I am writing a data entry application and am having problems dealing with add vs edit vs view 'modes' of the app.
The scenario: From a window, the user selects items in two combo boxes and then clicks a button. If the combo box selections don't match an existing record, the form should open with a new record ready to have values inserted. If the selections DO match an existing record, this record should be opened with all the textboxes in the form in 'Readonly' mode. Should the user wish to modify the existing data, they click the form's Edit button which sets the textboxes as 'Editable'.
I'm new to wpf, but in my vba apps, I'd normally have a DataMode property and a ToggleControls method which would loop through the TabControl's TabItems and then loop through the TabItems' controls, setting the IsReadOnly property of any TextBox controls found based on the 'DataMode' property. However, I have doubts about whether this is the path to follow in wpf.
So, my question is, do i use the approach above? If so, how do I access the controls in a TabItem. This doesn't work: foreach (Control ctrl in MyTabCtrl) { //if Textbox do stuff }.
If this isn't the way to do it, can someone show me the way? I'm guessing it's either a template / style issue or something to do with setting the data as readonly somehow, and then binding the TextBox's IsReadOnly property to the state of the data. Edit: Oh, or that ViewStateManager thing. All of which i know little about.
An easy approach would be
In Code behind declare a DependencyProperty named IsReadOnly
public static readonly DependencyProperty IsReadOnlyProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
"IsReadOnly",
typeof (bool),
typeof (MainWindow)
);
public bool IsReadOnly
{
get { return (bool) GetValue(IsReadOnlyProperty); }
set { SetValue(IsReadOnlyProperty, value); }
}
Implement the Buttons Click event, so that IsReadOnly gets false on Click
private void Button_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
IsReadOnly = false;
}
Bind the TextBoxes to the IsReadonly property using DataBinding
<TextBox IsReadOnly="{Binding Path=IsReadOnly, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType=Window}, Mode=OneWay}" />
This binding assumes that your code behind is not your DataContext and you therefore have to bind relatively to the Window/ UserControl which the CodeBehind is applied to.
This way the TextBoxes listen to changes on this property. When it switches, they change their ReadOnly state automatically.
You can use DataContext :
Bind the datacontext of your tabControl to your record (with the button event click write
this.Canvas.DataContext = _yourRecord for sample)
public void bntEvent_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// Do matching and put the result in result field
MyTabCtrl.DataContext = false;
}
Bind IsReadOnly/IsEnable property of your textboxs on your datacontext and use a converter to return true/false value
<TextBox IsReadOnly="{Binding .}" />
See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.data.ivalueconverter.aspx for more informations about Converters.
I hope I help you and you understand my bad English.
Good bye
Related
I asked a similar question a while back here WPF MVVM User Control. I got some answers, but they were way off, so I guess I wasn't clear in what I want to do....
I am working on a WPF application using MVVM. The app is built using a component based approach, so I have some user controls that I've defined that will be used throughout the application. As an example, I have an Address control. I want to use it an multiple places throughout the application. Here's an example. See here:
http://sdrv.ms/1aD775H
The part with the green border is the Address control. The control has its own View Model.
When I place it on a window or other control, I need to tell it the PK of the customer to load addresses for. So I created a Customer ID DependencyProperty:
public partial class AddressView : UserControl
{
public AddressView()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
public static DependencyProperty CustomerIdProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("CustomerId", typeof(int), typeof(AddressView),
new UIPropertyMetadata(0, AddressView.CustomerIdPropertyChangedCallback, AddressView.CustomerIdCoerce, true));
public int CustomerId
{
// THESE NEVER FIRE
get { return (int)GetValue(CustomerIdProperty); }
set { SetValue(CustomerIdProperty, value); }
}
private static void CustomerIdPropertyChangedCallback(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs args)
{
// THIS NEVER FIRES
AddressView instance = (AddressView)d;
instance.CustomerId = (int)args.NewValue;
}
enter code here
private static object CustomerIdCoerce(DependencyObject d, object value)
{
return value; // <=== THIS FIRES ON STARTUP
}
}
Then in the MainWindowView I have:
<vw:AddressView Grid.Row="1"
Grid.Column="0"
x:Name="AddressList"
CustomerId="{Binding ElementName=TheMainWindow, Path=SelectedCustomer.Id, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
Note my comments in the user control's CS. The Coerce fires on startup. The callback never fires, nor do the CustomerId getter or setter.
