I'm having trouble in store filtering. My filter function is working fine and returning true/false as expected.. but in the end all the records are filtered out!!
The xstore is reference to store of Grid. I have also used the main store variable.. but no luck!! Any help is appriciated.
xstore.filterBy(function(rec){
app_rec = rec.get('APPNAME').toUpperCase(); //Record's value that needs to be checked'
Ext.each(elems,function(el){ //For each record, it checks 7 (dynamic) elements
//var ischecked = Ext.get(Ext.getCmp(el.id).teamName+'cb').dom.checked;
if(Ext.getCmp(el.id).teamName.toUpperCase() == app_rec)
{// If Element's attribute 'teamname' is matched then check if element's chkbox is chked/unched'
var ischecked = Ext.get(Ext.getCmp(el.id).teamName+'cb').dom.checked; //get the checkbox
//alert("app_rec: "+app_rec+"panelTeam: " + Ext.getCmp(el.id).teamName.toUpperCase()+"isChecked: "+ischecked );
if(ischecked) //if isChecked... keep record.. below alert if working as expected
{ alert("return true"+"app_rec: "+app_rec+"panelTeam: " + Ext.getCmp(el.id).teamName.toUpperCase()+"isChecked: "+ischecked);
return true;}
else //Else avoid record
{ //alert("return false");
return false;}
}
});
Thanks,
Tushar Saxena
Ext.each is different from a regular JavaScript for loop in that you can return false within the each call to stop iteration. The Ext.each documentation mentions this:
If the supplied function returns false, iteration stops and this
method returns the current index.
So when you're returning from within the each call, you're not returning true/false to the filterBy function like you expect, but to the each function.
Try keeping a handle on isChecked outside of the each loop, and then return true/false based on what was found inside the each function:
// excluded your other code to highlight area around Ext.each call
var isChecked = false;
Ext.each(elems, function(el){
if(Ext.getCmp(el.id).teamName.toUpperCase() == app_rec) {
ischecked = Ext.get(Ext.getCmp(el.id).teamName+'cb').dom.checked;
// can exit early if isChecked is true
if(isChecked){
return false; // this will exit the Ext.each method
}
}
});
// if this is true, filterBy will include the record
return isChecked;
Related
Forgive me there are a lot of questions asking this same thing but from over 10+ years ago.
Is there any way to checkmark a group of checkboxes based on an array in React? I have an array saved within state (stepThree) that I need to pulldown when a user returns to this screen within a multistep form. I'm looking for a way that the values within that array become/stay checked upon return to that screen so it shows the user their previous selections.
Current set-up explained below
State is opened with empty checkedBox array and stepThree initialized to pull responses later. checkedBox is eventually cloned into stepThree.
this.state = {
checkedBox: [],
stepThree: this.props.getStore().stepThree,
};
Boxes that are checked by the user are added to checkedBox array or removed if unchecked.
handleCheckboxChange = (event) =>{
const isChecked = event.target.value; //Grab the value of the clicked checkbox
if (this.state.checkedBox.includes(isChecked)) {
// If the checked value already exists in the array remove it
} else {
// If it does not exist, add it
}
}
Validate and store the completed array on clicking next
if (Object.keys(validateNewInput).every((k) => { return validateNewInput[k] === true })) {
if (this.props.getStore().stepThreeObjects != this.state.checkedBox) { // only update store of something changed
this.props.updateStore({
// Store the values of checkedBox inside stepThree and run updateStore to save the responses
});
} else {
// Return an error
}
Sample checkbox
<label className="choice-contain">
<span>Checkbox Sample</span>
<input
value="Checkbox Sample"
name="Question 3"
type="checkbox"
onChange={this.handleCheckboxChange}
/>
</label>
I've tried to create a persistCheckmark function that pulls the values of the array from stepThree and then does a comparison returning true/false like I do in the handler but since this is not an event I can't figure out how to trigger that function on return to the step.
Currently when returning to the step nothing is checked again and I believe that has to do with checkedBox being initiated as empty.
persistCheckmark(event) {
const isChecked = event.target.value; //Grab the value of the clicked checkbox
if (this.state.stepThree.includes(isChecked)) {
return true;
} else {
return false
}
}
Figured it out thanks to an old post here: How do I set a group of checkboxes using values?
Just updated the filter for when the component mounts
componentDidMount() {
if (this.state.stepThree != undefined) {
var isChecked = this.state.stepThree
$('input[type="checkbox"]').filter(function() {
return $.inArray(this.value, isChecked) != -1;
}).prop('checked', true);
} else { return }
}
and then added a ternary in the state initiation to check the storage and copy it over so it doesn't initialize as empty every time.
checkedBox: this.props.getStore().stepThree != undefined ? this.props.getStore().stepThree : [],
So here my problem
I am trying to make form toggles with a global toggle to basically check and uncheck all of them using ng-model.
$scope.globalToggle =
{
"toggle": true
}
$scope.Toggles =
{
"toggle1": true,
"toggle2": true,
"toggle3": true,
}
This is what Im trying to achieve in an efficient manner:
If global toggle is checked set all to true or false.
