remote: Undefined subroutine &main::repo_rights called at hooks/update line 41.
remote: error: hook declined to update
I have removed the update hook from all of my repos in order to get around this, but I know that they are now wide open.
I ran gl-setup, and I may have mixed versions of gitolite on my machine. I am afraid that I ran the gl-setup from a version that is different than the one I am running currently. I am not sure how to tell. Please help. :-(
Update, for a more recent version of Gitolite (namely a V3.x or more), the official documentation would be: "adding your own update hooks", and it uses VREFs (virtual refs).
add this line in the rc file, within the %RC block, if it's not already present, or uncomment it if it's already present and commented out:
LOCAL_CODE => "$ENV{HOME}/local",
copy your update hook to a subdirectory called VREF under this directory, giving it a suitable name (let's say "crlf"):
# log on to gitolite hosting user on the server, then:
cd $HOME
mkdir -p local/VREF
cp your-crlf-update-hook local/VREF/crlf
chmod +x local/VREF/crlf
in your gitolite-admin clone, edit conf/gitolite.conf and add lines like this:
- VREF/crlf = #all
to each repo that should have that "update" hook.
Alternatively, you can simply add this at the end of the gitolite.conf file:
repo #all
- VREF/crlf = #all
Either way, add/commit/push the change to the gitolite-admin repo.
Related
I'm passing a variable to my .dacpac but the text received is not what I passed. Example command:
sqlpackage /v:TextTest="abc]123" /Action:Publish /SourceFile:"my.dacpac" /TargetDatabaseName:MyDb /TargetServerName:"."
My variable $(TextTest) comes out as "abc]]123" instead of the original "abc]123".
Is there anything I can do to prevent SqlPackage from corrupting my input variables before they are passed to the .dacpac scripts?
Unfortunately, I don't think there is a good answer. This appears to be a very old bug. I'm seeing references to this issue going back 10 years.
Example A: https://web.archive.org/web/20220831180208/https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/azure/en-US/f1d153c2-8f42-4148-b313-3449075c612f/sql-server-database-project-sqlcmd-variables-with-closing-square-brackets
They mention a "workaround" in the post, but they link to a Microsoft Connect issue which no longer exists and is not available on archive.org.
My best guess is that the "workaround" is to generate the deploy script rather than publishing, and then manually modify the variable value in the script...which is not really a workaround if you are working on a build/release pipeline or any sort of automation.
I tried testing this to see if it would make any difference using Microsoft.SqlServer.Dac.DacServices.Publish() directly (via dbatools PowerShell module), but unfortunately the problem exists there as well.
I also tested it against every keyboard accessible symbol and that is the only character it seems to have a problem with.
Another option, though still not great, is to generate the deployment script, then execute it using SQLCMD.EXE.
So for example this would work:
sqlpackage /Action:Script `
/DeployScriptPath:script.sql `
/SourceFile:foobar.dacpac `
/TargetConnectionString:'Server=localhost;Database=foobar;Uid=sa;Password=yourStrong(!)Password' `
/p:CommentOutSetVarDeclarations=True
SQLCMD -S 'localhost' -d 'foobar' -U 'sa' -P 'yourStrong(!)Password' `
-i .\script.sql `
-v TextTest = "abc]123" `
-v DatabaseName = "foobar"
/p:CommentOutSetVarDeclarations=True - This setting is key, otherwise SQLCMD will be overridden by what's in the file. Just make sure you specify ALL variables, and not just the one you need. So open the file to look at what is commented out and make sure you are supplying what is needed.
It's not a great option...but it's at least scriptable and doesn't require manual intervention.
I was just wondering what’s the best way to configure codecov for a monorepo setting. For example, let’s say I have packages A and B under my monorepo. The way I’m currently using codecov is by using a github action codecov/codecov-action#v1, by using multiple uses statement in my GitHub workflow YAML file like the following:-
- uses: codecov/codecov-action#v1
with:
files: ./packages/A/coverage/lcov.info
flags: flag_a
name: A
- uses: codecov/codecov-action#v1
with:
files: ./packages/B/coverage/lcov.info
flags: flag_b
name: B
I know it's possible to use a comma-separated value to upload multiple files, but I have to set a separate flag for each package, and doing it that way doesn't seem to work.
Thank you.
If anyone wants to know my solution, heres what I came up with.