What I would like to happen seems simple, I just can't make it work....
When a customer is selected the CustomerId should be passed to the Address UserControl. Then in the VM for the Address UserControl should handle getting & saving the data.
So, again, 2 questions:
1) Anyone see what's wrong?
2) How does the UserControl DP send the PK to the ViewModel?
If anyone's interested, my sample project is here: http://sdrv.ms/136bj91
Thanks
Your CustomerId getter and setter will never fire in this situation. They are there simply as helper methods in case you want to access the CustomerIdProperty property from your code behind.
Your CustomerIdPropertyChangedCallback method will not fire because your binding expression is incorrect. You need to bind to the DataContext of MainWindow and not the window itself:
...
CustomerId="{Binding ElementName=TheMainWindow, Path=DataContext.SelectedCustomer.Id}"
...
Also, make sure that you are calling the INotifyPropertyChanged PropertyChanged event when the property bound to the ComboBox is changed.
Try this :
CustomerId="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource FindAncestor,
AncestorType={x:Type Window}}, Path=DataContext.YourSelectedItem.TheProperty}"
I am not sure how to manage your seleted item in window, so please change yourSelectedItem.TheProperty accordingly.
I am trying to bind the IsEnabled property of a button to properties of the window's CollectionViewSource. I am doing this to implement First/Previous/Next/Last buttons and want the First and Previous to be disabled when the view is on the first item etc.
I have the collection view source set up, UI controls binding to it correctly, with access to its view in code so the click event handlers work fine in navigating through the view.
<CollectionViewSource x:Key="cvMain" />
The DockPanel is the root element of the window
<DockPanel DataContext="{StaticResource cvMain}">
FoJobs is an observable collection, cvJobs is a CollectionView that I use in the button's click handler
private void Window_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) {
((CollectionViewSource)Resources["cvMain"]).Source = FoJobs;
cvJobs = (CollectionView)((CollectionViewSource)Resources["cvMain"]).View;
}
I have tried this but get a binding error "BindingExpression path error: '' property not found on 'object' ''ListCollectionView'"
<Button Name="cbFirst" Click="cbMove_Click" IsEnabled="{Binding Source={StaticResource cvMain}, Converter={StaticResource CurrPos2BoolConverter}}" />
I am trying to do with a converter first but figure a style with triggers would be more efficient, but cant get access to the collection view. Even though the underlying datacontext is set to a collection view source, the binding is passed to the converter as the view's source (if I dont explicity set the binding's Source, as above), which has no currency properties (CurrentPosition, Count etc).
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Why don't you use a RoutedCommand for this(even if you don't use MVVM that is)?
say something like:
<Button x:Name="nextButton"
Command="{x:Static local:MainWindow.nextButtonCommand}"
Content="Next Button" />
and in your code-behind:
public static RoutedCommand nextButtonCommand = new RoutedCommand();
public MainWindow() {
InitializeComponent();
CommandBinding customCommandBinding = new CommandBinding(
nextButtonCommand, ExecuteNextButton, CanExecuteNextButton);
nextButton.CommandBindings.Add(customCommandBinding); // You can attach it to a top level element if you wish say the window itself
}
private void CanExecuteNextButton(object sender, CanExecuteRoutedEventArgs e) {
e.CanExecute = /* Set to true or false based on if you want button enabled or not */
}
private void ExecuteNextButton(object sender, ExecutedRoutedEventArgs e) {
/* Move code from your next button click handler in here */
}
You can also apply one of the suggestions from Explicitly raise CanExecuteChanged() to manually re-evaluate Button.isEnabled state.
This way your encapsulating logic relating to the button in one area.
