Reference a remote site setting URL in Apex class? - salesforce

I have a webservice class that will be in a managed package and distributed to multiple clients. The class currently has a variable with the hardcoded value of the server it's hitting.
The problem: the server will be different for each client, so a hardcoded value will not work.
I figured since each client will have to add their server to their remote site settings, the easiest way might be to grab the correct URL from their setting. Is this possible? Or is there another "right" way to accomplish this? Thanks

The best way I've found to save configuration values is to use Apex Custom Settings. To set the Remote Site settings programmatically you could use the Metadata API.

Related

Access Sitecore DB from API in Console application

I would like to accesss the sitecore DB and items from console application like
Sitecore.Data.Database db = Sitecore.Context.Database
or
Sitecore.Data.Database db = Sitecore.Data.Database.GetDatabase("master")
how do I configure and setup my console application to access the DB as above?
Thanks Everyone for the suggestion, I am really interested in config changes, I used webservice, but it has very limited methods. For example, if I would like create an Item with the template and insert the item with prepopulated value, there is no such option. The reason I am looking for the console apporach is I would like to import the contents from XML or excel sheet and push those to the sitecore tree, eventually use the scheduled task to run the console app periodically. I do not want to copy the entire web.config and app_config. If anyone has already done this, could you please post your steps and necessary config changes?
You have two options I think:
1) Import the Sitecore bits of a website's web.config into your console application's app.config, so that the Sitecore API "just works"
I'm sure I read a blog post about this, but I can't find the reference right now. (I will have another look) But I think the simple but long winded approach is to copy all of the <sitecore/> element and all the separate files it references. I'm fairly sure you can whittle this down to a subset of the config required for data access with a bit of thinking.
2) Don't use the Sitecore API directly, connect to a web service that exposes access to it remotely.
There are a few of these that already exist. Sitecore itself exposes one, Sitecore Rocks has one, and Hedgehog TDS has one too. And you can always write your own (since any web service running inside the Sitecore ASP.Net app can make database calls and report values back and forth - just remember to consider security if this web service might end up exposed externally for any reason)
John West links to some relevant stuff here:
http://www.sitecore.net/Learn/Blogs/Technical-Blogs/John-West-Sitecore-Blog/Posts/2013/09/Getting-Data-Out-of-the-Sitecore-ASPNET-CMS.aspx
-- Edited to add --
I've not found the blog post I remember. But I came across this SO thread:
Accessing Sitecore API from a CLI tool
which refers to this blog post:
http://www.experimentsincode.com/?p=232
which I think gives the info you'll need for option 1.
(And it reminds me that, of course, when you copy the config stuff you have to copy the Sitecore binaries into your app's folder as well)
I would just like to expand on #JermDavis' post and note that Sitecore isn't a big fan of being accessed when not in a web application. However, if you still want to do this, you will need to make sure that you have all of the necessary configuration settings from the web.config and App_Config of your site in your console application's app.config file.
Moreover, you will never be able to call Sitecore.Context in a console application, as the Sitecore Context sits on top of the HttpContext which means that it must be an application and have a valid request for you to use it. What you are looking for is something more along the lines of Sitecore.Configuration.Factory.GetDatabase("master").
Good luck and happy coding :)
This sounds like a job for the Sitecore Item Web API. I use the Sitecore Item Web API whenever I need to access Sitecore data from the master database outside the context of the Content Management server or outside of the context of the Sitecore application. The Web API definitely does not allow you to do everything that the standard Sitecore API does but it can act as a good base and I now extend upon the Web API instead of writing my own custom web services whenever possible.
Thanks to JemDavis's advise.
After I copied the configuration and made changes to config section to get rid of conflicts. I copied almost all of Sitrecore, analytics and lucene dlls, it worked great.
Only thing you have to remember is, copy the app_config folder to the same location where your dlls are.
Thanks again JemDavis....

Remote Site Setting in Salesforce

Can we add a list of domain like this :
www.google.*
into Remote Site Setting.
Google has a lot of domain :
google.com.ar
google.com.au
google.ca
....
I don't believe you can. See here for an old question that was left unanswered.
Remote Site Settings are only for HTTP calls you make from Salesforce out to another server, so if you know your contained list for outbound calls you shouldn't have to worry about new ones dynamically being needed. If you want a faster way to update this, take a look at the Metadata API, which should let you bulk change the values through underlying XML (with the caveat that you need at least one Remote Site defined in the org first).

What is a proper way to initialize data store for static data in Google App Engine?

I have a model called "Category" in my app in GAE.
This model simply contains a name and it's parent category, and this won't be changed frequently after the website go online.
I'd like to know what is a better way to put these model instances in the beginning?
I now only know to execute (category.put()) in a webapp.RequestHandler by issuing a http request. But I suspect there is a proper way to do this.
Thanks!
You can use the remote API to connect to your datastore in a shell and add data as required.
Or, if it's a huge amount, you could think about using the bulk loader - but I suspect that the remote API will be more suitable.

