I am using VS 2019 and comparing 2 databases using Schema Compare. Most of the time it finds the differences just fine and replicates them across. However, on some Stored Procedures it highlights a difference because of a schema name missing. e.g. [dbo]
Example:
Left Panel (local DB)
CREATE Procedure MyNewProcedure
(
#prmParam1 int
)
Select * from TableA where Id = #prmParam1
And on the Right hand Panel (remote DB) it shows the schema name correctly:
CREATE Procedure [dbo].[MyNewProcedure]
(
#prmParam1 int
)
Select * from TableA where Id = #prmParam1
If I run the update, it will create another version of this stored procedure but it won't belong to the dbo schema - it will take on the schema name of the connection.
It only does this for a handful of stored procedures. All the rest it adds the [dbo]. to each of the create statements.
I can not figure out why as I have to manually create the SP on the remote DB and then do an Exclude for each of these in the compare so it won't delete my new SP on the remote and create the new one without the [dbo].
Anyone got any ideas or seen this before?
I don't think I am creating the original SP (local) in any different way. Just a blank New Query window and type it in and hit F5.
Thanks in advance,
Ro
I have a table in SQL that I can query easily when running SELECT * FROM Scheme.Table1
There are no Intellisense errors and I can see the table in the list of tables under the database
If I attempt to run an UPDATE against the table, I get the error
Msg 208 Invalid object name 'Table1'
Updates against other tabes within the same scheme all work fine
What could be causing this error? Is the wording misleading and it is really something else?
EDIT: update statement is...
UPDATE SCHEMA.TABLE1 SET SCH1 = 'DB', SCH2 = '1' WHERE MEMBERNO = 123999
All fields are correct and exist on the table
Thanks to the comments, it was a trigger on the table that was referencing itself without the SCHEMA (I was logged in using Windows Authentication)
I have a query in classic asp where SQL statement is this:
Select * from active_Case
I verified in the DB connection it is using and found there is no such table / view. But a table does exist by the name of Cases. Internally it appears to be selecting from this table itself.
Actually this is somebody else's code. Thus I am not sure how is it possible. Is it really possible or am I missing something?
this will give you the base table name
select name, base_object_name
from sys.synonyms
where name = 'active_Case'
other than tables and view you can even check in User defined table type under types. or there might be chance your table is having a schema other than 'dbo.'
I have a database and have a Sql script to add some fields to a table called "Products" in the database.
But when i am executing this script, I am getting the following error:
Cannot find the object "Products" because it does not exist or you do not have permissions
Why is the error occurring and what should I do to resolve it?
I found a reason why this would happen. The user had the appropriate permissions, but the stored procedure included a TRUNCATE statement:
TRUNCATE TableName
Since TRUNCATE deletes items without logging, you (apparently) need elevated permissions to execute a stored procedure that contains it. We changed the statement to:
DELETE FROM TableName
...and the error went away!
Are you sure that you are executing the script against the correct database? In SQL Server Management studio you can change the database you are running the query against in a drop-down box on one of the toolbars, or you can start your query with this:
USE SomeDatabase
It can also happen due to a typo in referencing a table such as [dbo.Product] instead of [dbo].[Product].
Does the user you're executing this script under even see that table??
select top 1 * from products
Do you get any output for this??
If yes: does this user have the permission to modify the table, i.e. execute DDL scripts like ALTER TABLE etc.? Typically, regular users don't have this elevated permissions.
Look for any DDL operation in the script.
Maybe the user does not have access rights to run changes.
In my case it was SET IDENTITY_INSERT tblTableName ON
You can either add db_ddladmin for the whole database or for just the table to solve this issue (or change the script)
-- give the non-ddladmin user INSERT/SELECT as well as ALTER:
GRANT ALTER, INSERT, SELECT ON dbo.tblTableName TO user_name;
It could also be possible that you have created the "Products" in your login schema and you were trying to execute the same in a different schema (probably dbo)
Steps to resolve this issue
1)open the management studio
2) Locate the object in the explorer and identify the schema under which your object is? ( it is the text before your object name ). In the image below its the "dbo" and my object name is action status
if you see it like "yourcompanydoamin\yourloginid" then you should
you can modify the permission on that specific schema and not any other schema.
you may refer to "Ownership and User-Schema Separation in SQL Server"
I've been trying to copy a table from PROD to DEV but get an error:
"Cannot find the object X because it does not exist or you do not have permissions."
However, the table did exist, and I was running as sa so I did have permissions.
The problem was actually with CONTRAINTS. I'd renamed the table on DEV to be old_XXX months ago. But when I tried to copy the original one over from PROD, the Defaut Constraint names clashed.
The error message was misleading
You can right click the procedure, choose properties and see which permissions are granted to your login ID. You can then manually check off the "Execute" and alter permission for the proc.