I have a form with two different UserControls - one that contains a Telerik RadGridView and the other that that contains a Telerik DataForm.
The grid usercontrol is bound to a ViewModel that includes a property that exposes the Items collection that the grid is bound to.
When I bind the form to that property, everything works fine.
But I need to access additional info in the form control that really doesn't belong in the grid control's viewmodel.
So I thought I'd add a property to the form usercontrol, and bind it to the items collection:
<local:FormControl x:Name="formControl"
ItemsSource="{Binding items}"
/>
In the form's code-behind, I added a normal property:
private object itemsSource;
public object ItemsSource
{
get { return this.itemsSource; }
set { this.itemsSource = value; }
}
And this didn't work, of course. I got errors about having to use a DependencyProperty. Which I thought was reassuring - the page was actually trying to bind to the property I thought it should.
So I converted this to a DependencyProperty:
public static DependencyProperty ItemsSourceProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("ItemsSource", typeof(object), typeof(FormControl));
public object ItemsSource
{
get { return GetValue(ItemsSourceProperty); }
set { SetValue(ItemsSourceProperty, value); }
}
That compiled and ran without errors. Except, of course, that the control's viewmodel didn't have any items. So next was to try to pass the ItemsSource property to the form control's viewmodel:
public FormControl()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.DataContext = new FormControlVM(this.ItemsSource);
...
And this didn't work. ItemsSource was null when FormControl() was constructed. So I added a setItemsSource() method to the viewmodel, and called it in the ItemsSource property's set function. This didn't work, either. The xaml is apparently binding to the property, but it seems to do it without calling the property's set function.
So I decided to listen to the ValueChanged event, on the DependencyProperty:
public FormControl()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.DataContext = new FormControlVM();
DependencyPropertyDescriptor prop =
DependencyPropertyDescriptor.FromProperty(FormControl.ItemsSourceProperty, this.GetType());
prop.AddValueChanged(this, delegate
{
FormControlVM formControlVM = (FormControlVM)this.DataContext;
formControlVM.setItemsSource(this.ItemsSource);
});
...
And it's still not working. The ValueChanged delegate never seems to get called.
This seems like it should be a simple thing, but I've not been able to find examples on-line, and I've tried every combination I can conceive of.
Any ideas as to how I should handle this?
============ Additional info on the binding ============
Will was asking for info on the xaml that does the binding.
If I put this in page that contains the user control, binding the user control to the viewmodel of the page:
<local:FormControl x:Name="formControl"
Grid.Column="2"
DataContext="{Binding}"
/>
And then this in the user control, binding the form in the user control to the itemsCollection of the page's viewmodel:
<telerik:RadDataForm
ItemsSource="{Binding itemsCollection}"
Header="View Item:"
CommandButtonsVisibility="None"
AutoGenerateFields="False"
/>
Then everything works fine.
But the problem is that I can't bind the user control to the viewmodel of the page. I need to have the user control's viewmodel expose information that the page's viewmodel should not be seeing.
And I can't have the form in the user control reaching outside of the user control, binding to a property on the page's viewmodel. It's a violation of encapsulation, that will make using the user control on a different page much more complicated, and severely limit how I might modify the internals of the control in the future. (The page should not know anything about the controls within the user control, the controls within the user control should not know anything about the page.)
When I include the user control on a page, I want to bind the user control to a property of the page's viewmodel, and I want any controls within the user control to bind to properties of the user control, or of the user control's viewmodel.
I'd think this was a fairly common occurrence. But I've not been able to find any examples of how it might be done.
To restate the problem: I have a UserControl, that contains an embedded Telerik DataForm control. I need to bind the ItemsSource property of the embedded DataForm to a property of the DataContext of the page on which my UserControl is placed.
If the UserControl did not have its DataContext set, it would inherit the DataContext of the page, and I could easily bind the embedded DataForm's ItemsSource property to a property of it, but the UserControl has it's own DataContext.
If the UserControl was written to be used only on this page, I could bind the embedded DataForm's ItemsSource property to a property of the page, using RelativeSource binding. But this UserControl is intended to be used in a number of places, and cannot have silent dependencies on properties outside of the UserControl. I need to make the dependency explicit.
