
]))
elements.append(t)
doc.build(elements)
Nothing particularly fancy, but it chokes. Is there a better way to do this? If I could write to some kind of file system and generate the file in bits, and then rejoin them that might work, but I think the system precludes this.
I need to do the same thing for a CSV file, however the limit is obviously a bit higher since it's just raw output.
self.response.headers['Content-Type'] = 'application/csv'
self.response.headers['Content-Disposition'] = 'attachment; filename=output.csv'
dataset = Voter.all().order('addr_str')
writer = csv.writer(self.response.out,dialect='excel')
writer.writerow(['#', 'STREET', 'UNIT', 'PROFILE', 'PHONE', 'NAME', 'REPLY', 'YS', 'VOL', 'NOTES', 'MAIN ISSUE'])
i = 0
s = 100
while ( i < 2000 ):
last_cursor = memcache.get('db_cursor')
if last_cursor:
dataset.with_cursor(last_cursor)
voters = dataset.fetch(s)
for voter in voters:
writer.writerow([voter.addr_num, voter.addr_str, voter.addr_unit_num, '', voter.phone, voter.firstname+' '+voter.middlename+' '+voter.lastname])
memcache.set('db_cursor', dataset.cursor())
i = i + s
memcache.delete('db_cursor')
Any suggestions would be very much appreciated.
Edit:
Above I had documented three possible solutions based on my research, plus suggestions etc
They aren't necessarily mutually exclusive, and could be a slight variation or combination of any of the three, however the gist of the solutions are there. Let me know which one you think makes the most sense, and might perform the best.
Solution A: Using mapreduce (or tasks), serialize each record, and create a memcache entry for each individual record keyed with the keyname. Then process these items individually into the pdf/xls file. (use get_multi and set_multi)
Solution B: Using tasks, serialize groups of records, and load them into the db as a blob. Then trigger a task once all records are processed that will load each blob, deserialize them and then load the data into the final file.
Solution C: Using mapreduce, retrieve the keynames and store them as a list, or serialized blob. Then load the records by key, which would be faster than the current loading method. If I were to do this, which would be better, storing them as a list (and what would the limitations be...I presume a list of 100,000 would be beyond the capabilities of the datastore) or as a serialized blob (or small chunks which I then concatenate or process)
Thanks in advance for any advice.
Here is one quick thought, assuming it is crapping out fetching from the datastore. You could use tasks and cursors to fetch the data in smaller chunks, then do the generation at the end.
Start a task which does the initial query and fetches 300 (arbitrary number) records, then enqueues a named(!important) task that you pass the cursor to. That one in turn queries [your arbitrary number] records, and then passes the cursor to a new named task as well. Continue that until you have enough records.
Within each task process the entities, then store the serialized result in a text or blob property on a 'processing' model. I would make the model's key_name the same as the task that created it. Keep in mind the serialized data will need to be under the API call size limit.
To serialize your table pretty fast you could use:
serialized_data = "\x1e".join("\x1f".join(voter) for voter in data)
Have the last task (when you get enough records) kick of the PDf or CSV generation. If you use key_names for you models you, should be able to grab all of the entities with encoded data by key. Fetches by key are pretty fast, you'll know the model's keys since you know the last task name. Again, you'll want to be mindful size of your fetches from the datastore!
To deserialize:
list(voter.split('\x1f') for voter in serialized_data.split('\x1e'))
Now run your PDF / CSV generation on the data. If splitting up the datastore fetches alone does not help you'll have to look into doing more of the processing in each task.
Don't forget in the 'build' task you'll want to raise an exception if any of the interim models are not yet present. Your final task will automatically retry.
Some time ago I faced the same problem with GAE. After many attempts I just moved to another web hosting since I could do it. Nevertheless, before moving I had 2 ideas how to resolve it. I haven't implemented them, but you may try to.
First idea is to use SOA/RESTful service on another server, if it is possible. You can even create another application on GAE in Java, do all the work there (I guess with Java's PDFBox it will take much less time to generate PDF), and return result to Python. But this option needs you to know Java and also to divide your app to several parts with terrible modularity.
So, there's another approach: you can create a "ping-pong" game with a user's browser. The idea is that if you cannot make everything in a single request, force browser to send you several. During first request make only a part of work which fits 30 seconds limit, then save the state and generate 'ticket' - unique identifier of a 'job'. Finally, send the user response which is simple page with redirect back to your app, parametrized by a job ticket. When you get it. just restore state and proceed with the next part of job.