Basic Question:
How can I get gcc to tell me where it searches for Ada includes?
Specific Problem:
I have just finished converting a C library's header files to Ada specs so that I can interface with the library using Ada. I now want to install the specs on my system. I also want to make the installation portable to some extent so that I can make install on any machine (and thus host the specs and Makefile on Github or similar). I'm just not sure where exactly to install the specs to.
gnat ls -v will give you the default search paths.
If you want to install your own Ada library, you should place a project file (.gpr) in the "Project Search Path", which will tell gnat where to find the ada and ali files and the library.
Normally, you will place the ada files in /usr/[local/]include/myadalib and the ali files in /usr/[local/]lib/myadalib and maybe link the .so file into /usr/[local/]lib, but you can put them anywhere you want. The important thing is to place the project file (myadalib.gpr) in the project search path.
You can even adjust the project search path by setting the ADA_PROJECT_PATH environment variable.
Related
I have an entire library made in C. It has almost 10 folders with a lot of files.
I have created a filename.c file in root folder and trying to compile it in mac using gcc test.c -o test however its not including header files. Generally I have to add all the header files gcc test.c libaudio.c -o test
How can I compile entire project instead of just one file.
Makefiles will solve your problem. You can create your own rules to clear the project (remove the generated files), build the project indicating where is your compiler (compile the source files located in some specific path, extension, etc), set the output path and so on, without typing a large compilation order.
https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html
Edit: There you will be able to find how to add shared, static or raw libraries to your proyect through makefiles.
Use a Makefile. make the utility the reads the configuration within the Makefile will automate the running of the individual commands, such that you only need to name the item you wish to be rebuilt.
make myprogram
And make will use the dependency information stored in the Makefile's rules to determine what other elements are "out of date", rebuilding those and assembling them into myprogram.
This is a decent "first time" tutorial for "make".
Here is the full blown documentation for "make"
Once you master the concepts within make, you can then use other tools that make maintaining Makefiles either easier, more portable, or both.
Some tools that improve upon "make" include "cmake", "automake", "the autotools collection", "scons", "waf", "rake", "doit", "ninja", "tup", "redo", and "sake". There are more, and some are programming language specific, or limited to a particular enviornment.
The reason I recommend "make" over the others is because "make" is a baseline that will always be present, and the features in the other tools are often not understood or recognized to be needed until you get enough experience with "make".
In C, the concept of project is not part of the language, it depends generally of the tools / platform / library you have to build.
On Linux based platforms, you may have a makefile describing the project, or the library may have a cmake script.
You should be able to find the build instructions in you library documentation.
I definitely recommend the make approach as it is scalable.
If you really only have a couple of files, gcc will accept multiple .c files on the command line and link them all to generate one executable.
I am using the MinGW-w64 installer found here:
https://mingw-w64.org/doku.php/download/mingw-builds
Installing to a directory creates a folder called mingw32 or mingw64 that contains the compiler. I already know that the additional batch script, HTML link, and uninstall executable in the same directory can be deleted.
The mingw32/64 folder contains these folders:
bin
etc
include
lib
libexec
licenses
opt
share
i686-w64-mingw32 (mingw32) or x86_64-w64-mingw32 (mingw64)
I only wish to compile with C and nothing else. So what files can I delete in order to reduce the file count because the compiler contains files for Ruby, Fortran and other languages which as I stated, I don't need it.
Why are people still using Mingw or Mingw64 instead of TDM-GCC ? You have to rely on the default builds or build it yourself from source. Trying to install it on your own terms sucks.
TDM-GCC on the other hand, you can specify where and which components to install as you wish. You can upgrade or remove it without any worries. It's more fast, easy,modern and equivelant these days.
Now for your question, you can download and install TDM-GCC by it's installer. I don't really think you need any further instructions as a 5 year old would understand how to use it. Just select only the components required for c.
If you don't understand,I would gladly help you more if needed. ^_^
If you want a smaller GCC toolset, try MinGW Distro.
Scroll down to "How To Build Your Own Distro", download components-14.1.7z, extract it, extract binutils 2.27 and GCC 6.3.0 inside the same folder. The total size is about 270MB.
as far as i know the minimum are yours
1, bin
5. libexec
not all tools in bin you may need but generally i would hold both of those dirs
you also ned libraries and headers if you want to build abainst standard c library and windows.h, so
include
lib
is also needed (hovever part of it may contain also headers and libraries for c++ standard library) all those main 3 libs are kinda mixed there afaik so it might be a bit hard to find what comes for what
I am trying to have a scheme with my library that is coherent and usable/reusable.
I work in a team where we work with continuous integration but sometimes I need to use old version of the same library. That's because some part of the software are not updated for using the new version.
I'm actually in the middle of a headache understanding how to use cmake for having something like this:
PATH/Library/Processor/Library_X/Version/static_library_and_includes
Where Library is a common name where to put my stuff
Processor could be attiny24, atmega, lxpXXXX, etc
Library_X is the name of the library
Version a progressive number from 0 to X
static_library_and_includes the static libraries built within that cmake module and the include files needed for using it.
How can I do this using cmake?
I work with different microprocessor crosscompiling with gcc. This is not a problem.
I work with static library, this is not a problem.
I can install them in the right directory. Not a problem
I can't ask the executable to link to the right .a file. Sometimes cmake pick the right one, sometimes not.
