Bear with a bit me before jumping straight to the normal caching fix solutions. Here's what happening:
I have a project, a single project out of dozens in our solution that appears to be refusing to update its code when I build and run. It's not part of the xap, but a dll sitting along side the xap.
Things I've already determined not a solution:
I've checked the output of its dll and it has been built, and its contents updated to match my code, verified with dotPeek. But it refuses to display the updated code.
I clean, rebuild the solution, and restart the dev server but it refuses to display the updated code.
I switch to a different browser, no dice.
I clear browser cache's to no avail.
I completely delete my local code and do a fresh fetch from our repository, again, no love from silverlight.
I have not been without a little success though. The ONE bone I've been thrown was over the weekend. Not touching it for a couple days, I came back to work on Monday and, without having done anything to it, it just updated. Now, however, it's cached again, or something, because it's stuck in the last set of changes I made to it.
So my question is this: What am I missing?
Most likely your files may be read only and MS Build fails to display error message and it does not update files. In case if you have mistakenly checked in your .xap files, then this is possible, you will have to remove it from your source control and also make .xap file writable by removing readonly checkbox.
Visual Studio checks in your .xap files by mistake and silverlight build does not report any error.
Second, do you have any other file backup service installed like Shadow copy or Dropbox kind of online backup service, something is probably making xap files readonly and that is causing this problem.
Here there are couple answers: Prevent Silverlight 3 from caching while debugging
Code below helped me(add this to Page_Load of page that hosted the app ):
Response.Cache.SetExpires(DateTime.Now.AddSeconds(-100));
Response.Cache.SetCacheability(HttpCacheability.NoCache);
UPDATE:
Prevent Silverlight xap from being cached by proxy server
"So my question is this: What am I missing?"
An internal caching mechanism that our application uses. So, none of you could really have helped me as it was an architectural feature of our software.
Related
I'm running into a small but weird annoyance that seems to be happening to other people, too (for example, check out the revision history of SEDE). I have a SQL Server 2008 database project in Visual Studio 2010 that works properly. When I go to commit/checkin to source control, I'm told that my DB project's .dbmdl file has changed, even when I've made no changes to the project!
I'm not sure if the changes are triggered by building my solution (which also includes an ASP.NET MVC application and a unit test project) or by simply opening the DB project, but this is getting kind of annoying and is creating clutter in source control.
Is it possible to stop these changes from occurring, or get rid of the .dbmdl file whatsoever?
If you delete the .dbml file, it is rebuilt without errors or warnings, so I think it's just a cache file for references, intellisense, etc. I'm going to exclude it from source control.
I believe Visual Studio serializes the dbmdl file every time the project is opened. The only possible work around would be to keep the project open.
See related question here. The .dbmdl file is unique per user (and some kind of cache, as said above) and so the right solution is indeed to exclude it from source control.
I am using VS2008 to publish my application files using ClickOnce. I read somewhere that ClickOnce intelligently does only partial updates; meaning it only downloads files from the network share if the file has changed in subsequent updates. However, this wasn't working for me. So I did some research and stumbled upon this MSDN article - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms404267.aspx. It says that if we build using VS, it doesn't perform the partial updates. Can anyone tell me why this is the case? If so, is there a way to atleast let the referenced dlls to be downloaded only for the first time. I am using Microsoft Practices Enterprise Library and some 3rd party controls (with huge Theme files).
Thanks,
Uniball
Partial updates work fine in ClickOnce even when building in VS. However, if you have a solution made up of a few projects (eg a couple of class library projects and an executable) then any time you rebuild all the projects the timestamp on the assembly files will change, even if the code hasn't. Since ClickOnce really only looks at the timestamps to decide whether a file needs updating, it'll pull down the (unchanged) assemblies as new files when the user updates.
The workaround is to pull any dependent projects out of your executable's solution file and build them separately. That means that any assemblies whose code doesn't change very often will only get pulled down to the client once. If you need to change the assembly, you simply open its solution and make the change, then reopen your executable's solution and rebuild that. The next ClickOnce update will pull down both the exe and the changed assembly.
Hope that's clear enough!
i am trying to figure this out for a long time now, but so far no luck, maybe somebody can help me.
I have a 2.2.2 cakephp installed on my computer (localhost) and everything works perfectly. But now i want that same project to be online on remote server. I upload everything, set mysql path but i get a blank page when trying to access the site.
If i upload a fresh cakephp it works, but my project doesnt. The debug is set to default, think that should be 2? I also deleted files in cache/tmp, but still no errors or anything, just blank page.
