I inherited a project that uses a RadioButtonList which inherits from a ListBox. It was taken off the web (currently cannot find a link to), and contains RadioButtonList.cs (which contains six dependency properties) and RadioButtonList.xaml (which is just styles and control templates).
This control is used in over a hundred places. It causes problems because it is not a complete and professional control. Problems such as, focus issues, keyboard navigation, and so on. (See comments.)
After much research at different times over the last couple years, it seems that this control is really not necessary. All that is needed is to set the GroupName property on a group of radio-buttons. And, the only reason why a RadioButtonList control is used is to help with data-binding a list of options through the inherited ListBox.
1) Is this control really necessary? Is there a better way?
2) Is there a professional control, open-source or otherwise, that will allow me to get the benefits of data-binding without the headaches? (We use Infragistics and DevExpress, but I am not familiar with all the controls these suites offer.)
My Answers
1a) Is this control really necessary?
If you only need one list of radio buttons, then no this control is not necessary.
If your applicaton uses many lists of radio buttons, then yes this control is necessary.
If you use a list of radio buttons in different applications, then yes this control is probably necessary.
1b) Is there a better way?
I say that deriving from a ListBox, ItemsControl, or whatever then creating styles and templates is the only way to create this control; therefore, no there is no better way.
2) Is there a professional control...
Definitely, the ListBoxEdit with the RadioListBoxEditStyleSettings.
Comments Regarding Answers
All the answers indicate that creating a RadioButtonList control is not necessary. Yet, if you need more than a couple lists of radio buttons, by the time you create the styles and control templates and maybe data template, you will end up with a collection of code artifacts that can be called a radio-button-list-control. Therefore, in my opinion, a RadioButtonList is necessary.
Moreover, my understanding is a RadioButtonList was dropped in an early WPF CTP. Which I can understand, because of the limited need for such a control that can easily be created.
Comment Regarding Accepted Answer
2) Is there a professional control...
Definitely, the ListBoxEdit with the RadioListBoxEditStyleSettings.
Lastly Comment on Mike Strobel's Answer
The RadioButtonList that I have is the end-result of his answer. While I am good at creating custom-controls, I rather let third-party component makers, such as Infragistics and DevExpress, create and support a basic control like this one.
Is this control really necessary? Is there a better way?
As #lawc points out, no, it is not necessary. It may, however, be preferable, depending on what level of flexibility you desire. A reusable style is easy enough to create, but doing it "correctly" is a bit more involved than simply setting a custom ItemTemplate.
Using Styles
An ItemsControl in WPF will wrap its items in appropriate containers. Each of the selector controls in core WPF overrides the logic which determines whether an item is capable of serving as its own container, as well as the factory code which produces new item containers. A ListBox, for example, will wrap each of its items in a ListBoxItem (unless the item itself is already a ListBoxItem). The style applied to these containers can be set for the parent ItemsControl via the ItemContainerStyle property. This differs from the ItemTemplate property, which allows you to control the appearance of the item within the container. More specifically, it overrides the content template applied to the ContentPresenter within the container.
Since a RadioButton does not derive from ListBoxItem, simply setting the ItemTemplate will produce a list of RadioButton controls embedded within ListBoxItem controls, which means they will still have the same selection chrome normally associated with ListBox controls, and possibly some layout and focus oddities. This is probably not what you want.
Instead, override the ItemContainerStyle and use it to assign a custom ListBoxItem template which embeds a RadioButton. You can probably get away with not setting the GroupName property at all, which eliminates possible name collisions. Instead, just establish a two-way binding between the RadioButton.IsChecked property and the templated parent's ListBoxItem.IsSelected property.
In order to use this technique conveniently, one generally creates a Style resource (available application-wide) which can be applied to the appropriate ListBox instances, and which sets the ItemContainerStyle. Alternatively, you can make the container style available as a global resource and set that on your ListBox instances. Either way, you need to set a property.
Using a Custom Control
While WPF evangelists often recite the philosophy of preferring custom styles over custom controls, in practice this is not always convenient. You may find it more convenient to create a RadioButtonList which extends the ListBox control, and then give it a default style which automatically applies the custom style described above. This gets you out of manually assigning the list style or container style on every ListBox instance, but it's not a huge win.
But maybe you want a bit more control over the appearance of the RadioButton items. For instance, you may want to:
Adjust the margin around the "bullet" of each RadioButton item;
Adjust the vertical alignment of the bullets relative to the content;
Support both horizontal and vertical orientations;
Automatically disable the RadioButton content for items which are not selected.
Creating your own implementation, most likely derived from ListBox, allows you to add these features easily, even after you are already using your radio list across your application. This could be done with the technique above too, though it may require an attached behavior or some attached properties, in which case you end up with a somewhat fragmented design.