ActiveDirectoryMembershipProvider not accepting FQDN

We are trying to set up the ActiveDirectoryMemebershipProvider for an ASP.NET intranet application that is supposed to automatically sign the users into the application when it is accessed in the browser.
However the browser is sending the FQDN (MYDOMAIN\some.user) to the server and the ActiveDirectoryMemebershipProvider seems not to be able to be able to find the user based on the FQDN. However when we test the provider manually from code we found that if we try just the user name (some.user) the provider seems to be able to find the user.
Is there any setting or anything we can use to make the provider skip the domain part sent from the browser ?
Try setting atttributeMapUsername if you haven't and let me know if that works for you. When I didn't set this I had to specify my users in some.user#my.ldap.domain format.
My Web.config
<add name="MyADMembershipProvider"
type="System.Web.Security.ActiveDirectoryMembershipProvider" connectionStringName="ADConnectionString"
attributeMapUsername="sAMAccountName"
enablePasswordReset="false" maxInvalidPasswordAttempts="1" passwordAttemptWindow="15"
passwordAnswerAttemptLockoutDuration="1" minRequiredNonalphanumericCharacters="0" attributeMapEmail="mail"
/>
In IIS, go to the properties of the website and set the default domain to "\". Not sure which version of IIS you are using so if IIS resets this on you, the other way to accomplish this is to simply prepend the domain part so that it is added automatically?
Is this a custom app you are using or a product? Trying to understand why it is working from code but not from app. If you wrote the app, I assume you can change it to mimic your code. If you did not write the app, what is it? The app (such as OWA or SharePoint) may have a custom way it wants this done.

Using a subdomain to identify a client

I'm working on building a Silverlight application whereas we want to be able to have a client hit a url like:
http://{client}.domain.com/
and login, where the {client} part is their business name. so for example, google's would be:
http://google.domain.com/
What I was wondering was if anyone has been able, in silverlight, to be able to use this subdomain model to make decisions on the call to the web server so that you can switch to a specific database to run a query? Unfortunately, it's something that is quite necessary for the project, as we are trying to make it easy for their employees to get their company specific information for our software.
Wouldn't it work to put the service on a specific subdomain itself, such as wcf.example.com, and then setup a cross domain policy file on the service to allow it to access it?
As long as this would work you could just load the silverlight in the proper subdomain and then pass that subdomain to your service and let it do its thing.
Some examples of this below:
Silverlight Cross Domain Services
Silverlight Cross Domain Policy Helpers
On the server side you can check the HTTP 1.1 Host header to see how the user came to your server and do the necessary customization based on that.
I think you cannot do this with Silverlight alone, I know you cannot do this without problems with Javascript, Ajax etc. . That is because a sub domain is - for security reasons - treated otherwise than a sub-page by the browsers.
What about the following idea: Insert a rewrite rule to your web server software. So if http://google.domain.com is called, the web server itself rewrites the URL to something like http://www.domain.com/google/ (or better: http://www.domain.com/customers/google/). Would that help?
Georgi:
That would help if it would be static, but alas, it's going to all be dynamic. My hope was to have 1x deployment for the application, and to use the http://google.domain.com/ idea to switch to the correct database for the user. I recall doing this once when we built an asp.net website, using the domain context to figure out what skin to use, etc.
Ates: Can you explain more about what you are saying... sounds like you are close to what I am trying to come up with. Have you seen such a tutorial for this?
The only other way I have come up with to make this work is to have a metabase that when the user logs in, it will switch them to the appropriate database as required... was just thinking as well that telling Client x to hit:
http://ClientX.domain.com/ would have been sweeter than saying to hit http://www.domain.com/ and login. It seemed as if they were to hit their name, and to show it personalized for them right from the login screen would have been much more appealing for the client base.
#Richard B: No, I can't think of any such tutorial that I've seen before. I'll try to be more verbose.
The server-side approach in more detail:
Direct *.example.com to the same IP in your DNS settings.
The backend app that handles login checks the Host HTTP header (e.g. the "HTTP_HOST" server variable in some platforms). That would contain the exact subdomain.example.com that the client used for reaching your server. Extract the subdomain part and continue...
There can also be a client-side-only approach. I don't know much about Silverlight but I'm assuming that you should be able to interface Silverlight with JavaScript. You could read document.location with JavaScript and pass it to your Silverlight applet, whereon further data fetching etc. logic would rely on the subdomain that was passed in by JavaScript.
#Ates:
That is what we did when we wrote the ASP.Net system... we pushed a slew of *.example.com hosts against the web server, and handled using the HTTP headers. The hold-up comes when dealing with WCF pushing the info between the client and the server... it can only exist in one domain...
So, for example, when you have {client}.example.com and {sandbox}.example.com, the WCF service can't be registered to both. It also cannot be registered to just *.example.com or example.com, so that's where the catch 22 is coming in at. everything else I have the prior knowledge of handling.
I recall a method by which an application can "spoof" another domain name in certain instances. I take it in this case, I would need to do such a configuration? Much to research yet I believe.

Resources