I have a Silverlight 4 application which uses RIA Services.
I updated Ria Services SP1 to SP2.
In my local pc my application works without any issues but when I deploy it to a server and I try to use it I get a very annoying message:
"HTTP 404. The resource you are looking for (or one of its dependencies) could have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable. Please review the following URL and make sure that it is spelled correctly"
Before my application worked perfectly I just applied the ria services sp2 upgrade.
Ria Servcies is not installed on the server but the necessary dlls are in the bin folder.
Anybody can help me?
l.
Install RIA on the server... that way you can be sure all the correct DLLs are installed and registered in the right place on the machine.
You'll need to run msiexec with SERVER=TRUE
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff426912(v=vs.91).aspx
Related
I have deployed an Website built with angularjs and a Web Service Running Nancyfx framework rather than the "suggested" Web Api. I also use 2 SQL Databases.
I did this from Visual Studio where I have my project running. However the app (still in development) was developed locally on my mac and then just copied in visual studio.
Since I would be working with a friend of mine on it (who also uses mac) and we already have it on bitbucket with Git (my local version) I was wondering if it was possible to 'Set up deployment from source control' but only for the "website" part, meaning the angularjs. The web service needs to obviously be deployed from Visual Studio (I'm the only one working on that part).
Is there any way to achieve this? If I set up deployment from source control and then publish to the website from visual studio, would this override the existing version and current deployment last updated from Git? will it get denied publishing since it's set up from Git?
I am not sure how to better approach this.
The dirty way would be to set git for me and my friend on my local "app" folder of my Visual Studio solution so that I get his changes and then it's my job to publish it to azure via Visual Studio.
Turned out that what i needed is exactly this: Publish WebAPI and MVC projects to same Azure Web Site?
I therefore split my webservice (API) project so it's by itself and published that to mywebsite/api while my app resides on mywebsite/app so that I can publish my webservice changes from visual studio without problems, and also publish the changes to my angularjs app via git.
I haven't encountered any downside atm of doing this but it seems this is the best approach.
I’m new to vs2010 and the entity framework (and ASP.NET MVC as well....I’m from a winforms vs2005 background) as well as the azure platform and am starting a project using these technologies soon.
I’ve installed vs2010 and the windows azure sdk kit for vs2010 and am running through this tutorial, Deploying an ASP.NET Web Application to a Windows Azure Cloud Service and SQL Database.
http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/develop/net/tutorials/cloud-service-with-sql-database/
I’ve got as far as the ‘Add SQL support’ section, followed the instructions and when I compile and run no database is being created.
And I’m using sql server 2008 r2.
Any ideas why this is the case? Nothing at all is being shown in the sql server log. My connection details look fine, am I missing some kind of add on or some permission settings need changing?
Cheers,
I've sorted this myself. If you wish to know the answers I've posted them in the comments on the tutorial page, just follow the link (names Mathew in the comments section).
http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/develop/net/tutorials/cloud-service-with-sql-database/
I've developed a Lync Silverlight application and it is working on my local machine. Then I needed to add this Silverlight to a Sharepoint site, thus i used Silverlight web part. It is OK on my local Sharepoint site but when i install it to server i could not see the Silverlight and not getting error.
I am using web service on my Silverlight application. I check that server can access to web services. My development environment is Visual Studio 2010 and Lync Server 2010. Also I am using Sharepoint 2010.
Here is what i tried for the solution:
Check the whether IIS is configured for xap - OK
I tried to install xap file through Sharepoint module, it did not work.
I tried to use a visual web part, it did not work.
I tried to embed xap file to an HTML page for debugging, there was no error.
Now i am stuck. Any suggestion will be appreciated.
Have you cross-verify with which Silverlight sdk version you have developed your silverlight application.
And server is having that version installed?
if it's working fine with your local server then it also works fine with another server.
regards.
I am trying to deploy a LightSwitch application to a hosted ASP.NET webserver in my company. The application access data stored on a SQL Server. My webserver admin is asking me if there are any special prerequisites needed for it to run. I've been reviewing the deployment guide
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bethmassi/archive/2010/09/23/configuring-a-machine-to-host-a-3-tier-lightswitch-application.aspx
The article lists that there was a server component, but that it might change when RTM arrived:
NOTE: The team is looking at simplifying this process and possibly making the LightSwitch server component pre-reqs go away so this process will likely change for RTM.
This other MSDN article states that there are prerequisites.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg481779.aspx
My webserver admin keeps saying there's nothing to install on the ASP.NET web server other than .NET 4.0.
Am I missing something?
Server setup procedures haven't changed since Beta 1 (although of course the runtime has changed). It's pretty simple; the prerequisites article that you cited has the correct information. Basically the process is:
Install the Web Platform Installer if you don't already have it installed
Fire up the WPI and search for the LightSwitch runtime
Install!
As mentioned in the article, you'll need to decide whether you want to install a new instance of SQL Server locally with the prerequisites. If you've already planned for a production SQL Server, you'll want to choose the "without local SQL" option.
I don't have a specific answer, but I would stand up a VM with the appropriate version of windows server on it and run through an install on a do novo machine. Should confirm or deny what your server admin says . . .
I have a need to host WCF RIA Services outside IIS on a client machine. After reading the following threads:
http://forums.silverlight.net/forums/p/182302/413287.aspx
Can WCF RIA Services be self hosted?
http://forums.silverlight.net/forums/p/213861/512468.aspx
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-CA/silverlightdeveloper/thread/804341f3-9f1e-420b-9cdc-c1334bd9302f
I gave up on that idea due to the "AspNetCompatibilityRequirementsAttribute" that RIA Service uses and started researching alternative solutions.
However, just yesterday I read more about Visual Studio LightSwitch and the fact that uses WCF RIA Services internally. With LightSwitch, you can deploy your appliction in a 2-tier scenario on the desktop that gets installed using ClickOnce and runs as a Silverlight out-of-browser application that can access data without connectiong to IIS.
Does anyone know how this can be accomplished?
Thank you in advance
Lightswitch uses Visual Studio's Cassini server in the 2-tier scenario. I don't know much more about how it's hosted. In summary, it's still an ASP.NET compatible environment but this time with dependencies on Visual Studio.