If any toggle is un-checked set global to false.
If any toggle is checked and the other two toggles are also checked
then set global to true.
Currently I have managed to use a long winded out process of scope functions and adding ng-click to each checkbox element to achieve this, but I was hoping there is some better way to achieve my goal where I don't have to use ng-click on my elements. Is it possible to have some binding between these two variables that can change their value based on the conditions when they are changed from the DOM using ng-model?
Here you have a snipped which does exactly what you want :)
you just have to put ng-click directive on your toggles and write your algorithm
basicaly that:
globalToggleClicked = function() {
for (var toggle in $scope.Toggles) {
if ($scope.globalToggle.toggle == true)
$scope.Toggles[toggle] = true;
else
$scope.Toggles[toggle] = false;
}
};
toggleClicked = function(toggle){
if (toggle == false)
$scope.globalToggle.toggle = false;
else if (toggle == true) {
var nbChecked = 0;
for (var t in $scope.Toggles) {
if ($scope.Toggles[t] == true)
nbChecked++;
}
if (Object.keys($scope.Toggles).length == nbChecked)
$scope.globalToggle.toggle = true;
}
};
multi toggle management
I know it's with ng-click, but you don't really have other ways to do that
want to filter out values both the select box and in checkbox i achieved in select box but can't able to get from checkbox
MY PLUNKER DEMO
Example Here. Use a single object for the checkboxes, and then you can use a comparator function in the filter, like this:
$scope.checkMake = function(value) {
//Assume no filter is applied so the value will be shown.
var result = true;
for (var i in $scope.selected) {
if ($scope.selected[i] === true) {
//if we get here, we know a filter is applied, so
//check to see if the passed value is one of the selected
//checkboxes
result = $scope.selected[value];
break;
}
}
return result;
}
I have a small app that users can use to search for a movie, and then add it to their watchlist. Currently it is possible to add 1 movie multple times for the same user. Which ofcourse isn't expected behaviour.
My solution would be to find the unique id of the movie that's being added and crosscheck that with my movies_users data. If the movie_id value exists, do this, else do this.
At the moment I do have the unique movie id of the movie that's being added,
$scope.movieListID = response;
console.log ($scope.movieListID.id)
Which gets ouputted like a string, like so,
314365
And I got the movie records from the current user,
$scope.moviesCheck = response.data;
console.log ($scope.moviesCheck)
Which looks like this,
[{"id":2,"title":"Black Panther", "movie_id":"284054"}]
So what would be a good way to check if the result from $scope.movieListID.id already exists in the $scope.moviesCheck data?
* update *
Trying a suggestion below does not give the expected result.
var exists = function (id) {
$scope.moviesCheck.forEach(function (movie) {
console.log (movie.movie_id)
console.log (id)
if (movie.movie_id === id)
console.log ('duplicate')
else
console.log ('not duplicate')
});
}
exists($scope.movieListID.id);
The console.log output from this is,
312221
312221
not duplicate
Which clearly are duplicate results.
You can add a function in your controller to check if the movie exists in the list
var exists = function (id) {
$scope.moviesCheck.forEach(function (movie) {
if (movie.id === id)
return true;
});
return false;
}
// and call it
exists($scope.movieListID.id); // true or false
I'm not 100% if this is a good way to do this, but for me it works and I think it's pretty low on performance,
movieService.loadMovies().then(function(response) {
$scope.moviesCheck = response.data;
var arr = $scope.moviesCheck
function myIndexOf(o) {
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (arr[i].movie_id == o.exisitingMovie_id) {
return i;
}
}
return -1;
}
var checkDuplicate = (myIndexOf({exisitingMovie_id:movie.id}));
if (checkDuplicate == -1) {
From your question I've understood that, based on the object exists using id in the array of object, you have to do different action.
You can use $filter for this. Inject the filter for your controller and assign it to the scope. So this will be available whenever you want in this controller.
$scope.cFilter('filter')($scope.movies, {movie_id:$scope.existingMovie.movie_id}, true);
$sope.movies - is the list of movies passed to the filter. You can
send any list based on your need.
{movie_id:$scope.existingMovie.movie_id} - This one is the object
which one we need to find. This can be based on your need. Since we
are searching movie_id, we need to send the object with property
and value. {movie_id:$scope.existingMovie.movie_id}, Here movie_id is
the property and followed by the value with the colon.
true: This indicates that, to search exact matched values. By default
this is false. If this is set to false, then if we want to search 54
in the movie id, this will returns the objects whichever contains 54
as part of the value.
app.controller('controller', ['$filter',function($filter){
$scope.cFilter= $filter;
$scope.Exists=function(){
$scope.movies=[{"id":2,"title":"Black Panther", "movie_id":"284054"},{"id":3,"title":"Black Panther", "movie_id":"32343"},{"id":4,"title":"Black Panther", "movie_id":"98863"}]
$scope.existingMovie={"id":3,"title":"Black Panther", "movie_id":"32343"};
var _obj=$scope.cFilter('filter')($scope.movies, {movie_id:$scope.existingMovie.movie_id}, true);
if(_obj && _obj[0])
{
Console.log('object exists')
}
else
{
Console.log('Object is not found')
}
}
}])
Many Thanks Jeeva Jsb. This got me on the right track, however I thought I would clarify with a practical example that seems to work as expected.