Creating a DependencyProperty on the UserControl is the right approach, but there's no need to try to replicate the property in the UserControl's viewmodel.
What I need to do is to
1: Add a DependencyProperty to the UserControl:
public QueryableCollectionView ItemsSource
{
get { return (QueryableCollectionView)GetValue(ItemsSourceProperty); }
set { SetValue(ItemsSourceProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty ItemsSourceProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("ItemsSource", typeof(QueryableCollectionView), typeof(FormControl));
Note: I do not need to implement a call-back function.
2: Bind the embedded DataForm's ItemsProperty to this new DependencyProperty of the UserControl, using RelativeSource binding:
<UserControl
...>
<telerik:RadDataForm
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=ItemsSource, RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType={x:Type UserControl}}}"
/>
</UserControl>
3: Make the viewModel of the page visible, with the proper type (DataContext has type object):
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
public MainWIndow()
{
this.InitializeComponent();
this.DataContext = new MainWindowVM();
}
public MainWindowVM viewModel
{ get { return this.DataContext as MainWindowVM; } }
}
4: On the page, bind the UserControl's new ItemsProperty DependencyProperty to the appropriate property of the page's viewmodel, again using RelativeSource binding:
<Window
...>
<local:FormControl
ItemsSource="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type telerik:RadPane}},Path=viewModel.items}"
/>
</Window>
This is a running question that I have updated to hopefully be a little more clear.
In short what I am trying to accomplish is pass a property from a listbox selected item to the viewmodel so that this property can be used within a new query. In the code below the Listbox inherits databinding from the parent object. The listbox contains data templates (user controls) used to render out detailed results.
The issue I am having is that within the user control I have an expander which when clicked calls a command from the ViewModel. From what I can see the Listbox object is loosing it's data context so in order for the command to be called when the expander is expanded I have to explicitly set the datacontext of the expander. Doing this seems to instantiate a new view model which resets my bound property (SelectedItemsID) to null.
Is there a way to pass the selected item from the view to the viewmodel and prevent the value from being reset to null when a button calls a command from within the templated listbox item?
I realize that both Prism and MVVMLite have workarounds for this but I am not familiar with either framework so I don't know the level of complexity in cutting either of these into my project.
Can this be accomplished outside of Prism or MVVMLite?
original post follows:
Within my project I have a listbox usercontrol which contains a custom data template.
<ListBox x:Name="ResultListBox"
HorizontalAlignment="Stretch"
Background="{x:Null}"
BorderThickness="0"
HorizontalContentAlignment="Stretch"
ItemsSource="{Binding SearchResults[0].Results,
Mode=TwoWay}"
ScrollViewer.HorizontalScrollBarVisibility="Disabled"
SelectionChanged="ResultListBox_SelectionChanged">
<ListBox.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<dts:TypeTemplateSelector Content="{Binding}" HorizontalContentAlignment="Stretch">
<!-- CFS Template -->
<dts:TypeTemplateSelector.CFSTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<qr:srchCFS />
</DataTemplate>
</dts:TypeTemplateSelector.CFSTemplate>
<!-- Person Template -->
<dts:TypeTemplateSelector.PersonTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<qr:srchPerson />
</DataTemplate>
</dts:TypeTemplateSelector.PersonTemplate>
<!-- removed for brevity -->
</DataTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemTemplate>
</ListBox>
SelectionChanged calls the following method from the code behind
private void ResultListBox_SelectionChanged(object sender, SelectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (((ListBox)sender).SelectedItem != null)
_ViewModel.SelectedItemID = (((ListBox)sender).SelectedItem as QueryResult).ID.ToString();
this.NotifyPropertyChanged(_ViewModel.SelectedItemID);//binds to VM
}
Within the ViewModel I have the following property
public string SelectedItemID
{
get
{
return this._SelectedItemID;
}
set
{
if (this._SelectedItemID == value)
return;
this._SelectedItemID = value;
}
}
the listbox template contains a custom layout with an expander control. The expander control is used to display more details related to the selected item. These details (collection) are created by making a new call to my proxy. To do this with an expander control I used the Expressions InvokeCommandAction