Or to script this it would be:
GRANT EXECUTE ON OBJECT::dbo.[PROCNAME]
TO [ServerInstance\user];
GRANT ALTER ON OBJECT::dbo.[PROCNAME]
TO [ServerInstance\user];
This could be a permission issue. The user needs at least ALTER permission to truncate a table.
Another option is to call DELETE FROM instead of TRUNCATE TABLE, but this operation is slower because it writes to the Log file, whereas TRUNCATE does not write to the log file.
The minimum permission required is ALTER on table_name. TRUNCATE TABLE
permissions default to the table owner, members of the sysadmin fixed
server role, and the db_owner and db_ddladmin fixed database roles,
and are not transferable. However, you can incorporate the TRUNCATE
TABLE statement within a module, such as a stored procedure, and grant
appropriate permissions to the module using the EXECUTE AS clause.
Sharing my case, hope that will help.
In my situation inside MY_PROJ.Database->MY_PROJ.Database.sqlproj I had to put this:
<Build Include="dbo\Tables\MyTableGeneratingScript.sql" />
In my case I was running under a different user than the one I was expecting.
My code passed 'DRIVER={SQL Server};SERVER=...;DATABASE=...;Trusted_Connection=false;User Id=XXX;Password=YYY' as the connection string to pypyodbc.connect(), but it ended up connecting with the credentials of the Windows user that ran the script instead of the User Id= from the connection string.
(I verified this using the SQL Server Profiler and by putting an invalid uid/password combination in the connection string - which didn't result in an expected error).
I decided not to dig into this further, since switching to this better way of connecting fixed the issue:
conn = pypyodbc.connect(driver='{SQL Server}', server='servername',
database='dbname', uid='userName', pwd='Password')
In my case the sql server version on my localhost is higher than that on the production server and hence some new variables were added to the generated script from the localhost. This caused errors in creating the table in the first place.
Since the creation of the table failed, subsequent query on the "NON EXISITING" table also failed.
Luckily, in among the long list of the sql errors, I found this "OPTIMIZE_FOR_SEQUENTIAL_KEY = OFF" to be the new varialbe in the script causing my issue. I did a search and replace and the error went away.
Hope it helps someone.
The TRUNCATE statement was my first problem, glad to find the solution here. But I was using SSIS and trying to load data from another database, and it failed with the same error on any table that used IDENTITY to create an auto-incrementing ID. If I was scripting it myself I'd first need to use the command SET IDENTITY_INSERT tablename ON, and then SET IDENTITY_INSERT tablename OFF when the table update was done. But this requires ALTER permissions on the table, which I do not have. Hence the error message in SSIS on the table load (even though the previous step had just deleted all the data out of the table.)
You receive this error, when you use an ORM like GORM (https://gorm.io/) in Go for example.
When you try to create a struct and accidentally pass the ID (primary key) although it's inserted automatically.
Rich features IDE like Visual Studio Code make this mistake happen easily:
if tx := db.Create(&myStruct{
Ts: Time.Now(),
ID: 42,
}); tx.Error != nil {
t.Fatal(tx.Error)
}
You can still use auto-filling by Visual Studio Code, but delete your entry for your model's primary keys:
if tx := db.Create(&myStruct{
Ts: Time.Now(),
}); tx.Error != nil {
t.Fatal(tx.Error)
}
I have an Access database in which I drop the table and then create the table afresh. However, I need to be able to test for the table in case the table gets dropped but not created (i.e. when someone stops the DTS package just after it starts -roll-eyes- ). If I were doing this in the SQL database I would just do:
IF (EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sysobjects WHERE name = 'Table-Name-to-look-for'))
BEGIN
drop table 'Table-Name-to-look-for'
END
But how do I do that for an Access database?
Optional answer: is there a way to have the DTS package ignore the error and just go to the next step rather than checking to see if it exists?
SQL Server 2000
I'm not sure whether you can query the system objects table in an Access database from a DTS package.
If that doesn't work, why not just try doing a SELECT * from the Access table in question and then catch the error if it fails?
Try the same T-SQL, but in MS ACCESS the sys objects table is called:
MSysObjects.
Try this:
SELECT * FROM MSysObjects WHERE Name = 'your_table';
and see if it works from there.
You can take a look at these tables if you go to Tools -> Options -> View (a tab) -> and check Hidden Objects, System Objects. So you can see both. If you open the table, you should see your table names, queries, etc. Do not change this manually or the DB could panic :)
Martin.
P.D.: Your If Exists should also check of object type:
IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sysobjects WHERE id = object_id(N'[dbo].[Your_Table_Name]') AND OBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsUserTable') = 1)
Microsoft Access has a system table called MSysObjects that contains a list of all database objects, including tables. Table objects have Type 1, 4 and 6.
It is important to reference the type:
... Where Name='TableName' And Type In (1,4,6)
Otherwise, what is returned could be a some object other than a table.