I ended up replacing the github action with my own bash script.
final code
#!/usr/bin/env bash
codecov_file="${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/scripts/codecov.sh"
curl -s https://codecov.io/bash > $codecov_file
chmod +x $codecov_file
cd "${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/packages";
for dir in */
do
package="${dir/\//}"
if [ -d "$package/coverage" ]
then
file="$PWD/$package/coverage/lcov.info"
flag="${package/-/_}"
$codecov_file -f $file -F $flag -v -t $CODECOV_TOKEN
fi
done
this is what the above bash script does
Downloading the bash uploader script from codecov
Moving to the packages directory where are the packages are located, and going through all the 1st level directories
Change the package name by removing extra slash
If the directory contains coverage directory only then enter into it, since only those packages have been tested.
Create a file and flag variable (removing hypen with underscore as codecov doesn't support hypen in flag name)
Executed the downloaded codecov script by passing the file and flag variable as argument
I've got the strange behavior in svn checkout for checkout folder with # char in folder name
If I do
svn.exe checkout "file:///d:/test/test_repo" "D:\test\#path"
then I got checkout in D:\test#path folder, not in D:\test\#path
Why?
Doc say about special # meaning in URL[#REV] part, not in path part.
Update
Simple
md "D:\test\#path"
creates the D:\test\#pathfilder, so # is not batch-special macro.
Update - 2
svn.exe" checkout "file:///d:/test/test_repo" "D:\test\\#path" - same result.
I use svn v1.8
I know to create a patch for an existing file is easy:
diff -aru oldFile newFile 2>&1 | tee myPatch.patch
But what to do, if i want to create a patch for a totally new file? Assume my file is residing in a folder called TestDir. Earlier TestDir did not have a file called entirelyNewfile.c, but now it is having the same.
How to create a patch for entirelyNewfile.c? The idea is, the patch should get properly applied to the specs and generate the RPM build. With BUILD dir having this new file.
Just to add: if i try to take diff between the two directories, one having the new file and the other missing the same, to create the patch, it generates an error saying that file is only present in one folder
Add -N to the diff arguments.
diff /dev/null <newfile>
Will create a patch for your newfile.
The easiest way to do this that I know is to put all the files under version control (if they aren't already). I prefer Git, but something similar could be done in any other version control system:
git init
git add .
git commit -m "initial state"
<do your edits here>
git add .
git commit -m "new state"
git diff HEAD^1
I have a CakePHP project under Mercurial version control. Right now all the files in the app/tmp directory are being versioned, which are always changing.
I do not want to version control these files.
I know I can stop by running hg forget app/tmp/*
But this will also forget the file structure. Which I want to keep.
Now I know that Mercurial doesn't version directories, just files, but the CakePHP folks were also smart enough to put an empty file called empty in every empty directory (I am guessing for this reason).
So what I want to do is tell Mercurial to forget every file under app/tmp except files whos name is exactly empty.
What would the command be for this?
Well, if nothing else works, you can always just ask Mercurial to forget everything, and then revert empty before committing:
Here's how I reproduced it, first create initial repo:
hg init
md app
md app\tmp
echo a>app\empty
echo a>app\tmp\empty
hg commit -m "initial" -A
Then add some files we later want to get rid of:
echo a >app\tmp\test1.txt
echo a >app\tmp\test2.txt
hg commit -m "adding" -A
Then forget the files we don't want:
hg forget app\tmp\*
hg status <-- will show all 3 files
hg revert app\tmp\empty
hg status <-- now empty is gone
echo glob:app/tmp>.hgignore
hg commit -m "ignored" -A
Note that all .hgignore does is to prevent Mercurial from discovering new files during addremove or commit -A, if you have explicitly tracked files that match your ignore filter, Mercurial will still track changes to those files.
In other words, even though I asked Mercurial to ignore app/tmp above, the file empty inside will not be ignored, or removed, since I have explicitly asked Mercurial to track it.
At least theoretically (I don't have time to try it right now), pattern matching should work with the hg forget command. So, you could do something like hg forget -X empty while in the directory (-X means "exclude").
You may want to consider using .hgignore, of course.
Since you only need to do it once I'd just do this:
find app/tmp -type f | grep -v empty | xargs hg forget
hg commit
from then on just put this in your `.hgignore'
^app/tmp
Mercurial has built-in support for globbing and regexes, as explained in the relevant chapter in the mercurial book. The python regex implementation is used.
This should work for you:
hg forget "re:app/tmp/.*(?<!/empty)$"