<toolkit:Expander Height="auto"
Margin="0,0,-2,0"
Foreground="#FFFFC21C"
Header="View Details"
IsExpanded="False"
DataContext="{Binding Source={StaticResource SearchViewModelDataSource}}"
Style="{StaticResource DetailExpander}">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger EventName="Expanded">
<i:InvokeCommandAction Command="{Binding GetCfsResultCommand}" />
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
Within the ViewModel the delegate command GetCFSResultCommandExecute which is called is fairly straight forward
private void GetCfsResultCommandExecute(object parameter)
{
long IdResult;
if (long.TryParse(SelectedItemID, out IdResult))
{
this.CallForServiceResults = this._DataModel.GetCFSResults(IdResult);}
The issue I am experiencing is when selecting a listbox Item the selectionchanged event fires and the property SelectedItemID is updated with the correct id from the selected item. When I click on the expander the Command is fired but the property SelectedItemID is set to null. I have traced this with Silverlight-Spy and the events are consistent with what you would expect when the expander is clicked the listbox item loses focus, the expander (toggle) gets focus and there is a LeftMouseDownEvent but I cannot see anything happening that explains why the property is being set to null. I added the same code used in the selection changed event to a LostFocus event on the listboxt item and still received the same result.
I'd appreciate any help with understanding why the public property SelectedItemID is being set to null when the expander button which is part of the listbox control is being set to null. And of course I would REALLY appreciate any help in learning how prevent the property from being set to null and retaining the bound ID.
Update
I have attempted to remove the datacontext reference from the Expander as this was suggested to be the issue. From what I have since this is a data template item it "steps" out of the visual tree and looses reference to the datacontext of the control which is inherited from the parent object. If I attempt to set the datacontext in code for the control all bindings to properties are lost.
My next attempt was to set the datacontext for the expander control within the constructor as
private SearchViewModel _ViewModel;
public srchCFS()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.cfsExpander.DataContext = this._ViewModel;
}
This approach does not seem to work as InvokeCommandAction is never fired. This command only seems to trigger if data context is set on the expander.
thanks in advance
With this line you create a new SearchViewModelDataSource using its default constructor.
DataContext="{Binding Source={StaticResource SearchViewModelDataSource}}"
I guess this is why you find null because this is the default value for reference type.
You can resolve the issue by setting DataContext to the same instance used to the main controll (you can do it by code after all components are initialized).
Hope this help!
Edit
I don't think that binding may be lost after setting datacontext from code. I do it every time I need to share something between two or more model.
In relation to the code you've written :
private SearchViewModel _ViewModel;
public srchCFS()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.cfsExpander.DataContext = this._ViewModel;
}
Instead of using this.cfsExpander you can try to use the FindName method. Maybe this will return you the correct instance.
object item = this.FindName("expander_name");
if ((item!=null)&&(item is Expander))
{
Expander exp = item as Expander;
exp.DataContext = this._ViewModel;
}
Try if its work for you.
Of course, this._ViewModel has to expose a property of type ICommand named GetCfsResultCommand but I think this has been already done.
While this was a hacky approach I found an intermediate solution to get the listbox item value to the view model. I ended up using the selection changed event and passing the value directly to a public property wihtin my view model. Not the best approach but it resolved the issue short term
private void ResultListBox_SelectionChanged(object sender, SelectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (((ListBox)sender).SelectedItem != null)
_ViewModel.SelectedItemID = (((ListBox)sender).SelectedItem as QueryResult).ID.ToString();
MySelectedValue = (((ListBox)sender).SelectedItem as QueryResult).ID.ToString();
this.NotifyPropertyChanged(_ViewModel.SelectedItemID);
}
For this to fire I did have to also setup a property changed handler within the view to push the change to the VM. You can disregard the MySelectedValue line as it is secondary code I have in place for testing.