So I have a function called getData which get the AJAX array but we need to check if the record exist before added to scope (else we get duplicates)
if (d.data.length) {
for (var i = 0; i < d.data.length; i++) {
var doesExist = $filter('filter')($scope.notifications, {NotifId:d.data[i].NotifId}, true);
if (doesExist.length == 0){
$scope.notifications.push(d.data[i]);
}
}
}
This should look familier...
when we are iterating through the returned AJAX object we need to check the ID of the (in my case notificiation)
var doesExist = $filter('filter')($scope.notifications, {NotifId:d.data[i].NotifId}, true);
This line creates a new array by filtering the existing array in scope ($scope.notifications) and passing in the same value from you interation.
If the value exists the object will be copied to the new array called doesExist.
A simple check of length will determine if the record needs to be written.
I hope this helps someone.
I been trying to do checkbox Checkall and UnCheckall using subscribe and i'm partially successful doing that but i am unable to find a fix in couple of scenarios when i am dealing with subscribe .
Using subscribe :
I am here able to checkAll uncheckAll but when i uncheck a child checkbox i.e test1 or test2 i need my parent checkbox name also to be unchecked and in next turn if i check test1 the parent checkbox should be checked i.e keeping condition both child checkboxes are checked .
For fiddle : Click Here
ViewModel :
self.selectedAllBox.subscribe(function (newValue) {
if (newValue == true) {
ko.utils.arrayForEach(self.People(), function (item) {
item.sel(true);
});
} else {
ko.utils.arrayForEach(self.People(), function (item) {
item.sel(false);
});
}
});
The same scenario can be done perfectly in easy way using computed but due some performance issues i need to use subscribe which is best way it wont fire like computed onload .
Reference : Using computed same thing is done perfectly check this Fiddle
I tried to use change event in individual checkbox binding but its a dead end till now.
Any help is appreciated .
Your subscription only applies to edits on the selectedAllBox. To do what you want, you'll need subscriptions on every Person checkbox as well, to check for the right conditions and uncheck the selectedAllBox in the right situations there.
It strikes me as odd that this would be acceptable but using computed() is not. Maybe you should reconsider that part of your answer. I would much rather compute a "isAllSelected" value based on my viewModel state, then bind the selectedAllBox to that.
I solved a similar problem in my own application a couple of years ago using manual subscriptions. Although the computed observable method is concise and easy to understand, it suffers from poor performance when there's a large number of items. Hopefully the code below speaks for itself:
function unsetCount(array, propName) {
// When an item is added to the array, set up a manual subscription
function addItem(item) {
var previousValue = !!item[propName]();
item[propName]._unsetSubscription = item[propName].subscribe(function (latestValue) {
latestValue = !!latestValue;
if (latestValue !== previousValue) {
previousValue = latestValue;
unsetCount(unsetCount() + (latestValue ? -1 : 1));
}
});
return previousValue;
}
// When an item is removed from the array, dispose the subscription
function removeItem(item) {
item[propName]._unsetSubscription.dispose();
return !!item[propName]();
}
// Initialize
var tempUnsetCount = 0;
ko.utils.arrayForEach(array(), function (item) {
if (!addItem(item)) {
tempUnsetCount++;
}
});
var unsetCount = ko.observable(tempUnsetCount);
// Subscribe to array changes
array.subscribe(function (changes) {
var tempUnsetCount = unsetCount();
ko.utils.arrayForEach(changes, function (change) {
if (change.moved === undefined) {
if (change.status === 'added') {
if (!addItem(change.value))
tempUnsetCount++;
} else {
if (!removeItem(change.value))
tempUnsetCount--;
}
}
});
unsetCount(tempUnsetCount);
}, null, 'arrayChange');
return unsetCount;
}
You'll still use a computed observable in your viewmodel for the the select-all value, but now it'll only need to check the unselected count:
self.unselectedPeopleCount = unsetCount(self.People, 'Selected');
self.SelectAll = ko.pureComputed({
read: function() {
return self.People().length && self.unselectedPeopleCount() === 0;
},
write: function(value) {
ko.utils.arrayForEach(self.People(), function (person) {
person.Selected(value);
});
}
}).extend({rateLimit:0});
Example: http://jsfiddle.net/mbest/dwnv81j0/
The computed approach is the right way to do this. You can improve some performance issues by using pureComputed and by using rateLimit. Both require more recent versions of Knockout than the 2.2.1 used in your example (3.2 and 3.1, respectively).
self.SelectAll = ko.pureComputed({
read: function() {
var item = ko.utils.arrayFirst(self.People(), function(item) {
return !item.Selected();
});
return item == null;
},
write: function(value) {
ko.utils.arrayForEach(self.People(), function (person) {
person.Selected(value);
});
}
}).extend({rateLimit:1});
http://jsfiddle.net/mbest/AneL9/98/