Third-Party Solutions
Is there a professional control, open-source or otherwise, that will allow me to get the benefits of data-binding without the headaches?
This is not an uncommon use case, and I have no doubt there are some implementations floating around. Some may be in open source frameworks, and some may be extracted from open source applications. As for third-party implementations, I do know that Actipro ships a RadioButtonList in their Shared WPF library, which is included with all of their WPF components. When last I checked, it was not available on its own. It does, however, support all of the additional features I listed above.
I can only tell you that DevExpress uses a ListBoxEdit with a RadioListBoxEditStyleSettings to represent a group of RadioButtons. Practically it is the same as your control you are using, but i think it provides better functionality and is well tested. A RadioButton is not provided by DevExpress and in my application i use the Default RadionButton-Control provided by WPF/Silverlight.
You use the RadioListBoxEdit of DevExpress as follows:
<dxe:ListBoxEdit SelectedItem={Binding CheckItem, Mode=TwoWay}>
<dxe:ListBoxEdit.StyleSettings>
<dxe:RadioListBoxEditStyleSettings />
</dxe:ListBoxEdit.StyleSettings>
</dxe:ListBoxEdit>
More information about the ListBoxEdit of DevExpress can be found here
In my opinion you don't need this control.
You can simply use .Net ListBox to achieve all your existing functionality.
Using ListBox.ItemsSource you can data bind your options collection
Specify ListBox.ItemTemplate containing the RadioButton, in this template you can data bind your view model property to RadioButton.GroupName
IMHO, a control deriving from ItemsControl would be the cleanest approach.
Then you probably would override
IsItemItsOwnContainerOverride() with return item is RadioButton;
GetContainerForItemOverride() to return a new RadioButton() for each item and
PrepareContainerForItemOverride() to set up binding of ToggleButton.IsCheckedProperty and ContentControl.ContentProperty.
While these parts are just boilerplate code, some more efforts may lie in the implementation of the keyboard behavior.
I've written a WPF control which accepts a number of UIElement objects as input and displays them docked either vertically or horizontally. The control exposes functions for enumerating, removing and inserting children, but internally I'm using a Grid to build the layout, creating a row/column for each item and inserting a GridSplitter between them. To do this I've inherited from ContentControl, and upon initialization I just set the Content property with the Grid. Everything is working as intended, but now I wonder if this might be confusing for the user of my control, as it would be counter-intuitive to have a ContentControl that has many items.
Should I be inheriting from ItemsControl instead?
Should I inherit directly from Control which is "content-agnostic"?
Is there a better way to do this?
Thanks in advance.
What you describe sounds like a Panel - basically a control which is responsible for the layout of many elements. I would consider inheriting from that.
Your mention of "docked either vertically or horizontally" leads me to believe perhaps a StackPanel would be a better fit, since it does docking as well.
This feels like a stupid question, but is there a simple control for WPF that just displays a collection of items? I am currently using a ListBox to display a collection of usercontrols, but the selection element is not needed and the highlighting is actually a distraction. I could disable the highlighting, but this seems like extra work if a simpler control exists. I don't need to track the selected item.
Basically, I want a stackpanel that I can just define an itemssource of viewmodels for. Does such a thing exist?
You can use an ItemsControl - it's pretty much exactly what you are looking for
Well I'm designing a Custom WPF control - fore the sake of learning - that display logs message in a similar way Visual Studio does. I want to allow the user add messages by adding message istances to an Items collection, or by binding to an ItemSource. I think this is a well established pattern in many wpf controls, but I have no Idea on how achieve it. I know I can obtain the same result by adding a listview as a part of my control, but the project goal is learning, so I prefer avoid that solution. Any idea ?
Have a read around the ItemsControl, your custom control can inherit from an ItemsControl, or a derivative of it. If you create an ObservableCollection containing your items and bind that to your ItemsSource, then your list will be automatically updated. You can style the ItemTemplate and Template to give the list a different look and feel.
There's loads of info here
Can someone elaborate the difference between ControlTemplate and DataTemplate in wpf?
What should one use in case of custom controls? Like for example a StackPanel which possibly has an image and a TextBox?
It seems confusing in some cases where you define a custom control using the 'Content' property.
It would be great if an example of how each can be used in different scenarios can be provided.
A ControlTemplate is used to change the look of an existing control. So if you don't want your buttons to look rectangular, you can define a control Template which makes them look oval or any irregular shape. It's a way to customize 'look-less' stock WPF controls ; an alternative to writing your own user-controls. More details
A DataTemplate is used to specify how an instance of a specific class (usually a Data Transfer object - an object with properties) is to be rendered visually. e.g. define a DataTemplate to visualize a Customer instance in a listbox displaying all customers. More details