For those intereted the generic property changed handler
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
private void NotifyPropertyChanged(string info)
{
if (PropertyChanged != null)
{
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(info));
}
}
I'm experimenting with MVVM and I can't quite wrap my mind around it.
I have a View (windows) that has several repeated controls.
Let's say I have 4 textbox - button pairs. Their behavior should be the same, after pressing a button paired textbox says "Hello World!"
I have tried several options I could think of:
One ViewModel, 4 string properties binded to textboxes, 1 command
When I bind each button to the same command I can't tell which property needs to be set.
Passing enum to CommandParameter feels awkward.
One ViewModel and UserControl that hosts a textbox and a button repeated 4 times.
Now I need to expose all the properties like Command, CommandParameter, Text etc.. Seems like a lot of work.
Still can't say which property needs to be updated after click.
Each UserControl has a ViewModel
This solves button clicking and setting property, but now I have no clue how to extract texts from nested ViewModels to the window ViewModel.
Is there any other way? I suspect DataTemplates could be of use, but I'm not sure how.
What you describe is such an abstract and contrived idea that it doesn't warrant MVVM. You're talking about TextBoxes and Buttons, which are all 'View', and not the MVVM way of thinking. You'd almost always start with a Model.
There is no 'Model' per-se here though; your specification is literally to set the value of a TextBox on a Button click. The seemingly random list of '4' items (picked out of nowhere) and a seemingly useless TextBox mean nothing.
Putting that aside and assuming that you have a set of 4 business entities, each with a field on them that is user-editable, and an action that the user can trigger, you'd do this:
Create a ViewModel class to represent an item - eg MyItemModel
Create a ViewModel class to represent the set of items (likely it will just return a Collection of the first) - eg AllMyItemsListModel
Then for the View:
Create an ItemsControl, with ItemsSource bound to an instance of the 'collection' of the second ViewModel class
For each ItemTemplate, have a template or UserControl for each item
Within the template or UserControl, bind the TextBox's Text property to the appropriate property of the first class
Bind the Button's Command property to a property on the first class returning an ICommand - using RelayCommand for example
I don't know what you mean about 'extracting texts from nested ViewModels to the window ViewModel' - what does that mean and why would you want to do it?
Hope that helps.
Number 3. Except there would just be one UserControl with viewmodel and then the Main page that would have multiple instances of that UserControl on it. If the main window needs info from the UserControl you could pass it through events or use something like MVVM Light and it's messenger class.
There's no need to create a separate ViewModel for a reusable control that has such simple behavior. Just by adding a few DependencyProperties and an event handler to the simple UserControl you can reuse the logic and only set the properties that are actually different on each instance. For the UserControl XAML you just need to hook up the TextBox to the DependencyProperty and the Button to a Click handler.
<DockPanel>
<Button Content="Reset" Click="Button_Click"/>
<TextBox Text="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type UserControl}}, Path=Text}"/>
</DockPanel>
The code for the UserControl just needs to define the properties that can be bound externally and the handler to reset the Text.
public partial class ResetTextBox : UserControl
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty TextProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
"Text",
typeof(string),
typeof(ResetTextBox),
new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(null, FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.BindsTwoWayByDefault));
public string Text
{
get { return (string)GetValue(TextProperty); }
set { SetValue(TextProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty ResetTextProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
"ResetText",
typeof(string),
typeof(ResetTextBox),
new UIPropertyMetadata(String.Empty));
public string ResetText
{
get { return (string)GetValue(ResetTextProperty); }
set { SetValue(ResetTextProperty, value); }
}
public ResetTextBox()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void Button_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
Text = ResetText;
}
}
Then to use the control you just need to bind to your ViewModel string properties and set the default text that should be applied on a reset which can either be hardcoded here, or bound to other VM properties.
<StackPanel>
<local:ResetTextBox ResetText="One" Text="{Binding Name1}"/>
<local:ResetTextBox ResetText="Two" Text="{Binding Name2}"/>
<local:ResetTextBox ResetText="Three" Text="{Binding Name3}"/>
</StackPanel>