Any info would be helpful, thank you.
I hate when that happens :). Usually it does if there is an error somewhere and you can't see it because the errors are turned off, so you should call phpinfo() and see if display_errors is on. Changing the debug mode doesn't work every time since display_errors is set from php.ini.
Unfortunately, if this is the problem and you don't have access to edit the php.ini file, you might need to ask the hosting provider to change it and restart the php service.
You can also try this: error_reporting(E_ALL)
I uploaded changes to my cakephp website and discovered that all actions for a particular controller returned a blank page. I discovered what the error was and was able to reproduce it with another controller.
The problem was that in the first line of my controller file I had a space before the opening php tag.
One space cost me hours.
Just uploading all files won't cut it. Make sure you work through this checklist:
First and foremost, check the error log file located under app/tmp/logs/error.log, this usually holds some very good pointers as to what is wrong.
Make sure you have uploaded the app/Config/database.php file with the proper details. Local installs usually have user root without password. Online servers (obviously) do not!
To that extent, also make sure you actually have a database with your hosting provider (either your host sent you the info or you need to create it yourself using their control panel).
Make sure you also uploaded all .htaccess files (the one under the root directory and /app and /app/webroot), some FTP programs don't show this "hidden" file by default.
If all else fails, contact your hosting provider for further support as they usually have access to more verbose server logs that can also hold clues.
The real problem was only the coding I used in notepad++. All my files were encoded with UTF-8, but they should have been UTF-8 without BOM. After I changed it to UTF-8 withot BOM, everything started to work perfectly.
I'm running into a small but weird annoyance that seems to be happening to other people, too (for example, check out the revision history of SEDE). I have a SQL Server 2008 database project in Visual Studio 2010 that works properly. When I go to commit/checkin to source control, I'm told that my DB project's .dbmdl file has changed, even when I've made no changes to the project!
I'm not sure if the changes are triggered by building my solution (which also includes an ASP.NET MVC application and a unit test project) or by simply opening the DB project, but this is getting kind of annoying and is creating clutter in source control.
Is it possible to stop these changes from occurring, or get rid of the .dbmdl file whatsoever?
If you delete the .dbml file, it is rebuilt without errors or warnings, so I think it's just a cache file for references, intellisense, etc. I'm going to exclude it from source control.
I believe Visual Studio serializes the dbmdl file every time the project is opened. The only possible work around would be to keep the project open.
See related question here. The .dbmdl file is unique per user (and some kind of cache, as said above) and so the right solution is indeed to exclude it from source control.
I have an ASP.NET app in which I've used Vertigo's SlideShow 2 silverlight image gallery component. All was working well and the app went through testing and suddenly, after a recent deployment I get an alert box that says:
IMPORTANT: Remove this line from json2.js before deployment.
This pops up after the Silverlight component loads but then the SlideShow2 xap file seems to work fine after that.
Anyone have any ideas on why this would just start happening? I've done some research and can't come up with much and it's pretty mysterious that it just started happening. I've not directly used json2.js in this application nor have I customized the Slideshow 2 component in any way.
It also happens both in my dev and production environments.
-Kevin
Something like this?
From http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/json/message/1413:
Thu Dec 10, 2009 5:23 am
The server at JSON.org is getting
hammered. It turns out that there are
some sites that are linking directly
to json2.js instead of dispensing it
from their own servers. By far the
heaviest impact is from
onlinebootycall.com. My intention was
to provide the world with a free
implementation, but the world can buy
its own bandwidth.
So I have added this line as the first
line in the json2.js file:
alert('IMPORTANT: Remove this line
from json2.js before deployment.');
It will not break anything, but it
should help get a message to the
onlinebootycalls that you should not
load code from strange third party
servers. It is not safe.
- "Douglas Crockford" <douglas#...>
Don't link to json.js OR json2.js directly from json.org. It is bad etiquette, it uses their bandwidth for your site.
Copy the file to your own server, remove the line, and redeploy.
p.s. what are you using silverlight for at onlinebootycall.com? Curious... ;)
In doing more research (and taking a step back to evaluate my environment), the implementation of SlideShow2 I am using is a modified one from an opensource CodePlex project. This particular version supports streaming images and albums from Picasa's web albums. The version I'm using is located here: http://slideshow2picasa.codeplex.com/. In checking out their online dmeos they exhibit the same behavior so obviously this implementation is linking to the json2.js file on your servers as a means to interact with Picasa web.
Today I'll take at their code and see if I can rely on a local copy fo json2.js.
Thanks for helping me out.