Can you please give me a hint on how you guys do it?
thank in advance
Andrea
See the search paths here: https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/command/find_package.html#search-procedure .
CMake will find packages in directories named name*, so you can install to <prefix>/FizzBuzz-1.0.0 and <prefix>/FizzBuzz-2.0.0.
As long as each as a correct ConfigVersion.cmake file, it should do what you want.
it is awkward, but until now i always copy the *.h and the *.c files to my projekts location. this is a mess and i want to change it!
i want to build my own c library and have a few questions about it.
where should i locate the *.h files?
should i copy them in the global /usr/include/ folder or should i create my own folder in $HOME (or anywhere else)?
where should i locate the *.a files and the *.o files and where the *.c files.
i am using debian and gcc. my c projects are in $HOME/dev/c/.
i would keep my lib-sources in $HOME/dev/c/lib (if this is the way you could recommend) and copy the *.o, *.a and *.h files to the location i am asking for.
how would you introduce the lib-location to the compiler? should i add it to the $PATH or should i introduce it in the makefiles of my projekt (like -L PATH/TO/LIBRARY -l LIBRARY).
do you have anny further tips and tricks for building a own library?
I would recommend putting the files somewhere in your $HOME directory. Let's say you've created a library called linluk and you want to keep that library under $HOME/dev/c/linluk. That would be your project root.
You'll want a sensible directory structure. My suggestion is to have a lib directory containing your library and an include directory with the header files.
$PROJECT_ROOT/
lib/
liblinluk.so
include/
linluk.h
src/
linluk.c
Makefile
Compiling: When you want to use this library in another project, you'd then add -I$PROJECT_ROOT/include to the compile line so that you could write #include <linluk.h> in the source files.
Linking: You would add -L$PROJECT_ROOT/lib -llinluk to the linker command line to pull in the compiled library at link time. Make sure your .so file has that lib prefix: it should be liblinluk.so, not linluk.so.
A src directory and Makefile are optional. The source code wouldn't be needed by users of the library, though it might be helpful to have it there in case someone wants to remake the .so file.
As I commented, you should try first to build and install from its source code several free software libraries, e.g. like libonion or gdbm or GNU readline etc (don't use any distribution package, but compile and install these from source code). This will teach you some good practice.
You probably want to install these libraries system-wide, not for your particular user. Then, assuming that your library is called foo (you need to give it some name!),
the header files *.h go into /usr/local/include/foo/
the shared objects (dynamic libraries) go into /usr/local/lib/libfoo.so (with perhaps some version numbering)
if relevant, static library go into /usr/local/lib/libfoo.a
You need to add once /usr/local/lib/ into /etc/ld.so.conf and run ldconfig(8)
and you usually don't want to copy any source file *.c or object file *.o
(except for homoiconic programs, bootstrapped compilers, Quine programs, generated C code, etc... See RefPerSys or Jacques Pitrat systems as an incomplete example of self generated C or C++). In some weird cases, you may want to copy such "source" or "generated C" code under /usr/src/.
Read Program Library HowTo (and later, Drepper's paper: How To Write Shared Libraries)
You could consider making your library known by pkg-config. Then install some foo.pc under /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/
BTW, I strongly suggest you to publish your library as free software, perhaps on github or elsewhere. You'll get useful feedback and could get some help and some bug reports or enhancements.
You probably should use some builder like make and have an install target in your Makefile (hint: make it use the DESTDIR convention).
I have to use LU decompostion to fit a simple model to some data (simulated) in C. An example of what I need to do is here:
However, I'm stuck with a more basic problem: how do I install packages in C and call them in my code?
I'm new in C and I'm used to R. But I have this assingment to do some tests about Matrix inversion, LU decomposision and the professor suggested using Lapack to easy things (thus, I don't need to code myself the LU decomposition etc.). But I don't know how to install the package and call it in my code, in order to use the functions of LAPACK.
I have a windows 7 64 bits and I'm using compiler Code Blocks 8.02
Thanks for any help.
Normally you don't "install" C libraries in that sense. Normally, in Windows you have three types of files. The header files, typically ending in .h, the dynamic library, .dll, and most likely some linker files (typically, .lib, .a or something). The linker and compiler will need to be able to find these files somewhere. Normally you set the include directory paths, and library directory paths.
E.g. Let's say you downloaded a library called foo, and you extract it to C:\foo.
In that folder, libfoo.a, foo.dll and foo.h reside. In Code::Blocks you will have to point include directory path to C:\foo and library path to C:\foo so that the linker and compiler know where to look for these files. Since you're linking against the foo library, you will also have to set -lfoo or something similiar in linker command line. This is GCC syntax, but I think Code::Blocks uses GCC compiler behind the scenes anyways.
In the C code you can just #include <foo.h> and the compiler will find it for you.
You need to install that library and it might actually supply a tool for that. Check their documentation (e.g. a file INSTALL or README in their distributed sources). If the library uses only headers you might only need to copy it's headers to some directory on your system, but their buildsystem might be able to do that for you.
Once that is done you would tell your IDE on where to look for the sources and if the library uses not just headers to link against the actual library file. See the documentation in the Code::Blocks Wiki on how this is done for some example cases and adapt for your library.
The simplest thing to do in your situation is to install Cygwin. You can use the setup.exe installer to install the GCC and the LAPACK libraries. When you want to use the LAPACK library, you will add the -llapack option to your GCC command line.